Development of a general circumferentially nonuniform heat transfer fuel rod model for subchannel analysis and application to helical fuel rods
Source abstract
Abstract
The subchannel analysis method is one of the most crucial transient safety analysis methods in the thermal design of nuclear reactors. The nonuniformity of circumferential heat transfer is slight in conventional pressurized water reactor (PWR) cores, but it is significant in advanced reactors with wire-wrapped or helical fuel rods. Predicting circumferentially nonuniform heat transfer behavior can be challenging owing to the complex geometry of helical fuel rods. In this study, a general circumferentially nonuniform heat transfer fuel rod (GCNF) model is developed to predict the fuel central temperature and circumferential heat flux and wall temperature. This model incorporates a refined two-dimensional fuel conduction model and circumferential nonuniform shape factor, addressing the dual factors contributing to the circumferential nonuniformity of helical fuel rods. An empirical correlation for the nonuniform shape factor is developed based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results, and it is implemented to the subchannel code. The newly developed model is applied to a helical fuel annulus and validated by comparing the prediction results with CFD data. The maximum wall temperature predicted by the code is 1.15°C lower than the value calculated through CFD. In terms of the heat flux, the maximum value at the inner corner is 22 kW lower than that obtained from the CFD prediction. The accurate prediction of circumferentially nonuniform heat transfer in helical fuel, concerning the surface heat flux and cladding temperature, addresses existing shortcomings in helical fuel subchannel analysis methods. Additionally, the capability to predict the fuel central temperature is essential for the safety analysis to determine whether fuel rods are melting. The generality of the model framework allows it to be used for the prediction of circumferential nonuniform heat transfer behavior in other types of fuel assemblies.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Heat transfer and supercritical fluids · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Kubo S. The roles of nuclear energy in hydrogen production. Engineering, 2022, 16: 16–2010.1016/j.eng.2021.12.024 ↗
2. Ye Q Z. Safety and effective developing nuclear power to realize green and low-carbon development. Adv Clim Change Res, 2016, 7: 10–1610.1016/j.accre.2016.06.005 ↗
3. Conboy T M, McKrell T J, Kazimi M S. Evaluation of helical-cruciform fuel rod assemblies for high-power-density LWRs. Nucl Tech, 2014, 188: 139–15310.13182/NT13-104 ↗
4. Kim T, Kim K M, Bae J Y, et al. Turbulent vortex trains in narrow square arrayed rod bundles of a dual-cooled nuclear reactor. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 2143–214910.1007/s11431-013-5293-3 ↗
5. Diakov A C, Dmitriev A M, Kang J, et al. Feasibility of converting russian icebreaker reactors from HEU to LEU fuel. Sci Glob Security, 2006, 14: 33–4810.1080/08929880600620575 ↗
6. Touran N W, Gilleland J, Malmgren G T, et al. Computational tools for the integrated design of advanced nuclear reactors. Engineering, 2017, 3: 518–52610.1016/J.ENG.2017.04.016 ↗
7. Fu J S, Xiao Y, Li J L, et al. Development of a refined helical fuel mixing model and application to a helical fuel rod bundle. Sci China Tech Sci, 2023, 66: 586–59810.1007/s11431-022-2278-2 ↗
8. Zhang Q, Liu L, Xiao Y, et al. Experimental study on the transverse mixing of 5 × 5 helical cruciform fuel assembly by wire mesh sensor. Ann Nucl Energy, 2021, 164: 10858210.1016/j.anucene.2021.108582 ↗
9. Shirvan K, Kazimi M S. Three dimensional considerations in thermal-hydraulics of helical cruciform fuel rods for LWR power uprates. Nucl Eng Des, 2014, 270: 259–27210.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.01.015 ↗
10. Cong T, Xiao Y, Wang B, et al. Numerical study on the boiling heat transfer and critical heat flux in a simplified fuel assembly with 2 × 2 helical cruciform rods. Prog Nucl Energy, 2022, 145: 10411110.1016/j.pnucene.2021.104111 ↗
11. Cong T, Zhang R, Wang B, et al. Single-phase flow in helical cruciform fuel assembly with conjugate heat transfer. Prog Nucl Energy, 2022, 147: 10419910.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104199 ↗
12. Yang T, Liu X J, Cheng X. Investigation on heat transfer non-uniformity in rod bundle. Nucl Eng Des, 2013, 265: 222–23110.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.08.063 ↗
13. Chen J, Gu H, Xiong Z. A circumferentially non-uniform heat transfer model for subchannel analysis of tight rod bundles. Ann Nucl Energy, 2018, 121: 50–6110.1016/j.anucene.2018.07.014 ↗
14. ANSYS. Ansys fluent user’s guide. 2021, www.ansyshelp.ansys.com
15. Cong T, Zhang Q, Zhu J, et al. Transverse mixing characteristics of single-phase flow in the helical cruciform fuel assembly. Ann Nucl Energy, 2023, 180: 10942710.1016/j.anucene.2022.109427 ↗
16. Chen S, Liu D, Xiao Y, et al. Experimental study on onset of nucleate boiling and flow boiling heat transfer in a 5 × 5 rod bundle at low flow rate. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2019, 137: 727–73910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.03.156 ↗
17. Kitto J, Wiener M. Effects of nonuniform circumferential heating and inclination on critical heat flux in smooth and ribbed bore tubes. In: 7th Heat Transfer International Conference. Munich, 1982. 297–302
18. Zhou B, Wang X, Gao Y, et al. An adaptive chaos synchronization with controller and secure communication. Appl Mech Mater, 2013, 401–403: 1657–166010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.401-403.1657 ↗