Fabrication of a biomimetic controllable adhesive surface by ultraprecision multistep and layered scribing and casting molding
Source abstract
Abstract
Wedge-shaped microstructures have the ability to reproduce the excellent adhesive properties of geckos’ feet because of their unique anisotropic structure. In particular, the controllability of the wedge-shaped microstructures on adhesion is beneficial to the undisturbed grasp or the capture of space targets. However, the problem currently remains of how to process it efficiently and with high quality. Here a strategy called ultraprecision multistep and layered scribing is proposed for the manufacture of the biomimetic controllable adhesive surface. The results show that the metal master mold prepared based on the manufacturing strategy has not only good surface topography but also high reliability and durability. Furthermore, the controllable adhesive surface of 1.96 cm2, fabricated by the proposed manufacturing strategy, has a normal adhesion of 1.012 N, and the corresponding shear friction and adhesion coefficient are 3.105 N and 4.82, respectively. Additionally, the controllable adhesive surface has been shown to be approximately superhydrophobic and also to possess the properties of controllable adhesion and dynamic adhesion. Also, after 250 adhesion-detachment cycles, the normal adhesion and shear friction only decrease by 5% and 3%, respectively. The research realizes an environmentally friendly and efficient method by which to manufacture a durable metal mold for fabricating a biomimetic controllable adhesive surface, laying a foundation for its effective application in the adherence of space-floating targets.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Sameoto D, Menon C. Recent advances in the fabrication and adhesion testing of biomimetic dry adhesives. Smart Mater Struct, 2010, 19: 10300110.1088/0964-1726/19/10/103001 ↗
2. Li X, Tao D, Lu H, et al. Recent developments in gecko-inspired dry adhesive surfaces from fabrication to application. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop, 2019, 7: 02300110.1088/2051-672X/ab1447 ↗
3. Santos D, Spenko M, Parness A, et al. Directional adhesion for climbing: Theoretical and practical considerations. J Adhes Sci Tech, 2007, 21: 1317–134110.1163/156856107782328399 ↗
4. Gao H, Wang X, Yao H, et al. Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos. Mech Mater, 2005, 37: 275–28510.1016/j.mechmat.2004.03.008 ↗
5. Filippov A, Popov V L, Gorb S N. Shear induced adhesion: Contact mechanics of biological spatula-like attachment devices. J Theor Biol, 2011, 276: 126–13110.1016/j.jtbi.2011.01.049 ↗
6. Parness A, Soto D, Esparza N, et al. A microfabricated wedge-shaped adhesive array displaying gecko-like dynamic adhesion, directionality and long lifetime. J R Soc Interface, 2009, 6: 1223–123210.1098/rsif.2009.0048 ↗
7. Jeong H E, Lee J K, Kim H N, et al. A nontransferring dry adhesive with hierarchical polymer nanohairs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106: 5639–564410.1073/pnas.0900323106 ↗
8. Hill G C, Soto D R, Peattie A M, et al. Orientation angle and the adhesion of single gecko setae. J R Soc Interface, 2011, 8: 926–93310.1098/rsif.2010.0720 ↗
9. Autumn K. Gecko adhesion: Structure, function, and applications. MRS Bull, 2007, 32: 473–47810.1557/mrs2007.80 ↗
10. Day P, Eason E V, Esparza N, et al. Microwedge machining for the manufacture of directional dry adhesives. J Micro Nano-Manuf, 2013, 1: 01100110.1115/1.4023161 ↗
11. Aksak B, Murphy M P, Sitti M. Adhesion of biologically inspired vertical and angled polymer microfiber arrays. Langmuir, 2007, 23: 3322–333210.1021/la062697t ↗
12. Chary S, Tamelier J, Turner K. A microfabricated gecko-inspired controllable and reusable dry adhesive. Smart Mater Struct, 2013, 22: 02501310.1088/0964-1726/22/2/025013 ↗
13. Yoo B, Cho S, Seo S, et al. Elastomeric angled microflaps with reversible adhesion for transfer-printing semiconductor membranes onto dry surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 19247–1925310.1021/am505286b ↗
14. Wang Z, Gu P, Wu X. Gecko-inspired bidirectional double-sided adhesives. Soft Matter, 2014, 10: 3301–331010.1039/c3sm52921e ↗
15. Murphy M P, Aksak B, Sitti M. Adhesion and anisotropic friction enhancements of angled heterogeneous micro-fiber arrays with spherical and spatula tips. J Adhes Sci Tech, 2007, 21: 1281–129610.1163/156856107782328380 ↗
16. Murphy M P, Aksak B, Sitti M. Gecko-inspired directional and controllable adhesion. Small, 2009, 5: 170–17510.1002/smll.200801161 ↗
17. Jin K, Cremaldi J C, Erickson J S, et al. Biomimetic bidirectional switchable adhesive inspired by the gecko. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 574–57910.1002/adfm.201301960 ↗
18. Seo S, Lee J, Kim K S, et al. Anisotropic adhesion of micropillars with spatula pads. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 1345–135010.1021/am4044135 ↗
19. Wang Y, Tian H, Shao J, et al. Switchable dry adhesion with step-like micropillars and controllable interfacial contact. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 10029–1003710.1021/acsami.6b01434 ↗
20. Wang Y, Hu H, Shao J, et al. Fabrication of well-defined mushroom-shaped structures for biomimetic dry adhesive by conventional photolithography and molding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 2213–221810.1021/am4052393 ↗
21. Wang Y, Li X, Tian H, et al. Rectangle-capped and tilted micropillar array for enhanced anisotropic anti-shearing in biomimetic adhesion. J R Soc Interface, 2015, 12: 2015009010.1098/rsif.2015.0090 ↗
22. Jiang H, Hawkes E W, Arutyunov V, et al. Scaling controllable adhesives to grapple floating objects in space. In: The Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation. Washington, 201510.1109/ICRA.2015.7139584 ↗
23. Bylard A, Pherson R M, Hockman B, et al. Robust capture and deorbit of rocket body debris using controllable dry adhesion. In: The Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky, 201710.1109/AERO.2017.7943844 ↗
24. Jiang H, Hawkes E W, Fuller C, et al. A robotic device using gecko-inspired adhesives can grasp and manipulate large objects in microgravity. Sci Robot, 2017, 2: eaan454510.1126/scirobotics.aan4545 ↗
25. Zhao P Y, Liu J G, Wu C C. Survey on research and development of on-orbit active debris removal methods. Sci China Technol Sci, 2020, 63: 2188–221010.1007/s11431-020-1661-7 ↗
26. Seo J, Eisenhaure J, Kim S. Micro-wedge array surface of a shape memory polymer as a reversible dry adhesive. Extreme Mech Lett, 2016, 9: 207–21410.1016/j.eml.2016.07.007 ↗
27. Tao D, Gao X, Lu H, et al. Controllable anisotropic dry adhesion in vacuum: Gecko inspired wedged surface fabricated with ultraprecision diamond cutting. Adv Funct Mater, 2017, 27: 160657610.1002/adfm.201606576 ↗
28. Kerst C, Suresh S A, Cutkosky M R. Creating metal molds for directional gecko-inspired adhesives. J Micro Nano-Manuf, 2020, 8: 01100410.1115/1.4045764 ↗
29. Moriya T, Nakamoto K, Ishida T, et al. Creation of V-shaped microgrooves with flat-ends by 6-axis control ultraprecision machining. CIRP Ann, 2010, 59: 61–6610.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.054 ↗
30. Liu X, Zhou T, Pang S, et al. Burr formation mechanism of ultra-precision cutting for microgrooves on nickel phosphide in consideration of the diamond tool edge radius. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 94: 3929–393510.1007/s00170-017-1079-2 ↗
31. Zhang S, Zhou Y, Zhang H, et al. Advances in ultra-precision machining of micro-structured functional surfaces and their typical applications. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2019, 142: 16–4110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.04.009 ↗
32. Yang X, Qiu Z, Li X. Investigation of scratching sequence influence on material removal mechanism of glass-ceramics by the multiple scratch tests. Ceram Int, 2019, 45: 861–87310.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.256 ↗
33. Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature, 2000, 405: 681–68510.1038/35015073 ↗
34. Federle W, Labonte D. Dynamic biological adhesion: mechanisms for controlling attachment during locomotion. Phil Trans R Soc B, 2019, 374: 2019019910.1098/rstb.2019.0199 ↗
35. Autumn K, Dittmore A, Santos D, et al. Frictional adhesion: A new angle on gecko attachment. J Exp Biol, 2006, 209: 3569–357910.1242/jeb.02486 ↗
36. Gravish N, Wilkinson M, Sponberg S, et al. Rate-dependent frictional adhesion in natural and synthetic gecko setae. J R Soc Interface, 2010, 7: 259–26910.1098/rsif.2009.0133 ↗
37. Alizadehyazdi V, Simaite A, Spenko M. Evaluation of material properties for practical microstructured adhesives: low dust adhesion and high shear strength. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 8654–866610.1021/acsami.8b19895 ↗
38. Mengüç Y, Röhrig M, Abusomwan U, et al. Staying sticky: contact self-cleaning of gecko-inspired adhesives. J R Soc Interface, 2014, 11: 2013120510.1098/rsif.2013.1205 ↗
39. Alizadehyazdi V, McQueney E, Tanaka K, et al. Ultrasonic and electrostatic self-cleaning microstructured adhesives for robotic grippers. In: The Proceedings of 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Madrid, 201810.1109/IROS.2018.8594091 ↗
40. Alizadehyazdi V, Spenko M. A microstructured adhesive gripper with piezoelectric controlled adhesion, cleaning, and sensing. Smart Mater Struct, 2019, 28: 11503710.1088/1361-665X/ab46fc ↗
41. Alizadehyazdi V, Modabberifar M, Mahmoudzadeh Akherat S M J, et al. Electrostatic self-cleaning gecko-like adhesives. J R Soc Interface, 2018, 15: 2017071410.1098/rsif.2017.0714 ↗