Numerical investigation on flow and convective heat transfer of aviation kerosene at supercritical conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, characteristics of flow and convective heat transfer of China RP-3 kerosene in straight circular pipe were numerically studied. Navier-Stokes equations were solved using RNG k-ɛ turbulence model with low Reynolds number correction. The thermophysical and transport properties of the China RP-3 kerosene were calculated with a 10-species surrogate and the extended corresponding state method (ECS) combined with Benedict-Webb-Rubin equation. The independence of grids was first studied and the numerical results were then compared with experimental data for validation. Under flow conditions given in the paper, the results show that deterioration of convective heat transfer occurs when the wall temperature is slightly higher than the pseudo-critical temperature of kerosene for cases with wall heat flux of 1.2 and 0.8 MW/m2. The degree of the heat transfer deterioration is weakened as the heat flux decreases. The deterioration, however, does not happen when the heat flux on the pipe wall is reduced to 0.5 MW/m2. Based on the analysis of the near-wall turbulent properties, it is found that the heat transfer deterioration and then the enhancement are attributed partly to the change in the turbulent kinetic energy in the vicinity of pipe wall. The conventional heat transfer relations such as Sieder-Tate and Gnielinski formulas can be used for the estimation of kerosene heat convection under subcritical conditions, but they are not capable of predicting the phenomenon of heat transfer deterioration. The modified Bae-Kim formula can describe the heat transfer deterioration. In addition, the frictional drag would increase dramatically when the fuel transforms to the supercritical state.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Heat transfer and supercritical fluids · Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Sobel D R, Spadaccini L J. Hydrocarbon fuel cooling technologies for advanced propulsion. J Eng Gas Turb Power, 1997, 119: 344–35110.1115/1.2815581 ↗
2. Hang H, Spadaccini L J, Sobel D R. Fuel-cooled thermal management for advanced aero-engines. J Eng Gas Turb Power, 2004, 126: 284–29310.1115/1.1689361 ↗
3. Yang V. Modeling of supercritical vaporization, mixing and combustion processes in liquid-fueled propulsion system. P Combust Inst, 2000, 28: 925–94210.1016/S0082-0784(00)80299-4 ↗
4. Fan X J, Yu G, Analysis of thermophysical properties of Daqing RP-3 aviation kerosene. J Propul Tech, 2006, 27: 187–192
5. Linne D L, Meyer M L. Evaluation of heat transfer and thermal stability of supercritical JP-7 fuel. AIAA J, 1997: 1–1710.2514/6.1997-3041 ↗
6. Shiralkar, B S, Griffith P. Deterioration in heat transfer to fluids at supercritical pressure and high heat flux. J Heat Transfer, 1969, 91: 27–3610.1115/1.3580115 ↗
7. Pioro I L, Duffey R B. Experimental transfer in supercritical water flowing inside channels (survey). Nucl Eng Des, 2005, 235: 2407–243010.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.05.034 ↗
8. Dang C, Hihara E. In-tube cooling heat transfer of supercritical carbon dioxide, Part1, Experimental measurement. Int J Refrig, 2004, 27: 736–74710.1016/j.ijrefrig.2004.04.018 ↗
9. Wang Y Z, Hua Y X, Meng H. Numerical studies of supercritical turbulent convective heat transfer of cryogenic-propellant methane. J Thermophys Heat Tr, 2010, 24: 490–50010.2514/1.46769 ↗
10. Hu Z H, Chen T K, Luo Y S, et al. Heat transfer to kerosene at supercritical pressure in small-diameter tube with large heat flux. J Chem Ind Eng, 2002, 53: 134–138
11. Zhong F Q, Fan X J, Yu G, et al. Heat transfer of aviation kerosene at supercritical conditions. J Thermophys Heat Tr, 2009, 23: 543–55010.2514/1.41619 ↗
12. Jang C X, Zhong F Q, Fan X J, et al. Experiment on convective heat transfer of aviation kerosene under supercritical pressures. J Propul Tech, 2010, 31: 230–234
13. Li X F, Zhong F Q, Fan X J, et al. Numerical study of convective heat transfer of aviation kerosene flows in pipe at supercritical pressure. J Propul Tech, 2010, 31: 467–472
14. Leach J W, Chappelear P S, Leland T W. Use of molecular shape factors in vapor-liquid equilibrium calculations with the corresponding states principle. AICHE J, 1968, 14: 568–57610.1002/aic.690140407 ↗
15. Yakhot V, Orszag S A. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence: I, basic theory. J Sci Comput, 1986, 1: 1–5110.1007/BF01061451 ↗
16. Wolfstein M. The velocity and temperature distribution of one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient. Int J Heat Mass Tran, 1969, 12: 301–31810.1016/0017-9310(69)90012-X ↗
17. Zhong F Q, Fan X J, Yu G, et al. Thermal cracking of aviation kerosene for scramjet applications. Sci China Tech Sci, 2009, 52: 2644–265210.1007/s11431-009-0090-8 ↗
18. Yamagata K, Nishikawa K, Hasegawa S, et al. Forced convective heat transfer to supercritical water flowing in tubes. Int J Heat Mass Tran, 1972, 15: 2575–259310.1016/0017-9310(72)90148-2 ↗
19. Hua Y X, Wang Y Z, Meng H. A numerical study of supercritical forced convective heat transfer of n-heptane inside a horizontal miniature tube. J Supercrit Fluid, 2010, 52: 36–4610.1016/j.supflu.2009.12.003 ↗
20. Sieder E N, Tate G E. Heat transfer and pressure drop of liquids in tubes. Ind Eng Chem, 1936, 28: 1429–143510.1021/ie50324a027 ↗
21. Incropera F P, Dewitt D P, Bergman T L, et al. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 6th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2007. 297–341
22. Jackson J D, Hall W B. Forced convective heat transfer to fluids at supercritical pressure. In: Kakac S, Spalding D B, eds. Turbulent Forced Convective in Channels and Bundles. New York: Hemisphere, 1979. 563–612
23. Bae Y Y, Kim H Y. Convective heat transfer to CO2 at a supercritical pressure flowing vertically upward in tubes and an annular channel. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 2009, 33: 329–33910.1016/j.expthermflusci.2008.10.002 ↗