Dual-wavelength extreme ultraviolet camera (EUC) for the Chang’E-7 mission: Scientific objectives and system design
Source abstract
Abstract
The dual-wavelength extreme ultraviolet camera (EUC) onboard the Queqiao-2 relay satellite of the Chang’E-7 (CE-7) mission will be used to investigate the global structure and dynamics of the Earth’s magnetosheath and plasmasphere by simultaneously capturing emissions at 30.4 and 83.4 nm. In geospace, there are two emission sources at 30.4 nm: resonantly scattered emissions from plasmaspheric He+ions and solar wind charge-exchange in the Earth’s magnetosheath. The sources of 83.4 nm emission include the ionospheric outflow O+and the plasmaspheric O+ions, both of which resonantly scatter sunlight at this wavelength. Global images at these wavelengths will enhance understanding of mass and energy transportation in solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere couplings, crucial for comprehending space weather. The Moon is an ideal platform for global imaging, allowing the EUC’s two optical heads operating at 30.4 and 83.4 nm, each with a circular field of view of 20° to capture spatial resolution of ∼0.1REfor the plasmasphere, ∼0.3REfor the magnetosheath, and ∼0.3REfor the ionospheric outflow in the meridian plane perpendicular to the Earth-Moon line. The sensitivities are as follows: 0.1 counts s−1Rayleigh−1at 30.4 nm channel for an angular resolution of 0.1° and 0.07 counts s−1Rayleigh−1at 83.4 nm channel for an angular resolution of 0.3°. Sufficient sensitivity was achieved to obtain plasmaspheric images every 10 min, magnetosheath images every 10–20 min, and ionospheric outflow images every 10 min. All of the original photon signals are transmitted to the ground, allowing for flexible processing of spatial and temporal resolutions.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photocathodes and Microchannel Plates · Calibration and Measurement Techniques · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. He F, Yao Z H, Wei Y. Optical remote sensing of planetary space environment. In: Recent Remote Sensing Sensor Applications—Satellites and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). London: IntechOpen, 2021. 55–78
2. He F, Zhang X X, Chen B, et al. Calculation of the extreme ultraviolet radiation of the earth’s plasmasphere. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci, 2010, 53: 200–20510.1007/s11431-009-0311-1 ↗
3. He F, Zhang X X, Chen B, et al. Moon-based EUV imaging of the Earth’s plasmasphere: Model simulations. JGR Space Phys, 2013, 118: 7085–710310.1002/2013JA018962 ↗
4. He F, Zhang X X, Chen B, et al. Determination of the Earth’s plasmapause location from the CE-3 EUVC images. JGR Space Phys, 2016, 121: 296–30410.1002/2015JA021863 ↗
5. Sandel B R, Broadfoot A L, Curtis C C, et al. The extreme ultraviolet imager investigation for 431 the IMAGE mission. Space Sci Rev, 2000, 91: 197–24210.1023/A:1005263510820 ↗
6. Davis M W, Gladstone G R, Goldstein J, et al. An improved wide-field camera for imaging Earth’s plasmasphere at 30.4 nm. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications. San Diego, 2013. 8859
7. He F, Zhang X X, Wang X Y, et al. EUV emissions from solar wind charge exchange in the Earth’s magnetosheath: Three-dimensional global hybrid simulation. JGR Space Phys, 2015, 120: 138–15610.1002/2014JA020521 ↗
8. Yamazaki A, Yoshikawa I, Takizawa Y, et al. Feasibility study of the O II 83.4-mm imaging of the inosphere and magnetosphere. Adv Space Res, 2003, 32: 441–44610.1016/S0273-1177(03)90285-7 ↗
9. Goldstein J, Chappell C R, Davis M W, et al. Imaging the global distribution of plasmaspheric oxygen. JGR Space Phys, 2018, 123: 2078–210310.1002/2017JA024531 ↗
10. Nakamura M, Yoshikawa I, Yamazaki A, et al. Terrestrial plasmaspheric imaging by an extreme ultraviolet scanner on planet-B. Geophys Res Lett, 2000, 27: 141–14410.1029/1999GL010732 ↗
11. Sandel B R, King R A, Forrester W T, et al. Initial results from the IMAGE extreme ultraviolet imager. Geophys Res Lett, 2001, 28: 1439–144210.1029/2001GL012885 ↗
12. Sandel B R, Goldstein J, Gallagher D L, et al. Extreme ultraviolet imager observations of the structure and dynamics of the plasmasphere. Space Sci Rev, 2003, 109: 25–4610.1023/B:SPAC.0000007511.47727.5b ↗
13. Yoshikawa I, Murakami G, Ogawa G, et al. Plasmaspheric EUV images seen from lunar orbit: Initial results of the extreme ultraviolet telescope on board the Kaguya spacecraft. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115: 2009JA01497810.1029/2009JA014978 ↗
14. Chen B, Song K F, Li Z H, et al. Development and calibration of the Moon-based EUV camera for Chang’e-3. Res Astron Astrophys, 2014, 14: 1654–166310.1088/1674-4527/14/12/013 ↗
15. Zhang X X, He F, Chen B, et al. Correlations between plasmapause evolutions and auroral signatures during substorms observed by Chang’e-3 EUV Camera. Earth Planet Phys, 2017, 1: 35–4310.26464/epp2017005 ↗
16. Zhang X X, Chen B, He F, et al. Wide-field auroral imager onboard the Fengyun satellite. Light Sci Appl, 2019, 8: 4710.1038/s41377-019-0157-7 ↗
17. Chen B, Zhang X X, He L P, et al. Solar X-ray and EUV imager on board the FY-3E satellite. Light Sci Appl, 2022, 11: 32910.1038/s41377-022-01023-z ↗
18. Wang C, Jia Y, Xue C, et al. Scientific objectives and payload configuration of the Chang’E-7 mission. Natl Sci Rev, 2024, 11: nwad32910.1093/nsr/nwad329 ↗
19. He L P, He F, Chen B, et al. Dual-wavelength extreme ultraviolet camera (EUC) for the Chang’E-7 mission: Instrument development and calibration. Sci China Tech Sci, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-024-2839-x10.1007/s11431-024-2839-x ↗
20. Yu Q L, Tianran Sun T R, Zhang X G, et al. Design and calibration of the grid-based energetic neutral atom imager (GENA) for the Que-qiao-2 Mission. Sci China Tech Sci, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-024-2949-410.1007/s11431-024-2949-4 ↗
21. Wang D N, Lei L X, Yu X C, et al. Image simulation of grid-based energetic neutral atom imager onboard the Queqiao-2 Mission. Sci China Tech Sci, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-024-2954-710.1007/s11431-024-2954-7 ↗
22. Russell C T, Luhmann J G, Strangeway R J. Space Physics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 222–245
23. Lin R L, Zhang X X, Liu S Q, et al. A three-dimensional asymmetric magnetopause model. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115: 2009JA01423510.1029/2009JA014235 ↗
24. Zhou M, Berchem J, Walker R J, et al. Coalescence of macroscopic flux ropes at the subsolar magnetopause: Magnetospheric multiscale observations. Phys Rev Lett, 2017, 119: 05510110.1103/PhysRevLett.119.055101 ↗
25. Zhou M, Zhong Z, Deng X. Kinetic properties of collisionless magnetic reconnection in space plasma: In situ observations. Rev Mod Plasma Phys, 2022, 6: 1510.1007/s41614-022-00079-z ↗
26. Tóth G, Sokolov I V, Gombosi T I, et al. Space weather modeling framework: A new tool for the space science community. J Geophys Res, 2005, 110: 2005JA01112610.1029/2005JA011126 ↗
27. Lin Y, Wang X Y, Lu S, et al. Investigation of storm time magnetotail and ion injection using three-dimensional global hybrid simulation. JGR Space Phys, 2014, 119: 7413–743210.1002/2014JA020005 ↗
28. Wolf R A, Spiro R W, Sazykin S, et al. How the Earth’s inner magnetosphere works: An evolving picture. J Atmos Sol-Terrestrial Phys, 2007, 69: 288–30210.1016/j.jastp.2006.07.026 ↗
29. Baker D N, Jaynes A N, Hoxie V C, et al. An impenetrable barrier to ultrarelativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation belts. Nature, 2014, 515: 531–53410.1038/nature13956 ↗
30. Fraser B J, Horwitz J L, Slavin J A, et al. Heavy ion mass loading of the geomagnetic field near the plasmapause and ULF wave implications. Geophys Res Lett, 2005, 32: L0410210.1029/2004GL021315 ↗
31. Zong Q, Rankin R, Zhou X. The interaction of ultra-low-frequency pc3-5 waves with charged particles in Earth’s magnetosphere. Rev Mod Plasma Phys, 2017, 1: 1010.1007/s41614-017-0011-4 ↗
32. He F, Guo R L, Dunn W R, et al. Plasmapause surface wave oscillates the magnetosphere and diffuse aurora. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 166810.1038/s41467-020-15506-3 ↗
33. Walsh B M, Foster J C, Erickson P J, et al. Simultaneous ground- and space-based observations of the plasmaspheric plume and reconnection. Science, 2014, 343: 1122–112510.1126/science.1247212 ↗
34. Gallagher D L, Comfort R H. Unsolved problems in plasmasphere refilling. JGR Space Phys, 2016, 121: 1447–145110.1002/2015JA022279 ↗
35. Welling D T, Jordanova V K, Zaharia S G, et al. The effects of dynamic ionospheric outflow on the ring current. J Geophys Res, 2011, 116: A00J1910.1029/2010JA015642 ↗
36. Welling D T, Jordanova V K, Glocer A, et al. The two-way relationship between ionospheric outflow and the ring current. JGR Space Phys, 2015, 120: 4338–435310.1002/2015JA021231 ↗
37. Roberts Jr W T, Horwitz J L, Comfort R H, et al. Heavy ion density enhancements in the outer plasmasphere. J Geophys Res, 1987, 92: 13499–1351210.1029/JA092iA12p13499 ↗
38. Fang X, Ridley A J, Liemohn M W, et al. Global 30–240 keV proton precipitation in the 17–18 April 2002 geomagnetic storms: 3. Impact on the ionosphere and thermosphere. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112: 2006JA01214410.1029/2006JA012144 ↗
39. Buzulukova N, Fok M, Pulkkinen A, et al. Dynamics of ring current and electric fields in the inner magnetosphere during disturbed periods: CRCM-BATS-R-US coupled model. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115: 2009JA01462110.1029/2009JA014621 ↗
40. Yu Y, Cao J, Pu Z, et al. Meso-scale electrodynamic coupling of the earth magnetosphere-ionosphere system. Space Sci Rev, 2022, 218: 7410.1007/s11214-022-00940-0 ↗
41. Meier R R. Ultraviolet spectroscopy and remote sensing of the upper atmosphere. Space Sci Rev, 1991, 58: 1–18510.1007/BF01206000 ↗
42. Meier R R, Weller C S. EUV resonance radiation from helium atoms and ions in the geocorona. J Geophys Res, 1972, 77: 1190–120410.1029/JA077i007p01190 ↗
43. Bush B C, Chakrabarti S. Analysis of Lyman α and He I 584 - Å airglow measurements using a spherical radiative transfer model. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100: 19609–1962510.1029/95JA01210 ↗
44. Vallerga J, Lallement R, Lemoine M, et al. EUVE observations of the helium glow: Interstellar and solar parameters. Astron Astrophys, 2004, 426: 855–86510.1051/0004-6361:20035887 ↗
45. Zoennchen J H, Nass U, Fahr H J. Terrestrial exospheric hydrogen density distributions under solar minimum and solar maximum conditions observed by the TWINS stereo mission. Ann Geophys, 2015, 33: 413–42610.5194/angeo-33-413-2015 ↗
46. Hapgood M A. Space physics coordinate transformations: A user guide. Planet Space Sci, 1992, 40: 711–71710.1016/0032-0633(92)90012-D ↗
47. Raab W, Branduardi-Raymont G, Wang C, et al. SMILE: A joint ESA/CAS mission to investigate the interaction between the solar wind and Earth’s magnetosphere. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation. Edinburgh, 2016. 9905
48. Sembay S L, Alme A, Agnolon D, et al. The soft X-ray imager (SXI) on the SMILE mission. Earth Planet Phys, 2024, 8: 5–1410.26464/epp2023067 ↗
49. Sun T R, Wang C, Wei F, et al. X-ray imaging of Kelvin-Helmholtz waves at the magnetopause. JGR Space Phys, 2015, 120: 266–27510.1002/2014JA020497 ↗
50. Zhang Z, He F, Zhang X X, et al. Solar wind charge-exchange X-ray emissions from the O5+ ions in the Earth’s magnetosheath. Remote Sens, 2024, 16: 148010.3390/rs16091480 ↗