journal article·2012-08

Experimental and numerical studies on the prediction of bendability limit of QSTE340 welded tube in NC bending process

He Yang, Ning Ren, Mei Zhan, ZhiYong Zhang, YaTao Qin, HaoMin Jiang, KeShan Diao, XinPing Chen

Publisher page

Abstract

For a low carbon steel tube with small wall factor D/t and bending radius R, the over-thinning induced localized necking is one dominant failure in tube numerical control (NC) bending process, which strongly restricts the bendability limit of the tube. In addition, the deterioration of bendability of a tube is increased by the existence of the weak weld region. Therefore, an important issue is how to determinate and predict the welded tube bendability limit. In the present study, a finite element (FE) model with weld and subdivided heat affected zones under ABAQUS platform is employed to explore the deformation behaviors of welded tube NC bending. A localized necking criterion based on the critical thickness thinning is used to predict the critical principal strains, critical bending radius and burst location during the forming process. It is found that the failures always occur at the rigid supporting point of mandrel flexible balls near the tangent point at the outside of the bend, where the wall thickness of the tube is the lowest. The bending limit curves (BLCs) of the QSTE340 welded tube are obtained by shifting the standard shaped forming limit curve to the critical principal strains along the major strain axis. Comparison between the numerical and experimental results has shown that the BLC and critical bending radius predictions agree well with the experimental results. In addition, the effect of weld positions on BLC is discussed, the weld region shows an almost negligible effect on the forming limit at a non-critical location that is far away from the outside of the bend. However, when the weld is at the large tensile deformation region on the outside of the bend, a decrease of the forming limit strains is seen.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Kim J, Kim Y W, Kang B S, et al. Finite element analysis for bursting failure prediction in bulge forming of a seamed tube. Finite Elem Anal Des, 2004, 40: 953–96610.1016/j.finel.2003.05.003 ↗
2. Yan J, Yang H, Zhan M, et al. Forming limits under multi-index constraints in NC bending of aluminum alloy thin-walled tubes with large diameters. Sci China Tech Sci, 2010, 53: 326–34210.1007/s11431-009-0331-x ↗
3. Lee J W, Kwon H C, Rhee M H, et al. Determination of forming limit of a structural aluminum tube in rubber pad bending. J Mater Process Technol, 2003, 140: 487–49310.1016/S0924-0136(03)00775-1 ↗
4. Yang H, Lin Y. Wrinkling analysis for forming limit of tube bending processes. J Mater Process Technol, 2004, 152: 363–36910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.410 ↗
5. Keeler S P, Backofen W A. Plastic instability and fracture in sheets stretched over rigid punches. Trans ASM, 1963, 56: 25–48
6. Goodwin G M. Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming problems in the press shop. SAE, Paper No. 680093, 196810.4271/680093 ↗
7. Keeler S P, Brazier W G. Relationship between laboratory material characterization and press shop formability. In: Proceedings of Microalloying 75, New York, 1977. 517–530
8. Khodayari G. Bending limit curve for rotary draw bending of tubular components in automotive hydroforming applications. Int J Mater Manuf, 2009, 1: 841–84810.1021/am8002445 ↗
9. Hwang Y M, Lin Y K, Chuang H C. Forming limit diagrams of tubular materials by bulge tests. J Mater Process Technol, 2009, 209: 5024–503410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.01.026 ↗
10. Assempour A, Hashemi R, Abrinia K, et al. A methodology for prediction of forming limit stress diagrams considering the strain path effect. Comput Mater Sci, 2009, 45: 195–20410.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.025 ↗
11. Kumar S, Date P P, Narasimhan K. A new criterion to predict necking failure under biaxial stretching. J Mater Process Technol, 1994, 45: 583–58810.1016/0924-0136(94)90402-2 ↗
12. Narayanan R G, Narasimhan K. Predicting the forming limit strains of tailor-welded blanks. J Strain Anal Eng, 2008, 43: 551–56310.1243/03093247JSA445 ↗
13. Narasimhan K, Wagoner R H. Finite element modeling simulation of in-plane forming limit diagrams of sheets containing finite defects. Metall Trans A, 1991, 22A: 2655–266510.1007/BF02851359 ↗
14. Kim H S, Koç M, Ni J, et al. Finite element modeling and analysis of warm forming of aluminum alloys-validation through comparisons with experiments and determination of a failure criterion. J Manuf Sci Eng, 2006, 128: 613–62110.1115/1.2194065 ↗
15. Ozturk F, Lee D. Analysis of forming limits using ductile fracture criteria. J Mater Process Technol, 2004, 147: 397–40410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.01.014 ↗
16. Li H, Fu M W, Lu J, et al. Ductile fracture: Experiments and computations. Int J Plasticity, 2011, 27: 147–18010.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.001 ↗
17. Zhan M, Gu C G, Jiang Z Q, et al. Application of ductile fracture criteria in spin-forming and tube-bending processes. Comput Mater Sci, 2009, 47: 353–36510.1016/j.commatsci.2009.08.011 ↗
18. Anand D, Chen D L, Bhole S D, et al. Fatigue behavior of tailor (laser)-welded blanks for automotive applications. Mater Sci Eng A, 2006, 420: 199–20710.1016/j.msea.2006.01.075 ↗
19. Barlat F. Crystallographic texture, anisotropic yield surfaces and forming limits of sheet metals. Mater Sci Eng, 1987, 91: 55–7210.1016/0025-5416(87)90283-7 ↗
20. Narayanan R G, Narasimhan K. Influence of the weld conditions on the forming-limit strains of tailor-welded blanks. J Strain Anal Eng, 2008, 43: 217–22710.1243/03093247JSA344 ↗
21. Zhan M, Du H F, Liu J, et al. A method for establishing the plastic constitutive relationship of the weld bead and heat-affected zone of welded tubes based on the rule of mixtures and a microhardness test. Mater Sci Eng A, 2010, 527: 2864–287410.1016/j.msea.2010.01.009 ↗
22. Naik B S, Janaki Ramulu P, Narayanan R G. Application of a few necking criteria in predicting the forming limit of unwelded and tailor-welded blanks. J Strain Anal Eng, 2009, 45: 79–9610.1243/03093247JSA562 ↗
23. Murata M, Kuboki T, Takahashi K, et al. Effect of hardening exponent on tube bending. J Mater Process Technol, 2008, 201: 189–19210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.286 ↗
24. Zhan M, Jiang Z Q, Yang H, et al. Numerically controlled bending performance of medium strength TA18 titanium alloy tubes under different die sets. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 841–85210.1007/s11431-010-4241-8 ↗
25. Ahmadi S, Eivani A R, Akbarzadeh A. Experimental and analytical studies on the prediction of forming limit diagrams. Comput Mater Sci, 2009, 44: 1252–125710.1016/j.commatsci.2008.08.008 ↗