journal article·2024-06

Vision-based docking system for an aromatic-hydrocarbon-inspired reconfigurable robot

FangYi Xing, Cheng Xu, JinGuo Liu, ZhiHui Xue

Publisher page

Abstract

Aromatic hydrocarbons generally refer to compounds containing benzene rings. Many types of isomers can be formed by replacing hydrogen atoms on the benzene ring. In this paper, an aromatic-hydrocarbon-inspired modular robot (AHIMR) is proposed. The robot can be reassembled into different configurations suitable for various task requirements. A vision-based docking system is designed for the AHIMR. The system primarily consists of two stages: a remote guidance stage and a precise docking stage. During the remote guidance stage, an object module is identified using an illumination adaptive target recognition algorithm, and then the active module moves to the docking area through communication with ZigBee. In the precise docking stage, the active module calculates the relative pose with the object module using a perspective-n-point method and dynamically adjusts its posture to dock. In this process, a Kalman filter is used to reduce target occlusion and jitter interference. In addition, the docking system feasibility is verified via several simulation experiments. The module docking accuracy is controlled within 0.01 m, which meets the reconfiguration task requirements of the AHIMR. In the AHIMR submodule docking experiment, the active module accurately moves to the expected position with a docking success rate of 95%.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization · Optimization and Search Problems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Sayed M E, Roberts J O, Donaldson K, et al. Modular robots for enabling operations in unstructured extreme environments. Adv Intell Syst, 2022, 4: 200022710.1002/aisy.202000227 ↗
2. Dokuyucu H İ, Özmen N G. Achievements and future directions in self-reconfigurable modular robotic systems. J Field Robot, 2023, 40: 701–74610.1002/rob.22139 ↗
3. Fukuda T, Kaga T. Distributed decision making of dynamically reconfigurable robotic system. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Grenoble: IEEE, 1997. 1604–1609
4. Trianni V, Nolfi S, Dorigo M. Cooperative hole avoidance in a swarmbot. Robot Auton Syst, 2006, 54: 97–10310.1016/j.robot.2005.09.018 ↗
5. Wang T M, Zou D, Chen D S. Mechanism design and control method of reconfigurable tracked robot. J B Univ Aeronaut Astronaut, 2005, 31: 705–708
6. Wang W, Li Z L, Yu W P, et al. An autonomous docking method based on ultrasonic sensors for self-reconfigurable mobile robot. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. Guilin: IEEE, 2009. 1744–174910.1109/ROBIO.2009.5420436 ↗
7. Wang W, Zhang H, Yu W. Design and realization of multimobile robot system with docking manipulator. J Mech Des, 2010, 132: 11450210.1115/1.4002719 ↗
8. Liu J G, Ma S G, Wang Y C, et al. Network-based reconfiguration routes for a self-reconfigurable robot. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2008, 51: 1532–154610.1007/s11432-008-0099-9 ↗
9. Li B, Ma S, Liu J, et al. AMOEBA-I: A shape-shifting modular robot for urban search and rescue. Adv Robot, 2009, 23: 1057–108310.1163/156855309X452485 ↗
10. Gao Y, Liu J. China’s robotics successes abound. Science, 2014, 345: 52310.1126/science.345.6196.523-a ↗
11. Liu J, Zhang X, Hao G. Survey on research and development of reconfigurable modular robots. Adv Mech Eng, 2016, 8: 16878140166595910.1177/1687814016659597 ↗
12. Feng J K, Liu J G. Configuration analysis of a chain-type reconfigurable modular robot inspired by normal alkane. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1167–117610.1007/s11431-020-1816-0 ↗
13. Yim M, Zhang Y, Roufas K, et al. Connecting and disconnecting for chain self-reconfiguration with PolyBot. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2002, 7: 442–45110.1109/TMECH.2002.806221 ↗
14. Park M, Chitta S, Teichman A, et al. Automatic configuration recognition methods in modular robots. Int J Robot Res, 2008, 27: 403–42110.1177/0278364907089350 ↗
15. Shen W M, Will P. Docking in self-reconfigurable robots. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Hawaii: IEEE, 2001. 1049–1054
16. Khoshnevis B, Will P, Shen W M. Highly compliant and self-tightening docking modules for precise and fast connection of self-reconfigurable robots. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Taipei: IEEE, 2003. 2311–2316
17. Ma L, Wu X, Li Z. High-precision medicine bottles vision online inspection system and classification based on multifeatures and ensemble learning via independence test. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 2021, 70: 1–12
18. Murata S, Kakomura K, Kurokawa H. Docking experiments of a modular robot by visual feedback. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Beijing: IEEE, 2006. 625–630
19. Yim M, Shirmohammadi B, Sastra J, et al. Towards robotic self-reassembly after explosion. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. San Diego: IEEE, 2007. 2767–2772
20. Liu C, Lin Q, Kim H, et al. SMORES-EP, a modular robot with parallel self-assembly. Auton Robot, 2023, 47: 211–22810.1007/s10514-022-10078-1 ↗
21. Liu J, Tong Y, Liu J. Review of snake robots in constrained environments. Robot Auton Syst, 2021, 141: 10378510.1016/j.robot.2021.103785 ↗
22. Liu J G, Wang Y C, Li B, et al. Center-configuration selection technique for the reconfigurable modular robot. Sci China Ser F, 2007, 50: 697–710
23. Liu J. Analysis of tipover stability for novel shape shifting modular robot. CJME, 2006, 19: 18110.3901/CJME.2006.02.181 ↗
24. Liu J G, Ma S G, Lu Z L, et al. Design and experiment of a novel link-type shape shifting modular robot series. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. Hong Kong: IEEE, 2005. 318–323
25. Liu J G, Wang Y C, Li B, et al. Transformation technique research of the improved link-type shape shifting modular robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. Luoyang: IEEE, 2006. 295–300
26. Liu J G, Wang Y C, Li B, et al. Transmutation mechanisms and its realization of a chain-type reconfigurable modular robot. Trans Chin Soci Agric Mach, 2005, 36: 101–105
27. Liu J, Wang Y, Ma S, et al. Enumeration of the non-isomorphic configurations for a reconfigurable modular robot with square-cubic-cell modules. Int J Adv Robot Syst, 2010, 7: 3110.5772/10489 ↗
28. Rublee E, Rabaud V, Konolige K, et al. ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Barcelona: IEEE, 2011. 2564–2571
29. Mur-Artal R, Tardos J D. ORB-SLAM2: An open-source SLAM system for monocular, stereo, and RGB-D cameras. IEEE Trans Robot, 2017, 33: 1255–126210.1109/TRO.2017.2705103 ↗
30. Ramadan M, El Tokhey M, Ragab A, et al. Adopted image matching techniques for aiding indoor navigation. Ain Shams Eng J, 2021, 12: 3649–365810.1016/j.asej.2021.04.029 ↗
31. Bi X, Shang Y, Liu B, et al. A versatile detection method for various contrast enhancement manipulations. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol, 2023, 33: 491–50410.1109/TCSVT.2022.3204789 ↗
32. Huang L D, Zhao W, Wang J, et al. Combination of contrast limited adaptive histogram equalisation and discrete wavelet transform for image enhancement. IET Image Process, 2015, 9: 908–91510.1049/iet-ipr.2015.0150 ↗
33. Wu X, Zhao Q, Bu W. A SIFT-based contactless palmprint verification approach using iterative RANSAC and local palmprint descriptors. Pattern Recognit, 2014, 47: 3314–332610.1016/j.patcog.2014.04.008 ↗
34. Xue X R, Huang S C, Zhang G S, et al. Optimization of fuel supply strategy for aircraft longitudinal motion based on complex method. J Nanjing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut, 2022, 54: 297–303
35. Li Y. A calibration method of computer vision system based on dual attention mechanism. Image Vis Comput, 2020, 103: 10403910.1016/j.imavis.2020.104039 ↗
36. Zhou H Y, Zhang T, Lu W N. Vision-based pose estimation from points with unknown correspondences. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2014, 23: 3468–347710.1109/TIP.2014.2329765 ↗
37. Zhu L, Dong X, Zhang Z, et al. Camera pose estimation algorithm for singular configuration of target points. Acta Photon Sin, 2021, 50: 28510.3788/gzxb20215007.0715001 ↗
38. Xu Q, Varadarajan S, Chakrabarti C, et al. A distributed canny edge detector: Algorithm and FPGA implementation. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2014, 23: 2944–296010.1109/TIP.2014.2311656 ↗
39. Hong R, Park J, Jang S, et al. Development of a parcel-level land boundary extraction algorithm for aerial imagery of regularly arranged agricultural areas. Remote Sens, 2021, 13: 116710.3390/rs13061167 ↗
40. Fang Q, Huang S X. UKF for integrated vision and inertial sensors based on three-view geometry. IEEE Sens J, 2013, 13: 2711–271910.1109/JSEN.2013.2259228 ↗
41. Simon D, Shmaliy Y S. Unified forms for Kalman and finite impulse response filtering and smoothing. Automatica, 2013, 49: 1892–189910.1016/j.automatica.2013.02.026 ↗
42. Wu J, Wang J, You Z. An overview of dynamic parameter identification of robots. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf, 2010, 26: 414–41910.1016/j.rcim.2010.03.013 ↗
43. Wu J, Zhang B B, Wang L P, et al. An iterative learning method for realizing accurate dynamic feedforward control of an industrial hybrid robot. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1177–118810.1007/s11431-020-1738-5 ↗
44. Wu J, Wang J, Wang L, et al. Dynamics and control of a planar 3-DOF parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy. Mechanism Machine Theor, 2009, 44: 835–84910.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.04.002 ↗
45. Li J, Guo X, Li Z, et al. Stochastic adaptive optimal control of under-actuated robots using neural networks. Neurocomputing, 2014, 142: 190–20010.1016/j.neucom.2014.04.049 ↗
46. Sir Elkhatem A, Naci Engin S. Robust LQR and LQR-PI control strategies based on adaptive weighting matrix selection for a UAV position and attitude tracking control. Alex Eng J, 2022, 61: 6275–629210.1016/j.aej.2021.11.057 ↗
47. Ma C Q, Hu X G, Xiao J, et al. Homogenized ORB algorithm using dynamic threshold and improved quadtree. Math Probl Eng, 2021, 2021: 6693627
48. Yang S, Fan G, Bai L, et al. MGC-VSLAM: A meshing-based and geometric constraint vslam for dynamic indoor environments. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 81007–8102110.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990890 ↗
49. Gan H, Lee W S, Alchanatis V, et al. Immature green citrus fruit detection using color and thermal images. Comput Electron Agr, 2018, 152: 117–12510.1016/j.compag.2018.07.011 ↗
50. Ramya R, Sasikala T. A comparative analysis of similarity distance measure functions for biocryptic authentication in cloud databases. Cluster Comput, 2019, 22: 12147–1215510.1007/s10586-017-1568-y ↗