journal article·2021-11-25

Pilot multi-axis control behavior modeling of receivers in probe-and-drogue aerial refueling

LiXin Wang, Chang Lu, Peng Zhao, HaiLiang Liu, Ting Yue

Publisher page

Abstract

The probe-and-drogue aerial refueling (PDR) task is seriously disturbed by the wind field, so it is difficult to obtain accurate visual information of the probe and drogue position. Additionally, the pilot needs to control the vertical, lateral and forward-backward positions of the receiver through the stick and throttle lever, and the pitch and roll manipulation actions of the stick should be reasonably distributed. To simulate the behavior of the pilot’s visual perception and the stick manipulation allocation in the PDR task, three modules are designed, including the visual information acquisition module (VIAM), strategy switching module (SSM) and pilot control and action module (CAM). Based on the coherence function analysis of the flight simulation test data, it is proven that the pilot’s multi-axis control behavior can be decoupled, and the flight states to be controlled are determined. Finally, the established multi-axis receiver pilot model (EPM) is developed. Combined with the motion models of the receiver, the tanker and the refueling equipment, a PDR flight task simulation model is established, and the evaluation indicators for the receiver’s flight performance during the PDR task, such as capture time and settling time, are proposed. The PDR flight simulation model was used to build the ground-based flight simulation test platform, and the flight simulation test of the PDR task was carried out. A comparison between the flight simulation test data and the numerical simulation results shows that the calculation error is less than 10%, which verifies the correctness of the established pilot model. The pilot model can be used to evaluate the design scheme of the refueling equipment and the receiver flight control law and provide a theoretical reference for the flight test design of the PDR task.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems · Spacecraft Dynamics and Control · Heat Transfer and Mathematical Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Luo D L, Shao J, Xu Y, et al. Docking navigation method for UAV autonomous aerial refueling. Sci China Inf Sci, 2019, 62: 01020310.1007/s11432-018-9578-9 ↗
2. Klyde D H, Aponso B L, Mitchell D G, et al. Development of demonstration maneuvers for aircraft handling qualities evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. New Orleans, 1997. 485–49510.2514/6.1997-3653 ↗
3. Duan H B, Li H, Luo Q N, et al. A binocular vision-based UAVs autonomous aerial refueling platform. Sci China Inf Sci, 2016, 59: 05320110.1007/s11432-016-5553-5 ↗
4. Yue T, Zhang Q, Yin H P, et al. Suggested closed-loop response characteristics for tanker in aerial refueling via mission-oriented evaluation. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 490–50110.1007/s11431-018-9325-4 ↗
5. Li H, Duan H B. Verification of monocular and binocular pose estimation algorithms in vision-based UAVs autonomous aerial refueling system. Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 1730–173810.1007/s11431-016-6097-z ↗
6. Thomas P R, Bhandari U, Bullock S, et al. Advances in air to air refuelling. Prog Aerospace Sci, 2014, 71: 14–3510.1016/j.paerosci.2014.07.001 ↗
7. He Q, Wang H, Chen Y, et al. Command filtered backstepping sliding mode control for the hose whipping phenomenon in aerial refueling. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2017, 67: 495–50510.1016/j.ast.2017.04.020 ↗
8. Su Z, Wang H, Yao P, et al. Back-stepping based anti-disturbance flight controller with preview methodology for autonomous aerial refueling. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2017, 61: 95–10810.1016/j.ast.2016.11.028 ↗
9. Lone M, Cooke A. Review of pilot models used in aircraft flight dynamics. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2014, 34: 55–7410.1016/j.ast.2014.02.003 ↗
10. Wang L, Yin H, Guo Y, et al. Closed-loop motion characteristic requirements of receiver aircraft for probe and drogue aerial refueling. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2019, 93: 10529310.1016/j.ast.2019.07.026 ↗
11. Wang L, Yin H, Yang K, et al. Water takeoff performance calculation method for amphibious aircraft based on digital virtual flight. Chin J Aeronautics, 2020, 33: 3082–309110.1016/j.cja.2020.03.019 ↗
12. Wang L, Zhu Q, Zhang Z, et al. Modeling pilot behaviors based on discrete-time series during carrier-based aircraft landing. J Aircraft, 2016, 53: 1922–193110.2514/1.C033721 ↗
13. Hess R A. Simplified approach for modelling pilot pursuit control behaviour in multi-loop flight control tasks. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part G-J Aerospace Eng, 2006, 220: 85–10210.1243/09544100JAERO33 ↗
14. Xu S, Tan W, Efremov AV, et al. Review of control models for human pilot behavior. Annu Rev Control, 2017, 44: 274–29110.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.009 ↗
15. Lu C, Wang L, Yue T, et al. Longitudinal flying qualities evaluation method for receiver in probe and drogue aerial refueling. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Athens, 2020. 87–9210.1109/ICMAE50897.2020.9178904 ↗
16. Hess R A. Obtaining multi-loop pursuit-control pilot models from computer simulation. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part G-J Aerospace Eng, 2008, 222: 189–19910.1243/09544100JAERO260 ↗
17. Chen C, Tan W Q, Qu X J, et al. A fuzzy human pilot model of longitudinal control for a carrier landing task. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2018, 54: 453–46610.1109/TAES.2017.2760779 ↗
18. Yang C, Yin T, Fu S. Predicating the safety of airport approaches using a cognitive pilot model. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Digital Human Modeling & Applications in Health. Las Vegas, 2013. 126–13310.1007/978-3-642-39173-6_15 ↗
19. Nguyen L T, Ogburn M E, Gilbert W P, et al. Simulator Study of Stall/Post-Stall Characteristics of a Fighter Airplane with Relaxed Longitudinal Static Stability. NASA Technical Paper, 1979
20. Guo Y, Yue T, Wang L. Unconventional roll axis response-type nonlinear dynamic inversion flight control law design. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. Nanjing, 2016. 1085–109010.1109/CGNCC.2016.7828939 ↗
21. Wu G, Meng X, Wang F. Improved nonlinear dynamic inversion control for a flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2018, 78: 734–74310.1016/j.ast.2018.04.036 ↗
22. Miller C J. Nonlinear dynamic inversion baseline control law: Architecture and performance predictions. In: Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Portland, 201110.2514/6.2011-6467 ↗
23. Vassberg J C, Yeh D, Blair A J, et al. Numerical simulations of KC-10 wing-mount aerial refueling hose-drogue dynamics with a reel take-up system. In: Proceedings of the 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Orlando, 200310.2514/6.2003-3508 ↗
24. Rui X, He B, Lu Y, et al. Discrete time transfer matrix method for multibody system dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn, 2005, 14: 317–34410.1007/s11044-005-5006-1 ↗
25. Wu L, Sun Y, Huang B, et al. Dynamic modeling and performance analysis of a hose-drogue aerial refueling system based on the Kane equation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Guidance, Navigation & Control Conference. Nanjing, 2016. 759–76410.1109/CGNCC.2016.7828881 ↗
26. Leitner R M, Estrugo R. Numeric simulation of aerial refueling coupling dynamics in case of hose reel malfunction. In: Proceedings of AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies (MST) Conference. Boston, 201310.2514/6.2013-4840 ↗
27. Yu Z, Qu Y, Zhang Y. Safe control of trailing UAV in close formation flight against actuator fault and wake vortex effect. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2018, 77: 189–20510.1016/j.ast.2018.01.028 ↗
28. Dogan A, Blake W, Haag C. Bow wave effect in aerial refueling: Computational analysis and modeling. J Aircraft, 2013, 50: 1856–186810.2514/1.C032165 ↗
29. Dai X, Wei Z, Quan Q. Modeling and simulation of bow wave effect in probe and drogue aerial refueling. Chin J Aeronaut, 2016, 29: 448–46110.1016/j.cja.2016.02.001 ↗
30. Dorf R C, Bishop R H. Modern Control System. 13th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2016
31. Schmid H P, Bekey G A. Tactile information processing by human operators in control systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, 1978, 8: 860–86610.1109/TSMC.1978.4309886 ↗
32. Carter G C, Knapp C H, Nuttall A H. Estimation of the magnitude-squared coherence function via overlapped fast Fourier transform processing. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust, 1973, 21: 337–34410.1109/TAU.1973.1162496 ↗
33. Xu S, Tan W, Qu X, et al. Prediction of nonlinear pilot-induced oscillation using an intelligent human pilot model. Chin J Aeronaut, 2019, 32: 2592–261110.1016/j.cja.2019.06.003 ↗
34. Pan T T, Jiang J, Wang X H, et al. Research on multiple mode conversion technology of carrier-based aircraft landing (in Chinese). Flight Dyn, 2014, 32: 25–28
35. Wang Y, Song H Y, Li Q, et al. Research on a full envelop controller for an unmanned ducted-fan helicopter based on switching control theory. Sci China Technol Sci, 2019, 62: 1837–184410.1007/s11431-018-9347-1 ↗
36. Hess R A, Marchesi F. Analytical assessment of flight simulator fidelity using pilot models. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2009, 32: 760–77010.2514/1.40645 ↗
37. Xu C, Liu P, Wang W, et al. Effects of behavioral characteristics of taxi drivers on safety and capacity of signalized intersections. J Cent South Univ, 2014, 21: 4033–404210.1007/s11771-014-2392-7 ↗