journal article·2022-04

Semi-custom methodology to fabricate transmission electron microscopy chip for in situ characterization of nanodevices and nanomaterials

BoCheng Yu, Mei Sun, RuHao Pan, JiaMin Tian, FengYi Zheng, Dong Huang, FengJiao Lyu, ZhiTong Zhang, JunJie Li, Qing Chen, ZhiHong Li

Publisher page

Abstract

The fabrication of nanodevices on the delicate membrane window of the TEM (transmission electron microscopy) chip has the risk of breakage failure, limiting in-depth research in this area. This work proposed a methodology to address this issue, enabling secure in-situ transmission electron microscopic observation of many devices and materials that would otherwise be difficult to achieve. Combining semi-custom TEM chip design and front-side protected release technology, a variety of nanodevices were successfully fabricated onto the window membrane of the TEM chip and studied in situ. Moreover, the pressure tolerance of window membrane was investigated and enhanced with a reinforcing structure. As an example of typical applications, MoS2 devices on the TEM chip have been fabricated and electron beam-induced gate modulation and irradiation damage effects, have been demonstrated.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Creemer J F, Helveg S, Hoveling G H, et al. Atomic-scale electron microscopy at ambient pressure. Ultramicroscopy, 2008, 108: 993–99810.1016/j.ultramic.2008.04.014 ↗
2. Espinosa H D, Bernal R A, Filleter T. In situ TEM electromechanical testing of nanowires and nanotubes. Small, 2012, 8: 3233–325210.1002/smll.201200342 ↗
3. Ramachandramoorthy R, Bernal R, Espinosa H D. Pushing the envelope of in situ transmission electron microscopy. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 4675–468510.1021/acsnano.5b01391 ↗
4. Taheri M L, Stach E A, Arslan I, et al. Current status and future directions for in situ transmission electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy, 2016, 170: 86–9510.1016/j.ultramic.2016.08.007 ↗
5. Wu J, Shan H, Chen W, et al. In situ environmental TEM in imaging gas and liquid phase chemical reactions for materials research. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 9686–971210.1002/adma.201602519 ↗
6. Dai S, Gao W, Zhang S, et al. Transmission electron microscopy with atomic resolution under atmospheric pressures. MRS Commun, 2017, 7: 798–81210.1557/mrc.2017.125 ↗
7. Jiang Y, Zhang Z, Yuan W, et al. Recent advances in gas-involved in situ studies via transmission electron microscopy. Nano Res, 2017, 11: 42–6710.1007/s12274-017-1645-9 ↗
8. He B, Zhang Y, Liu X, et al. In-situ transmission electron microscope techniques for heterogeneous catalysis. ChemCatChem, 2020, 12: 1853–187210.1002/cctc.201902285 ↗
9. Zhang C, Firestein K L, Fernando J F S, et al. Recent progress of in situ transmission electron microscopy for energy materials. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 190409410.1002/adma.201904094 ↗
10. Zhang Y Z, Bu Y Q, Fang X Y, et al. A compact design of four-degree-of-freedom transmission electron microscope holder for quasi-four-dimensional characterization. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 1272–127910.1007/s11431-019-1516-5 ↗
11. Creemer J F, Helveg S, Kooyman P J, et al. A MEMS reactor for atomic-scale microscopy of nanomaterials under industrially relevant conditions. J Microelectromech Syst, 2010, 19: 254–26410.1109/JMEMS.2010.2041190 ↗
12. Ross F M. Opportunities and challenges in liquid cell electron microscopy. Science, 2015, 350: 149010.1126/science.aaa9886 ↗
13. Wu F, Yao N. Advances in windowed gas cells for in-situ TEM studies. Nano Energy, 2015, 13: 735–75610.1016/j.nanoen.2015.03.015 ↗
14. Liao H G, Zheng H. Liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. Annu Rev Phys Chem, 2016, 67: 719–74710.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112501 ↗
15. Kim B H, Yang J, Lee D, et al. Liquid-phase transmission electron microscopy for studying colloidal inorganic nanoparticles. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 170331610.1002/adma.201703316 ↗
16. Pu S, Gong C, Robertson A W. Liquid cell transmission electron microscopy and its applications. R Soc Open Sci, 2020, 7: 19120410.1098/rsos.191204 ↗
17. Spies M, Sadre Momtaz Z, Lähnemann J, et al. Correlated and in-situ electrical transmission electron microscopy studies and related membrane-chip fabrication. Nanotechnology, 2020, 31: 47200110.1088/1361-6528/ab99f0 ↗
18. Ye F, Xu M, Dai S, et al. In situ TEM studies of catalysts using windowed gas cells. Catalysts, 2020, 10: 77910.3390/catal10070779 ↗
19. Hultman L, Robertsson A, Hentzell H T G, et al. Crystallization of amorphous silicon during thin-film gold reaction. J Appl Phys, 1987, 62: 3647–365510.1063/1.339244 ↗
20. Jang M H, Agarwal R, Nukala P, et al. Observing oxygen vacancy driven electroforming in Pt-TiO2-Pt device via strong metal support interaction. Nano Lett, 2016, 16: 2139–214410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02951 ↗
21. Meister S, Schoen D T, Topinka M A, et al. Void formation induced electrical switching in phase-change nanowires. Nano Lett, 2008, 8: 4562–456710.1021/nl802808f ↗
22. Kumar P, Horwath J P, Foucher A C, et al. Direct visualization of out-of-equilibrium structural transformations in atomically thin chalcogenides. npj 2D Mater Appl, 2020, 4: 1610.1038/s41699-020-0150-2 ↗
23. Inani H, Shin D H, Madsen J, et al. Step-by-step atomic insights into structural reordering from 2D to 3D MoS2. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31: 200839510.1002/adfm.202008395 ↗
24. Almeida T P, McGrouther D, Pivak Y, et al. Preparation of high-quality planar FeRh thin films for in situ TEM investigations. J Phys-Conf Ser, 2017, 903: 01202210.1088/1742-6596/903/1/012022 ↗
25. Gong Y, Zhang J, Jiang L, et al. In situ atomic-scale observation of electrochemical delithiation induced structure evolution of LiCoO2 cathode in a working all-solid-state battery. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139: 4274–427710.1021/jacs.6b13344 ↗
26. Vijayan S, Jinschek J R, Kujawa S, et al. Focused ion beam preparation of specimens for micro-electro-mechanical system-based transmission electron microscopy heating experiments. Microsc Microanal, 2017, 23: 708–71610.1017/S1431927617000605 ↗
27. Sun M, Li X, Tang Z, et al. Constant-rate dissolution of InAs nanowires in radiolytic water observed by in situ liquid cell TEM. Nanoscale, 2018, 10: 19733–1974110.1039/C8NR04096F ↗
28. Gorji S, Kashiwar A, Mantha L S, et al. Nanowire facilitated transfer of sensitive TEM samples in a FIB. Ultramicroscopy, 2020, 219: 11307510.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113075 ↗
29. Textor M, de Jonge N. Strategies for preparing graphene liquid cells for transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett, 2018, 18: 3313–332110.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01366 ↗
30. Boston R, Schnepp Z, Nemoto Y, et al. In situ TEM observation of a microcrucible mechanism of nanowire growth. Science, 2014, 344: 623–62610.1126/science.1251594 ↗
31. Tanta R, Kanne T, Amaduzzi F, et al. Morphology and composition of oxidized InAs nanowires studied by combined Raman spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Nanotechnology, 2016, 27: 30570410.1088/0957-4484/27/30/305704 ↗
32. Song B, He K, Yuan Y, et al. In situ study of nucleation and growth dynamics of Au nanoparticles on MoS2 nanoflakes. Nanoscale, 2018, 10: 15809–1581810.1039/C8NR03519A ↗
33. Huang X, Farra R, Schlögl R, et al. Growth and termination dynamics of multiwalled carbon nanotubes at near ambient pressure: An in situ transmission electron microscopy study. Nano Lett, 2019, 19: 5380–538710.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01888 ↗
34. Munch U, Brand O, Paul O, et al. Metal film protection of CMOS wafers against KOH. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). Miyazaki, 2000. 608–61310.1109/MEMSYS.2000.838587 ↗
35. Canavese G, Marasso S L, Quaglio M, et al. Polymeric mask protection for alternative KOH silicon wet etching. J Micromech Microeng, 2007, 17: 1387–139310.1088/0960-1317/17/7/022 ↗
36. Marsi N, Majlis B Y, Mohd-Yasin F, et al. ProTEK PSB as biotechnology photosensitive protection mask on 3C-SiC-on-Si in MEMS sensor. IOP Conf Ser-Mater Sci Eng, 2016, 160: 01209310.1088/1757-899X/160/1/012093 ↗
37. Brugger J, Beljakovic G, Despont M, et al. Low-cost PDMS seal ring for single-side wet etching of MEMS structures. Sens Actuat A-Phys, 1998, 70: 191–19410.1016/S0924-4247(98)00132-0 ↗
38. Xu S Y, Xu J, Tian M L. A low cost platform for linking transport properties to the structure of nanomaterials. Nanotechnology, 2006, 17: 1470–147510.1088/0957-4484/17/5/051 ↗
39. Wang Z, Yang F, Han D, et al. Alternative method to fabricate microdevices on a freestanding Si3N4 window. J Vacuum Sci Tech B Nanotechnol MicroElectron-Mater Proce Measure Phenomena, 2017, 35: 041601
40. Yu B, Li T, Yu P, et al. An interweaved-release silicon nitride film fabrication technique for mitochondrial vesicles electron microscopy. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences (MicroTAS). Savannah, 2017. 975–976
41. Tabata O, Tsuchiya T. Reliability of MEMS. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2008
42. Shafikov A, Schurink B, van de Kruijs R W E, et al. Strengthening ultrathin Si3N4 membranes by compressive surface stress. Sens Actuat A-Phys, 2021, 317: 11245610.1016/j.sna.2020.112456 ↗
43. Pan R, Yang Y, Wang Y, et al. Nanocracking and metallization doubly defined large-scale 3D plasmonic sub-10 nm-gap arrays as extremely sensitive SERS substrates. Nanoscale, 2018, 10: 3171–318010.1039/C7NR08646F ↗
44. Yang Y, Pan R, Tian S, et al. Plasmonic hybrids of MoS2 and 10-nm nanogap arrays for photoluminescence enhancement. Micromachines, 2020, 11: 110910.3390/mi11121109 ↗
45. Li H, Liu C, Zhang Y, et al. Electron radiation effects on the structural and electrical properties of MoS2 field effect transistors. Nanotechnology, 2019, 30: 48520110.1088/1361-6528/ab3ce2 ↗