Inter- and intramolecular adhesion mechanisms of mussel foot proteins
Source abstract
Abstract
Mussel foot proteins (Mfps) secreted in the byssal plaque of marine mussels are widely researched for their relevance to mussel adhesion in water. As the abundant residue in the amino acid sequences of major adhesive proteins, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (Dopa) or its catecholic moiety plays a key role in both Mfp binding to surface and cohesive cross-linking of Mfps in byssal plaques. The binding performance of an Mfp significantly depends on the content and redox state of Dopa, whereas the types of interaction vary in line with different surface chemistries and pH conditions. Thorough understanding of mussel adhesion from a molecular perspective is crucial to promote the application of synthetic mussel-bionic adhesives. This article presents a brief review of the research progress on the adhesion mechanisms of Mfps, which further emphasizes the contributions of Dopa-mediated interactions and considers other amino acids and factors. The involved inter- and intramolecular interactions are responsible for not only the diverse adhesion capacities of an adhesive byssal plaque as mussel’s adhesion precursor but also the formation and properties of the plaque structure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Israelachvili J N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces. San Diego: Academic Press, 2011
2. Bell E, Gosline J. Mechanical design of mussel byssus: Material yield enhances attachment strength. J Exp Biol, 1996, 199: 1005–101710.1242/jeb.199.4.1005 ↗
3. Ackerman J D, Cottrell C M, Ethier C R, et al. Attachment strength of zebra mussels on natural, polymeric, and mettallic materials. J Environ Eng, 1996, 122: 141–14810.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1996)122:2(141) ↗
4. Wilker J J. Marine bioinorganic materials: Mussels pumping iron. Curr Opin Chem Biol, 2010, 14: 276–28310.1016/j.cbpa.2009.11.009 ↗
5. Waite J H, Tanzer M L. Polyphenolic substance of mytilus edulis: Novel adhesive containing l-dopa and hydroxyproline. Science, 1981, 212: 1038–104010.1126/science.212.4498.1038 ↗
6. Waite J H. Evidence for a repeating 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine- and hydroxyproline-containing decapeptide in the adhesive protein of the mussel, mytilus edulis L. J Biol Chem, 1983, 258: 2911–291510.1016/S0021-9258(18)32805-9 ↗
7. DeMartini D G, Errico J M, Sjoestroem S, et al. A cohort of new adhesive proteins identified from transcriptomic analysis of mussel foot glands. J R Soc Interface, 2017, 14: 2017015110.1098/rsif.2017.0151 ↗
8. Rees D J, Hanifi A, Obille A, et al. Fingerprinting of proteins that mediate quagga mussel adhesion using a de novo assembled foot transcriptome. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 630510.1038/s41598-019-41976-7 ↗
9. Waite J H. Mussel adhesion—essential footwork. J Exp Biol, 2017, 220: 517–53010.1242/jeb.134056 ↗
10. Yu M, Hwang J, Deming T J. Role of l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine in mussel adhesive proteins. J Am Chem Soc, 1999, 121: 5825–582610.1021/ja990469y ↗
11. Li Y, Qin M, Li Y, et al. Single molecule evidence for the adaptive binding of dopa to different wet surfaces. Langmuir, 2014, 30: 4358–436610.1021/la501189n ↗
12. Zhang W, Yang H, Liu F, et al. Molecular interactions between dopa and surfaces with different functional groups: A chemical force microscopy study. RSC Adv, 2017, 7: 32518–3252710.1039/C7RA04228K ↗
13. Yu J, Kan Y, Rapp M, et al. Adaptive hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions of mussel foot proteins with organic thin films. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110: 15680–1568510.1073/pnas.1315015110 ↗
14. Wei W, Petrone L, Tan Y P, et al. An underwater surface-drying peptide inspired by a mussel adhesive protein. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 3496–350710.1002/adfm.201600210 ↗
15. Utzig T, Stock P, Valtiner M. Resolving non-specific and specific adhesive interactions of catechols at solid/liquid interfaces at the molecular scale. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2016, 55: 9524–952810.1002/anie.201601881 ↗
16. Lee H, Scherer N F, Messersmith P B. Single-molecule mechanics of mussel adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103: 12999–1300310.1073/pnas.0605552103 ↗
17. Wang J, Tahir M N, Kappl M, et al. Influence of binding-site density in wet bioadhesion. Adv Mater, 2008, 20: 3872–387610.1002/adma.200801140 ↗
18. Anderson T H, Yu J, Estrada A, et al. The contribution of DOPA to substrate-peptide adhesion and internal cohesion of mussel-inspired synthetic peptide films. Adv Funct Mater, 2010, 20: 4196–420510.1002/adfm.201000932 ↗
19. Zhang W, Yang F K, Pan Z, et al. Bio-inspired dopamine functio-nalization of polypyrrole for improved adhesion and conductivity. Macromol Rapid Commun, 2014, 35: 350–35410.1002/marc.201300761 ↗
20. Das P, Reches M. Revealing the role of catechol moieties in the interactions between peptides and inorganic surfaces. Nanoscale, 2016, 8: 15309–1531610.1039/C6NR04550B ↗
21. Zhong C, Gurry T, Cheng A A, et al. Strong underwater adhesives made by self-assembling multi-protein nanofibres. Nat Nanotech, 2014, 9: 858–86610.1038/nnano.2014.199 ↗
22. Saiz-Poseu J, Mancebo-Aracil J, Nador F, et al. The chemistry behind catechol-based adhesion. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2019, 58: 696–71410.1002/anie.201801063 ↗
23. Lee H, Dellatore S M, Miller W M, et al. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science, 2007, 318: 426–43010.1126/science.1147241 ↗
24. Fant C, Sott K, Elwing H, et al. Adsorption behavior and en-zymatically or chemically induced cross-linking of a mussel adhesive protein. Biofouling, 2000, 16: 119–13210.1080/08927010009378437 ↗
25. Höök F, Kasemo B, Nylander T, et al. Variations in coupled water, viscoelastic properties,and film thickness of a mefp-1 protein film during adsorption and cross-linking: A quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring,ellipsometry,and surface plasmon resonance study. Anal Chem, 2001, 73: 5796–580410.1021/ac0106501 ↗
26. Baty A M, Leavitt P K, Siedlecki C A, et al. Adsorption of adhesive proteins from the marine mussel, Mytilus edulis, on polymer films in the hydrated state using angle dependent X-ray photoelectron spec-troscopy and atomic force microscopy. Langmuir, 1997, 13: 5702–571010.1021/la9610720 ↗
27. Baty A M, Suci P., Tyler B J, et al. Investigation of mussel adhesive protein adsorption on polystyrene and poly(octadecyl methacrylate) using angle dependent XPS, ATR-FTIR, and A. M. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1996, 177: 307–31510.1006/jcis.1996.0036 ↗
28. Suci P A, Geesey G G. Influence of sodium periodate and tyrosinase on binding of alginate to adlayers of mytilus edulis foot protein 1. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2000, 230: 340–34810.1006/jcis.2000.7120 ↗
29. Fant C, Hedlund J, Höök F, et al. Investigation of adsorption and cross-linking of a mussel adhesive protein using attenuated total internal reflection fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (atr-ftir). J Adhes, 2010, 86: 25–3810.1080/00218460903417768 ↗
30. Wei W, Yu J, Broomell C, et al. Hydrophobic enhancement of dopa-mediated adhesion in a mussel foot protein. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135: 377–38310.1021/ja309590f ↗
31. Mudunkotuwa I A, Minshid A A, Grassian V H. ATR-FTIR spec-troscopy as a tool to probe surface adsorption on nanoparticles at the liquid-solid interface in environmentally and biologically relevant media. Analyst, 2014, 139: 870–88110.1039/C3AN01684F ↗
32. Onyido I, Norris A R, Buncel E. Biomolecule-mercury interactions: Modalities of DNA base-mercury binding mechanisms. Remediation strategies. Chem Rev, 2004, 104: 5911–593010.1021/cr030443w ↗
33. Hong S, Chen T, Zhu Y, et al. Live-cell stimulated raman scattering imaging of alkyne-tagged biomolecules. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53: 5827–583110.1002/anie.201400328 ↗
34. Hwang D S, Harrington M J, Lu Q, et al. Mussel foot protein-1 (mcfp-1) interaction with titania surfaces. J Mater Chem, 2012, 22: 15530–1553310.1039/c2jm32439c ↗
35. Yu J, Wei W, Menyo M S, et al. Adhesion of mussel foot protein-3 to TiO2 surfaces: The effect of pH. Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14: 1072–107710.1021/bm301908y ↗
36. Harrington M J, Masic A, Holten-Andersen N, et al. Iron-clad fibers: A metal-based biological strategy for hard flexible coatings. Science, 2010, 328: 216–22010.1126/science.1181044 ↗
37. Willets K A, van Duyne R P. Localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and sensing. Annu Rev Phys Chem, 2007, 58: 267–29710.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104607 ↗
38. Nie S. Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface-enhanced raman scattering. Science, 1997, 275: 1102–110610.1126/science.275.5303.1102 ↗
39. Akemi Ooka A, Garrell R L. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of DOPA-containing peptides related to adhesive protein of marine mussel, Mytilus edulis. Biopolymers, 2000, 57: 92–10210.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(2000)57:2<92::AID-BIP6>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
40. Lee N, Hummer D R, Sverjensky D A, et al. Speciation of l-DOPA on nanorutile as a function of pH and surface coverage using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Langmuir, 2012, 28: 17322–1733010.1021/la303607a ↗
41. Waite J H. Adhesion à la moule. Integrative Comp Biol, 2002, 42: 1172–118010.1093/icb/42.6.1172 ↗
42. Hansen D C, Corcoran S G, Waite J H. Enzymatic tempering of a mussel adhesive protein film. Langmuir, 1998, 14: 1139–114710.1021/la970881w ↗
43. Engel A, Müller D J. Observing single biomolecules at work with the atomic force microscope. Nat Struct Biol, 2000, 7: 715–71810.1038/78929 ↗
44. Neuman K C, Nagy A. Single-molecule force spectroscopy: Optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers and atomic force microscopy. Nat Methods, 2008, 5: 491–50510.1038/nmeth.1218 ↗
45. Frank B P, Belfort G. Adhesion of mytilus edulis foot protein 1 on silica: Ionic effects on biofouling. Biotechnol Prog, 2002, 18: 580–58610.1021/bp010140s ↗
46. Hwang D S, Yoo H J, Jun J H, et al. Expression of functional re-combinant mussel adhesive protein mgfp-5 in escherichia coli. Appl Environ MicroBiol, 2004, 70: 3352–335910.1128/AEM.70.6.3352-3359.2004 ↗
47. Li Y, Cao Y. The molecular mechanisms underlying mussel adhesion. Nanoscale Adv, 2019, 1: 4246–425710.1039/C9NA00582J ↗
48. Butt H J, Cappella B, Kappl M. Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: Technique, interpretation and applications. Surf Sci Rep, 2005, 59: 1–15210.1016/j.surfrep.2005.08.003 ↗
49. Tabor D, Winterton R H S. The direct measurement of normal and retarded van der Waals forces. Proc R Soc Lond A, 1969, 312: 435–45010.1098/rspa.1969.0169 ↗
50. Oh D X, Shin S, Yoo H Y, et al. Surface forces apparatus and its applications for nanomechanics of underwater adhesives. Korean J Chem Eng, 2014, 31: 1306–131510.1007/s11814-014-0136-x ↗
51. Chough S K, Lee H J, Yoon S H. Marine Geology of Korean Seas. Elsevier, 2000
52. Si W, Zhang Y, Wu G, et al. DNA sequencing technology based on nanopore sensors by theoretical calculations and simulations. Chin Sci Bull, 2014, 59: 4929–494110.1007/s11434-014-0622-x ↗
53. Petrone L, Kumar A, Sutanto C N, et al. Mussel adhesion is dictated by time-regulated secretion and molecular conformation of mussel adhesive proteins. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 873710.1038/ncomms9737 ↗
54. Levine Z A, Rapp M V, Wei W, et al. Surface force measurements and simulations of mussel-derived peptide adhesives on wet organic surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2016, 113: 4332–433710.1073/pnas.1603065113 ↗
55. He C, Zhang H, Lin C, et al. A molecular dynamics study on the adsorption of a mussel protein on two different films: Polymer film and a sam. Chem Phys Lett, 2017, 676: 144–14910.1016/j.cplett.2017.03.070 ↗
56. Mian S A, Yang L M, Saha L C, et al. A fundamental understanding of catechol and water adsorption on a hydrophilic silica surface: Exploring the underwater adhesion mechanism of mussels on an atomic scale. Langmuir, 2014, 30: 6906–691410.1021/la500800f ↗
57. Li Y, Liao M, Zhou J. Catechol-cation adhesion on silica surfaces: Molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2017, 19: 29222–2923110.1039/C7CP05284G ↗
58. Li Y, Liao M, Zhou J. Catechol and its derivatives adhesion on graphene: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem C, 2018, 122: 22965–2297410.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06392 ↗
59. Li S C, Chu L N, Gong X Q, et al. Hydrogen bonding controls the dynamics of catechol adsorbed on a TiO2(110) surface. Science, 2010, 328: 882–88410.1126/science.1188328 ↗
60. Leng C, Liu Y, Jenkins C, et al. Interfacial structure of a dopa-inspired adhesive polymer studied by sum frequency generation vi-brational spectroscopy. Langmuir, 2013, 29: 6659–666410.1021/la4008729 ↗
61. Mian S A, Saha L C, Jang J, et al. Density functional theory study of catechol adhesion on silica surfaces. J Phys Chem C, 2010, 114: 20793–2080010.1021/jp1070538 ↗
62. Mian S A, Gao X, Nagase S, et al. Adsorption of catechol on a wet silica surface: Density functional theory study. Theor Chem Acc, 2011, 130: 333–33910.1007/s00214-011-0982-0 ↗
63. Mian S A, Khan Y. The adhesion mechanism of marine mussel foot protein: Adsorption of L-Dopa on α- and β-cristobalite silica using density functional theory. J Chem, 2017, 2017: 1–610.1155/2017/8756519 ↗
64. Qin Z, Buehler M. Molecular mechanics of dihydroxyphenylalanine at a silica interface. Appl Phys Lett, 2012, 101: 08370210.1063/1.4747214 ↗
65. Lee B P, Messersmith P B, Israelachvili J N, et al. Mussel-inspired adhesives and coatings. Annu Rev Mater Res, 2011, 41: 99–13210.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100429 ↗
66. Lin Q, Gourdon D, Sun C, et al. Adhesion mechanisms of the mussel foot proteins mfp-1 and mfp-3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 3782–378610.1073/pnas.0607852104 ↗
67. Yu J, Wei W, Danner E, et al. Effects of interfacial redox in mussel adhesive protein films on mica. Adv Mater, 2011, 23: 2362–236610.1002/adma.201003580 ↗
68. Danner E W, Kan Y, Hammer M U, et al. Adhesion of mussel foot protein mefp-5 to mica: An underwater superglue. Biochemistry, 2012, 51: 6511–651810.1021/bi3002538 ↗
69. Lu Q, Danner E, Waite J H, et al. Adhesion of mussel foot proteins to different substrate surfaces. J R Soc Interface, 2013, 10: 2012075910.1098/rsif.2012.0759 ↗
70. Papov V V, Diamond T V, Biemann K, et al. Hydroxyarginine-containing polyphenolic proteins in the adhesive plaques of the marine mussel Mytilus edulis. J Biol Chem, 1995, 270: 20183–2019210.1074/jbc.270.34.20183 ↗
71. Ahn B K, Lee D W, Israelachvili J N, et al. Surface-initiated self-healing of polymers in aqueous media. Nat Mater, 2014, 13: 867–87210.1038/nmat4037 ↗
72. Maier G P, Rapp M V, Waite J H, et al. Adaptive synergy between catechol and lysine promotes wet adhesion by surface salt displacement. Science, 2015, 349: 628–63210.1126/science.aab0556 ↗
73. Rapp M V, Maier G P, Dobbs H A, et al. Defining the catechol-cation synergy for enhanced wet adhesion to mineral surfaces. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138: 9013–901610.1021/jacs.6b03453 ↗
74. Li Y, Wang T, Xia L, et al. Single-molecule study of the synergistic effects of positive charges and dopa for wet adhesion. J Mater Chem B, 2017, 5: 4416–442010.1039/C7TB00131B ↗
75. Sever M J, Weisser J T, Monahan J, et al. Metal-mediated cross-linking in the generation of a marine-mussel adhesive. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2004, 43: 448–45010.1002/anie.200352759 ↗
76. Holten-Andersen N, Mates T E, Toprak M S, et al. Metals and the integrity of a biological coating: The cuticle of mussel byssus. Langmuir, 2009, 25: 3323–332610.1021/la8027012 ↗
77. Li S, Xia Z, Chen Y, et al. Byssus structure and protein composition in the highly invasive fouling mussel limnoperna fortunei. Front Physiol, 2018, 9: 41810.3389/fphys.2018.00418 ↗
78. Taylor S W, Luther G W, Waite J H. Polarographic and spectro-photometric investigation of iron(iii) complexation to 3,4-dihydrox-yphenylalanine-containing peptides and proteins from mytilus edulis. Inorg Chem, 1994, 33: 5819–582410.1021/ic00103a032 ↗
79. Dalsin J L, Lin L, Tosatti S, et al. Protein resistance of titanium oxide surfaces modified by biologically inspired mpeg-dopa. Langmuir, 2005, 21: 640–64610.1021/la048626g ↗
80. Janković I A, Šaponjić Z V, Čomor M I, et al. Surface modification of colloidal TiO2 nanoparticles with bidentate benzene derivatives. J Phys Chem C, 2009, 113: 12645–1265210.1021/jp9013338 ↗
81. Holten-Andersen N, Jaishankar A, Harrington M J, et al. Metal-coordination: Using one of nature’s tricks to control soft material mechanics. J Mater Chem B, 2014, 2: 2467–247210.1039/C3TB21374A ↗
82. Karpishin T B, Gebhard M S, Solomon E I, et al. Spectroscopic studies of the electronic structure of iron(III) tris(catecholates). J Am Chem Soc, 1991, 113: 2977–298410.1021/ja00008a028 ↗
83. Lana-Villarreal T, Rodes A, Pérez J M, et al. A spectroscopic and electrochemical approach to the study of the interactions and pho-toinduced electron transfer between catechol and anatase nano-particles in aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc, 2005, 127: 12601–1261110.1021/ja052798y ↗
84. Keten S, Buehler M J. Geometric confinement governs the rupture strength of h-bond assemblies at a critical length scale. Nano Lett, 2008, 8: 743–74810.1021/nl0731670 ↗
85. Li Y, Liu H, Wang T, et al. Single-molecule force spectroscopy reveals multiple binding modes between dopa and different rutile surfaces. ChemPhysChem, 2017, 18: 1466–146910.1002/cphc.201600374 ↗
86. Xu Z. Mechanics of metal-catecholate complexes: The roles of coordination state and metal types. Sci Rep, 2013, 3: 291410.1038/srep02914 ↗
87. Yu M, Deming T J. Synthetic polypeptide mimics of marine ad-hesives. Macromolecules, 1998, 31: 4739–474510.1021/ma980268z ↗
88. Zhang F, Pan J. Recent development of corrosion protection strategy based on mussel adhesive protein. Front Mater, 2019, 6: 20710.3389/fmats.2019.00207 ↗
89. Hansen D C, Luther G. George W. I, Waite J H. The adsorption of the adhesive protein of the blue mussel mytilus edulis l onto type 304l stainless steel. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1994, 168: 206–21610.1006/jcis.1994.1410 ↗
90. Yu F, Chen S, Chen Y, et al. Experimental and theoretical analysis of polymerization reaction process on the polydopamine membranes and its corrosion protection properties for 304 stainless steel. J Mol Structure, 2010, 982: 152–16110.1016/j.molstruc.2010.08.021 ↗
91. Sababi M, Zhang F, Krivosheeva O, et al. Thin composite films of mussel adhesive proteins and ceria nanoparticles on carbon steel for corrosion protection. J Electrochem Soc, 2012, 159: C364–C37110.1149/2.061208jes ↗
92. Zhao H, Waite J H. Proteins in load-bearing junctions: The histidine-rich metal-binding protein of mussel byssus. Biochemistry, 2006, 45: 14223–1423110.1021/bi061677n ↗
93. Schmidt S, Reinecke A, Wojcik F, et al. Metal-mediated molecular self-healing in histidine-rich mussel peptides. Biomacromolecules, 2014, 15: 1644–165210.1021/bm500017u ↗
94. Hwang D S, Zeng H, Masic A, et al. Protein- and metal-dependent interactions of a prominent protein in mussel adhesive plaques. J Biol Chem, 2010, 285: 25850–2585810.1074/jbc.M110.133157 ↗
95. Zeng H, Hwang D S, Israelachvili J N, et al. Strong reversible Fe3+-mediated bridging between dopa-containing protein films in water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 12850–1285310.1073/pnas.1007416107 ↗
96. Hwang D S, Waite J H. Three intrinsically unstructured mussel adhesive proteins, mfp-1, mfp-2, and mfp-3: Analysis by circular di-chroism. Protein Sci, 2012, 21: 1689–169510.1002/pro.2147 ↗
97. Ninan L, Stroshine R L, Wilker J J, et al. Adhesive strength and curing rate of marine mussel protein extracts on porcine small intestinal submucosa. Acta Biomater, 2007, 3: 687–69410.1016/j.actbio.2007.02.004 ↗
98. Park J P, Song I T, Lee J, et al. Vanadyl-catecholamine hydrogels inspired by ascidians and mussels. Chem Mater, 2014, 27: 105–11110.1021/cm503425d ↗
99. Das S, Miller D R, Kaufman Y, et al. Tough coating proteins: Subtle sequence variation modulates cohesion. Biomacromolecules, 2015, 16: 1002–100810.1021/bm501893y ↗
100. Priemel T, Degtyar E, Dean M N, et al. Rapid self-assembly of complex biomolecular architectures during mussel byssus biofabri-cation. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 1453910.1038/ncomms14539 ↗