Study of the nose event on 11 April 2002 with UBK method
Source abstract
Abstract
Nose event, which names after the nose-like shape of structures in ion spectrograms observed by satellite in the inner magnetosphere, refers to the deep inward penetration of ions from magnetotail at discrete energy bands. Nose events have been studied extensively both with observations and simulations since first discovered in 1970s. In this study we use the UBK method to model the different L-shell penetration characteristics for a multi-band nose event observed by Cluster/CODIF on April 11, 2002. The modeled open-closed orbit separatrices are generally smaller than the observed L-shell penetrations for outbound crossing; the difference varies from −2.02 to −0.62 RE for different energy channels of H+ bands and from −1.88 to −1.10 RE for O+ band. The average difference is −1.46 RE. The separatrices for the inbound crossing are generally larger than those of outbound crossing and are more consistent with the observed L-shell penetration depths. The modeled open-closed orbit separatrices are smaller than the observed L-shell penetrations for 6.5–17.1 keV energy channels of H+ bands but larger for 4.0–5.1 keV (due to closed banana orbits region) and 21.7–35.2 keV (due to energy increasing) energy channels of H+ bands. For O+ band, the difference between the modeled open-closed orbit separatrix and observed L-shell penetrations of 4.6 keV energy channel is larger (due to closed banana orbits region), the difference of 7.4 keV energy channel is smaller. The overall average difference is 0.043 RE for nose structures of inbound crossing. The discrepancies between the model and observation may come from the magnetic field and electric potential models we used. The formation of multi nose event and relations to the observed plasma flow vortices are discussed, the local intense E Y may relate to the formation of the observed multi nose structures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Smith P H, Hoffman R A. direct observations in the dusk hours of the characteristics of the storm time ring current particles during the beginning of magnetic storms. J Geophys Res, 1974, 79: 966–971, doi: 10.1029/JA079i007p0096610.1029/JA079i007p00966 ↗
2. Ejiri M, Hoffman R A, Smith P H. Energetic particle penetrations into the inner magnetosphere. J Geophys Res, 1980, 85: 653–663, doi:10.1029/JA085iA02p0065310.1029/JA085iA02p00653 ↗
3. Ejiri M. Trajectory traces of charged particles in the magnetosphere. J Geophys Res, 1978, 83: 4798–4810, doi: 10.1029/JA083iA10p0-479810.1029/JA083iA10p04798 ↗
4. Shirai H, Maezawa K, Fujimoto M, et al. Monoenergetic ion drop-off in the inner magnetosphere. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102: 19873–19882, doi: 10.1029/97JA0115010.1029/97JA01150 ↗
5. Kovrazhkin R A, Sauvaud J, Delcourt D C. INTERBALL-Auroral observations of 0.1–12 keV ion gaps in the diffuse auroral zone. Ann Geophys, 1999, 17: 734–742, doi:10.1007/s005850050802
6. Ganushkina N Y, Pulkkinen T I, Sergeev V A, et al. Entry of plasma sheet particles into the inner magnetosphere as observed by Polar/CAMMICE. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105: 25205–25220, doi: 10.1029/2000JA90006210.1029/2000JA900062 ↗
7. Ganushkina N Y, Pulkkinen T I, Bashkirov V F, et al. Formation of intense nose structures. Geophys Res Lett, 2001, 28: 491–494, doi: 10.1029/2000GL01195510.1029/2000GL011955 ↗
8. Buzulukova N Y, Kovrazhkin R A, Glazunov A L, et al. Stationary Nose Structures of Protons in the Inner Magnetosphere: Observations by the ION Instrument onboard the Interball-2 Satellite and Modeling. Cosmic Research, 2003, 41: 3–1210.1023/A:1022343327565 ↗
9. Ebihara Y, Ejiri M, Nilsson H, et al. Multiple discrete-energy ion features in the inner magnetosphere: 9 February 1998, event. Ann Geophys, 2000, 22: 1297–130410.5194/angeo-22-1297-2004 ↗
10. Buzulukova N, Vovchenko V. Modeling of proton nose structures in the inner magnetosphere with a self-consistent electric field model. J Atmos Terr Phys, 2008, 70: 503–510, doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2007.08.02810.1016/j.jastp.2007.08.028 ↗
11. Huang C Y, Burke W J, Lin C S. Ion precipitation in the dawn sector during geomagnetic storms. J Geophys Res, 2005, 110: 11213–11228, doi: 10.1029/2005JA01111610.1029/2005JA011116 ↗
12. Vallat C, Ganushkina N, Dandouras I, et al. Ion multi-nose structures observed by Cluster in the inner Magnetosphere. Ann Geophys, 2007, 25: 171–19010.5194/angeo-25-171-2007 ↗
13. Dandouras I, Cao J, Vallat C. Energetic ion dynamics of the inner magnetosphere revealed in coordinated Cluster-Double Star observations. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114: 1–10, doi: 10.1029/2007JA01275710.1029/2007JA012757 ↗
14. Chen A J. Penetration of low-energy protons deep into the magnetosphere. J Geophys Res, 1970, 75: 2458–2467, doi: 10.1029/JA075i-013p0245810.1029/JA075i013p02458 ↗
15. Chen A J, Stern D P. Adiabatic Hamiltonian of charged particle motion in a dipole field. J Geophys Res, 1975, 80: 690–693, doi: 10.1029/JA080i004p0069010.1029/JA080i004p00690 ↗
16. Stern D P. The motion of a proton in the equatorial magnetosphere. J Geophys Res, 1975, 80: 595–599, doi: 10.1029/JA080i004p0059510.1029/JA080i004p00595 ↗
17. Cowley S W H, Ashour-Abdalla M. Adiabatic plasma convection in a dipole field. I — Electron forbidden-zone effects for a simple electric field model. Planet Space Sci, 1976, 24: 805–819, doi: 10.1016/0032-0633(76)90071-4
18. Cowley S W H, Ashour-Abdalla M. Adiabatic plasma convection in a dipole field: Proton forbidden-zone effects for a simple electric field model. Planet Space Sci, 1976, 24: 821–833, doi: 10.1016/0032-0633(76)90072-610.1016/0032-0633(76)90072-6 ↗
19. Kivelson M G, Southwood D J. Approximations for the study of drift boundaries in the magnetosphere. J Geophys Res, 1975, 80: 3528–3534, doi: 10.1029/JA080i025p0352810.1029/JA080i025p03528 ↗
20. Southwood D J, Kaye S M. Drift boundary approximations in simple magnetospheric convection models. J Geophys Res, 1979, 84: 5773–5780, doi: 10.1029/JA084iA10p0577310.1029/JA084iA10p05773 ↗
21. Whipple E C Jr. /U,B,K/coordinates — A natural system for studying magnetospheric convection. J Geophys Res, 1978, 83: 4318–4326, doi: 10.1029/JA083iA09p0431810.1029/JA083iA09p04318 ↗
22. Sheldon R B, Gaffey J D Jr. Particle tracing in the magnetosphere — New algorithms and results. Geophys Res Lett, 1993, 20: 767–770, doi: 10.1029/93GL0083510.1029/93GL00835 ↗
23. Sheldon R B, Eastman T E. Particle transport in the magnetosphere: A new diffusion model. Geophys Res Lett, 1997, 24: 811–814, doi: 10.1029/97GL0070710.1029/97GL00707 ↗
24. Whipple E C, Halekas J S, Scudder J D, et al. Identification of magnetospheric particles that travel between spacecraft and their use to help obtain magnetospheric potential distributions. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103: 93–102, doi: 10.1029/97JA0219510.1029/97JA02195 ↗
25. Whipple E C, Starr D L, Halekas J S, et al. Magnetospheric electric fields from ion data. Geophys Res Lett, 1999, 26: 1561–1564, doi: 10.1029/1999GL90031810.1029/1999GL900318 ↗
26. Korth H, Thomsen M F, Borovsky J E, et al. Plasma sheet access to geosynchronous orbit. J Geophys Res, 1999, 104: 25047–25062, doi: 10.1029/1999JA90029210.1029/1999JA900292 ↗
27. Friedel R H W, Korth H, Henderson M G, et al. Plasma sheet access to the inner magnetosphere. J Geophys Res, 2001, 106: 5845–5858, doi: 10.1029/2000JA00301110.1029/2000JA003011 ↗
28. Korth H, Thomsen M F. Plasma sheet access to geosynchronous orbit: Generalization to numerical global field models. J Geophys Res, 2001, 106: 29655–29668, doi: 10.1029/2000JA00037310.1029/2000JA000373 ↗
29. Ding W Z, Cao J B, Zeng L, et al. Simulation studies of plasma sheet ion boundary. Chin J Geophys (in Chinese), 2010, 53(7): 1505–1514, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2010.07.001
30. Volland H. A semiempirical model of large-scale magnetospheric electric fields. J Geophys Res, 1973, 78: 171–180, doi: 10.1029/JA078i001p0017110.1029/JA078i001p00171 ↗
31. Gussenhoven M S, Burke W J, Hardy D A. DMSP/F2 electron observations of equatorward auroral boundaries and their relationship to magnetospheric electric fields. J Geophys Res, 1981, 86: 768–778, doi: 10.1029/JA086iA02p0076810.1029/JA086iA02p00768 ↗
32. Gussenhoven M S, Heinemann N, Hardy D A. Systematics of the equatorward diffuse auroral boundary. J Geophys Res, 1983, 88: 5692–5708, doi: 10.1029/JA088iA07p0569210.1029/JA088iA07p05692 ↗
33. Maynard N C, Chen A J. Isolated cold plasma regions — Observations and their relation to possible production mechanisms. J Geophys Res, 1975, 80: 1009–1013, doi: 10.1029/JA080i007p0100910.1029/JA080i007p01009 ↗
34. Reme H, Bosqued J M, Sauvaud J A, et al. The cluster ion spectrometry (CIS) experiment. Space Sci Rev, 1997, 79: 303–35010.1023/A:1004929816409 ↗
35. Balogh A, Dunlop M W, Cowley S W H, et al. The cluster magnetic field investigation. Space Sci Rev, 1997, 79: 65–9110.1023/A:1004970907748 ↗
36. Cao J B, Ding W Z, Reme H, et al. The statistical studies of the inner boundary of plasma sheet. Ann Geophys, 2011, 29: 289–298, doi: 10.5194/angeo-29-289-201110.5194/angeo-29-289-2011 ↗
37. Roederer J G. Dynamics of Geomagnetically Trapped Radiation. Physics and Chemistry in Space. Berlin: Springer, 1970. 108–109
38. Zong Q G, Wang Y F, Yang B, et al. Vortex-like plasma flow structures observed by Cluster at the boundary of the outer radiation belt and ring current: A link between the inner and outer magnetosphere. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114: 10211–10221, doi: 10.1029/2009JA01438810.1029/2009JA014388 ↗