Experimental characterization and modeling of stress-dependent hysteresis of a giant magnetostrictive actuator
Source abstract
Abstract
The hysteresis nonlinearity of giant magnetostrictive actuator (GMA) is stress-dependent. In this paper, laboratory experiments were performed to characterize the stress-dependent hysteresis properties of a GMA under different compressive stresses ranging from −11.3 MPa to −24.3 MPa and harmonic current excitation with amplitudes from 0.6 A to 1.2 A. The experimental results showed that remarkable changes in peak-peak displacement responses, hysteresis loop width and hysteresis loss occurred with the increasing of compressive stress; no significant changes in coercive current were observed. Based on the analysis of experimental data and discussion of the influences of the weights of Modified Prandtl-Ishlinskii (MPI) on the characteristics of hysteresis loops, a stress-dependent Prandtl-Ishlinskii (SDPI) model was proposed by extending the MPI model to describe the effects of compressive stress, in which the weights of deadzone operators are extended as function of compressive stress. Good agreements were obtained between the model simulation results and the experimental data. Additional model validations were given by the performances of tracking control experiments with an inverse feedforward controller. The experimental results have clearly shown that the inverse SDPI is effective for compensating stress-dependent hysteresis including major and minor loops.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Piezoelectric Actuators and Control · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Tan X B, John S B. Modeling and control of hysteresis in magnetostrictive actuators. Automatica, 2004, 40: 1469–148010.1016/j.automatica.2004.04.006 ↗
2. Calkins F T, Smith R C, Flatau A B. Energy-based hysteresis model for magnetostrictive transducers. IEEE Trans Magn, 2000, 36(2): 429–43910.1109/20.825804 ↗
3. Jiles D C, Atherton D L. Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis. J Magn Magn Mater, 1986, 61: 48–6010.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-1 ↗
4. Natale C, Velardi F, Visone C. Identification and compensation of Preisach hysteresis models for magnetostrictive actuators. Physica B, 2001, 306: 161–16510.1016/S0921-4526(01)00997-8 ↗
5. Kuhnen K. Modeling, identification and compensation of complex hysteretic nonlinearities-A modified Prandtl-Ishlinskii approach. European Journal of Control, 2003, 9(4): 407–418.10.3166/ejc.9.407-418 ↗
6. Chen Y S, Qiu J H, Palacios J, et al. Tracking controll of piezoelectric stack actuator using modified Prandtl-Ishlinskii model. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, August 14, 2012, doi: 10.1177/1045389X1245572510.1177/1045389X12455725 ↗
7. Yamamoto K, Nakano H, Yamashiro Y. Effect of compressive stress on hysteresis loss of Terfenol-D. J Magn Magn Mater, 2003, 254–255: 222–22410.1016/S0304-8853(02)00772-2 ↗
8. Calkins F T, Dapino M J, Flatau A B. Effect of prestress on the dynamic performance of a Terfenol-D transducer. SPIE, 1997, 3041: 293–30410.1117/12.275654 ↗
9. Kvarnsjo L, Bergqvist A. Application of a stress-dependent magnetic preisach hysteresis model on a simulation model for Terfenol-D. IEEE Trans Magn, 1992, 28(5): 2623–262510.1109/20.179577 ↗
10. Cavallo A, Davino D, Maria G, et al. Hysteresis compensation of smart actuators under variable stress conditions. Physica B, 2008, 403: 261–26510.1016/j.physb.2007.08.024 ↗
11. Ma Y H, Mao J Q. On modeling and tracking control for a smart structure with stress-dependent hysteresis nonlinearity. Acta Automat Sin, 2010, 36(11): 1611–161910.3724/SP.J.1004.2010.01611 ↗
12. Ma Y H, Mao J Q, Zhang Z. On generalized dynamic preisach operator with application to hysteresis nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2011, 19(6): 1527–153310.1109/TCST.2010.2089687 ↗
13. Zhang Z, Mao J Q. Modeling rate-dependent hysteresis for magnetostrictive actuator. Mater Sci Forum, 2007, 546–549: 2251–2256
14. Kuhnen K. Compensation of parameter-dependent complex hysteretic actuator nonlinearities in smart material system. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 2008, 19: 1411–142410.1177/1045389X08089690 ↗
15. Zhang H B, Jiang C B, Xu H B. Effect of compressive stress on magnetostriction hysteresis of 110 oriented Tb0.29Dy0.48Ho0.23Fe2 crystal. J Alloys Compd, 2009, 475: 35–3710.1016/j.jallcom.2008.07.138 ↗
16. Zhang Z, Mao J Q, Chen W L. Stress-dependent hysteresis modeling and tracking control of giant magnetostrictive actuator for periodic reference input. Proceedings of the 17th World Congress IFAC, 2008: 2288–229310.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.00386 ↗
17. Ang W T, Khosla P K, Riviere C N. Feedforward controller with inverse rate-dependent model for piezoelectric actuators in trajectory-tracking applications. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2007, 12(2): 134–14210.1109/TMECH.2007.892824 ↗