journal article·2024-06

A novel domain decomposition-based model for efficient dynamic predictions of large composite machine tools

YangBo Yu, YuLei Ji, YanRen Chen, Kun Xu, QingZhen Bi

Publisher page

Abstract

We propose a large combined moving component composed of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates for making lightweight machine tools with high dynamic performance. The accurate dynamic prediction of composite machine tools is essential for the new generation machine tool. This paper aims to address two challenges in numerical dynamic modeling and the design of composite machine tools to enhance development efficiency. (1) Anisotropic composite laminates, which form the composite machine tool, exhibit coupling in various directions. We propose the generalized continuity condition of the boundary to tackle this dynamic modeling challenge. (2) Composite machine tools feature numerous composite-metal coupled structures. The mechanical model correction of isotropic metals is performed to address their dynamics. We take the example of a five-axis gantry machine tool with composite moving parts, establish a dynamic model for efficient prediction, and verify it through simulation and experimentation. The proposed method yields remarkable results, with an average relative error of only 3.85% in modal frequency prediction and a staggering 99.7% reduction in solution time compared to finite element analysis. We further discuss the dynamic performance of the machine tool under varied stacking angles and layer numbers of the composite machine tool. We propose general design criteria for composite machine tools to consider the modal frequency and manufacturing cost of machine tools.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Möhring H C, Brecher C, Abele E, et al. Materials in machine tool structures. CIRP Ann, 2015, 64: 725–74810.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.005 ↗
2. Ma Y, Li F, Wang L, et al. Life cycle carbon emission assessments and comparisons of cast iron and resin mineral composite machine tool bed in China. Int J Adv Manuf Tech, 2021, 113: 1143–115210.1007/s00170-021-06656-9 ↗
3. Wang X J, Ma Y J, Wang L, et al. Advances in the optimization design study for aircraft composite structure. Sci Sin-Phys Mech Astron, 2018, 48: 01460210.1360/SSPMA2017-00043 ↗
4. Hu L, Zha J, Chen Y. Study on chuck performance of ultra-precision machine tool based on CFRP pair bionic structure. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 2020, 42: 23110.1007/s40430-020-02307-4 ↗
5. Lee D G, Do Suh J, Sung Kim H, et al. Design and manufacture of composite high speed machine tool structures. Compos Sci Tech, 2004, 64: 1523–153010.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.021 ↗
6. Kato M, Kono D, Kakinuma Y. Dynamical characteristic validation of motorized CFRP spindle unit based on receptance coupling. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2022, 173: 10902810.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109028 ↗
7. Yang M, Gui L, Hu Y, et al. Dynamic analysis and vibration testing of CFRP drive-line system used in heavy-duty machine tool. Results Phys, 2018, 8: 1110–111810.1016/j.rinp.2018.01.067 ↗
8. Rangasamy S, Loganathan K, Natesan A. Experimental investigation and numerical analysis of the dynamic characteristics of a laminated hybrid composite bed. Polym Compos, 2017, 38: 20–2610.1002/pc.23555 ↗
9. Wu J, Ye H, Yu G, et al. A novel dynamic evaluation method and its application to a 4-DOF parallel manipulator. Mech Mach Theor, 2022, 168: 10462710.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104627 ↗
10. Wu J, Yu G, Gao Y, et al. Mechatronics modeling and vibration analysis of a 2-DOF parallel manipulator in a 5-DOF hybrid machine tool. Mech Mach Theor, 2018, 121: 430–44510.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.10.023 ↗
11. Wu J, Wang J, Wang L, et al. Dynamics and control of a planar 3-DOF parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy. Mech Mach Theor, 2009, 44: 835–84910.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.04.002 ↗
12. Fu Y, Yao X. A review on manufacturing defects and their detection of fiber reinforced resin matrix composites. Compos Part C-Open Access, 2022, 8: 10027610.1016/j.jcomc.2022.100276 ↗
13. Mohring H C. Composites in production machines. Procedia CIRP, 2017, 66: 2–910.1016/j.procir.2017.04.013 ↗
14. Altintas Y. Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201210.1017/CBO9780511843723 ↗
15. Li X F, Huang T, Zhao H, et al. A review of recent advances in machining techniques of complex surfaces. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 1915–193910.1007/s11431-022-2115-x ↗
16. Song C, Xu S, Zhang J, et al. Design and analysis of carbon fiber composite propeller shaft for machine tool. Manuf Tech Mach Tool, 2012, 12: 53–55.
17. Birk F, Ali F, Weigold M, et al. Lightweight hybrid CFRP design for machine tools with focus on simple manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Tech, 2020, 108: 3915–392410.1007/s00170-020-05535-z ↗
18. Murugan S, Thyla P R. Mechanical and dynamic properties of alternate materials for machine tool structures: A review. J Reinf Plast Compos, 2018, 37: 1456–146710.1177/0731684418799946 ↗
19. Wu T, Cai L. Optimization design of cross beam structure of gantry heavy duty CNC machine tool. DEStech Trans Eng Tech Res, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.12783/dtetr/amee2018/2528910.12783/dtetr/amee2018/25289 ↗
20. Law M, Phani A S, Altintas Y. Position-dependent multibody dynamic modeling of machine tools based on improved reduced order models. J Manuf Sci Eng, 2013, 135: 02100810.1115/1.4023453 ↗
21. Lu H, Ding Y, Chang Y, et al. Dynamics modelling and simulating of ultra-precision fly-cutting machine tool. Int J Precis Eng Manuf, 2020, 21: 189–20210.1007/s12541-019-00239-1 ↗
22. Bilgili D, Budak E, Altintas Y. Multibody dynamic modeling of five-axis machine tools with improved efficiency. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2022, 171: 10894510.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108945 ↗
23. Semm T, Sellemond M, Rebelein C, et al. Efficient dynamic parameter identification framework for machine tools. J Manuf Sci Eng, 2020, 142: 08100310.1115/1.4046987 ↗
24. Law M, Altintas Y, Srikantha Phani A. Rapid evaluation and optimization of machine tools with position-dependent stability. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2013, 68: 81–9010.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.02.003 ↗
25. Huynh H N, Altintas Y. Modeling the dynamics of five-axis machine tool using the multibody approach. J Manuf Sci Eng, 2021, 143: 02101210.1115/1.4048854 ↗
26. Yang P, Hao S, Chen K, et al. Modeling of precision reliability for NC machine tool based on multi-body system theory. In: Proceedings of the 2011 2nd International Conference on Digital Manufacturing and Automation. Zhangjiajie: IEEE, 2011. 750–75410.1109/ICDMA.2011.185 ↗
27. Venugopal P R, Kalayarasan M, Thyla P R, et al. Structural investigation of steel-reinforced epoxy granite machine tool column by finite element analysis. Proc IMechE, 2019, 233: 2267–227910.1177/1464420719840592 ↗
28. Li F, Chen J L, Gong W R. Buckling behaviour of delaminated composite panels under four-point bending. Sci Sin Tech, 2015, 45: 464–47010.1360/N092014-00432 ↗
29. Sayyad A S, Ghugal Y M. Bending, buckling and free vibration of laminated composite and sandwich beams: A critical review of literature. Compos Struct, 2017, 171: 486–50410.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.053 ↗
30. Hu H, Mei Z, Li H. A three-dimensional equivalent stiffness model of composite laminates with wrinkle defects. Materials, 2022, 15: 526410.3390/ma15155264 ↗
31. Li J, Hua H, Shen R. Dynamic finite element method for generally laminated composite beams. Int J Mech Sci, 2008, 50: 466–48010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.09.014 ↗
32. Qu Y, Hua H, Meng G. A domain decomposition approach for vibration analysis of isotropic and composite cylindrical shells with arbitrary boundaries. Compos Struct, 2013, 95: 307–32110.1016/j.compstruct.2012.06.022 ↗
33. Guo X Y, Zhang W, Yao M H. Nonlinear dynamics of angle-ply composite laminated thin plate with third-order shear deformation. Sci China Tech Sci, 2010, 53: 612–62210.1007/s11431-010-0074-8 ↗
34. Liu F, Qi L, Feng S F. Load distributions analysis of muti-pin composite joints: Single-lap. IOP Conf Ser-Mater Sci Eng, 2018, 292: 01207410.1088/1757-899X/292/1/012074 ↗
35. Qu Y, Wu S, Li H, et al. Three-dimensional free and transient vibration analysis of composite laminated and sandwich rectangular parallelepipeds: Beams, plates and solids. Compos Part B-Eng, 2015, 73: 96–11010.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.027 ↗
36. Meng S, Zhong R, Wang Q, et al. Vibration characteristic analysis of three-dimensional sandwich cylindrical shell based on the Spectro-Geometric method. Compos Struct, 2024, 327: 11766110.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117661 ↗
37. Carrera E, Miglioretti F, Petrolo M. Accuracy of refined finite elements for laminated plate analysis. Compos Struct, 2011, 93: 1311–132710.1016/j.compstruct.2010.11.007 ↗
38. Reddy J N. Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates and Shells. Florida: CRC Press, 2004
39. Ritchie I G, Rosinger H E, Shillinglaw A J, et al. The dynamic elastic behaviour of a fibre-reinforced composite sheet. I. The precise experimental determination of the principal elastic moduli. J Phys D-Appl Phys, 1975, 8: 1733–174910.1088/0022-3727/8/15/007 ↗
40. Cai L, Zhang D, Zhou S, et al. Investigation on mechanical properties and equivalent model of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels. J Mater Eng Perform, 2018, 27: 6585–659610.1007/s11665-018-3771-2 ↗
41. Wu Y X, Wang F. Analysis for equivalent in-plane elastic parameters of the honeycomb core. AMM, 2014, 441: 84–9010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.441.84 ↗
42. Zhao M, Yue C, Chen Z, et al. Research progress on milling deformation and control of aviation structural parts. Aeronaut Manuf Tech, 2022, 65: 108–117
43. Yuan J, Lyu B, Hang W, et al. Review on the progress of ultraprecision machining technologies. Front Mech Eng, 2017, 12: 158–18010.1007/s11465-017-0455-9 ↗