Model predictions for behaviors of sand-nonplastic-fines mixturesusing equivalent-skeleton void-ratio state index
Source abstract
Abstract
It is a challenge to suggest a constitutive model for describing the stress-strain behavior of sand-fines mixtures due to that these granular mixtures exhibited very complex behaviors at different densities, pressures and fines contents. In this study, an elastoplastic constitutive model within the framework of the bounding surface plasticity and critical state theories was proposed for sand-nonplastic-fines mixtures by using the concept of the equivalent-skeleton void ratio and equivalent-skeleton void-ratio state index. The proposed model with a set of material constants calibrated from a few tests could be used to model the fines-dependent and state-dependent behaviors of the sand-nonplastic-fines mixture including the strain-softening and volumetric-expansion behaviors in the drained triaxial compression tests, and also the effects of fines content on the critical state lines in both the deviatoric stress versus mean effective stress and the void ratio versus mean effective stress planes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. Pitman T D, Robertson P K, Sego D C. Influence of fines on the collapse of loose sands. Can Geotech J, 1994, 31: 728–73910.1139/t94-084 ↗
2. Thevanayagam S, Mohan S. Intergranular state variables and stressstrain behaviour of silty sands. Géotechnique, 2000, 50: 1–2310.1680/geot.2000.50.1.1 ↗
3. Salgado R, Bandini P, Karim A. Shear strength and stiffness of silty sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2000, 126: 451–46210.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:5(451) ↗
4. Chu J, Leong W K. Effect of fines on instability behaviour of loose sand. Géotechnique, 2002, 52: 751–75510.1680/geot.2002.52.10.751 ↗
5. Ni Q, Dasari G R, Tan T S. Equivalent granular void ratio for characterization of Singapore’s old alluvium. Can Geotech J, 2006, 43: 563–57310.1139/t06-023 ↗
6. Yang S L, Sandven R, Grande L. Steady-state lines of sand-silt mixtures. Can Geotech J, 2006, 43: 1213–121910.1139/t06-069 ↗
7. Rahman M M, Lo S R, Baki M A L. Equivalent granular state parameter and undrained behaviour of sand-fines mixtures. Acta Geotech, 2011, 6: 183–19410.1007/s11440-011-0145-4 ↗
8. Xiao Y, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Strength and dilatancy of silty sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2014, 140: 0601400710.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001136 ↗
9. Seed H B, Idriss I M, Arango I. Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng, 1983, 109: 458–48210.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:3(458) ↗
10. Thevanayagam S, Shenthan T, Mohan S, et al. Undrained fragility of clean sands, silty sands, and sandy silts. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2002, 128: 849–85910.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:10(849) ↗
11. Huang Y T, Huang A B, Kuo Y C, et al. A laboratory study on the undrained strength of a silty sand from Central Western Taiwan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2004, 24: 733–74310.1016/j.soildyn.2004.06.013 ↗
12. Murthy T G, Loukidis D, Carraro J A H, et al. Undrained monotonic response of clean and silty sands. Géotechnique, 2007, 57: 273–28810.1680/geot.2007.57.3.273 ↗
13. Chiu C F, Fu X J. Interpreting undrained instability of mixed soils by equivalent intergranular state parameter. Géotechnique, 2008, 58: 751–75510.1680/geot.2008.58.9.751 ↗
14. Papadopoulou A, Tika T. The effect of fines on critical state and liquefaction resistance characteristics of non-plastic silty sands. Soils Found, 2008, 48: 713–72510.3208/sandf.48.713 ↗
15. Bobei D C, Lo S R, Wanatowski D, et al. Modified state parameter for characterizing static liquefaction of sand with fines. Can Geotech J, 2009, 46: 281–29510.1139/T08-122 ↗
16. Stamatopoulos C A. An experimental study of the liquefaction strength of silty sands in terms of the state parameter. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2010, 30: 662–67810.1016/j.soildyn.2010.02.008 ↗
17. Yang J, Wei L M. Collapse of loose sand with the addition of fines: The role of particle shape. Géotechnique, 2012, 62: 1111–112510.1680/geot.11.P.062 ↗
18. Rahman M M, Lo S R. Undrained behavior of sand-fines mixtures and their state parameter. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2014, 140: 0401403610.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001115 ↗
19. Yin Z Y, Zhao J, Hicher P Y. A micromechanics-based model for sand-silt mixtures. Int J Solids Struct, 2014, 51: 1350–136310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.12.027 ↗
20. Yang J, Wei L M, Dai B B. State variables for silty sands: Global void ratio or skeleton void ratio? Soils Found, 2015, 55: 99–11110.1016/j.sandf.2014.12.008 ↗
21. Yang J, Luo X D. Exploring the relationship between critical state and particle shape for granular materials. J Mech Phys Solids, 2015, 84: 196–21310.1016/j.jmps.2015.08.001 ↗
22. Muir Wood D, Maeda K. Changing grading of soil: Effect on critical states. Acta Geotech, 2008, 3: 3–1410.1007/s11440-007-0041-0 ↗
23. Xiao Y, Liu H, Desai C S, et al. Effect of intermediate principal-stress ratio on particle breakage of rockfill material. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2016, 142: 0601501710.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001433 ↗
24. Xiao Y, Liu H, Ding X, et al. Influence of particle breakage on critical state line of rockfill material. Int J Geomech, 2016, 16: 0401503110.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000538 ↗
25. Xiao Y, Coop M R, Liu H, et al. Transitional behaviors in wellgraded coarse granular soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2016, 142: 0601601810.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001551 ↗
26. Rahman M M, Lo S C R, Dafalias Y F. Modelling the static liquefaction of sand with low-plasticity fines. Géotechnique, 2014, 64: 881–89410.1680/geot.14.P.079 ↗
27. Chang C S, Yin Z Y. Micromechanical modeling for behavior of silty sand with influence of fine content. Int J Solids Struct, 2011, 48: 2655–266710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.05.014 ↗
28. Lashkari A. Recommendations for extension and re-calibration of an existing sand constitutive model taking into account varying non-plastic fines content. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng, 2014, 61–62: 212–23810.1016/j.soildyn.2014.02.012 ↗
29. Lashkari A. Prediction of flow liquefaction instability of clean and silty sands. Acta Geotech, 2016, 11: 987–101410.1007/s11440-015-0413-9 ↗
30. Li X S, Dafalias Y F. Dilatancy for cohesionless soils. Géotechnique, 2000, 50: 449–46010.1680/geot.2000.50.4.449 ↗
31. Thevanayagam S. Effect of fines and confining stress on undrained shear strength of silty sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 1998, 124: 479–49110.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:6(479) ↗
32. Chien L K, Oh Y N, Chang C H. Effects of fines content on liquefaction strength and dynamic settlement of reclaimed soil. Can Geotech J, 2002, 39: 254–26510.1139/t01-083 ↗
33. Belkhatir M, Arab A, Della N, et al. Influence of inter-granular void ratio on monotonic and cyclic undrained shear response of sandy soils. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 2010, 338: 290–30310.1016/j.crme.2010.04.002 ↗
34. Cabalar A F. The effects of fines on the behaviour of a sand mixture. Geotech Geol Eng, 2011, 29: 91–10010.1007/s10706-010-9355-z ↗
35. Ni Q, Tan T S, Dasari G R, et al. Contribution of fines to the compressive strength of mixed soils. Géotechnique, 2004, 54: 561–56910.1680/geot.2004.54.9.561 ↗
36. Rahman M M, Lo S R. The prediction of equivalent granular steady state line of loose sand with fines. Geomech Geoeng, 2008, 3: 179–19010.1080/17486020802206867 ↗
37. Rahman M M, Baki M A L, Lo S R. Prediction of undrained monotonic and cyclic liquefaction behavior of sand with fines based on the equivalent granular state parameter. Int J Geomech, 2014, 14: 254–26610.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000316 ↗
38. Carraro J A H, Prezzi M, Salgado R. Shear strength and stiffness of sands containing plastic or nonplastic fines. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2009, 135: 1167–117810.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:9(1167) ↗
39. Li X S, Wang Y. Linear representation of steady-state line for sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 1998, 124: 1215–121710.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:12(1215) ↗
40. Been K, Jefferies M G. A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique, 1985, 35: 99–11210.1680/geot.1985.35.2.99 ↗
41. Bardet J P. Bounding surface plasticity model for sands. J Eng Mech, 1986, 112: 1198–121710.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:11(1198) ↗
42. Dafalias Y F, Herrmann L R. Bounding surface plasticity. II: Application to isotropic cohesive soils. J Eng Mech, 1986, 112: 1263–129110.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:12(1263) ↗
43. Manzari M T, Dafalias Y F. A critical state two-surface plasticity model for sands. Géotechnique, 1997, 47: 255–27210.1680/geot.1997.47.2.255 ↗
44. Ling H I, Liu H, Mohri Y, et al. Bounding surface model for geosynthetic reinforcements. J Eng Mech, 2001, 127: 963–96710.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:9(963) ↗
45. Hu C, Liu H, Huang W. Anisotropic bounding-surface plasticity model for the cyclic shakedown and degradation of saturated clay. Comp Geotechnics, 2012, 44: 34–4710.1016/j.compgeo.2012.03.009 ↗
46. Xiao Y, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Bounding surface model for rockfill materials dependent on density and pressure under triaxial stress conditions. J Eng Mech, 2014, 140: 0401400210.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000702 ↗
47. Xiao Y, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. State-dependent constitutive model for rockfill materials. Int J Geomech, 2015, 15: 0401407510.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000421 ↗
48. Xiao Y, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Bounding surface plasticity model incorporating the state pressure index for rockfill materials. J Eng Mech, 2014, 140: 0401408710.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000802 ↗
49. Xiao Y, Liu H L, Yang G, et al. A constitutive model for the state-dependent behaviors of rockfill material considering particle breakage. Sci China Tech Sci, 2014, 57: 1636–164610.1007/s11431-014-5601-6 ↗
50. Xiao Y, Liu H L, Liu H, et al. Unified plastic modulus in the bounding surface plasticity model. Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 932–94010.1007/s11431-016-6016-3 ↗
51. Pastor M, Zienkiewicz O C, Chan A H C. Generalized plasticity and the modelling of soil behaviour. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech, 1990, 14: 151–19010.1002/nag.1610140302 ↗
52. Ling H I, Yang S. Unified sand model based on the critical state and generalized plasticity. J Eng Mech, 2006, 132: 1380–139110.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:12(1380) ↗
53. Liu H, Zou D. Associated generalized plasticity framework for modeling gravelly soils considering particle breakage. J Eng Mech, 2013, 139: 606–61510.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000513 ↗
54. Xiao Y, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Testing and modeling of the statedependent behaviors of rockfill material. Comput Geotech, 2014, 61: 153–16510.1016/j.compgeo.2014.05.009 ↗
55. Desai C S. Mechanics of Materials And Interfaces: The Disturbed State Concept. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2001
56. Desai C S. Constitutive modeling for geologic materials: Significance and directions. Int J Geomech, 2005, 5: 81–8410.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:2(81) ↗
57. Desai C S, Chen J Y. Parameter optimization and sensitivity analysis for disturbed state constitutive model. Int J Geomech, 2006, 6: 75–8810.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2006)6:2(75) ↗
58. Desai C S. Unified DSC constitutive model for pavement materials with numerical implementation. Int J Geomech, 2007, 7: 83–10110.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(83) ↗
59. Desai C S, Sane S, Jenson J. Constitutive modeling including creepand rate-dependent behavior and testing of glacial tills for prediction of motion of glaciers. Int J Geomech, 2011, 11: 465–47610.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000091 ↗
60. Desai C S. Constitutive modeling of materials and contacts using the disturbed state concept: Part 2-Validations at specimen and boundary value problem levels. Comput Struct, 2015, 146: 234–25110.1016/j.compstruc.2014.07.026 ↗
61. Desai C S. Constitutive modeling of materials and contacts using the disturbed state concept: Part 1-Background and analysis. Comput Struct, 2015, 146: 214–23310.1016/j.compstruc.2014.07.018 ↗
62. Yao Y P, Hou W, Zhou A N. UH model: Three-dimensional unified hardening model for overconsolidated clays. Géotechnique, 2009, 59: 451–46910.1680/geot.2007.00029 ↗
63. Yao Y P, Yang Y F, Niu L. UH model considering temperature effects. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 190–20210.1007/s11431-010-4209-8 ↗
64. Yao Y P, Kong Y X. Extended UH model: Three-dimensional unified hardening model for anisotropic clays. J Eng Mech, 2012, 138: 853–86610.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000397 ↗
65. Yao Y P, Zhou A N. Non-isothermal unified hardening model: A thermo-elasto-plastic model for clays. Géotechnique, 2013, 63: 1328–134510.1680/geot.13.P.035 ↗
66. Xiao Y, Liu H L, Sun Y F, et al. Modeling of strength and deformation of overconsolidated clays based on bounding surface plasticity. Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 1452–146210.1007/s11431-016-6088-0 ↗
67. Xiao Y, Sun Y, Yin F, et al. Constitutive modeling for transparent granular soils. Int J Geomech, 2017, 17: 0401615010.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000857 ↗
68. Xiao Y, Liu H. Elastoplastic constitutive model for rockfill materials considering particle breakage. Int J Geomech, 2017, 17: 0401604110.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000681 ↗
69. Hardin B O, Richart F E. Elastic wave velocities in granular soils. J Soil Mech Found, 1963, 89: 33–6610.1061/JSFEAQ.0000493 ↗
70. Richart F E, Jr Hall J R, Woods R D. Vibration of Soils and Foundations. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 1970
71. Rowe P W. The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proc R Soc A-Math Phys Eng Sci, 1962, 269: 500–52710.1098/rspa.1962.0193 ↗
72. Xiao Y, Desai C S. General stress-dilatancy relation for granular soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2016, 142: 0281600110.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001473 ↗
73. Xiao Y, Liu H, Liu H, et al. Strength and dilatancy behaviors of dense modeled rockfill material in general stress space. Int J Geomech, 2016, 16: 0401601510.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000645 ↗
74. Xu M, Song E. Numerical simulation of the shear behavior of rockfills. Comput Geotech, 2009, 36: 1259–126410.1016/j.compgeo.2009.05.010 ↗
75. Yang J, Li X S. State-dependent strength of sands from the perspective of unified modeling. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2004, 130: 186–19810.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:2(186) ↗
76. Wan R G, Guo P J. A simple constitutive model for granular soils: Modified stress-dilatancy approach. Comput Geotech, 1998, 22: 109–13310.1016/S0266-352X(98)00004-4 ↗