Elastography mapped by deep convolutional neural networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Elastography emerges as a medical modality to map stiffness distribution of tissues and is expected to help identify malignant tumors. To this end, tissues are externally stimulated with dynamic waves, and thereafter mechanical responses are internally measured. However, internal measurements limit the resolution and accuracy due to wave scattering and frequency-dependence. Although models have been reported only with need for acquiring transmitted responses, the computational processes are time-consuming in the inverse analysis. Here we develop an architecture of deep learning-based convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to image elastography based on sound transmission. The proposed CNNs contain three branches, one of which considers the contribution of original features in input data. By comparison, the developed architecture not only maps elastography accurately, but also is more efficient than traditional CNNs in sequence.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Lerner R M, Huang S R, Parker K J. “Sonoelasticity” images derived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990, 16: 231–23910.1016/0301-5629(90)90002-T ↗
2. Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: A quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imag, 1991, 13: 111–13410.1177/016173469101300201 ↗
3. Muthupillai R, Lomas D J, Rossman P J, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science, 1995, 269: 1854–185710.1126/science.7569924 ↗
4. Manduca A, Oliphant T E, Dresner M A, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med Image Anal, 2001, 5: 237–25410.1016/S1361-8415(00)00039-6 ↗
5. Y. Liu, G. Wang, L. Z. Sun. Anisotropic elastography for local passive properties and active contractility of myocardium from dynamic heart imaging sequence.Int J Biomed Imaging, 2006, 2006: 4595710.1155/IJBI/2006/45957 ↗
6. Liu D, Hu Z, Wang G, et al. Sound transmission-based elastography imaging. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 74383–7439210.1109/ACCESS.2019.2921303 ↗
7. Liu D, Sun L. Elastography mapped by untangling compressional and shear deformation. Extreme Mech Lett, 2020, 36: 10066910.1016/j.eml.2020.100669 ↗
8. Mariappan Y K, Glaser K J, Ehman R L. Magnetic resonance elastography: A review. Clin Anat, 2010, 23: 497–51110.1002/ca.21006 ↗
9. Duck F A. Physical Properties of Tissue: A Comprehensive Reference Book. New York: Academic Press, 1990
10. Garra B S. Elastography: History, principles, and technique comparison. Abdom Imag, 2015, 40: 680–69710.1007/s00261-014-0305-8 ↗
11. Parker K J, Doyley M M, Rubens D J. Corrigendum: Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: The 20 year perspective. Phys Med Biol, 2012, 57: 5359–536010.1088/0031-9155/57/16/5359 ↗
12. Dewall R J. Ultrasound elastography: Principles, techniques, and clinical applications. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 2013, 41: 1–1910.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2013006991 ↗
13. Zaleska-Dorobisz U, Kaczorowski K, Pawluś A, et al. Ultrasound elastography—Review of techniques and its clinical applications. Adv Clin Exp Med, 2014, 23: 645–65510.17219/acem/26301 ↗
14. Sigrist R M S, Liau J, Kaffas A E, et al. Ultrasound elastography: Review of Techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics, 2017, 7: 1303–132910.7150/thno.18650 ↗
15. Hamilton T J, Bailat C, Gehring S, et al. X-ray elastography: Modification of X-ray phase contrast images using ultrasonic radiation pressure. J Appl Phys, 2009, 105: 10200110.1063/1.3111783 ↗
16. Parker K J, Ormachea J, Zvietcovich F, et al. Reverberant shear wave fields and estimation of tissue properties. Phys Med Biol, 2017, 62: 1046–106110.1088/1361-6560/aa5201 ↗
17. Racedo J, Urban M W. Evaluation of reconstruction parameters for 2-D comb-push ultrasound shear wave elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr, 2019, 66: 254–26310.1109/TUFFC.2018.2884348 ↗
18. Doyley M M. Model-based elastography: A survey of approaches to the inverse elasticity problem. Phys Med Biol, 2012, 57: R35–R7310.1088/0031-9155/57/3/R35 ↗
19. Graff K F. Wave Motion in Elastic Solids. New York: Dover Publications, 1991
20. Sarvazyan A P, Rudenko O V, Swanson S D, et al. Shear wave elasticity imaging: A new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1998, 24: 1419–143510.1016/S0301-5629(98)00110-0 ↗
21. Tapper E B, Loomba R. Noninvasive imaging biomarker assessment of liver fibrosis by elastography in NAFLD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 15: 274–28210.1038/nrgastro.2018.10 ↗
22. Van Houten E E W, Miga M I, Weaver J B, et al. Three-dimensional subzone-based reconstruction algorithm for MR elastography. Magn Reson Med, 2001, 45: 827–83710.1002/mrm.1111 ↗
23. Cao Y, Zheng Y, Li G Y, et al. Elastodiagnosis of diseases: A review. Extreme Mech Lett, 2019, 27: 102–12310.1016/j.eml.2019.01.009 ↗
24. Weaver J B, van Houten E E W, Miga M I, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography using 3D gradient echo measurements of steady-state motion. Med Phys, 2001, 28: 1620–162810.1118/1.1386776 ↗
25. Zorgani A, Souchon R, Dinh A H, et al. Brain palpation from physiological vibrations using MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2015, 112: 12917–1292110.1073/pnas.1509895112 ↗
26. Ji L, McLaughlin J R, Renzi D, et al. Interior elastodynamics inverse problems: Shear wave speed reconstruction in transient elastography. Inverse Problems, 2003, 19: S1–S2910.1088/0266-5611/19/6/051 ↗
27. Malandrino A, Mak M, Kamm R D, et al. Complex mechanics of the heterogeneous extracellular matrix in cancer. Extreme Mech Lett, 2018, 21: 25–3410.1016/j.eml.2018.02.003 ↗
28. Deffieux T, Gennisson J L, Bercoff J, et al. On the effects of reflected waves in transient shear wave elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr, 2011, 58: 2032–203510.1109/TUFFC.2011.2052 ↗
29. Manduca A, Lake D S, Kruse S A, et al. Spatio-temporal directional filtering for improved inversion of MR elastography images. Med Image Anal, 2003, 7: 465–47310.1016/S1361-8415(03)00038-0 ↗
30. Montgomery D C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 5th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000
31. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2012, 1097–1105
32. Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 2015, 61: 85–11710.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
33. Erickson B J, Korfiatis P, Akkus Z, et al. Machine learning for medical imaging. RadioGraphics, 2017, 37: 505–51510.1148/rg.2017160130 ↗
34. Yoo J, Wahab A, Ye J C. A mathematical framework for deep learning in elastic source imaging. SIAM J Appl Math, 2018, 78: 2791–281810.1137/18M1174027 ↗
35. Pelt D M, Sethian J A. A mixed-scale dense convolutional neural network for image analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115: 254–25910.1073/pnas.1715832114 ↗
36. Ameri A, Akhaee M A, Scheme E, et al. Regression convolutional neural network for improved simultaneous EMG control. J Neural Eng, 2019, 16: 03601510.1088/1741-2552/ab0e2e ↗
37. Fu X, Zhang C, Peng X, et al. Towards end-to-end pulsed eddy current classification and regression with CNN. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC). Auckland, 2019. 1–510.1109/I2MTC.2019.8826858 ↗
38. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courvile A. Deep Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016
39. Bengio Y, Courville A, Vincent P. Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 2013, 35: 1798–182810.1109/TPAMI.2013.50 ↗
40. Murphy M C, Manduca A, Trzasko J D, et al. Artificial neural networks for stiffness estimation in magnetic resonance elastography. Magn Reson Med, 2018, 80: 351–36010.1002/mrm.27019 ↗
41. Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis G E. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys, 2019, 378: 686–70710.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
42. Liu T, Chen M, Zhou M, et al. Towards understanding the importance of shortcut connections in residual networks. arXiv: 1909.04653
43. Budday S, Sommer G, Birkl C, et al. Mechanical characterization of human brain tissue. Acta Biomater, 2017, 48: 319–34010.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.036 ↗
44. Kingma D P, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv: 1412.6980