journal article·2014-09

Damage detection of long-span bridges using stress influence lines incorporated control charts

ZhiWei Chen, QinLin Cai, Ying Lei, SongYe Zhu

Publisher page

Abstract

Numerous long-span bridges have been built throughout the world in recent years. These bridges are progressively damaged by continuous usage throughout their long service life. The failure of local structural components is detrimental to the performance of the entire bridge, furthermore, detecting the local abnormality at an early stage is difficult. This paper explores a novel damage detection method for long-span bridges by incorporating stress influence lines (SILs) in control charts, and validates the efficacy of the method through a case study of the Tsing Ma Suspension Bridge. Damage indices based on SILs are subsequently proposed and applied to hypothetical damage scenarios in which one or two critical bridge components are subjected to severe damage. The comparison study suggests that the first-order difference of SIL change is an accurate indicator for location of the damage. To some extent, different levels of damage can be quantified by using SILs incorporating with X-bar control chart. Results of this study indicate that the proposed SIL-based method offers a promising technique for damage detection in long-span bridges.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen Z W, Xu Y L, Wong K Y. Fatigue analysis of long-span suspension bridges under multiple loading: Case study. Eng Struct, 2011, 33: 3246–325610.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.027 ↗
2. Wang S S, Ren Q W. Relationship between local damage and structural dynamic behavior. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 3257–326210.1007/s11431-012-5032-1 ↗
3. Zheng F G, Wu Z R, Gu C S, et al. A plastic damage model for concrete structure cracks with two damage variables. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 2971–298010.1007/s11431-012-4983-6 ↗
4. Doebling S W, Farrar C R, Prime M B. A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock Vib Digest, 1998, 30: 91–10510.1177/058310249803000201 ↗
5. Sohn H, Farrar C, Hunter N F, et al. Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques. J Dynam Syst, Measur Control, Trans ASME, 2001, 123: 706–71110.1115/1.1410933 ↗
6. Fan W, Qiao P. Vibration-based damage identification methods: A review and comparative study. Struct Health Monit, 2001, 10: 83–11110.1177/1475921710365419 ↗
7. Heylen W, Lammens S, Sas P P. Modal Analysis Theory and Testing. Depart Mech Eng Kath Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 1998
8. Maia N M M, Silva J M M, Almas E A M, et al. Damage detection in structures: From mode shapes to frequency response function methods. Mech Syst Signal Proc, 2003, 17: 489–49810.1006/mssp.2002.1506 ↗
9. Shi Z Y, Law S S. Structural damage localization from modal strain energy change. J Sound Vib, 1998, 218: 825–84410.1006/jsvi.1998.1878 ↗
10. Huang T J, Liang Z, Lee G C. Structural damage detection using energy transfer ratios (ETR). In: Proc 14th International Modal Analysis Conference. Dearborn, Michigan, USA, 1995
11. Pandey A K, Biswas M. Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility. J Sound Vib, 1994, 169: 3–1710.1006/jsvi.1994.1002 ↗
12. Li H J, Zhang M, Wang J R, et al. Fundamental modeling issues on benchmark structure for structural health monitoring. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 52: 1999–2008
13. Fei Q G, Li A Q, Han X L, et al. Modal identification of long-span Runyang Bridge using ambient responses recorded by SHMS. Sci China Tech Sci, 2009, 52: 3632–363910.1007/s11431-009-0360-5 ↗
14. Yi T H, Li H N, Gu M. Full-scale measurements of dynamic response of suspension bridge subjected to environmental loads using GPS technology. Sci China Tech Sci, 2010, 53: 469–47910.1007/s11431-010-0051-2 ↗
15. Lei Y, Jiang Y Q, Xu Z Q. Structural damage detection with limited input and output measurement signals. Mech Syst Signal Proc, 2012, 28: 229–24310.1016/j.ymssp.2011.07.026 ↗
16. Lei Y, He M Y. Identification of the nonlinear properties of rubber-bearings in base-isolated buildings with limited seismic response data. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 1224–123110.1007/s11431-013-5196-3 ↗
17. Chen B, Xu Y L. A new damage index for detecting sudden change of structural stiffness. Int J Struct Eng Mech, 2007, 26: 315–34110.12989/sem.2007.26.3.315 ↗
18. Yi T H, Li H N, Gu M. Wavelet based multi-step filtering method for bridge health monitoring using GPS and accelerometer. Smart Struc Syst, 2013, 11: 331–34810.12989/sss.2013.11.4.331 ↗
19. Yi T H, Li H N, Sun H N. Multi-stage structural damage diagnosis method based on “energy-damage” theory. Smart Struc Syst, 2013, 12: 345–36110.12989/sss.2013.12.3_4.345 ↗
20. Zhu S, He W Y, Ren W X. Adaptive-scale damage detection for frame structures using beam-type wavelet finite element: Experimental validation. Earthq Tsunam, 2013, 7: 135002410.1142/S1793431113500243 ↗
21. Chen B, Chen Z W, Wang G J, et al. Damage detection on sudden stiffness reduction based on discrete wavelet transform. Sci World J, 2014, 2014: 1–16
22. Sanayei M, Onipede O. Damage assessment of structures using static test data. AIAA J, 1991, 29: 1174–117910.2514/3.10720 ↗
23. Yeo I, Shin S, Lee H S, et al. Statistical damage assessment of framed structures from static response. J Eng Mech-ASCE, 2000, 126: 414–42110.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:4(414) ↗
24. Zhao L, Shenton H W. Structural damage detection using best approximated dead load approximation. Struct Health Monit, 2005, 4: 319–33910.1177/1475921705057967 ↗
25. Shenton H W, Hu X. Damage identification based on dead load distribution: Methodology. J Struct Eng-ASCE, 2006, 132: 1254–126310.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:8(1254) ↗
26. Hua X G, Ni Y Q, Chen Z Q, et al. Structural damage detection of cable-stayed bridges using changes in cable forces and model updating. J Struct Eng-ASCE, 2009, 135: 1093–110610.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:9(1093) ↗
27. Zaurin R, Catbas F N. Integration of computer imaging and sensor data for structural health monitoring of bridges. Smart Mater Struct, 2000, 19: 1–15
28. Sohn H, Czarnecki J A, Farrar C R. Structural health monitoring using statistical process control. J Struct Eng-ASCE, 2000, 126: 1356–136310.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:11(1356) ↗
29. Zonta D, Lanaro A, Zanon P. A strain-flexibility-based approach to damage location. Key Eng Mater, 2003, 245–246: 87–9610.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.245-246.87 ↗
30. Sim S, Spencer B F, Nagayama T. Multimetric sensing for structural damage detection. J Eng Mech-ASCE, 2011, 137: 22–3010.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000199 ↗
31. Montgomery D C. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. 4th ed. Singapore: John Wiley and Sons, 2004
32. Montgomery D C. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. New York: Wiley, 1997
33. Chen Z W, Zhu S, Xu Y L, et al. Damage detection for local components of long suspension bridges using influence lines. In: the 6th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management-IABMAS2012, Stresa, Italy, 2012
34. Xu Y L, Ko J M, Zhang W S. Vibration studies of Tsing Ma Suspension Bridge. J Bridge Eng-ASCE, 1997, 2: 149–15610.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1997)2:4(149) ↗
35. Liu T T, Xu Y L, Zhang W S, et al. Buffeting-Induced stresses in a long suspension bridge: Structural health monitoring orientated stress analysis. Wind Struct Int J, 2009, 12: 479–50410.12989/was.2009.12.6.479 ↗