On-chip immunomagnetic bead swarm based on magnetic actuation and mechanical vibration for biological detection
Source abstract
Abstract
Immunomagnetic bead (IMB)-based detection has great potential for biomedical applications. Passive and active strategies, including microfluidics and magnetic actuation methods, have been developed to mix IMBs and analytes efficiently. However, cost-effective on-site detection using a simple microfluidic chip is challenging, and miniaturization of the magnetic driving device is imperative for portability. In this study, we propose a novel mixing method for an on-chip IMB swarm via magnetic actuation and mechanical vibration. A microfluidic chip system coupled with double spiral magnetic coils and a vibration motor was fabricated. The aggregation behavior of IMBs under magnetic fields and the diffusion behavior of the IMB swarm under mechanical vibration were analyzed in detail. Based on the synergetic effects of magnetic actuation and mechanical vibration, we achieved the highly efficient capturing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus DNA and goat anti-human immunoglobulin G by mixing the IMB swarm with the microfluidic chip. In this case, the antigen detection rate could reach ∼94.4%. Given its fascinating features, such IMB-microfluidic detection demonstrates significant potential for biomedical applications.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Micro and Nano Robotics · Biosensors and Analytical Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang L, Wang X, Cheng L, et al. SERS-based test strips: Principles, designs and applications. Biosens Bioelectron, 2021, 189: 11336010.1016/j.bios.2021.113360 ↗
2. Cinti S, Moscone D, Arduini F. Preparation of paper-based devices for reagentless electrochemical (bio)sensor strips. Nat Protoc, 2019, 14: 2437–245110.1038/s41596-019-0186-y ↗
3. Byram C, Soma V R. 2,4-dinitrotoluene detected using portable Raman spectrometer and femtosecond laser fabricated Au-Ag nanoparticles and nanostructures. Nano-Struct Nano-Objects, 2017, 12: 121–12910.1016/j.nanoso.2017.09.019 ↗
4. Westphall M S, Lee K W, Salome A Z, et al. Three-dimensional structure determination of protein complexes using matrix-landing mass spectrometry. Nat Commun, 2022, 13: 227610.1038/s41467-022-29964-4 ↗
5. Yeh E C, Fu C C, Hu L, et al. Self-powered integrated microfluidic point-of-care low-cost enabling (SIMPLE) chip. Sci Adv, 2017, 3: e150164510.1126/sciadv.1501645 ↗
6. Shang Y, Xiang X, Ye Q, et al. Advances in nanomaterial-based microfluidic platforms for on-site detection of foodborne bacteria. TrAC Trends Anal Chem, 2022, 147: 11650910.1016/j.trac.2021.116509 ↗
7. Xu D, Huang X, Guo J, et al. Automatic smartphone-based microfluidic biosensor system at the point of care. Biosens Bioelectron, 2018, 110: 78–8810.1016/j.bios.2018.03.018 ↗
8. Vollertsen A R, de Boer D, Dekker S, et al. Modular operation of microfluidic chips for highly parallelized cell culture and liquid dosing via a fluidic circuit board. Microsyst Nanoeng, 2020, 6: 10710.1038/s41378-020-00216-z ↗
9. Zheng H, Zhang W, Yang H, et al. An immunomagnetic bead enrichment technique to improve the detection efficiency for trace silk protein, its application. J Cultural Heritage, 2019, 38: 46–5210.1016/j.culher.2019.02.003 ↗
10. Wang X, He X, He Z, et al. Detection of prostate specific antigen in whole blood by microfluidic chip integrated with dielectrophoretic separation and electrochemical sensing. Biosens Bioelectron, 2022, 204: 11405710.1016/j.bios.2022.114057 ↗
11. Ma Y D, Chen Y S, Lee G B. An integrated self-driven microfluidic device for rapid detection of the influenza A (H1N1) virus by reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2019, 296: 12664710.1016/j.snb.2019.126647 ↗
12. Groisman A, Quake S R. A microfluidic rectifier: Anisotropic flow resistance at low Reynolds numbers. Phys Rev Lett, 2004, 92: 9450110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.094501 ↗
13. Duong H L, Chen P C. Novel solvent bonding method for creation of a three-dimensional, non-planar, hybrid PLA/PMMA microfluidic chip. Sens Actuat A-Phys, 2018, 280: 350–35810.1016/j.sna.2018.08.002 ↗
14. Chen H. A triplet parallelizing spiral microfluidic chip for continuous separation of tumor cells. Sci Rep, 2018, 8: 404210.1038/s41598-018-22348-z ↗
15. Xu B, Du W Q, Li J W, et al. High efficiency integration of three-dimensional functional microdevices inside a microfluidic chip by using femtosecond laser multifoci parallel microfabrication. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 1998910.1038/srep19989 ↗
16. Liu P, Li B, Fu L, et al. Hybrid three dimensionally printed paper-based microfluidic platform for investigating a cell’s apoptosis and intracellular cross-talk. ACS Sens, 2020, 5: 464–47310.1021/acssensors.9b02205 ↗
17. Du M, Ma Z S, Ye X Y, et al. On-chip fast mixing by a rotary peristaltic micropump with a single structural layer. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 1047–105410.1007/s11431-013-5140-6 ↗
18. Yu J, Yang L, Zhang L. Pattern generation and motion control of a vortex-like paramagnetic nanoparticle swarm. Int J Robot Res, 2018, 37: 912–93010.1177/0278364918784366 ↗
19. Magdanz V, Khalil I S M, Simmchen J, et al. IRONSperm: Spermtemplated soft magnetic microrobots. Sci Adv, 2020, 6: a585510.1126/sciadv.aba5855 ↗
20. Yigit B, Alapan Y, Sitti M. Programmable collective behavior in dynamically self-assembled mobile microrobotic swarms. Adv Sci, 2019, 6: 180183710.1002/advs.201801837 ↗
21. Xin C, Yang L, Li J, et al. Conical hollow microhelices with superior swimming capabilities for targeted cargo delivery. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 180822610.1002/adma.201808226 ↗
22. Feng Z, Zhi S, Guo L, et al. A novel integrated microfluidic platform based on micro-magnetic sensor for magnetic bead manipulation and detection. Microfluid Nanofluid, 2018, 22: 8610.1007/s10404-018-2107-8 ↗
23. Gooneratne C P, Liang C, Kosel J. A planar conducting microstructure to guide and confine magnetic beads to a sensing zone. Microelectron Eng, 2011, 88: 1757–176010.1016/j.mee.2010.12.068 ↗
24. Issadore D, Franke T, Brown K A, et al. A microfluidic microprocessor: Controlling biomimetic containers and cells using hybrid integrated circuit/microfluidic chips. Lab Chip, 2010, 10: 293710.1039/c0lc00092b ↗
25. Silverio V, Amaral M, Gaspar J, et al. Manipulation of magnetic beads with thin film microelectromagnet traps. Micromachines, 2019, 10: 60710.3390/mi10090607 ↗
26. Wu X Y, Wu H Y, Hu D H. High-efficiency magnetophoretic separation based on synergy of magnetic force field and flow field in microchannels. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 3311–331910.1007/s11431-011-4593-8 ↗
27. Qi W, Zheng L, Wang S, et al. A microfluidic biosensor for rapid and automatic detection of Salmonella using metal-organic framework and Raspberry Pi. Biosens Bioelectron, 2021, 178: 11302010.1016/j.bios.2021.113020 ↗
28. Ren Y, Ray S, Liu Y. Reconfigurable acrylic-tape hybrid microfluidics. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 482410.1038/s41598-019-41208-y ↗
29. Weng C H, Lien K Y, Yang S Y, et al. A suction-type, pneumatic microfluidic device for liquid transport and mixing. Microfluid Nanofluid, 2011, 10: 301–31010.1007/s10404-010-0669-1 ↗
30. López R R, Sánchez L M, Alazzam A, et al. Numerical and experimental validation of mixing efficiency in periodic disturbance mixers. Micromachines, 2021, 12: 110210.3390/mi12091102 ↗
31. Wang L, Niu J, Wei P, et al. Rapid determination of 2,4-diaminopyrimidine residues through sample pretreatment using immunomagnetic bead purification along with HPLC-UV. Food Chem, 2022, 376: 13183510.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131835 ↗
32. Kuciński K, Jankowska-Wajda M, Ratajczak T, et al. Silica surface modification and its application in permanent link with nucleic acids. ACS Omega, 2018, 3: 5931–593710.1021/acsomega.8b00547 ↗
33. de Lambert B, Chaix C, Charreyrex M T, et al. Polymer-oligonucleotide conjugate synthesis from an amphiphilic block copolymer. Applications to DNA detection on microarray. Bioconjugate Chem, 2005, 16: 265–27410.1021/bc049791a ↗