journal article·2024-04

3D printed β-sheet-reinforced natural polymer hydrogel bilayer tissue engineering scaffold

XinRui Zhao, XiongFeng Nie, XiaoPing Zhang, YaGe Sun, Rong Yang, XinYu Bian, Qian Zhang, HongYing Wang, ZiYang Xu, WenGuang Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

It remains a significant challenge to fabricate natural polymer (NP) hydrogels with anti-swelling ability and high strengths in the physiological environment. Herein, the β-sheet-reinforced NP hydrogel is developed by copolymerizing methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) and methacrylated silk fibroin (SFMA) in aqueous solution, followed by ethanol treatment (named GelMA-SFMA-AL). The β-sheets formed by SFMA can act as a stable physical crosslink to enhance the mechanical properties and prolong the degradation of the GelMA network. Importantly, the chemical crosslinking in the GelMA-SFMA hydrogel prevents excessive aggregation of hydrophobic β-sheets, thereby avoiding the formation of brittle hydrogel. The obtained GelMA-SFMA-AL hydrogels exhibit considerably enhanced mechanical properties (Young’s modulus: 0.89–3.68 MPa; tensile strength: 0.31–0.96 MPa; toughness: 0.09–0.63 MJ/m3; compressive modulus: 0.78–2.20 MPa; compressive strength: 2.65–5.93 MPa) compared with GelMA-SFMA hydrogels (Young’s modulus: 0.04–0.13 MPa; tensile strength: 0.04–0.07 MPa; toughness: 0.01–0.02 MJ/m3; compressive modulus: 0.03–0.09 MPa; compressive strength: 0.30–0.64 MPa). A bilayer osteochondral scaffold is constructed via digital light processing (DLP) three-dimensiaonl (3D) printing technology, comprising GelMA-SFMA@diclofenac sodium (DS)-AL as the top layer and GelMA-SFMA@bioactive glass (BG)-AL as the bottom layer. The bilayer hydrogel scaffold is demonstrated to support cell attachment and spreading, and facilitate osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow stem cells in vitro. In vivo implantation experiment suggests this bilayer scaffold is promising to be used for osteo-chondral tissue regeneration.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhao W, Jin X, Cong Y, et al. Degradable natural polymer hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2013, 88: 327–33910.1002/jctb.3970 ↗
2. Zhang X, Sun Y, Wu T, et al. Combined intramyocardial injectable hydrogel and pericardial adhesive hydrogel patch therapy strategy to achieve gene/ion/gas delivery for improving cardiac function. Nano Today, 2023, 50: 10186110.1016/j.nantod.2023.101861 ↗
3. Silberman E, Oved H, Namestnikov M, et al. Post-maturation reinforcement of 3D-printed vascularized cardiac tissues. Adv Mater, 2023, 35: 230222910.1002/adma.202302229 ↗
4. Wang L, Li A, Zhang D, et al. Injectable double-network hydrogel for corneal repair. Chem Eng J, 2023, 455: 14069810.1016/j.cej.2022.140698 ↗
5. Cui Z K, Kim S, Baljon J J, et al. Microporous methacrylated glycol chitosan-montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 352310.1038/s41467-019-11511-3 ↗
6. Zhang G, Lv L, Deng Y, et al. Self-healing gelatin hydrogels cross-linked by combining multiple hydrogen bonding and ionic coordination. Macromol Rapid Commun, 2017, 38: 170001810.1002/marc.201700018 ↗
7. Shi M Y, Jiang L J, Yu C J, et al. A robust polyacrylic acid/chitosan cryogel for rapid hemostasis. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 1029–104210.1007/s11431-021-1986-9 ↗
8. Shepherd J H, Ghose S, Kew S J, et al. Effect of fiber crosslinking on collagen-fiber reinforced collagen-chondroitin-6-sulfate materials for regenerating load-bearing soft tissues. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl BioMater, 2013, 101A: 176–18410.1002/jbm.a.34317 ↗
9. Liu K Q, Liu Y N, Duan Z G, et al. A biomimetic bi-layered tissue engineering scaffolds for osteochondral defects repair. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 793–80510.1007/s11431-020-1597-4 ↗
10. He B, Wang J, Xie M, et al. 3D printed biomimetic epithelium/stroma bilayer hydrogel implant for corneal regeneration. Bioactive Mater, 2022, 17: 234–24710.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.034 ↗
11. Montazerian H, Baidya A, Haghniaz R, et al. Stretchable and bioadhesive gelatin methacryloyl-based hydrogels enabled by in situ dopamine polymerization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13: 40290–4030110.1021/acsami.1c10048 ↗
12. Kim S H, Yeon Y K, Lee J M, et al. Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 162010.1038/s41467-018-03759-y ↗
13. Bian X, Cui C, Qi Y, et al. Amino acid surfactant-induced superfast gelation of silk fibroin for treating noncompressible hemorrhage. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32: 220734910.1002/adfm.202207349 ↗
14. Grant A M, Kim H S, Dupnock T L, et al. Silk fibroin-substrate interactions at heterogeneous nanocomposite interfaces. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 6380–639210.1002/adfm.201601268 ↗
15. Kaewprasit K, Kobayashi T, Damrongsakkul S. Alcohol-triggered silk fibroin hydrogels having random coil and β-turn structures enhanced for cytocompatible cell response. J Appl Polym Sci, 2020, 137: 4873110.1002/app.48731 ↗
16. Quan H, Zhang T, Xu H, et al. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioactive Mater, 2020, 5: 110–11510.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003 ↗
17. Hong H, Seo Y B, Kim D Y, et al. Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2020, 232: 11967910.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679 ↗
18. Wu T, Cui C, Fan C, et al. Tea eggs-inspired high-strength natural polymer hydrogels. Bioactive Mater, 2021, 6: 2820–282810.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.009 ↗
19. Kilic Bektas C, Hasirci V. Mimicking corneal stroma using keratocyte-loaded photopolymerizable methacrylated gelatin hydrogels. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2018, 12: e1899–e191010.1002/term.2621 ↗
20. Rajput M, Mondal P, Yadav P, et al. Light-based 3D bioprinting of bone tissue scaffolds with tunable mechanical properties and architecture from photocurable silk fibroin. Int J Biol Macromol, 2022, 202: 644–65610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.081 ↗
21. Huang W, Ebrahimi D, Dinjaski N, et al. Synergistic integration of experimental and simulation approaches for the de novo design of silk-based materials. Acc Chem Res, 2017, 50: 866–87610.1021/acs.accounts.6b00616 ↗
22. Dai X, Zhang Y, Gao L, et al. A mechanically strong, highly stable, thermoplastic, and self-healable supramolecular polymer hydrogel. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 3566–357110.1002/adma.201500534 ↗
23. Tan L S, Tan H L, Deekonda K, et al. Fabrication of radiation cross-linked diclofenac sodium loaded carboxymethyl sago pulp/chitosan hydrogel for enteric and sustained drug delivery. Carbohyd Polym Technol Appl, 2021, 2: 100084
24. Zhao M, Qi Z, Tao X, et al. Chemical, thermal, time, and enzymatic stability of silk materials with silk i structure. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22: 413610.3390/ijms22084136 ↗
25. Gil E S, Park S H, Hu X, et al. impact ofsterilization on the enzymatic degradation and mechanical properties of silk biomaterials. Macromol Biosci, 2014, 14: 257–26910.1002/mabi.201300321 ↗
26. Zhu Z, Ling S, Yeo J, et al. High-strength, durable all-silk fibroin hydrogels with versatile processability toward multifunctional applications. Adv Funct Mater, 2018, 28: 170475710.1002/adfm.201704757 ↗
27. Nogueira G M, Rodas A C D, Leite C A P, et al. Preparation and characterization of ethanol-treated silk fibroin dense membranes for biomaterials application using waste silk fibers as raw material. Bioresource Tech, 2010, 101: 8446–845110.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.064 ↗
28. Chen X, Shao Z, Knight D P, et al. Conformation transition kinetics of Bombyx mori silk protein. Proteins, 2007, 68: 223–23110.1002/prot.21414 ↗
29. Lin Y, Xia X, Shang K, et al. Tuning chemical and physical crosslinks in silk electrogels for morphological analysis and mechanical reinforcement. Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14: 2629–263510.1021/bm4004892 ↗
30. Li T, Song X, Weng C, et al. Silk fibroin/carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel with tunable biomechanical properties has application potential as cartilage scaffold. Int J Biol Macromol, 2019, 137: 382–39110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.245 ↗
31. Fan L, Wang H, Zhang K, et al. Regenerated silk fibroin nanofibrous matrices treated with 75% ethanol vapor for tissue-engineering applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2012, 23: 497–50810.1163/092050610X552771 ↗
32. Heinemann P, Kasperski M. Damping induced by walking and running. Procedia Eng, 2017, 199: 2826–283110.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.537 ↗
33. Gao F, Xu Z, Liang Q, et al. Osteochondral regeneration with 3D-printed biodegradable high-strength supramolecular polymer re-inforced-gelatin hydrogel scaffolds. Adv Sci, 2019, 6: 190086710.1002/advs.201900867 ↗
34. Maver U, Xhanari K, Zizek M, et al. Carboxymethyl cellulose/diclofenac bioactive coatings on AISI 316LVM for controlled drug delivery, and improved osteogenic potential. Carbohyd Polym, 2020, 230: 11561210.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115612 ↗
35. Altman R, Bosch B, Brune K, et al. Advances in NSAID development: Evolution of diclofenac products using pharmaceutical technology. Drugs, 2015, 75: 859–87710.1007/s40265-015-0392-z ↗
36. Xin B, Li Z J, Wang Y S, et al. Effect of diclofenac sodium on chondrocyte inflammation and synovial macrophage polarization in osteoarthritis rat model (in Chinese). J Clinical Exp Med, 2022, 21: 1671–4695
37. Zhou Z J, Zhang L Y, Li F G, et al. Effects of compound diclofenac sodium on cartilage morphology and oxidative stress in osteoarthritis rats (in Chinese). Chin J Tissue Eng Res, 2023, 27: 4154–4160
38. El-Rashidy A A, Roether J A, Harhaus L, et al. Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: A review of in vivo studies in bone defect models. Acta Biomater, 2017, 62: 1–2810.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.030 ↗
39. Sun Y, Gao Z, Zhang X, et al. 3D-printed, bi-layer, biomimetic artificial periosteum for boosting bone regeneration. Bio-Des Manuf, 2022, 5: 540–55510.1007/s42242-022-00191-6 ↗