journal article·2023-04

Numerical and experimental studies on unsupervised deep Lagrangian learning based rotor balancing method

Shun Zhong, Lei Hou

Publisher page

Abstract

Rotor balancing is essential to rotor dynamic analysis. To make the balancing process convenient and costless, a balancing method using unsupervised deep Lagrangian network without weight trail is proposed. In the proposed network, a Lagrangian layer is applied to the network to introduce the physical prior knowledge. Compared to traditional balancing method, trail weight process is not necessary. Meanwhile, parameter sharing mechanics in baseline design or Lagrangian layer are applied to identify the unbalanced force without labeled data. Both numerical case study and corresponding experiment are conducted to validate the method. Both experimental and numerical results find that the proposed rotor balancing approach gives reasonable and comparative results with the considerations of both cost and accuracy. Compared with the baseline, to which no physical prior is applied, the balancing method with Lagrangian mechanism involved could achieve better performance. This proposed rotor dynamic balancing method gives out an alternative approach of rotor balancing methods.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Lubrication Engineering · Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Yao J, Yang F, Su Y, et al. Balancing optimization of a multiple speeds flexible rotor. J Sound Vib, 2020, 480: 11540510.1016/j.jsv.2020.115405 ↗
2. Xu J H, Jiao C X, Zou D L, et al. Study on the dynamic behavior of herringbone gear structure of marine propulsion system powered by double-cylinder turbines. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 611–63010.1007/s11431-021-1916-x ↗
3. Cao Y, Li F, Cao J, et al. Calibration of a hub dynamic balancing machine based on the least squares method and systematic error analysis. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 17874610.1109/ACCESS.2020.3024850 ↗
4. Ranjan G, Tiwari R. On-site high-speed balancing of flexible rotor-bearing system using virtual trial unbalances at slow run. Int J Mech Sci, 2020, 183: 10578610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105786 ↗
5. Zhang S, Zhang Z. Online measuring and estimating methods for the unbalancing vector of thin-disc workpiece based on the adaptive influence coefficient. J Vib Control, 2021, 27: 1753–176410.1177/1077546320948384 ↗
6. Bishop R E D, Gladwell G M L. The vibration and balancing of an unbalanced flexible rotor. J Mech Eng Sci, 1959, 1: 66–7710.1243/JMES_JOUR_1959_001_010_02 ↗
7. Bishop R E D, Parkinson A G. On the use of balancing machines for flexible rotors. J Eng Ind, 1972, 94: 561–57210.1115/1.3428193 ↗
8. Goodman T P. A least-squares method for computing balance corrections. J Eng Ind, 1964, 86: 273–27710.1115/1.3670532 ↗
9. Lund J W, Tonnesen J. Analysis and experiments on multi-plane balancing of a flexible rotor. J Eng Ind, 1972, 94: 233–24210.1115/1.3428116 ↗
10. Zhao S, Ren X, Deng W, et al. A transient characteristic-based balancing method of rotor system without trail weights. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2021, 148: 10711710.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107117 ↗
11. Untaroiu C D, Allaire P E, Foiles W C. Balancing of flexible rotors using convex optimization techniques: Optimum min-max LMI influence coefficient balancing. J Vib Acoust, 2008, 130: 02100610.1115/1.2730535 ↗
12. Wang X. SQP algorithms in balancing rotating machinery. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2007, 21: 1469–147810.1016/j.ymssp.2006.06.003 ↗
13. Messager T, Pyrz M. Discrete optimization of rigid rotor balancing. J Mech Sci Technol, 2013, 27: 2231–223610.1007/s12206-013-0605-x ↗
14. Kang Y, Lin T W, Chang Y J, et al. Optimal balancing of flexible rotors by minimizing the condition number of influence coefficients. Mech Mach Theory, 2008, 43: 891–90810.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.06.005 ↗
15. Li G, Lin Z, Allaire P E. Robust optimal balancing of high-speed machinery using convex optimization. J Vib Acoust, 2008, 130: 03100810.1115/1.2890405 ↗
16. Zhang Z X, Zhang Q, Li X L, et al. The whole-beat correlation method for the identification of an unbalance response of a dual-rotor system with a slight rotating speed difference. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2011, 25: 1667–167310.1016/j.ymssp.2010.12.001 ↗
17. Zhang Z X, Wang L Z, Jin Z J, et al. Non-whole beat correlation method for the identification of an unbalance response of a dual-rotor system with a slight rotating speed difference. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2013, 39: 452–46010.1016/j.ymssp.2012.06.003 ↗
18. Tresser S, Dolev A, Bucher I. Dynamic balancing of super-critical rotating structures using slow-speed data via parametric excitation. J Sound Vib, 2018, 415: 59–7710.1016/j.jsv.2017.11.029 ↗
19. Khulief Y A, Oke W, Mohiuddin M A. Modally tuned influence coefficients for low-speed balancing of flexible rotors. J Vib Acoust, 2014, 136: 02450110.1115/1.4025995 ↗
20. Deepthikumar M B, Sekhar A S, Srikanthan M R. Modal balancing of flexible rotors with bow and distributed unbalance. J Sound Vib, 2013, 332: 6216–623310.1016/j.jsv.2013.04.043 ↗
21. Villafane Saldarriaga M, Steffen Jr V, Der Hagopian J, et al. On the balancing of flexible rotating machines by using an inverse problem approach. J Vib Control, 2011, 17: 1021–103310.1177/1077546310370669 ↗
22. Han D J. Generalized modal balancing for non-isotropic rotor systems. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2007, 21: 2137–216010.1016/j.ymssp.2006.09.004 ↗
23. Li X, Zheng L, Liu Z. Balancing of flexible rotors without trial weights based on finite element modal analysis. J Vib Control, 2013, 19: 461–47010.1177/1077546311433916 ↗
24. Yue C, Ren X, Yang Y, et al. Unbalance identification of speed-variant rotary machinery without phase angle measurement. Shock Vib, 2015, 2015: 934231
25. Li K, Peng C, Deng Z, et al. Field dynamic balancing for active magnetic bearings supporting rigid rotor shaft based on extended state observer. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2021, 158: 10780110.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107801 ↗
26. Zheng S, Wang C. Rotor balancing for magnetically levitated TMPs integrated with vibration self-sensing of magnetic bearings. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2021, 26: 3031–303910.1109/TMECH.2021.3051372 ↗
27. Duan P H, Xie Z J, Kang X D, et al. Self-supervised learning-based oil spill detection of hyperspectral images. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 793–80110.1007/s11431-021-1989-9 ↗
28. Shen T, Dong Y L, He D X, et al. Online identification of time-varying dynamical systems for industrial robots based on sparse Bayesian learning. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 386–39510.1007/s11431-021-1947-5 ↗
29. Ting J A, Mistry M N, Peters J, et al. A Bayesian approach to nonlinear parameter identification for rigid body dynamics. In: Robotics: Science and Systems. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2006. 32–39
30. Atkeson C G, An C H, Hollerbach J M. Estimation of inertial parameters of manipulator loads and links. Int J Robot Res, 1986, 5: 101–11910.1177/027836498600500306 ↗
31. Haruno M, Wolpert D M, Kawato M. MOSAIC model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput, 2001, 13: 2201–222010.1162/089976601750541778 ↗
32. Calinon S, D’halluin F, Sauser E, et al. Learning and reproduction of gestures by imitation. IEEE Robot Automat Mag, 2010, 17: 44–5410.1109/MRA.2010.936947 ↗
33. Ledezma F, Haddadin S. First-order-principles-based constructive network topologies: An application to robot inverse dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE-RAS 17th International Conference on Humanoid Robotics (Humanoids). Birmingham: IEEE, 2017. 438–44510.1109/HUMANOIDS.2017.8246910 ↗
34. Zhang W, Li X, Ma H, et al. Federated learning for machinery fault diagnosis with dynamic validation and self-supervision. Knowledge-Based Syst, 2021, 213: 10667910.1016/j.knosys.2020.106679 ↗
35. Zhang W, Li X, Li X. Deep learning-based prognostic approach for lithium-ion batteries with adaptive time-series prediction and on-line validation. Measurement, 2020, 164: 10805210.1016/j.measurement.2020.108052 ↗
36. Ding B, Wu J, Chuang S, et al. Sparsity-assisted intelligent condition monitoring method for aero-engine main shaft bearing. Trans Nanjing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut, 2020, 37: 508–516
37. Zhao Z, Li T, An B, et al. Model-driven deep unrolling: Towards interpretable deep learning against noise attacks for intelligent fault diagnosis. ISA Trans, 2022, 129: 644–66210.1016/j.isatra.2022.02.027 ↗
38. Lutter M, Listmann K, Peters J. Deep lagrangian networks for end-to-end learning of energy-based control for under-actuated systems. arxiv: 1907.04489
39. Zhong S, Li L, Chen H, et al. A novel balancing method for rotor using unsupervised deep learning. Shock Vib, 2021, 2021: 180016410.1155/2021/1800164 ↗
40. Chen H, Zhong S, Lu Z, et al. Analysis on multi-mode nonlinear resonance and jump behavior of an asymmetric rolling bearing rotor. Arch Appl Mech, 2021, 91: 2991–300910.1007/s00419-021-01944-y ↗