Seismic resilient shear wall structures: A state-of-the-art review
Source abstract
Abstract
The ductile design principle has been widely adopted in seismic design of structures, so the main structural components are designed to have the dual functions of bearing and energy dissipation under the earthquake. In recent years, the intensity of major earthquakes occurred in China, Chile, New Zealand, and Japan had reached or exceeded the design level of the maximum credible earthquake. In most cases, the designed structures did not collapse and the casualties were small. However, many structures were seriously damaged and must be overhauled or rebuilt, resulting in huge economic losses. Therefore, researchers have paid more attention to the seismic resilient structures. The shear wall can provide an efficient lateral force resisting capacity and has a wide range of applications in building structures. This review firstly summarized the research advances of seismic resilient shear wall structures, mainly from three aspects: high-performance materials, replaceable components, and hybrid structural systems; then, the development of seismic performance analysis, design methods, and engineering applications of seismic resilient shear wall structures were presented; finally, the key issues that need to be explored in the future research were discussed, which was helpful for the wide application of seismic resilient shear wall structures.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhao B, Taucer F, Rossetto T. Field investigation on the performance of building structures during the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Eng Struct, 2009, 31: 1707–172310.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.039 ↗
2. Lew M, Naeim F, Carpenter L D, et al. The significance of the 27 February 2010 offshore Maule, Chile earthquake. Struct Des Tall Spec Build, 2010, 19: 826–83710.1002/tal.668 ↗
3. Naeim F, Lew M, Carpenter L D, et al. Performance of tall buildings in Santiago, Chile during the 27 February 2010 offshore Maule, Chile earthquake. Struct Des Tall Spec Build, 2011, 20: 1–16
4. Comerio M, Elwood K, Berkowitz R, et al. Learning from earthquakes: The M6.3 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquake of February 22, 2011. Oakland: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) Special Earthquake Report, 2011
5. Zhou F L, Cui H H, Shigataka A B E, et al. Inspection report of the disaster of the East Japan earthquake by Sino-Japanese joint mission. Build Struct, 2012, 42: 1–20
6. Cimellaro G P, Reinhorn A M, Bruneau M. Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Eng Struct, 2010, 32: 3639–364910.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008 ↗
7. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Construction of the People’s Republic of China (MHURC). Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (GB 50011-2010). Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2010
8. Xiang Y, Sheng J B, Wang L, et al. Research progresses on equipment technologies used in safety inspection, repair, and reinforcement for deepwater dams. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 1059–107110.1007/s11431-021-1958-y ↗
9. Lu X, Chen Y, Jiang H. Earthquake resilience of reinforced concrete structural walls with replaceable “fuses”. J Earthq Eng, 2018, 22: 801–82510.1080/13632469.2016.1264330 ↗
10. Lu X, Gong Z, Weng D, et al. The application of a new structural control concept for tall building with large podium structure. Eng Struct, 2007, 29: 1833–184410.1016/j.engstruct.2006.10.008 ↗
11. Almufti I, Krolicki J, Crowther A. The resilience-based design of the 181 Fremont tower. Struct Mag, 2016, 6: 42–46
12. Qian H, Kang L P, Guo Y C, et al. Experimental study on seismic behavior of self-centering shear wall reinforced with shape memory alloy bars and engineered cementitious composites (in Chinese). China Civil Eng J, 2020, 53: 51–61
13. Wang W, Fang C, Liu J. Self-centering beam-to-column connections with combined superelastic SMA bolts and steel angles. J Struct Eng, 2017, 143: 0401617510.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001675 ↗
14. Liu W, Hutchinson T C, Gavras A G, et al. Seismic behavior of frame-wall-rocking foundation systems. I: Test program and slow cyclic results. J Struct Eng, 2015, 141: 0401505910.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001264 ↗
15. Liu W A, Hutchinson T C, Gavras A G, et al. Seismic behavior of frame-wall-rocking foundation systems. II: Dynamic test phase. J Struct Eng, 2015, 141: 0401506010.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001313 ↗
16. Priestley M J N, Sritharan S S, Conley J R, et al. Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building. PCI J, 1999, 44: 42–6710.15554/pcij.11011999.42.67 ↗
17. Nakaki S D, Stanton J F, Sritharan S S. An overview of the PRESSS five-story precast test building. PCI J, 1999, 44: 26–3910.15554/pcij.03011999.26.39 ↗
18. Jangid R S, Datta T K. Seismic behaviour ofbase-isolated buildings: A state-of-the art review. P I Civil Eng-Struct Build, 1995, 110: 186–20310.1680/istbu.1995.27599 ↗
19. Yenidogan C. Earthquake-resilient design of seismically isolated buildings: A review of technology. Vibration, 2021, 4: 602–64710.3390/vibration4030035 ↗
20. ACI. Acceptance criteria for special unbonded post tensioned precast structural walls based on validation tes ting and commentary: ACI ITG 5.1. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute (ACI), 2007
21. Pampanin S, Cattanach A, Haverland G. PRESSS Design Handbook: Seminar Notes. Technical Report. Wellington: New Zealand Concrete Society, 2010
22. Duerig T W, Melton K N, Stoeckel D, et al. Engineering aspects of shape memory alloys. London: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990
23. Fang C, Yam M C H, Ma H W, et al. Tests on superelastic Ni-Ti SMA bars under cyclic tension and direct-shear: Towards practical recentring connections. Mater Struct, 2015, 48: 1013–103010.1617/s11527-013-0212-4 ↗
24. Xiao R, Hou B, Sun Q P, et al. Mechanical behaviors of poly-crystalline NiTi SMAs of various grain sizes under impact loading. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1401–141110.1007/s11431-020-1798-4 ↗
25. Sun Q, Cao B, Iwamoto T, et al. Effect of impact deformation on shape recovery behavior in Fe-Mn-Si shape memory alloy under shape memory training process with cyclic thermo-mechanical loading. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1389–140010.1007/s11431-020-1759-y ↗
26. Wang B, Zhu S Y. Seismic behavior of self-centering reinforced concrete wall enabled by superelastic shape memory alloy bars. Bull Earthq Eng, 2018, 16: 479–50210.1007/s10518-017-0213-8 ↗
27. Wang B, Zhu S Y, Zhao J X, et al. Earthquake resilient RC walls using shape memory alloy bars and replaceable energy dissipating devices. Smart Mater Struct, 2019, 28: 06502110.1088/1361-665X/ab1974 ↗
28. de Almeida J P, Steinmetz M, Rigot F, et al. Shape-memory NiTi alloy rebars in flexural-controlled large-scale reinforced concrete walls: Experimental investigation on self-centring and damage limitation. Eng Struct, 2020, 220: 11086510.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110865 ↗
29. Abraik E, El-Fitiany S F, Youssef M A. Seismic performance of concrete core walls reinforced with shape memory alloy bars. Structures, 2020, 27: 1479–148910.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.053 ↗
30. Ma H W, Cho C D. Feasibility study on a superelastic SMA damper with re-centring capability. Mater Sci Eng-A, 2008, 473: 290–29610.1016/j.msea.2007.04.073 ↗
31. Mirzai N M, Attarnejad R, Hu J W. Experimental investigation of smart shear dampers with re-centering and friction devices. J Build Eng, 2021, 35: 10201810.1016/j.jobe.2020.102018 ↗
32. Fang C, Wang W, Zhang A, et al. Behavior and design of self-centering energy dissipative devices equipped with superelastic SMA ring springs. J Struct Eng, 2019, 145: 0401910910.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002414 ↗
33. Wang W, Fang C, Zhao Y, et al. Self-centering friction spring dampers for seismic resilience. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 2019, 48: 1045–106510.1002/eqe.3174 ↗
34. Fang C, Wang W, He C, et al. Self-centring behaviour of steel and steel-concrete composite connections equipped with NiTi SMA bolts. Eng Struct, 2017, 150: 390–40810.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.067 ↗
35. Li V C. Engineered cementitious composites through micro-mechanical modeling. In: Proceedings of Fiber Reinforced Concrete: Present and the Furture. Montreal: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, 1998
36. Li V C. Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) Bendable Concrete for Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure. Berlin: Springer-Verlag GmbH, 201910.1007/978-3-662-58438-5 ↗
37. Yuan F, Chen M, Zhou F, et al. Behaviors of steel-reinforced ECC columns under eccentric compression. Constr Build Mater, 2018, 185: 402–41310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.100 ↗
38. Maalej M, Quek S T, Ahmed S F U, et al. Review of potential structural applications of hybrid fiber engineered cementitious composites. Constr Build Mater, 2012, 36: 216–22710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.010 ↗
39. Yun H D, Kim S W, Park W S, et al. Shear behavior of strain-hardening cement composite walls under quasi-static cyclic loading. Eng Struct, 2017, 143: 398–40910.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.036 ↗
40. Zhang X, Li B. Seismic performance of RC beam-column joints constructed with engineered cementitious composites. J Struct Eng, 2020, 146: 0402027110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002824 ↗
41. Yang J, Liang S T, Zhu X J, et al. Seismic behavior of precast concrete coupled shear walls with engineered cementitious composite (ECC) in the critical cast-in-place regions. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 1244–125410.1007/s11431-016-9052-2 ↗
42. Deng M K, Yang S. Cyclic testing of unreinforced masonry walls retrofitted with engineered cementitious composites. Constr Build Mater, 2018, 177: 395–40810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.132 ↗
43. Niasar A N, Alaee F J, Zamani S M. Experimental investigation on the performance of unreinforced masonry wall, retrofitted using engineered cementitious composites. Constr Build Mater, 2020, 239: 11778810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117788 ↗
44. Yang X, Xu L, Pan J L. Mechanical behavior of full-scale composite steel plate shear wall restrained by ECC panels. J Build Eng, 2021, 44: 10286410.1016/j.jobe.2021.102864 ↗
45. Hou L J, Xu R, Chen D, et al. Seismic behavior of reinforced engineered cementitious composite members and reinforced concrete/engineered cementitious composite members: A review. Struct Concrete, 2020, 21: 199–21910.1002/suco.201800269 ↗
46. Bai L, Hou C, Cao M W, et al. Cyclic performance of steel moment frames with prefabricated RC and ECC wall panels. Eng Struct, 2021, 242: 11249210.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112492 ↗
47. Kim M K, Kim D J, Chung Y S, et al. Direct tensile behavior of shape-memory-alloy fiber-reinforced cement composites. Constr Build Mater, 2016, 102: 462–47010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.015 ↗
48. Kang L P, Qian H, Guo Y C, et al. Seismic performance of SMA/ECC concrete shear wall with self-centering and self-repairing. In: 17th Biennial International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments (Earth and Space). Virtual Conference, 202110.1061/9780784483381.030 ↗
49. Qian H, Zhang Q Y, Zhang X, et al. Experimental investigation on bending behavior of existing RC beam retrofitted with SMA-ECC composites materials. Materials, 2022, 15: 1210.3390/ma15010012 ↗
50. Ali M A E M, Nehdi M L. Innovative crack-healing hybrid fiber reinforced engineered cementitious composite. Constr Build Mater, 2017, 150: 689–70210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.023 ↗
51. Chen W H, Feng K, Wang Y, et al. Evaluation of self-healing performance of a smart composite material (SMA-ECC). Constr Build Mater, 2021, 290: 12321610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123216 ↗
52. Cui H R, Wu G, Zhang J, et al. Experimental study on damage-controllable rocking walls with resilient corners. Mag Concrete Res, 2019, 71: 1113–112910.1680/jmacr.18.00503 ↗
53. Jiang H, Li S, Bolander J E, et al. Seismic performance of a new type of coupled shear wall with replaceable components: Experimental validation. J Earthq Eng, 2023, 27: 810–83210.1080/13632469.2022.2033353 ↗
54. Lu X L, Chen C, Jiang H J, et al. Shaking table tests and numerical analyses of an RC coupled wall structure with replaceable coupling beams. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 2018, 47: 1882–190410.1002/eqe.3046 ↗
55. Moehle J P. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. New York: Mc Graw Hill Education, 2015
56. Ji X, Wang Y, Ma Q, et al. Cyclic behavior of replaceable steel coupling beams. J Struct Eng, 2017, 143: 0401616910.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001661 ↗
57. Christopoulos C, Montgomery M. Viscoelastic coupling dampers (VCDs) for enhanced wind and seismic performance of high-rise buildings. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 2013, 42: 2217–223310.1002/eqe.2321 ↗
58. Lu Y, Chen W, Xiong F, et al. Seismic performance of a full-scale two-story bolt-connected precast concrete composite wall panel building tested on a shake table. J Struct Eng, 2021, 147: 0402120910.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003183 ↗
59. Jiang H, Qiu H, Sun J, et al. Influence offriction-bearing devices on seismic behavior of PC shear walls with end columns. Eng Struct, 2020, 210: 11029310.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110293 ↗
60. Xu G, Li A Q. Seismic performance and design approach of unbonded post-tensioned precast sandwich wall structures with friction devices. Eng Struct, 2020, 204: 11003710.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110037 ↗
61. Xu L H, Xiao S J, Li Z X. Behaviors and modeling of new self-centering RC wall with improved disc spring devices. J Eng Mech, 2020, 146: 0402010210.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001838 ↗
62. Wu H H, Zhou T H, Liao F F, et al. Seismic behavior ofsteel frames with replaceable reinforced concrete wall panels. Steel Compos Struct, 2017, 22: 1055–107110.12989/scs.2016.22.5.1055 ↗
63. Kurama Y C. Seismic design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls with supplemental viscous damping. ACI Struct J, 2000, 97: 648–658
64. Marriott D, Pampanin S, Bull D K, et al. Dynamic testing ofprecast, post-tensioned rocking wall systems with alternative dissipating solutions. Bull N Z Soc Earthq, 2008, 41: 90–103
65. Yan F, Lu X L. Comparative experimental study of concrete frames with and without supplemental viscous damping walls. J Build Struct, 2005, 26: 8–16
66. Liu W G, Hu L M, Xu H, et al. Mechanical model of displacement amplification damping wall and seismic response analysis of cross-layer damping structure (in Chinese). Eng Mech, 2021, 38: 197–256
67. Sano T, Shirai K, Suzui Y, et al. Dynamic loading tests and seismic response analysis of a stud-type damper composed of multiple friction units with disc springs. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 2020, 49: 1259–128010.1002/eqe.3289 ↗
68. Li A Q. Vibration Control for Building Structures: Theory and Applications. Bern: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 202010.1007/978-3-030-40790-2 ↗
69. Housner G W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 1963, 53: 403–41710.1785/BSSA0530020403 ↗
70. Gajan S. Physical and numerical modeling of nonlinear cyclic load-deformation behavior of shallow foundations supporting rocking shear walls. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Davis: University of California, 2006
71. Gajan S, Kutter B L. Capacity, settlement, and energy dissipation of shallow footings subjected to rocking. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2008, 134: 1129–114110.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:8(1129) ↗
72. Wada A, Qu Z, Ito H, et al. Seismic retrofit using rocking walls and steel dampers. In: Proceedings of ATC/SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures. San Francisco, 200910.1061/41084(364)92 ↗
73. Kurama Y C, Sause R, Pessiki S, et al. Lateral load behavior and seismic design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. ACI Struct J, 1999, 96: 622–632
74. Kurama Y C, Sritharan S, Fleischman R B, et al. Seismic-resistant precast concrete structures: State of the art. J Struct Eng, 2018, 144: 0311800110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001972 ↗
75. Henry R S. Self-centering precast concrete walls for buildings in regions with low to high seismicity. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Auckland: The University of Auckland, 2011
76. Patil S J, Reddy G R. State of art review-base isolation systems for structures. Int J Emerg Tech Adv Eng, 2014, 2: 438–453
77. Li A Q, Ding Y L, Gao Z S. Seismic Design of Engineering Structures. Beijing: China Construction Industry Press, 2010
78. Gajan S, Kutter B L. Effects of moment-to-shear ratio on combined cyclic load-displacement behavior of shallow foundations from centrifuge experiments. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2009, 135: 1044–105510.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000034 ↗
79. Zhou Y, Lu X L. State-of-the-art on rocking and self-centering structures (in Chinese). J Build Struct, 2011, 32: 1–10
80. Hashemi A, Zarnani P, Masoudnia R, et al. Seismic resistant rocking coupled walls with innovative Resilient Slip Friction (RSF) joints. J Constr Steel Res, 2017, 129: 215–22610.1016/j.jcsr.2016.11.016 ↗
81. Nielsen G M, Almufti I, Mahin S A. Performance of rocking core walls in tall buildings under severe seismic motions. In: Proceedings of the 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Ottawa, 2010
82. Toranzo L A, Restrepo J I, Mander J B, et al. Shake-table tests of confined-masonry rocking walls with supplementary hysteretic damping. J Earthq Eng, 2009, 13: 882–89810.1080/13632460802715040 ↗
83. Wu S J, Pan P, Nie X, et al. Experimental investigation on reparability of an infilled rocking wall frame structure. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 2017, 46: 2777–279210.1002/eqe.2930 ↗
84. Loo W Y, Kun C, Quenneville P, et al. Experimental testing of a rocking timber shear wall with slip-friction connectors. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 2014, 43: 1621–163910.1002/eqe.2413 ↗
85. Blomgren H E, Pei S, Jin Z, et al. Full-scale shake table testing of cross-laminated timber rocking shear walls with replaceable components. J Struct Eng, 2019, 145: 0401911510.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002388 ↗
86. Kurama Y C, Sause R, Pessiki S, et al. Seismic response evaluation of unbonded post-tensioned precast walls. ACI Struct J, 2002, 99: 641–651
87. Sritharan S, Aaleti S, Henry R S, et al. Precast concrete wall with end columns (PreWEC) for earthquake resistant design. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 2015, 44: 2075–209210.1002/eqe.2576 ↗
88. Holden T, Restrepo J, Mander J B. Seismic performance of precast reinforced and prestressed concrete walls. J Struct Eng, 2003, 129: 286–29610.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:3(286) ↗
89. Restrepo J I, Rahman A. Seismic performance of self-centering structural walls incorporating energy dissipators. J Struct Eng, 2007, 133: 1560–157010.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1560) ↗
90. Guo T, Wang L, Xu Z, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of jointed self-centering concrete walls with friction connectors. Eng Struct, 2018, 161: 192–20610.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.028 ↗
91. Kurama Y C. Simplified seismic design approach for friction-damped unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. ACI Struct J, 2001, 98: 705–716
92. Deng K, Pan P, Wu S. Experimental study on a self-centering coupling beam eliminating the beam elongation effect. Struct Des Tall Spec Build, 2016, 25: 265–27710.1002/tal.1257 ↗
93. Kurama Y C, Shen Q. Posttensioned hybrid coupled walls under lateral loads. J Struct Eng, 2004, 130: 297–30910.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(297) ↗
94. Lu X L, Yang B Y, Zhao B. Shake-table testing of a self-centering precast reinforced concrete frame with shear walls. Earthq Eng Eng Vib, 2018, 17: 221–23310.1007/s11803-018-0436-y ↗
95. Henry R S, Zhou Y, Lu Y, et al. Shake-table test of a two-storey low-damage concrete wall building. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 2021, 50: 3160–318310.1002/eqe.3504 ↗
96. Dowden D M, Bruneau M. Dynamic shake-table testing and analytical investigation of self-centering steel plate shear walls. J Struct Eng, 2016, 142: 0401608210.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001547 ↗
97. Dowden D M, Purba R, Bruneau M. Behavior of self-centering steel plate shear walls and design considerations. J Struct Eng, 2012, 138: 11–2110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000424 ↗
98. Wight G D, Ingham J M, Kowalsky M J. Shake table testing of rectangular post-tensioned concrete masonry walls. ACI Struct J, 2006, 103: 587–595
99. Kalliontzis D, Schultz A E, Sritharan S. Unbonded post-tensioned structural masonry wall with rubber interface for limited-damage systems. J Struct Eng, 2021, 148: 0402122310.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003159 ↗
100. Ganey R, Berman J, Akbas T, et al. Experimental investigation of self-centering cross-laminated timber walls. J Struct Eng, 2017, 143: 0401713510.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001877 ↗