journal article·2020-12

Improvements to machining surface quality by controlling the flow direction of electrolyte during electrochemical sinking and milling of titanium alloy

Yang Liu, NingSong Qu

Publisher page

Abstract

Electrochemical milling is eminently suitable for machining aerospace parts (which usually have complex structures) because of its great flexibility. However, titanium alloys are particularly sensitive to changes in the flow field, which often cause severe pitting corrosion of the machined surface. Although electrochemical sinking and milling (ESM) can restrict the flow of electrolyte and reduce pitting corrosion, the quality of the machined surface is not ideal because the latter are susceptible to stray corrosion. To reduce such corrosion and improve the surface quality, the internal flow channel of the tool electrode and the cutting depth were investigated thoroughly. Extensive experiments revealed that stray corrosion could be reduced significantly and surface quality improved by controlling the electrolyte flow direction in the machining area, which was achieved by changing the style of the internal flow channel of the tool electrode. These reductions in corrosion and surface roughness were achieved using a tool electrode with a triangular internal flow channel. In addition, the main components and micro-hardness of the machined surface were close to that of the TB6 titanium alloy substrate, which helped to maintain the inherent high strength of the titanium alloy. The surface of the workpiece changed from being hydrophilic to being hydrophobic, which reduced the flow resistance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Hu X, Zhu D, Li J, et al. Flow field research on electrochemical machining with gas film insulation. J Mater Processing Tech, 2018, 267: 247–25610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.12.019 ↗
2. Zhu D, Gu Z, Xue T, et al. Flow field design in electrochemical machining of diffuser. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 42: 121–12410.1016/j.procir.2016.02.205 ↗
3. Zhu Z, Wang D, Bao J, et al. Cathode design and experimental study on the rotate-print electrochemical machining of revolving parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2015, 80: 1957–196310.1007/s00170-015-7172-5 ↗
4. Klocke F, Klink A, Veselovac D, et al. Turbomachinery component manufacture by application of electrochemical, electro-physical and photonic processes. CIRP Ann, 2014, 63: 703–72610.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.004 ↗
5. Ge Y C, Zhu Z, Ma Z, et al. Large allowance electrochemical turning of revolving parts using a universal cylindrical electrode. J Mater Process Tech, 2018, 258: 89–9610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.03.013 ↗
6. Wang H, Zhu D, Liu J. Improving the accuracy of the blade leading/trailing edges by electrochemical machining with tangential feeding. CIRP Ann, 2019, 68: 165–16810.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.107 ↗
7. Wang D, Zhu Z, He B, et al. Counter-rotating electrochemical machining of a combustor casing part using a frustum cone-like cathode tool. J Manufact Processes, 2018, 35: 614–62310.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.016 ↗
8. Wang X, Qu N, Guo P, et al. Electrochemical machining properties of the laser rapid formed inconel 718 alloy in NaNO3 solution. J Electrochem Soc, 2017, 164: E548–E55910.1149/2.1221714jes ↗
9. Wang X, Qu N, Fang X. Reducing stray corrosion in jet electrochemical milling by adjusting the jet shape. J Mater Process Tech, 2019, 264: 240–24810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.09.017 ↗
10. Hinduja S, Pattavanitch J. Experimental and numerical investigations in electro-chemical milling. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 12: 79–89
11. Mitchell-Smith J, Speidel A, Gaskell J, et al. Energy distribution modulation by mechanical design for electrochemical jet processing techniques. Int J Machine Tools Manufacture, 2017, 122: 32–4610.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.05.005 ↗
12. Mitchell-Smith J, Speidel A, Clare A T. Advancing electrochemical jet methods through manipulation of the angle ofaddress. J Mater Process Tech, 2018, 255: 364–37210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.12.026 ↗
13. Liu Y, Qu N. Electrochemical Milling of TB6 Titanium Alloy in NaNO3 Solution. J Electrochem Soc, 2019, 166: E35–E4910.1149/2.1181902jes ↗
14. Liu Y, Qu N. Obtaining high surface quality in electrolyte jet machining TB6 titanium alloy via enhanced product transport. J Mater Process Tech, 2020, 276: 11638110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116381 ↗
15. Liu W, Ao S, Li Y, et al. Effect of anodic behavior on electrochemical machining of TB6 titanium alloy. Electrochim Acta, 2017, 233: 190–20010.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.025 ↗
16. Liu W, Luo Z, Li Y, et al. Investigation on parametric effects on groove profile generated on Ti1023 titanium alloy by jet electrochemical machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 100: 2357–237010.1007/s00170-018-2804-1 ↗
17. Liu W, Ao S, Li Y, et al. Jet electrochemical machining of TB6 titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2017, 90: 2397–240910.1007/s00170-016-9500-9 ↗
18. Speidel A, Mitchell-Smith J, Bisterov I, et al. Oscillatory behaviour in the electrochemical jet processing of titanium. J Mater Process Tech, 2019, 273: 11626410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116264 ↗
19. Mishra K, Dey D, Sarkar B R, et al. Experimental investigation into electrochemical milling of Ti6Al4V. J Manufact Processes, 2017, 29: 113–12310.1016/j.jmapro.2017.07.014 ↗
20. Van Camp D, Bouquet J, Qian J, et al. Investigation on hybrid mechano-electrochemical milling of Ti6Al4V. Procedia CIRP, 2018, 68: 156–16110.1016/j.procir.2017.12.158 ↗
21. Wang F, Zhao J, Lv Y, et al. Electrochemical machining of deep narrow slits on TB6 titanium alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2017, 92: 3063–307110.1007/s00170-017-0392-0 ↗
22. Yao J, Chen Z T, Nie Y J, et al. Investigation on the electrochemical machining by using metal reinforced double insulating layer cathode. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2017, 89: 2031–204010.1007/s00170-016-9196-x ↗
23. Speidel A, Mitchell-Smith J, Walsh D A, et al. Electrolyte jet machining of titanium alloys using novel electrolyte solutions. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 42: 367–37210.1016/j.procir.2016.02.200 ↗
24. Liu G, Luo H, Zhang Y, et al. Pulse electrochemical machining of large lead ball nut raceway using a spherical cathode. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2016, 85: 191–20010.1007/s00170-015-7937-x ↗
25. Luo H, Liu G, Zhang Y, et al. Flow field design and experiments on pulse ECM of large-lead ball nut raceway during tool cutting-out stage. Procedia CIRP, 2018, 68: 690–69310.1016/j.procir.2017.12.138 ↗
26. Zhang C, Zhang Y, Chen X, et al. Investigation on the ECM cut-in of large-lead ball nut raceway. Procedia CIRP, 2018, 68: 731–73410.1016/j.procir.2017.12.136 ↗
27. Li H, Niu S, Zhang Q, et al. Investigation of material removal in inner-jet electrochemical grinding of GH4169 alloy. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 348210.1038/s41598-017-03770-1 ↗
28. Niu S, Qu N, Fu S, et al. Investigation of inner-jet electrochemical milling of nickel-based alloy GH4169/Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2017, 93: 2123–213210.1007/s00170-017-0680-8 ↗
29. Niu S, Qu N, Li H. Investigation of electrochemical mill-grinding using abrasive tools with bottom insulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 97: 1371–138210.1007/s00170-018-2043-5 ↗
30. Niu S, Qu N, Yue X, et al. Effect oftool-sidewall outlet hole design on machining performance in electrochemical mill-grinding of Inconel 718. J Manufact Processes, 2019, 41: 10–2210.1016/j.jmapro.2019.03.027 ↗
31. Li H, Fu S, Zhang Q, et al. Simulation and experimental investigation of inner-jet electrochemical grinding of GH4169 alloy. Chin J Aeronautics, 2018, 31: 608–61610.1016/j.cja.2017.08.014 ↗
32. Yue X, Qu N, Niu S, et al. Improving the machined bottom surface in electrochemical mill-grinding by adjusting the electrolyte flow field. J Mater Process Tech, 2020, 276: 11641310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116413 ↗
33. Liu Y, Qu N. Investigation on the performance of macro electrochemical machining of the end face of cylindrical parts. Int J Mech Sci, 2020, 169: 10533310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105333 ↗
34. Ge Y C, Zhu Z, Ma Z, et al. Tool design and experimental study on electrochemical turning ofnickel-based cast superalloy. J Electrochem Soc, 2018, 165: E162–E17010.1149/2.0371805jes ↗
35. Yang X, Breedveld V, Choi W T, et al. Underwater curvature-driven transport between oil droplets on patterned substrates. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10: 15258–1526910.1021/acsami.8b02413 ↗
36. Choi W T, Yang X, Breedveld V, et al. Creation ofwettability contrast patterns on metallic surfaces via pen drawn masks. Appl Surf Sci, 2017, 426: 1241–124810.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.215 ↗
37. Yang X, Liu X, Lu Y, et al. Controllable water adhesion and anisotropic sliding on patterned superhydrophobic surface for droplet manipulation. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120: 7233–724010.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02067 ↗
38. Poole W J, Ashby M F, Fleck N A. Micro-hardness of annealed and work-hardened copper polycrystals. Scripta Mater, 1996, 34: 559–56410.1016/1359-6462(95)00524-2 ↗
39. Paris S, Schwendicke F, Seddig S, et al. Micro-hardness and mineral loss ofenamel lesions after infiltration with various resins: Influence of infiltrant composition and application frequency in vitro. J Dentistry, 2013, 41: 543–54810.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.006 ↗
40. Li A, Zhu Z, Liu Y, et al. Ultrasound-assisted electrodeposition of Fe-Ni film for OLED mask. Mater Res Bull, 2020, 127: 11084510.1016/j.materresbull.2020.110845 ↗