journal article·2021-09

Data-driven sensor placement for efficient thermal field reconstruction

BangJun Li, HaoRan Liu, RuZhu Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Complete temperature field estimation from limited local measurements is widely desired in many industrial and scientific applications of thermal engineering. Since the sensor configuration dominates the reconstruction performance, some progress has been made in designing sensor placement methods. But these approaches remain to be improved in terms of both accuracy and efficiency due to the lack of comprehensive schemes and efficient optimization algorithms. In this work, we develop a data-driven sensor placement framework for thermal field reconstruction. Specifically, we first tailor the low-dimensional model from the prior thermal maps to represent the high-dimensional temperature distribution states by virtue of proper orthogonal decomposition technique. Then, on such subspace, a recursive greedy algorithm with determinant maximization as the objective function is developed to optimize the sensor placement configuration. Furthermore, we find that the same sensor configuration can be yielded faster by the standard procedures of column-pivoted QR factorization, which allows concise software implementation with readily available function packages. When the sensor locations are determined, we advocate using the data-based closed-form estimator to minimize the reconstruction error. Real-time thermal monitoring on the multi-core processor is employed as the case to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods for thermal field reconstruction. Extensive evaluations are conducted on simulation or experimental datasets of three processors with different architectures. The results show that our method achieves state-of-the-art reconstruction performance while possessing the lowest computational complexity when compared with the existing methods.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Model Reduction and Neural Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Li K, Su H, Chu J, et al. A fast-POD model for simulation and control of indoor thermal environment of buildings. Build Environ, 2013, 60: 150–15710.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.020 ↗
2. Reda S, Cochran R, Nowroz A N. Improved thermal tracking for processors using hard and soft sensor allocation techniques. IEEE Trans Comput, 2011, 60: 841–85110.1109/TC.2011.45 ↗
3. Zhou H, Li X, Cher C, et al. An information-theoretic framework for optimal temperature sensor allocation and full-chip thermal monitoring. In: Proceedings of the DAC Design Automation Conference. San Francisco, 2012. 642–64710.1145/2228360.2228476 ↗
4. Ranieri J, Vincenzi A, Chebira A D, et al. EigenMaps: Algorithms for optimal thermal maps extraction and sensor placement on multicore processors. In: Proceedings of the DAC Design Automation Conference. San Francisco, 2012. 636–64110.1145/2228360.2228475 ↗
5. Ranieri J, Vincenzi A, Chebira A, et al. Near-optimal thermal monitoring framework for many-core systems-on-chip. IEEE Trans Comput, 2015, 64: 3197–320910.1109/TC.2015.2395423 ↗
6. Jiang C, Soh Y C, Li H. Sensor and CFD data fusion for airflow field estimation. Appl Thermal Eng, 2016, 92: 149–16110.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.09.078 ↗
7. Koo B, Son H, Kim H, et al. Model-order reduction technique for temperature prediction and sensor placement in cylindrical steam reformer for HT-PEMFC. Appl Thermal Eng, 2020, 173: 11515310.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115153 ↗
8. Jo T, Koo B, Kim H, et al. Effective sensor placement in a steam reformer using gappy proper orthogonal decomposition. Appl Thermal Eng, 2019, 154: 419–43210.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.03.089 ↗
9. Wang Z, Li H X, Chen C. Reinforcement learning-based optimal sensor placement for spatiotemporal modeling. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2020, 50: 2861–287110.1109/TCYB.2019.2901897 ↗
10. Joshi S, Boyd S. Sensor selection via convex optimization. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2009, 57: 451–46210.1109/TSP.2008.2007095 ↗
11. Li X, Li X, Jiang W, et al. Optimising thermal sensor placement and thermal maps reconstruction for microprocessors using simulated annealing algorithm based on PCA. IET Circuits, Devices & Systems, 2016, 10: 463–47210.1049/iet-cds.2016.0201 ↗
12. Drmac Z, Gugercin S. A new selection operator for the discrete empirical interpolation method—Improved a priori error bound and extensions. SIAM J Sci Comput, 2016, 38: A631–A64810.1137/15M1019271 ↗
13. Leiserson C E, Thompson N C, Emer J S, et al. There’s plenty of room at the top: What will drive computer performance after Moore’s law? Science, 2020, 368: eaam974410.1126/science.aam9744 ↗
14. Sridhar A, Vincenzi A, Ruggiero M, et al. 3D-ICE: Fast compact transient thermal modeling for 3D ICs with inter-tier liquid cooling. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD). San Jose, 2010. 463–47010.1109/ICCAD.2010.5653749 ↗
15. Li X, Li Z, Zhou W, et al. Accurate on-chip temperature sensing for multicore processors using embedded thermal sensors. IEEE Trans VLSI Syst, 2020, 28: 2328–234110.1109/TVLSI.2020.3012833 ↗
16. Eckart C, Young G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1936, 1: 211–21810.1007/BF02288367 ↗
17. Shamaiah M, Banerjee S, Vikalo H. Greedy sensor selection: Leveraging submodularity. In: Proceedings of the 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). Atlanta, 2010. 2572–257710.1109/CDC.2010.5717225 ↗
18. Pukelsheim F. Optimal Design of Experiments. SIAM, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.978089871910910.1137/1.9780898719109 ↗
19. Saito Y, Nonomura T, Yamada K, et al. Determinant-based fast greedy sensor selection algorithm. arXiv: 1911.08757v4
20. Golub G, Van Loan C F. Matrix Computations. Vol. 3. JHU Press, 201310.56021/9781421407944 ↗
21. Jiang C, Chen Z, Su R, et al. Group greedy method for sensor placement. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2019, 67: 2249–226210.1109/TSP.2019.2903017 ↗
22. Horn R A, Johnson C R. Matrix Analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201210.1017/CBO9781139020411 ↗
23. Leon S J, Björck Å, Gander W. Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization: 100 years and more. Numer Linear Algebra Appl, 2013, 20: 492–53210.1002/nla.1839 ↗
24. Manohar K, Brunton B W, Kutz J N, et al. Data-driven sparse sensor placement for reconstruction: Demonstrating the benefits of exploiting known patterns. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2018, 38: 63–8610.1109/MCS.2018.2810460 ↗
25. Businger P, Golub G H. Linear least squares solutions by householder transformations. Numer Math, 1965, 7: 269–27610.1007/BF01436084 ↗
26. Semaan R. Optimal sensor placement using machine learning. Comput Fluids, 2017, 159: 167–17610.1016/j.compfluid.2017.10.002 ↗
27. Clark E, Askham T, Brunton S L, et al. Greedy sensor placement with cost constraints. IEEE Sens J, 2019, 19: 2642–265610.1109/JSEN.2018.2887044 ↗
28. Ranieri J, Chebira A, Vetterli M. Near-optimal sensor placement for linear inverse problems. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2014, 62: 1135–114610.1109/TSP.2014.2299518 ↗
29. Siegal B, Galloway J. Thermal test chip design and performance considerations. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Twenty-fourth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium. San Jose, 2008. 59–6210.1109/STHERM.2008.4509367 ↗