journal article·2026-02

Location encoding neural network-based posture estimation and vision-based implementation for continuum robots

Haochen Yong, Jian Wang, Han Ding, Zhigang Wu

Publisher page

Abstract

The capability of whole-body proprioception, e.g., pose estimation, is important for the control and interaction of continuum robots. However, existing pose estimation methods are often simplified through geometric assumptions, primarily due to constraints such as computational and sensor deployment costs. We propose an explicit posture estimation method through a neural network, and implement it using an embedded camera for vision-based proprioception. We design a continuous location encoding neural network (LENN) by encoding continuous locational information. The LENN can capture deformation from changes in internal texture observed by an integrated camera, and output pose information—both position and orientation—for any point along the robot backbone, rather than only discrete points. Compared with interpolation-based estimation using a reduced model, our method reduces single-point estimation error by 33.6%. Furthermore, a systematic evaluation of hardware configurations demonstrates that our prototype achieves sub-millimetre accuracy in shape estimation (0.383 mm) while maintaining real-time inference speeds below 12 ms per frame. By combining a learning-based approach with a simple mechanical design, our method leverages internal visual information to estimate the whole-body pose, providing an effective solution for accurate shape estimation in continuum robots.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics · Teleoperation and Haptic Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Huang X, Yuan Z, Yang X, et al. Precise control of soft robots amidst uncertain environmental contacts and forces. IEEE Trans Robot, 2024, 40: 3565–358010.1109/TRO.2024.3427339 ↗
2. Amanov E, Nguyen T D, Burgner-Kahrs J. Tendon-driven continuum robots with extensible sections—A model-based evaluation of path-following motions. Int J Robotics Res, 2021, 40: 7–2310.1177/0278364919886047 ↗
3. Li X, Xiong Q, Sui D, et al. Disturbance-adaptive tapered soft manipulator with precise motion controller for enhanced task performance. IEEE Trans Robot, 2024, 40: 3581–360110.1109/TRO.2024.3420802 ↗
4. Russo M, Sadati S M H, Dong X, et al. Continuum robots: An overview. Adv Intelligent Syst, 2023, 5: 220036710.1002/aisy.202200367 ↗
5. Rao P, Peyron Q, Lilge S, et al. How to model tendon-driven continuum robots and benchmark modelling performance. Front Robot AI, 2021, 7: 63024510.3389/frobt.2020.630245 ↗
6. Meng Y, Fang G, Yang J, et al. Spring-IMU fusion-based proprioception for feedback control of soft manipulators. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2024, 29: 832–84210.1109/TMECH.2023.3320980 ↗
7. Morales Bieze T, Kruszewski A, Carrez B, et al. Design, implementation, and control of a deformable manipulator robot based on a compliant spine. Int J Robotics Res, 2020, 39: 1604–161910.1177/0278364920910487 ↗
8. Baaij T, Holkenborg M K, Stölzle M, et al. Learning 3D shape proprioception for continuum soft robots with multiple magnetic sensors. Soft Matter, 2023, 19: 44–5610.1039/D2SM00914E ↗
9. Cao H, Chen W, Lu Y et al. An end-to-end proprioception framework for soft continuum robot. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). Jinghong: IEEE, 2022. 141–14710.1109/ROBIO55434.2022.10011982 ↗
10. Neppalli S, Jones BA. Design, construction, and analysis of a continuum robot. In: 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. San Diego: IEEE, 2007. 1503–150710.1109/IROS.2007.4399275 ↗
11. Li Y, Myszka D H, Murray A. The kinematics of constant curvature continuum robots through three segments. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2023, 8: 7631–763810.1109/LRA.2023.3320946 ↗
12. Cheng H, Xu H, Shang H et al. Orientation to pose: Continuum robots shape reconstruction based on the multi-attitude solving approach. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Philadelphia: IEEE, 2022. 3203–320910.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9812289 ↗
13. Santina C D, Rus D. Control oriented modeling of soft robots: The polynomial curvature case. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2020, 5: 290–29810.1109/LRA.2019.2955936 ↗
14. Shi C, Luo X, Qi P, et al. Shape sensing techniques for continuum robots in minimally invasive surgery: A survey. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2017, 64: 1665–167810.1109/TBME.2016.2622361 ↗
15. Wang X, Dai J, Tong H S, et al. Learning-based visual-strain fusion for eye-in-hand continuum robot pose estimation and control. IEEE Trans Robot, 2023, 39: 2448–246710.1109/TRO.2023.3240556 ↗
16. An X, Cui Y, Dong X, et al. Shape reconstruction of soft continuum robots via the fusion of local strains and global poses. Cell Rep Phys Sci, 2024, 5: 10222410.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102224 ↗
17. Alatorre D, Axinte D, Rabani A. Continuum robot proprioception: The ionic liquid approach. IEEE Trans Robot, 2022, 38: 526–53510.1109/TRO.2021.3082020 ↗
18. Yan H, Wang Y, Shen W, et al. Cable-driven continuum robot perception using skin-like hydrogel sensors. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32: 220324110.1002/adfm.202203241 ↗
19. Wang P, Xie Z, Xin W, et al. Sensing expectation enables simultaneous proprioception and contact detection in an intelligent soft continuum robot. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 997810.1038/s41467-024-54327-6 ↗
20. Jiang H, Wang Z, Jin Y, et al. Hierarchical control of soft manipulators towards unstructured interactions. Int J Robotics Res, 2021, 40: 411–43410.1177/0278364920979367 ↗
21. Zhang A, Wang T H, Truby RL, et al. Machine learning best practices for soft robot proprioception. In: 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Detroit: IEEE, 2023. 2564–257110.1109/IROS55552.2023.10342379 ↗
22. Almanzor E, Ye F, Shi J, et al. Static shape control of soft continuum robots using deep visual inverse kinematic models. IEEE Trans Robot, 2023, 39: 2973–298810.1109/TRO.2023.3275375 ↗
23. Wang R, Wang S, Du S, et al. Real-time soft body 3D proprioception via deep vision-based sensing. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2020, 5: 3382–338910.1109/LRA.2020.2975709 ↗
24. Werner P, Hofer M, Sferrazza C, et al. Vision-based proprioceptive sensing: Tip position estimation for a soft inflatable bellow actuator. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Las Vegas: IEEE, 2020. 8889–889610.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341271 ↗
25. Sun H, Kuchenbecker K J, Martius G. A soft thumb-sized vision-based sensor with accurate all-round force perception. Nat Mach Intell, 2022, 4: 135–14510.1038/s42256-021-00439-3 ↗
26. Liu X, Han X, Hong W, et al. Proprioceptive learning with soft polyhedral networks. Int J Robotics Res, 2024, 43: 1916–193510.1177/02783649241238765 ↗
27. Zhang A, Truby R L, Chin L, et al. Vision-based sensing for electrically-driven soft actuators. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2022, 7: 11509–1151610.1109/LRA.2022.3201604 ↗
28. Webster Iii R J, Jones B A. Design and kinematic modeling of constant curvature continuum robots: A review. Int J Robotics Res, 2010, 29: 1661–168310.1177/0278364910368147 ↗
29. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is all you need. In: 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach, 2017