A parameter-free upwind scheme for all speeds’ simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
With the rapid development of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD), a parameter-free upwind scheme capable of simulating all speeds accurately and efficiently is in high demand. To achieve this goal, we present a new upwind scheme called AUSMPWM in this paper. This scheme computes the numerical mass flux as the AUSMPW+ and computes the interfacial sound speed in a different way. Also, it computes the pressure flux by limiting the dissipation if the Mach number is less than 1. Series of numerical experiments show that AUSMPWM can satisfy the following attractive properties independent of any tuning coefficient: (1) Robustness against the shock anomaly and high discontinuity’s resolution; (2) high accuracy on hypersonic heating prediction and capability to give smooth reproductions of heating profiles; (3) low dissipation at low speeds; and (4) strong grid, reconstruction scheme, and Mach number independence in low speeds’ simulations. These properties suggest that AUSMPWM is promising to be widely used to accurately and efficiently simulate flows of all speeds.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson, J D. Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. Springer: Sprinter Press, 2010
2. Yang C, Yang Y X, Wu Z G. Shape sensitivity analysis of flutter characteristics of a low aspect ratio supersonic wing using analytical method. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 3370–337710.1007/s11431-012-4933-3 ↗
3. Qu F, Yan C, Yu J, et al. A study of parameter-free shock capturing upwind schemes on low speeds’ issues. Sci China Tech Sci, 2014, 57: 1183–119010.1007/s11431-014-5547-8 ↗
4. Jack R E, Liou M S. Low-diffusion Flux-Splitting Methods for Flows At All Speeds. AIAA, 1997
5. Roe P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and di. erence schemes. J Comp Phys, 1981, 43: 357–37210.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5 ↗
6. van Leer B. Flux vector splitting for the euler equations. Eighth International Conference of Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Lect Notes Phys, 1982, 170: 507–51210.1007/3-540-11948-5_66 ↗
7. Liou M S, Steen C J. A new flux splitting scheme. J Comp Phys, 1993, 107: 23–3910.1006/jcph.1993.1122 ↗
8. Weiss J M, Smith W A. Preconditioning applied to variable and constant density flows. AIAA J, 1995, 33: 2050–205710.2514/3.12946 ↗
9. Turkel E. Preconditioning technique in computational fluid dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 1999, 31: 385–41610.1146/annurev.fluid.31.1.385 ↗
10. Unrau D, Zingg D W. Viscous Airfoil Computations Using Local Preconditioning. AIAA, 1997
11. Kitamura K, Shima E, Nakamura Y, et al. Evaluation of euler fluxes for hypersonic heating computations. AIAA J, 2010, 48: 763–77610.2514/1.41605 ↗
12. Peery K M, Imlay S T. Blunt-Body Flow Simulations. AIAA, 1988
13. Yang G W, Zheng G N, Li G B. Computational methods and engineering applications of static/dynamic aeroelasticity based on CFD/CSD coupling solution. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 2453–246110.1007/s11431-012-4935-1 ↗
14. Kim K H, Rho O H. An improvement of AUSM schemes by introducing the pressure-based weight functions. Comput Fluids, 1998, 27: 311–34610.1016/S0045-7930(97)00069-8 ↗
15. Kitamura K, Shima E, Nakamura Y, et al. Evaluation of euler fluxes for hypersonic heating computations. AIAA J, 2010 48: 763–77610.2514/1.41605 ↗
16. Kitamura K, Shima, E. A New Pressure Flux for AUSM-Family Schemes for Hypersonic Heating Computation. AIAA, 2011
17. Liou M S. Mass flux schemes and connection to shock instability. J Comp Phys, 2000, 160: 623–64810.1006/jcph.2000.6478 ↗
18. Li X S, Gu C W. The momentum interpolation method based on the time-marching algotithm for all-speed flows. J Comp Phys, 2010, 229: 7806–781810.1016/j.jcp.2010.06.039 ↗
19. Kitamura K, Shima E. Improvements of simple low-dissipation AUSM against shock instabilities in consideration of interfacial speed of sound. Paper No.1283. In: Proceedings of ECCOMAS CFD 2010. Libson, Portugal, 2010
20. Kim K H, Rho O H. Methods for the accurate computations of hypersonic flows I. AUSMPW+ scheme. J Comp Phys, 2001, 174: 38–8010.1006/jcph.2001.6873 ↗
21. Chen J, Wang Z G, Wu J P, et al. Effect of the second-throat on the performance of supersonic-supersonic ejectors. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 2530–253710.1007/s11431-012-4975-6 ↗
22. Klopfer G H, Yee H. Viscous Hypersonic Shock-on-Shock Interaction on Blunt Cowl Lips. AIAA, 1988
23. Kitamura K, Shima E. Parameter-free simple low-dissipation AUSM-family scheme for all speeds. AIAA J, 2011, 49: 1693–170910.2514/1.J050905 ↗
24. Cao Y H, Wan K, Song Q F. Numerical simulation of parachute fluid-structure interaction in terminal descent. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 3131–314110.1007/s11431-012-4998-z ↗
25. Kim K H, Kim C. Accurate, efficient and monotonic numerical methods for multi-dimensional compressible flows Part II: Multi-dimensional limiting process. J Comp Phys, 2005, 208: 570–61510.1016/j.jcp.2005.02.022 ↗