Security region based security-constrained unit commitment
Source abstract
Abstract
As the issues of security and stability of power systems are becoming increasingly significant, it is necessary to consider the constraints of the static voltage stability and transient stability, which are closely related to the active power dispatch of power systems, in the daily power dispatch, i.e. the unit commitment. However, due to the complexity of these constraints and limitation of the existing analysis methods, there has been no unit commitment model reported so far that can deal with these security constraints. On the other hand, as lack of effective measures to evaluate the security margin of dispatch schemes, it is difficult for power system operators to integrate both the security and economy of power systems in unit commitment. To resolve the above-mentioned issues, a security region based security-constrained unit commitment model is presented in the paper, which gives consideration to both the security and economy of power systems. For the first time, the active power flow constraint, the static voltage stability constraint and the transient stability constraint are taken into account in unit commitment at the same time. The model presented in the paper takes the operating cost, the branch transmission capacity margin, the static voltage stability margin and the transient stability margin as sub-objectives. By adjusting the weighting factors of sub-objectives, it is convenient to adjust the preference on the security and economy of power systems and reach a balance. The IEEE RTS-24 test system is adopted to validate the correctness and the efficiency of the proposed model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electric Power System Optimization · Optimal Power Flow Distribution · Power System Optimization and Stability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Allen J W, Bruce F W. Power Generation Operation and Control. New York: Wiley, 1984
2. Ross B. The generalized unit commitment problem. IEEE T Power Syst, 1995, 10(1): 465–47510.1109/59.373972 ↗
3. Xia Q, Zhong H W, Kang C Q. Review and prospects of the security constrained unit commitment theory and applications (in Chinese). Proc CSEE, 2013, 33(16): 94–103
4. Wang S J, Shahidehpour S M, Kirschen D S, et al. Short-term generation scheduling with transmission and environmental constraints using an augmented lagrangian relaxation. IEEE T Power Syst, 1995, 10(3): 1294–130110.1109/59.466524 ↗
5. Haili M, Shahidehpour S M. Unit commitment with transmission security and voltage constraints. IEEE T Power Syst, 1999, 14(2): 757–76410.1109/59.761909 ↗
6. Farrokh A, Mahmud F F, Mohammad S. Unit commitment with probabilistic spinning reserve and interruptible load considerations. IEEE T Power Syst, 2009, 24(1): 388–39710.1109/TPWRS.2008.2008675 ↗
7. Amin K, Mohammad S. Transmission switching in security-constrained unit commitment. IEEE T Power Syst, 2010, 25(4): 1937–194510.1109/TPWRS.2010.2046344 ↗
8. Lei W, Mohammad S, Yong F. Security-constrained generation and transmission outage scheduling with uncertainties. IEEE T Power Syst, 2010, 25(3): 1674–168510.1109/TPWRS.2010.2040124 ↗
9. Ruiwei J, Jianhui W, Yongpei G. Robust unit commitment with wind power and pumped storage hydro. IEEE T Power Syst, 2012, 27(2): 800–81010.1109/TPWRS.2011.2169817 ↗
10. Yu Y X. Review of study on methodology of security regions of power systems (in Chinese). J Tianjin Univ, 2008, 41(6): 635–646
11. Yu Y X, Wang Y J. Security region based real and reactive power pricing of power system. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci, 2008, 51(12): 2095–211110.1007/s11431-008-0228-0 ↗
12. Yu Y X, Wang D T. Dynamic security risk assessment and optimization of power transmission system. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci 2008, 51(6): 713–72310.1007/s11431-008-0049-1 ↗
13. Yu Y X, Wang J R, Lv X Y. Security value based expansion planning of power system with integration of large scale wind power. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55(7): 1908–192210.1007/s11431-012-4866-x ↗
14. EPRI. Direct Methods for Security Regions of Bulk Power System, 1008608. Palo Alto: EPRI, 2004
15. Yu Y X, Feng F. Active power steady-state security region of power system. Sci China Ser A-Math, 1990, 33(12): 1488–1500
16. Li H L, Yu Y X, Han Q, et al. Practical boundary of static voltage stability region in cut-set power space of power systems (in Chinese). Autom Elec Power Syst, 2005, 29(4): 18–23
17. Feng F, Yu Y X. Dynamic security regions of power systems in injection spaces. Proc CSEE. 1993, 13(3): 14–22
18. Zeng Y, Yu Y X. A practical direct method for determining dynamic security regions of electric power systems (in Chinese). Proc CSEE, 2003, 23(5): 24–28
19. Fred N L. The application of commitment utilization factor to thermal unit commitment. IEEE T Power Syst, 1991, 6(2): 691–69810.1109/59.76714 ↗
20. Chung-Ching S, Yuan-Yih H. Fuzzy dynamic programming: An application to unit commitment. IEEE T Power Syst, 1991, 6(3): 1231–123710.1109/59.119271 ↗
21. Sudhir V, Eugene, C A, Karl I, et al. Implementation of a lagrangian relaxation based unit commitment problem. IEEE T Power Syst, 1989, 4(4): 1373–138010.1109/59.41687 ↗
22. Lau T W, Chung C Y, Wong K P, et al. Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm approach for unit commitment. IEEE T Power Syst, 2009, 24(3): 1503–151210.1109/TPWRS.2009.2021220 ↗
23. Po-Hung C. Two-level hierarchical approach to unit commitment using expert system and elite PSO. IEEE T Power Syst, 2012, 27(2): 780–78910.1109/TPWRS.2011.2171197 ↗
24. Wang Z, Yu Y X, Zhang H P. Social evolutionary programming based unit commitment. Proc CSEE, 2004, 24(4): 12–17
25. Subcommittee P M. IEEE reliability test system. IEEE T Power Appa Syst, 1979, 98(6): 2047–205410.1109/TPAS.1979.319398 ↗