3D MHD simulation of the double-gradient instability of the magnetotail current sheet
Source abstract
Abstract
Flapping motion of the current sheet (CS) is an important physical process in the Earths magnetotail. The magnetic double-gradient model, which includes both the instability and wave modes, offers a reasonable explanation for the exciting and propagation of the flapping wave. In this paper, we apply an advanced numerical magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) scheme (conservation element and solution element (CESE)-MHD) to simulate the magnetic double-gradient instability in an idealized current sheet that mimics the magnetotail configuration. We initialize the simulations with a numerically relaxed magnetotail equilibrium, in which the normal component of the magnetic field has a tailward gradient. It is confirmed in our simulation that the instability develops in the current layer. The growth rate of the instability yielded from the simulation is very close to the prediction of theory, with a relative deviation of only ten percent. The results demonstrate that the CESE-MHD scheme is very powerful in numerical study of the double-gradient mechanism of the CS flapping mode, and can be used for further investigations of the flapping motion in more realistic CS configurations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Lui A T Y, Meng C I, Akasofu S I. Wavy nature of the magnetotail neutral sheet. Geophys Res Lett, 1978, 5: 279–28210.1029/GL005i004p00279 ↗
2. Speiser T W, Ness N F. The neutral sheet in the geomagnetic tail: Its motion, equivalent currents, and field line connection through it. J Geo-phys Res, 1967, 72: 131–14110.1029/JZ072i001p00131 ↗
3. Zhang T L, BaumjohannW, Nakamura R, et al. A wavy twisted neutral sheet observed by CLUSTER. Geophys Res Lett, 2002, 29: 1–4
4. Runov A, Sergeev V A, Baumjohann W, et al. Electric current and magnetic field geometry in flapping magnetotail current sheets. Ann Geophys, 2005, 23: 1391–140310.5194/angeo-23-1391-2005 ↗
5. Sergeev V A, Sormakov D A, Apatenkov S V, et al. Survey of large-amplitude flapping motions in the midtail current sheet. Ann Geophys, 2006, 24: 2015–202410.5194/angeo-24-2015-2006 ↗
6. Petrukovich A A, Zhang T, Baumjohann W, et al. Oscillatory mag-netic flux tube slippage in the plasma sheet. Ann Geophys, 2006, 24: 1695–170410.5194/angeo-24-1695-2006 ↗
7. Wei X H, Cai C L, Cao J B, et al. Flapping motions of the magnetotail current sheet excited by nonadiabatic ions. Geophys Res Lett, 2015, 42: 4731–473510.1002/2015GL064459 ↗
8. Sergeev V, Runov A, Baumjohann W, et al. Current sheet flapping mo-tion and structure observed by Cluster. Geophys Res Lett, 2003, 30: 1327
9. Sergeev V, Runov A, Baumjohann W, et al. Orientation and propaga-tion of current sheet oscillations. Geophys Res Lett, 2004, 31: L0580710.1029/2003GL019346 ↗
10. Shen C, Rong Z J, Li X, et al. Magnetic configurations of the tilted current sheets in magnetotail. Ann Geophys, 2008, 26: 3525–354310.5194/angeo-26-3525-2008 ↗
11. Toichi T, Miyazaki T. Flapping motions of the tail plasma sheet induced by the interplanetary magnetic field variations. Planet Space Sci, 1976, 24: 147–15910.1016/0032-0633(76)90102-1 ↗
12. Forsyth C, Lester M, Fear R C, et al. Solar wind and substorm excita-tion of the wavy current sheet. Ann Geophys, 2009, 27: 2457–247410.5194/angeo-27-2457-2009 ↗
13. Malova H V, Zelenyi L M, Popov V Y, et al. Asymmetric thin current sheets in the Earth’s magnetotail. Geophys Res Lett, 2007, 34: L1610810.1029/2007GL030011 ↗
14. Daughton W. Kinetic theory of the drift kink instability in a current sheet. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103: 29429–2944310.1029/1998JA900028 ↗
15. Daughton W. Two-fluid theory of the drift kink instability. J Geophys Res, 1999, 104: 28701–2870710.1029/1999JA900388 ↗
16. Zelenyi L M, Artemyev A V, Petrukovich A A, et al. Low frequency eigenmodes of thin anisotropic current sheets and Cluster observations. Ann Geophys, 2009, 27: 861–86810.5194/angeo-27-861-2009 ↗
17. Karimabadi H W, Daughton W, Pritchett P L, et al. Ion-ion kink insta-bility in the magnetotail: 1. Linear theory. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108: 140010.1029/2003JA010026 ↗
18. Karimabadi H, Pritchett P L, Daughton W, et al. Ion-ion kink instabil-ity in the magnetotail: 2. Three-dimensional full particle and hybrid simulations and comparison with observations. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108: 140110.1029/2003JA010109 ↗
19. Sitnov M I, Swisdak M, Drake J F, et al. A model of the bifurcated cur-rent sheet: 2. Flapping motions. Geophys Res Lett, 2004, 31: L0980510.1029/2004GL019473 ↗
20. Ricci P, Lapenta G, Brackbill J U. Structure of the magnetotail current: Kinetic simulation and comparison with satellite observations. Geo-phys Res Lett, 2004, 31: L0680110.1029/2003GL019207 ↗
21. Cao J, Duan J, Du A, et al. Characteristics of middle-to low-latitude Pi2 excited by bursty bulk flows. J Geophys Res, 2008, 113: A07S15
22. Cao J B, Ma Y D, Parks G, et al. Joint observations by Cluster satel-lites of bursty bulk flows in the magnetotail. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111: A0420610.1029/2005JA011322 ↗
23. Ma Y D, Cao J B, Nakamura R, et al. Statistical analysis of earthward flow bursts in the inner plasma sheet during substorms. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114: A07215
24. Erkaev N V, Semenov V S, Kubyshkin I V, et al. MHD model of the flapping motions in the magnetotail current sheet. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114: A0320610.1029/2008JA013728 ↗
25. Duan A Y, Cao J B, Ma Y D, et al. Cluster observations of large-scale southward movement and dawnward-duskward flapping of Earth’s magnetotail current sheet. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 194–20410.1007/s11431-012-5077-1 ↗
26. Golovchanskaya I V, Maltsev Y P. On the identification of plasma sheet flapping waves observed by Cluster. Geophys Res Lett, 2005, 32: L0210210.1029/2004GL021552 ↗
27. Erkaev N V, Semenov V S, Biernat H K. Magnetic double-gradient in-stability and flapping waves in a current sheet. Phys Rev Lett, 2007, 99: 23500310.1103/PhysRevLett.99.235003 ↗
28. Sun W, Fu S, Shi Q, et al. THEMIS observation of a magnetotail cur-rent sheet flapping wave. Chin Sci Bull, 2014, 59: 154–16110.1007/s11434-013-0056-x ↗
29. Erkaev N V, Semenov V S, Biernat H K. Magnetic double gradient mechanism for flapping oscillations of a current sheet. Geophys Res Lett, 2008, 35: L0211110.1029/2007GL032277 ↗
30. Korovinskiy D B, Divin A, Erkaev N V, et al. MHD modeling of the double-gradient (kink) magnetic instability. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2013, 118: 1146–115810.1002/jgra.50206 ↗
31. Pritchett P L, Coroniti F V. A kinetic ballooning/interchange instability in the magnetotail. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115: A06301
32. Feng X, Hu Y, Wei F. Modeling the resistive MHD by the cese method. Sol Phys, 2006, 235: 235–25710.1007/s11207-006-0040-6 ↗
33. Feng X, Zhou Y, Wu S T. A novel numerical implementation for solar wind modeling by the modified conservation element/solution element method. Astrophys J, 2007, 655: 1110–112610.1086/510121 ↗
34. Jiang C W, Feng X S, Zhang J, et al. AMR simulations of magnetohy-drodynamic problems by the CESE method in curvilinear coordinates. Sol Phys, 2010, 267: 463–49110.1007/s11207-010-9649-6 ↗
35. Jiang CW, Feng X S, Wu S T, et al. Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of a sigmoid eruption of active region 11283. Astrophys J, 2013, 771: L3010.1088/2041-8205/771/2/L30 ↗
36. Jiang C W, Wu S T, Feng X S, et al. Formation and eruption of an ac-tive region sigmoid. I. A study by nonlinear force-free field modeling. Astrophys J, 2014, 780: 5510.1088/0004-637X/780/1/55 ↗
37. Jiang C W, Wu S T, Feng X S, et al. Data-driven magnetohydrodynamic modelling of a flux-emerging active region leading to solar eruption. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 1152210.1038/ncomms11522 ↗
38. Feng X, Yang L, Xiang C, et al. Three-dimensional solar WIND modeling from the Sun to Earth by a SIP-CESE MHD model with a sixcomponent grid. Astrophys J, 2010, 723: 300–31910.1088/0004-637X/723/1/300 ↗
39. Feng X, Zhang S, Xiang C, et al. A hybrid solar wind model of the CESE+HLL method with a Yin-Yang overset grid and an AMR grid. Astrophys J, 2011, 734: 5010.1088/0004-637X/734/1/50 ↗
40. Feng X, Jiang C, Xiang C, et al. A data-driven model for the global coronal evolution. Astrophys J, 2012, 758: 6210.1088/0004-637X/758/1/62 ↗
41. Feng X, Yang L, Xiang C, et al. Validation of the 3D AMR SIP-CESE solar wind model for four carrington rotations. Sol Phys, 2012, 279: 207–22910.1007/s11207-012-9969-9 ↗
42. Feng X, Xiang C, Zhong D, et al. SIP-CESE MHD model of solar wind with adaptive mesh refinement of hexahedral meshes. Comput Phys Commun, 2014, 185: 1965–198010.1016/j.cpc.2014.03.027 ↗
43. Feng X, Ma X, Xiang C. Data-driven modeling of the solar wind from 1 R s to 1 AU. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2015, 120: 10159–1017410.1002/2015JA021911 ↗
44. Jiang C W, Cui S X, Feng X S. Solving the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations by the AMR-CESE method. Comput Fluids, 2012, 54: 105–11710.1016/j.compfluid.2011.10.006 ↗
45. Birn J, Sommer R, Schindler K. Open and closed magnetospheric tail configurations and their stability. Astrophys Space Sci, 1975, 35: 389–40210.1007/BF00637005 ↗
46. Schindler K. A self-consistent theory of the tail of the magnetosphere. In: Earth’s Magnetospheric Processes. Dordrecht: Springer, 1972. 1836–1841
47. Schindler K. Physics of Space Plasma Activity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010
48. Hesse M, Birn J. Three-dimensional magnetotail equilibria by numerical relaxation techniques. J Geophys Res, 1993, 98: 3973–398210.1029/92JA02905 ↗