A robust and efficient structural reliability method combining radial-based importance sampling and Kriging
Source abstract
Abstract
Simulation based structural reliability analysis suffers from a heavy computational burden, as each sample needs to be evaluated on the performance function, where structural analysis is performed. To alleviate the computational burden, related research focuses mainly on reduction of samples and application of surrogate model, which substitutes the performance function. However, the reduction of samples is achieved commonly at the expense of loss of robustness, and the construction of surrogate model is computationally expensive. In view of this, this paper presents a robust and efficient method in the same direction. The present method uses radial-based importance sampling (RBIS) to reduce samples without loss of robustness. Importantly, Kriging is fully used to efficiently implement RBIS. It not only serves as a surrogate to classify samples as we all know, but also guides the procedure to determine the optimal radius, with which RBIS would reduce samples to the highest degree. When used as a surrogate, Kriging is established through active learning, where the previously evaluated points to determine the optimal radius are reused. The robustness and efficiency of the present method are validated by five representative examples, where the present method is compared mainly with two fundamental reliability methods based on active learning Kriging.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Optimal Experimental Design Methods · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Wu Z, Deng J, Su C, et al. Performance of the micro-texture selflubricating and pulsating heat pipe self-cooling tools in dry cutting process. Int J Refract Met H, 2014, 45: 238–24810.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.02.004 ↗
2. Schueller G I. Efficient Monte Carlo simulation procedures in structural uncertainty and reliability analysis—Recent advances. Struct Eng Mech, 2009, 32: 1–2010.12989/sem.2009.32.1.001 ↗
3. Melchers R E. Importance sampling in structural systems. Struct Saf, 1989, 6: 3–1010.1016/0167-4730(89)90003-9 ↗
4. Harbitz A. An efficient sampling method for probability of failure calculation. Struct Saf, 1986, 3: 109–11510.1016/0167-4730(86)90012-3 ↗
5. Grooteman F. Adaptive radial-based importance sampling method for structural reliability. Struct Saf, 2008, 30: 533–54210.1016/j.strusafe.2007.10.002 ↗
6. Zhou G, Duan L B, Zhao W Z, et al. An enhanced hybrid and adaptive meta-model based global optimization algorithm for engineering optimization problems. Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 1147–115510.1007/s11431-016-6068-4 ↗
7. Bucher C G, Bourgund U. A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems. Struct Saf, 1990, 7: 57–6610.1016/0167-4730(90)90012-E ↗
8. Han X, Jiang C, Liu L X, et al. Response-surface-based structural reliability analysis with random and interval mixed uncertainties. Sci China Tech Sci, 2014, 57: 1322–133410.1007/s11431-014-5581-6 ↗
9. Papadrakakis M, Papadopoulos V, Lagaros N D. Structural reliability analyis of elastic-plastic structures using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng, 1996, 136: 145–16310.1016/0045-7825(96)01011-0 ↗
10. Hurtado J E, Alvarez D A. Classification approach for reliability analysis with stochastic finite-element modeling. J Struct Eng, 2003, 129: 1141–114910.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1141) ↗
11. Dai H, Zhang B, Wang W. A multiwavelet support vector regression method for efficient reliability assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2015, 136: 132–13910.1016/j.ress.2014.12.002 ↗
12. Kaymaz I. Application of Kriging method to structural reliability problems. Struct Saf, 2005, 27: 133–15110.1016/j.strusafe.2004.09.001 ↗
13. Dubourg V, Sudret B, Deheeger F. Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis. Probabilist Eng Mech, 2013, 33: 47–5710.1016/j.probengmech.2013.02.002 ↗
14. Jones D R, Schonlau M, Welch W J. Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Glob Optim, 1998, 13: 455–49210.1023/A:1008306431147 ↗
15. Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M. AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Saf, 2011, 33: 145–15410.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002 ↗
16. Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M, et al. A combined importance sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2013, 111: 232–24010.1016/j.ress.2012.10.008 ↗
17. Hasofer A M, Lind N C. An exact and invariant first-order reliability format. ASCE J Eng Mech, 1974, 100: 111–121
18. Cadini F, Santos F, Zio E. An improved adaptive Kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability. Reliab Eng Syst Safet, 2014, 131: 109–11710.1016/j.ress.2014.06.023 ↗
19. Zhao H, Yue Z, Liu Y, et al. An efficient reliability method combining adaptive importance sampling and Kriging metamodel. Appl Math Model, 2015, 39: 1853–186610.1016/j.apm.2014.10.015 ↗
20. Tong C, Sun Z, Zhao Q, et al. A hybrid algorithm for reliability analysis combining Kriging and subset simulation importance sampling. J Mech Sci Technol, 2015, 29: 3183–319310.1007/s12206-015-0717-6 ↗
21. Zhang L, Lu Z, Wang P. Efficient structural reliability analysis method based on advanced Kriging model. Appl Math Model, 2015, 39: 781–79310.1016/j.apm.2014.07.008 ↗
22. Fauriat W, Gayton N. AK-SYS: An adaptation of the AK-MCS method for system reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2014, 123: 137–14410.1016/j.ress.2013.10.010 ↗
23. Sacks J, Welch W J, Mitchell T J, et al. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist Sci, 1989, 4: 409–42310.1214/ss/1177012413 ↗
24. Nie J, Ellingwood B R. Directional methods for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf, 2000, 22: 233–24910.1016/S0167-4730(00)00014-X ↗
25. Liu P L, Der Kiureghian A. Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances. Probabilist Eng Mech, 1986, 1: 105–11210.1016/0266-8920(86)90033-0 ↗
26. Au S K, Beck J L. A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations. Struct Saf, 1999, 21: 135–15810.1016/S0167-4730(99)00014-4 ↗
27. Engelund S, Rackwitz R. A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability. Struct Saf, 1993, 12: 255–27610.1016/0167-4730(93)90056-7 ↗
28. Mao H, Mahadevan S. Reliability analysis of creep-fatigue failure. Int J Fatigue, 2000, 22: 789–79710.1016/S0142-1123(00)00046-3 ↗
29. Borri A, Speranzini E. Structural reliability analysis using a standard deterministic finite element code. Struct Saf, 1997, 19: 361–38210.1016/S0167-4730(97)00017-9 ↗
30. Zhao G F. Reliability Theory and Its Applications for Engineering Structures (in Chinese). Dalian: Dalian University of Technology Press, 1996