journal article·2023-10

Tough adhesion and antifouling poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel coating on the arch wire for antibacterial adhesion

MingWen Li, Chen Tang, XiXi Yu, XinLei Shi, Hui Yu, HaiYan Yin, Min You, Qiang Chen, Xi Ding

Publisher page

Abstract

The arch wire (AW) plays an important role in providing continuous force, aligning the teeth, and excellent dental arch stability for orthodontic treatment. However, the high friction performance of the AW surface can increase bacterial adhesion and colonization, leading to oral hygiene problems. Herein, a simple method is developed to modify the surface of the orthodontic wire with a poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) hydrogel coating, which can improve the lubricity and antibacterial adhesion of the AW and prevent the oral hygiene problems caused by itself. The PVA hydrogel coating can toughly adhere to the surface of the AW and remarkably reduce the friction performance of the AW, and then its friction coefficient in water can reach 0.005. Under the action of brushing and bending, the PVA hydrogel coating possesses superior ultralubrication and hardly affects the mechanical properties of the stainless-steel substrate. Moreover, the PVA hydrogel coating can significantly inhibit bacterial adhesion on the surface of the AW, thereby reducing bacterial colonization and maintaining oral hygiene while correcting the shape of the mouth and jaw. Therefore, the PVA hydrogel coating exhibits tough adhesion and good antibacterial adhesion while maintaining the mechanical properties of the AW, and it is a promising antifouling coating for improving the performance of the AW.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Alhammadi M S, Halboub E, Fayed M S, et al. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod, 2018, 23: 40e1–40e1010.1590/2177-6709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl ↗
2. Magalhães I B, Pereira L J, Marques L S, et al. The influence of malocclusion on masticatory performance. Angle Orthod, 2010, 80: 981–98710.2319/011910-33.1 ↗
3. Lombardo G, Vena F, Negri P, et al. Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in the different stages of dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 2020, 21: 115–122
4. Kragt L, Dhamo B, Wolvius E B, et al. The impact of malocclusions on oral health-related quality of life in children—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest, 2016, 20: 1881–189410.1007/s00784-015-1681-3 ↗
5. Martins-Júnior P A, Marques L S, Ramos-Jorge M L. Malocclusion: Social, functional and emotional influence on children. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2012, 37: 103–10810.17796/jcpd.37.1.y75430328427210j ↗
6. Nikolai R J. Orthodontic wire: A continuing evolution. Semin Orthod, 1997, 3: 157–16510.1016/S1073-8746(97)80066-7 ↗
7. Antezack A, Monnet-corti V. Hygiène orale et parodontale chez les patients porteurs de dispositifs orthodontiques. Orthod Fr, 2018, 89: 181–19010.1051/orthodfr/2018015 ↗
8. Artun J, Brobakken B O. Prevalence of carious white spots after orthodontic treatment with multibonded appliances. Eur J Orthod, 1986, 8: 229–23410.1093/ejo/8.4.229 ↗
9. Gorelick L, Geiger A M, Gwinnett A J. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod, 1982, 81: 93–9810.1016/0002-9416(82)90032-X ↗
10. An J S, Kim K, Cho S, et al. Compositional differences in multi-species biofilms formed on various orthodontic adhesives. Eur J Orthod, 2017, 39: 528–53310.1093/ejo/cjw089 ↗
11. Ghasemi T, Arash V, Rabiee S M, et al. Antimicrobial effect, frictional resistance, and surface roughness of stainless steel orthodontic brackets coated with nanofilms of silver and titanium oxide: A preliminary study. Microsc Res Tech, 2017, 80: 599–60710.1002/jemt.22835 ↗
12. Muller L K, Jungbauer G, Jungbauer R, et al. Biofilm and orthodontic therapy. Monogr Oral Sci, 2021, 29: 201–21310.1159/000510193 ↗
13. Borzabadi-Farahani A, Borzabadi E, Lynch E. Nanoparticles in orthodontics, a review of antimicrobial and anti-caries applications. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2014, 72: 413–41710.3109/00016357.2013.859728 ↗
14. Huang S Y, Huang J J, Kang T, et al. Coating NiTi archwires with diamond-like carbon films: Reducing fluoride-induced corrosion and improving frictional properties. J Mater Sci-Mater Med, 2013, 24: 2287–229210.1007/s10856-013-4988-0 ↗
15. Kobayashi S, Ohgoe Y, Ozeki K, et al. Dissolution effect and cytotoxicity of diamond-like carbon coatings on orthodontic archwires. J Mater Sci-Mater Med, 2007, 18: 2263–226810.1007/s10856-007-3118-2 ↗
16. Peng L, Chang L, Liu X, et al. Antibacterial property of a polyethylene glycol-grafted dental material. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9: 17688–1769210.1021/acsami.7b05284 ↗
17. Peng L, Chang L, Si M, et al. Hydrogel-coated dental device with adhesion-inhibiting and colony-suppressing properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 9718–972510.1021/acsami.9b19873 ↗
18. Ryu H S, Bae I H, Lee K G, et al. Antibacterial effect of silver-platinum coating for orthodontic appliances. Angle Orthod, 2012, 82: 151–15710.2319/021411-111.1 ↗
19. Wu X, Liu S, Chen K, et al. 3D printed chitosan-gelatine hydrogel coating on titanium alloy surface as biological fixation interface of artificial joint prosthesis. Int J Biol Macromolecules, 2021, 182: 669–67910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.046 ↗
20. Husmann P, Bourauel C, Wessinger M, et al. The frictional behavior of coated guiding archwires. J Orofacial Orthop Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2002, 63: 199–21110.1007/s00056-002-0009-5 ↗
21. Muguruma T, Iijima M, Brantley W A, et al. Effects of a diamond-like carbon coating on the frictional properties of orthodontic wires. Angle Orthod, 2011, 81: 141–14810.2319/052110-276.1 ↗
22. Zufall S W, Kusy R P. Sliding mechanics of coated composite wires and the development of an engineering model for binding. Angle Orthod, 2000, 70: 34–47
23. Redlich M, Katz A, Rapoport L, et al. Improved orthodontic stainless steel wires coated with inorganic fullerene-like nanoparticles of WS2 impregnated in electroless nickel-phosphorous film. Dent Mater, 2008, 24: 1640–164610.1016/j.dental.2008.03.030 ↗
24. Yuk H, Wu J, Zhao X. Hydrogel interfaces for merging humans and machines. Nat Rev Mater, 2022, 7: 935–95210.1038/s41578-022-00483-4 ↗
25. Chen H, Yang F, Chen Q, et al. A novel design of multi-mechanoresponsive and mechanically strong hydrogels. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 160690010.1002/adma.201606900 ↗
26. Tang Z, He H, Zhu L, et al. A general protein unfolding-chemical coupling strategy for pure protein hydrogels with mechanically strong and multifunctional properties. Adv Sci, 2022, 9: 210255710.1002/advs.202102557 ↗
27. Liu J, Qu S, Suo Z, et al. Functional hydrogel coatings. Natl Sci Rev, 2021, 8: nwaa25410.1093/nsr/nwaa254 ↗
28. Fu M, Liang Y, Lv X, et al. Recent advances in hydrogel-based anti-infective coatings. J Mater Sci Tech, 2021, 85: 169–18310.1016/j.jmst.2020.12.070 ↗
29. Riga E K, Rühe J, Lienkamp K. Non-delaminating polymer hydrogel coatings via C,H-insertion crosslinking (CHic)—A case study of poly (oxanorbornenes). Macromol Chem Phys, 2018, 219: 180039710.1002/macp.201800397 ↗
30. Singh B, Pal L. Radiation crosslinking polymerization of sterculia polysaccharide-PVA-PVP for making hydrogel wound dressings. Int J Biol Macromolecules, 2011, 48: 501–51010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.01.013 ↗
31. Mansur H S, Costa H S. Nanostructured poly(vinyl alcohol)/bioactive glass and poly(vinyl alcohol)/chitosan/bioactive glass hybrid scaffolds for biomedical applications. Chem Eng J, 2008, 137: 72–8310.1016/j.cej.2007.09.036 ↗
32. Alves M H, Jensen B E B, Smith A A A, et al. Poly(vinyl alcohol) physical hydrogels: New vista on a long serving biomaterial. Macromol Biosci, 2011, 11: 1293–131310.1002/mabi.201100145 ↗
33. Baker M I, Walsh S P, Schwartz Z, et al. A review of polyvinyl alcohol and its uses in cartilage and orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl BioMater, 2012, 100B: 1451–145710.1002/jbm.b.32694 ↗
34. Liu J, Lin S, Liu X, et al. Fatigue-resistant adhesion of hydrogels. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 107110.1038/s41467-020-14871-3 ↗
35. Lin S, Liu X, Liu J, et al. Anti-fatigue-fracture hydrogels. Sci Adv, 2019, 5: eaau852810.1126/sciadv.aau8528 ↗
36. Ben Halima N. Poly(vinyl alcohol): Review of its promising applications and insights into biodegradation. RSC Adv, 2016, 6: 39823–3983210.1039/C6RA05742J ↗
37. Li Q, Liu J, Xu Y, et al. Fast cross-linked hydrogel as a green light-activated photocatalyst for localized biofilm disruption and brush-free tooth whitening. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2022, 14: 28427–2843810.1021/acsami.2c00887 ↗
38. Gkantidis N, Christou P, Topouzelis N. The orthodontic-periodontic interrelationship in integrated treatment challenges: A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil, 2010, 37: 377–39010.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02068.x ↗
39. Gal J. About a synthetic saliva for in vitro studies. Talanta, 2001, 53: 1103–111510.1016/S0039-9140(00)00618-4 ↗
40. Chen L, Hu W X, Du M, et al. Bioinspired, recyclable, stretchable hydrogel with boundary ultralubrication. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13: 42240–4224910.1021/acsami.1c12631 ↗
41. Qi X, Hu X, Wei W, et al. Investigation of Salecan/poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels prepared by freeze/thaw method. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2015, 118: 60–6910.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.021 ↗
42. Costa-Júnior E S, Barbosa-Stancioli E F, Mansur A A P, et al. Preparation and characterization of chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) chemically crosslinked blends for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym, 2009, 76: 472–48110.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.015 ↗
43. Fathi E, Atyabi N, Imani M, et al. Physically crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol-dextran blend xerogels: Morphology and thermal behavior. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2011, 84: 145–15210.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.018 ↗
44. Qing X, He G, Liu Z, et al. Preparation and properties of polyvinyl alcohol/N-succinyl chitosan/lincomycin composite antibacterial hydrogels for wound dressing. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2021, 261: 11787510.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117875 ↗
45. Durán-Guerrero J G, Martínez-Rodríguez M A, Garza-Navarro M A, et al. Magnetic nanofibrous materials based on CMC/PVA polymeric blends. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2018, 200: 289–29610.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.015 ↗
46. Shadak Alee K, Kuladeep R, Narayana Rao D. In-situ investigation of the formation of silver nanoparticles in polyvinyl alcohol through micro-Raman spectroscopy. Optics Commun, 2013, 293: 69–7410.1016/j.optcom.2012.12.004 ↗
47. El-Khodary A, Oraby A H, Abdelnaby M M. Characterization, electrical and magnetic properties of PVA films filled with FeCl3-MnCl2 mixed fillers. J Magn Magn Mater, 2008, 320: 1739–174610.1016/j.jmmm.2008.01.030 ↗
48. Wang Q L, Zhu L, Wei D D, et al. Near-infrared responsive shape memory hydrogels with programmable and complex shape-morphing. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1752–176410.1007/s11431-020-1735-9 ↗
49. Chen Q, Zhu L, Chen H, et al. A novel design strategy for fully physically linked double network hydrogels with tough, fatigue resistant, and self-healing properties. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 1598–160710.1002/adfm.201404357 ↗