journal article·2025-03

Multitarget gas alarm system for high-performance and anti-interference chemical warfare agents simulants detection

Yubin Yuan, Qiang Wu, Menglong Jiao, Haiyang Wu, Weihua Liu, Xuming Wang, Xiangrui Bu, Gong Li, Chuanyu Han, Long Hu, Xin Li, Xiaoli Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Chemical warfare agents (CWAs) can cause significant harm to health and even death in a very short time even when inhaled in small amounts (∼100 mg min/m3). Detection equipment based on conventional techniques, including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, Raman spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, and ion mobility spectrometry, have the disadvantages of high cost, long detection time, and high power consumption. Rapid, portable, and convenient equipment for target CWAs detection under interference is a challenge. In this study, we propose an alarm system comprising a multitype micro sensor array and a field-programmable gate array-based readout circuit for CWAs simulants detection. Under common volatile organic compound, temperature, and water vapor interference, the proposed multitype sensor-based detection system realizes an alarm function in less than 20 s with thresholds of 1 ppm dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP), 4.6 ppm 2,2′-dichlorodiethyl ether (DCE), and 20 ppm SO2. Furthermore, the proposed detection system was evaluated outside the laboratory and passed the wilderness test, demonstrating its reliability in the atmosphere. We believe that the proposed alarm system will contribute to the development of intelligent, portable, low-cost, and anti-interference CWAs detection technology.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies · Insect Pheromone Research and Control · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Mangerich A, Esser C. Chemical warfare in the First World War: Reflections 100 years later. Arch Toxicol, 2014, 88: 1909–191110.1007/s00204-014-1370-z ↗
2. Dale T J, Rebek J. Fluorescent sensors for organophosphorus nerve agent mimics. J Am Chem Soc, 2006, 128: 4500–450110.1021/ja057449i ↗
3. Goud K Y, Teymourian H, Sandhu S S, et al. OPAA/fluoride biosensor chip towards field detection of G-type nerve agents. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2020, 320: 12834410.1016/j.snb.2020.128344 ↗
4. Gundavarapu S, Zhuang J, Barrett E G, et al. A critical role of acute bronchoconstriction in the mortality associated with high-dose sarin inhalation: Effects of epinephrine and oxygen therapies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2014, 274: 200–20810.1016/j.taap.2013.11.007 ↗
5. Munro N B, Talmage S S, Griffin G D, et al. The sources, fate, and toxicity of chemical warfare agent degradation products. Environ Health Perspect, 1999, 107: 933–97410.1289/ehp.99107933 ↗
6. Raber E, Jin A, Noonan K, et al. Decontamination issues for chemical and biological warfare agents: How clean is clean enough? Int J Environ Health Res, 2001, 11: 128–14810.1080/09603120020047519 ↗
7. Smith P A, Lepage C J, Lukacs M, et al. Field-portable gas chromatography with transmission quadrupole and cylindrical ion trap mass spectrometric detection: Chromatographic retention index data and ion/molecule interactions for chemical warfare agent identification. Int J Mass Spectrometry, 2010, 295: 113–11810.1016/j.ijms.2010.03.001 ↗
8. Stuart D A, Biggs K B, Van Duyne R P. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of half-mustard agent. Analyst, 2006, 131: 568–57210.1039/b513326b ↗
9. Raghavender Goud D, Purohit A K, Tak V, et al. A highly selective and sensitive “turn-on” fluorescence chemodosimeter for the detection of mustard gas. Chem Commun, 2014, 50: 12363–1236610.1039/C4CC04801F ↗
10. Xu W, Bao H, Zhang H, et al. Ultrasensitive surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy detection of gaseous sulfur-mustard simulant based on thin oxide-coated gold nanocone arrays. J Hazard Mater, 2021, 420: 12666810.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126668 ↗
11. Pan Y, Wang P, Zhang G, et al. Development of a SAW poly(epichlorohydrin) gas sensor for detection of harmful chemicals. Anal Methods, 2022, 14: 1611–162210.1039/D2AY00196A ↗
12. Shulaker M M, Hills G, Park R S, et al. Three-dimensional integration of nanotechnologies for computing and data storage on a single chip. Nature, 2017, 547: 74–7810.1038/nature22994 ↗
13. Nazemi H, Joseph A, Park J, et al. Advanced micro- and nano-gas sensor technology: A review. Sensors, 2019, 19: 128510.3390/s19061285 ↗
14. Hu W, Wan L, Jian Y, et al. Electronic noses: From advanced materials to sensors aided with data processing. Adv Mater Technologies, 2019, 4: 180048810.1002/admt.201800488 ↗
15. Tricoli A, Nasiri N, De S. Wearable and miniaturized sensor technologies for personalized and preventive medicine. Adv Funct Mater, 2017, 27: 160527110.1002/adfm.201605271 ↗
16. Huang X, Yu S, Xu H, et al. Rapid and nondestructive detection of freshness quality of postharvest spinaches based on machine vision and electronic nose. J Food Saf, 2019, 39: e1270810.1111/jfs.12708 ↗
17. Zheng Q, Fu Y, Xu J. Advances in the chemical sensors for the detection of DMMP — A simulant for nerve agent sarin. Procedia Eng, 2010, 7: 179–18410.1016/j.proeng.2010.11.027 ↗
18. Zhang Z, Fan J, Yu J, et al. New poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)/polyvinyl alcohol copolymer coated QCM sensor for interaction with CWA simulants. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2012, 4: 944–94910.1021/am201603n ↗
19. Sayago I, Matatagui D, Fernández M J, et al. Graphene oxide as sensitive layer in Love-wave surface acoustic wave sensors for the detection of chemical warfare agent simulants. Talanta, 2016, 148: 393–40010.1016/j.talanta.2015.10.069 ↗
20. Grabka M, Witkiewicz Z, Jasek K, et al. Acoustic wave sensors for detection of blister chemical warfare agents and their simulants. Sensors, 2022, 22: 560710.3390/s22155607 ↗
21. Wu Q, Li X, Wang X, et al. High-performance p-hexafluoroisopropanol phenyl functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube film on surface acoustic wave device for organophosphorus vapor detection. Nanotechnology, 2022, 33: 37550110.1088/1361-6528/ac7242 ↗
22. Pakdel A, Bando Y, Golberg D. Nano boron nitride flatland. Chem Soc Rev, 2014, 43: 934–95910.1039/C3CS60260E ↗
23. Goh G L, Saengchairat N, Agarwala S, et al. Sessile droplets containing carbon nanotubes: A study of evaporation dynamics and CNT alignment for printed electronics. Nanoscale, 2019, 11: 10603–1061410.1039/C9NR03261D ↗
24. Dugyala V R, Basavaraj M G. Evaporation of sessile drops containing colloidal rods: Coffee-ring and order–disorder transition. J Phys Chem B, 2015, 119: 3860–386710.1021/jp511611v ↗
25. Pan Y, Zhang G, Guo T, et al. Environmental characteristics of surface acoustic wave devices for sensing organophosphorus vapor. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2020, 315: 12798610.1016/j.snb.2020.127986 ↗
26. Pan Y, Qin M, Wang P, et al. Interface and sensitive characteristics of the viscoelastic film used in a surface acoustic wave gas sensor. ACS Sens, 2022, 7: 612–62110.1021/acssensors.1c02509 ↗
27. Yang J, Gao W, Wang T, et al. A novel coupling-activated GO nanocomposites based on surface acoustic wave for assessing capture molecules and detection of explosive gases. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2022, 372: 13266510.1016/j.snb.2022.132665 ↗
28. Wang W, Liu X, Mei S, et al. Development of a Pd/Cu nanowires coated SAW hydrogen gas sensor with fast response and recovery. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2019, 287: 157–16410.1016/j.snb.2019.02.047 ↗
29. Pan Y, Zhang L, Cao B, et al. Effects of temperature and humidity on the performance of a PECH polymer coated SAW sensor. RSC Adv, 2020, 10: 18099–1810610.1039/D0RA02502J ↗
30. Ren Y, Wu G, Zhao X, et al. Effect of poly(epichlorohydrin) on the thermal and mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride). J Appl Polym Sci, 2010, 118: 3416–342410.1002/app.32687 ↗
31. Alali K T, Liu J, Moharram D, et al. Fabrication of electrospun Co3O4/CuO p-p heterojunctions nanotubes functionalized with HFIP for detecting chemical nerve agent under visible light irradiation. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2020, 314: 12807610.1016/j.snb.2020.128076 ↗
32. Wu H, Yuan Y, Wu Q, et al. A dimethyl methylphonate sensor based on HFIPPH modified SWCNTs. Nanotechnology, 2022, 33: 16550510.1088/1361-6528/ac49c0 ↗
33. Abraham M H, Andonian-Haftvan J, Du C M, et al. Hydrogen bonding. Part 29. Characterization of 14 sorbent coatings for chemical microsensors using a new solvation equation. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2, 1995, 36910.1039/p29950000369 ↗
34. Kshetrimayum R, Yadava R D S, Tandon R P. Mass sensitivity analysis and designing of surface acoustic wave resonators for chemical sensors. Meas Sci Technol, 2009, 20: 05520110.1088/0957-0233/20/5/055201 ↗
35. Weng H, Duan F L, Xie Z, et al. LiNbO3-based SAW sensors capable to measure up to 1100°C high temperature. IEEE Sens J, 2020, 20: 12679–1268310.1109/JSEN.2020.3002861 ↗
36. Olguín C, Laguarda-Miró N, Pascual L, et al. An electronic nose for the detection of Sarin, Soman and Tabun mimics and interfering agents. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2014, 202: 31–3710.1016/j.snb.2014.05.060 ↗
37. Wiederoder M S, Nallon E C, Weiss M, et al. Graphene nanoplatelet-polymer chemiresistive sensor arrays for the detection and discrimination of chemical warfare agent simulants. ACS Sens, 2017, 2: 1669–167810.1021/acssensors.7b00550 ↗
38. Kim J, Park H, Kim J, et al. SAW chemical array device coated with polymeric sensing materials for the detection of nerve agents. Sensors, 2020, 20: 702810.3390/s20247028 ↗
39. Davidson C E, Dixon M M, Williams B R, et al. Detection of chemical warfare agents by colorimetric sensor arrays. ACS Sens, 2020, 5: 1102–110910.1021/acssensors.0c00042 ↗
40. Song S G, Ha S, Cho H J, et al. Single-walled carbon-nanotube-based chemocapacitive sensors with molecular receptors for selective detection of chemical warfare agents. ACS Appl Nano Mater, 2018, 2: 109–11710.1021/acsanm.8b01713 ↗
41. Grabka M, Jasek K, Pasternak M. Application of polymethyl[4-(2,3-difluoro-4-hydroxyphenoxy)butyl] siloxane in surface acoustic wave gas sensors for dimethyl methylphosphonate detection. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2021, 329: 12921610.1016/j.snb.2020.129216 ↗
42. Wang Y, Du X, Long Y, et al. The response comparison of a hydrogen-bond acidic polymer to sarin, soman and dimethyl methyl phosphonate based on a surface acoustic wave sensor. Anal Methods, 2014, 6: 1951–195510.1039/C3AY42214C ↗
43. Casanova-Chafer J, Garcia-Aboal R, Mego K, et al. Lead-free Perovskite nanocrystals decorating graphene for detecting nerve agents. ACS Appl Electron Mater, 2024, 6: 6974–698110.1021/acsaelm.4c01220 ↗