journal article·2024-12

Boosting hydrogen storage performance in COF-108 by single-walled carbon nanotube insertion, boron substitution, and lithium doping at room temperature

ZhaoShun Meng, HongYan Ma, Qing Wang, Xiao Yang, YunHui Wang, XingAo Li

Publisher page

Abstract

A novel hybrid material based on covalent organic frameworks (COFs) was proposed for highly efficient hydrogen (H2) storage at room temperature. Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) were inserted into COF-108, and additional lithium (Li) atoms were doped into the boron-substituted structures. Density functional theory calculations were used to determine the optimized hybrid structures and the reasonable force field parameters between the hydrogen in H2and the elements in the sorbent. In addition, H2adsorption simulations via the grand canonical Monte Carlo approach revealed that SWNT insertion and Li doping substantially elevated the room-temperature H2storage performance. A detailed analysis was provided on the impact of the number of doped Li atoms and the specific surface area on H2uptake. The highest excess gravimetric and volumetric H2uptake values were 5.08 wt% and 31.65 g/L, respectively, for Li-doped B-substituted SWNT(15,0)@COF-108 and SWNT(9,9)@COF-108 at 298 K and 100 bar. Surprisingly, the total H2uptake of Li-doped B-substituted SWNT(9,9)@COF-108 not only met but also surpassed the 2020 target of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) within the temperature and pressure limits of the DOE. This study presents a theoretically grounded, multiple modification strategy for the design of porous materials with exceptional H2storage capabilities, offering a promising avenue for the development of advanced H2storage solutions.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. The U.S. DRIVE Partnership. DOE Technical Targets for Onboard Hydrogen Storage for Light-duty Vehicles. Technical Report, Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office, 2017
2. Schüth F, Bogdanović B, Felderhoff M. Light metal hydrides and complex hydrides for hydrogen storage. Chem Commun, 2004, 20: 2249–225810.1039/B406522K ↗
3. Orimo S, Nakamori Y, Eliseo J R, et al. Complex hydrides for hydrogen storage. Chem Rev, 2007, 107: 4111–413210.1021/cr0501846 ↗
4. Shevlin S A, Guo Z X. Density functional theory simulations of complex hydride and carbon-based hydrogen storage materials. Chem Soc Rev, 2009, 38: 211–22510.1039/B815553B ↗
5. Li A, Lu R, Wang Y, et al. Lithium-doped conjugated microporous polymers for reversible hydrogen storage. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2010, 49: 3330–333310.1002/anie.200906936 ↗
6. Xu D, Sun L, Li G, et al. Methyllithium-doped naphthyl-containing conjugated microporous polymer with enhanced hydrogen storage performance. Chem Eur J, 2016, 22: 7944–794910.1002/chem.201504666 ↗
7. Murray L J, Dincă M, Long J R. Hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev, 2009, 38: 1294–131410.1039/b802256a ↗
8. Hu Y H, Zhang L. Hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: E117–E13010.1002/adma.200902096 ↗
9. Suh M P, Park H J, Prasad T K, et al. Hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks. Chem Rev, 2012, 112: 782–83510.1021/cr200274s ↗
10. Han S S, Furukawa H, Yaghi O M, et al. Covalent organic frameworks as exceptional hydrogen storage materials. J Am Chem Soc, 2008, 130: 11580–1158110.1021/ja803247y ↗
11. Klontzas E, Tylianakis E, Froudakis G E. Hydrogen storage in 3D covalent organic frameworks. A multiscale theoretical investigation. J Phys Chem C, 2008, 112: 9095–909810.1021/jp711326g ↗
12. Furukawa H, Yaghi O M. Storage of hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide in highly porous covalent organic frameworks for clean energy applications. J Am Chem Soc, 2009, 131: 8875–888310.1021/ja9015765 ↗
13. Ding S Y, Wang W. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs): From design to applications. Chem Soc Rev, 2013, 42: 548–56810.1039/C2CS35072F ↗
14. Dillon A C, Jones K M, Bekkedahl T A, et al. Storage ofhydrogen in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature, 1997, 386: 377–37910.1038/386377a0 ↗
15. Liu C, Fan Y Y, Liu M, et al. Hydrogen storage in single-walled carbon nanotubes at room temperature. Science, 1999, 286: 1127–112910.1126/science.286.5442.1127 ↗
16. Yürüm Y, Taralp A, Veziroglu T N. Storage of hydrogen in nanostructured carbon materials. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34: 3784–379810.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.03.001 ↗
17. Côté A P, Benin A I, Ockwig N W, et al. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science, 2005, 310: 1166–117010.1126/science.1120411 ↗
18. Côté A P, El-Kaderi H M, Furukawa H, et al. Reticular synthesis of microporous and mesoporous 2D covalent organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc, 2007, 129: 12914–1291510.1021/ja0751781 ↗
19. El-Kaderi H M, Hunt J R, Mendoza-Cortes J L, et al. Designed synthesis of 3D covalent organic frameworks. Science, 2007, 316: 268–27210.1126/science.1139915 ↗
20. Garberoglio G. Computer simulation ofthe adsorption oflight gases in covalent organic frameworks. Langmuir, 2007, 23: 12154–1215810.1021/la701736m ↗
21. Choi Y J, Lee J W, Choi J H, et al. Ideal metal-decorated three dimensional covalent organic frameworks for reversible hydrogen storage. Appl Phys Lett, 2008, 92: 17310210.1063/1.2912525 ↗
22. Sun Y Y, Lee K, Kim Y H, et al. Ab initio design of Ca-decorated organic frameworks for high capacity molecular hydrogen storage with enhanced binding. Appl Phys Lett, 2009, 95: 03310910.1063/1.3182796 ↗
23. Wu M M, Wang Q, Sun Q, et al. First-principles study of hydrogen adsorption in metal-doped COF-10. J Chem Phys, 2010, 133: 15470610.1063/1.3503654 ↗
24. Cao D, Lan J, Wang W, et al. Lithium-doped 3D covalent organic frameworks: High-capacity hydrogen storage materials. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2009, 48: 4730–473310.1002/anie.200900960 ↗
25. Lan J, Cao D, Wang W. Li-doped and nondoped covalent organic borosilicate framework for hydrogen storage. J Phys Chem C, 2010, 114: 3108–311410.1021/jp9106525 ↗
26. Mendoza-Cortés J L, Han S S, Goddard Iii W A. High H2 uptake in Li, Na-, K-metalated covalent organic frameworks and metal organic frameworks at 298 K. J Phys Chem A, 2012, 116: 1621–163110.1021/jp206981d ↗
27. Klontzas E, Tylianakis E, Froudakis G E. Hydrogen storage in lithium-functionalized 3-D covalent-organic framework materials. J Phys Chem C, 2009, 113: 21253–2125710.1021/jp907241y ↗
28. Li F, Zhao J, Johansson B, et al. Improving hydrogen storage properties of covalent organic frameworks by substitutional doping. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 266–27110.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.061 ↗
29. Rao D, Lu R, Xiao C, et al. Lithium-doped MOF impregnated with lithium-coated fullerenes: A hydrogen storage route for high gravimetric and volumetric uptakes at ambient temperatures. Chem Commun, 2011, 47: 7698–770010.1039/c1cc11832c ↗
30. Ke Z, Cheng Y, Yang S, et al. Modification of COF-108 via impregnation/functionalization and Li-doping for hydrogen storage at ambient temperature. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 11461–1146810.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.143 ↗
31. Chae H K, Siberio-Pérez D Y, Kim J, et al. A route to high surface area, porosity and inclusion of large molecules in crystals. Nature, 2004, 427: 523–52710.1038/nature02311 ↗
32. Frost H, Düren T, Snurr R Q. Effects ofsurface area, free volume, and heat ofadsorption on hydrogen uptake in metal-organic frameworks. J Phys Chem B, 2006, 110: 9565–957010.1021/jp060433+ ↗
33. Azzouz A. Achievement in hydrogen storage on adsorbents with high surface-to-bulk ratio—Prospects for Si-containing matrices. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 5032–504910.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.024 ↗
34. Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54: 11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
35. Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci, 1996, 6: 15–5010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
36. Blöchl P E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B, 1994, 50: 17953–1797910.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
37. Kresse G, Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B, 1999, 59: 1758–177510.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
38. Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 77: 3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
39. Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, et al. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys, 2010, 132: 15410410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
40. Nosé S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J Chem Phys, 1984, 81: 511–51910.1063/1.447334 ↗
41. Hoover W G. Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A, 1985, 31: 1695–169710.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
42. Han S S, Goddard W A. Lithium-doped metal-organic frameworks for reversible H2 storage at ambient temperature. J Am Chem Soc, 2007, 129: 8422–842310.1021/ja072599+ ↗
43. Vlugt T J H, Schenk M. Influence of framework flexibility on the adsorption properties of hydrocarbons in the zeolite silicalite. J Phys Chem B, 2002, 106: 12757–1276310.1021/jp0263931 ↗
44. Bi L, Ding J, Zou J, et al. DFT study of hydrogen sorption on light metal (Li, Be, and Na) decorated novel fullerene-CNTs networks. Appl Surf Sci, 2021, 569: 15100010.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151000 ↗
45. Wei C, Niu X, Chen H. First-principle study of highly controllable boron-doped graphene (BC20) as a high-capacity anode for potassium-ion batteries. Mater Res Express, 2022, 9: 06560410.1088/2053-1591/ac76a2 ↗
46. Lee H, Ihm J, Cohen M L, et al. Calcium-decorated carbon nanotubes for high-capacity hydrogen storage: First-principles calculations. Phys Rev B, 2009, 80: 11541210.1103/PhysRevB.80.115412 ↗
47. Bhowmick R, Rajasekaran S, Friebel D, et al. Hydrogen spillover in Pt-single-walled carbon nanotube composites: Formation of stable C–H bonds. J Am Chem Soc, 2011, 133: 5580–558610.1021/ja200403m ↗
48. Zhou Z, Gao X, Yan J, et al. A first-principles study of lithium absorption in boron- or nitrogen-doped single-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon, 2004, 42: 2677–268210.1016/j.carbon.2004.06.019 ↗
49. Mpourmpakis G, Tylianakis E, Papanikolaou D, et al. Theoretical study of alkaline metal cations in carbon nanotubes. Rev Adv Mater Sci, 2006, 11: 92–97
50. Furukawa H, Ko N, Go Y B, et al. Ultrahigh porosity in metal-organic frameworks. Science, 2010, 329: 424–42810.1126/science.1192160 ↗
51. Xia L, Wang F, Liu Q. Effects of substituents on the H2 storage properties of COF-320. Mater Lett, 2016, 162: 9–1210.1016/j.matlet.2015.09.103 ↗
52. Bian L Y, Li X D, Huang X Y, et al. Molecular simulation on hydrogen storage properties of five novel covalent organic frameworks with the higher valency. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47: 29390–2939810.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.285 ↗
53. Guo J H, Zhang H, Gong M, et al. Ca2+- and Mg2+-doped covalent organic frameworks exhibiting high hydrogen and acetylene storage. Struct Chem, 2013, 24: 691–70310.1007/s11224-012-0120-1 ↗
54. Xia L, Liu Q. Lithium doping on covalent organic framework-320 for enhancing hydrogen storage at ambient temperature. J Solid State Chem, 2016, 244: 1–510.1016/j.jssc.2016.09.007 ↗
55. Dashevskaya E, Litvin I, Nikitin E. Gyroscopic effect in low-energy classical capture of a rotating quadrupolar diatom by an ion. J Phys Chem A, 2006, 110: 2876–288410.1021/jp053917z ↗