Hierarchical path planning for multi-arm spacecraft with general translational and rotational locomotion mode
Source abstract
Abstract
On-orbit construction and maintenance technology will play a significant role in future space exploration. The dexterous multifunctional spacecraft equipped with multi-arm, for instance, SpiderFab Bot, has attracted a great deal of focus due to its versatility in completing these missions. In such engineering practice, point-to-point moving in a complex environment is the fundamental issue. This paper investigates the three-dimensional point-to-point path planning problem, and a hierarchical path planning architecture is developed to give the trajectory of the multi-arm spacecraft effectively and efficiently. In the proposed 3-level architecture, the high-level planner generates the global constrained centric trajectory of the spacecraft with a rigid envelop assumption; the middle-level planner contributes the action sequence, a combination of the newly developed general translational and rotational locomotion mode, to cope with the relative position and attitude of the arms about the centroid of the spacecraft; the low-level planner maps the position/attitude of the end-effector of each arm from the operational space to the joint space optimally. Finally, the simulation experiment is carried out, and the results verify the effectiveness of the proposed three-layer architecture path planning strategy.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Space Satellite Systems and Control · Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Li W J, Cheng D Y, Liu X G, et al. On-orbit service (OOS) of spacecraft: A review of engineering developments. Prog Aerospace Sci, 2019, 108: 32–12010.1016/j.paerosci.2019.01.004 ↗
2. Ding X L, Wang Y C, Wang Y B, et al. A review of structures, verification, and calibration technologies of space robotic systems for on-orbit servicing. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 462–48010.1007/s11431-020-1737-4 ↗
3. Boning P, Dubowsky S. Coordinated control of space robot teams for the on-orbit construction of large flexible space structures. Adv Robotics, 2010, 24: 303–32310.1163/016918609X12619993300665 ↗
4. Hoyt R P, Cushing J, Jimmerson G, et al. Spiderfab: Process for on orbit construction of kilometer-scale apertures. Technical report. NASA Headquarters, Washington D C, 2018. HQ-E-DAA-TN62833, 2018
5. Deremetz M, Gerhard G, Cavenago F, et al. Concept of operations andpreliminary design of a modular multi-arm robot using standard interconnects for on-orbit large assembly. In: Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress (IAC). Dubai, 2021
6. Henshaw C G. The darpa phoenix spacecraft servicing program: Overview and plans for risk reduction. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS). Montreal, 2014
7. Hoyt R P. Spiderfab: An architecture for self-fabricating space systems. In: Proceedings of the AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition. IAAA, San Diego, 2013
8. Yue C F, Wei C, Cao X B, et al. A kind of implemental spacecraft system facing on-orbit manipulation missions. China Patent, CN114162353A, 2021
9. Zhang Y, Zhang J X, Ren L Q. The terrestrial locomotion of a mole cricket with foreleg amputation. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 999–100610.1007/s11431-015-5823-2 ↗
10. Xie Z, Chen X, Chen D, et al. Initial design and implementation of a space quadruped crawling robot prototype. Adv Astronaut Sci Technol, 2021, 4: 173–18110.1007/s42423-021-00090-5 ↗
11. Miao C W, Chen G Z, Yan C L, et al. Path planning optimization of indoor mobile robot based on adaptive ant colony algorithm. Comput Indust Eng, 2021, 156: 107–23010.1016/j.cie.2021.107230 ↗
12. Xiang D, Lin H, Ouyang J, et al. Combined improved A and greedy algorithm for path planning of multi-objective mobile robot. Sci Rep, 2022, 12: 1327310.1038/s41598-022-17684-0 ↗
13. Oroko J A, Nyakoe G N. Obstacle avoidance and path planningschemes for autonomous navigation of a mobile robot: A review. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Sustainable Research & Innovation (SRI) Conference. Pretoria, 2022. 314–318
14. Mo Y, Jiang Z H, Li H, et al. A kind of biomimetic control method to anthropomorphize a redundant manipulator for complex tasks. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 14–2410.1007/s11431-019-9542-5 ↗
15. Tian Y, Gao F, Liu J M, et al. Step rolling planning of a six-legged robot with 1-DOF waist for slope climbing. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 597–60710.1007/s11431-017-9216-x ↗
16. Mao L H, Tian Y, Gao F, et al. Novel method of gait switching in six-legged robot walking on continuous-nondifferentiable terrain by utilizing stability and interference criteria. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 2527–254010.1007/s11431-020-1588-5 ↗
17. Spröwitz A, Tuleu A, Vespignani M, et al. Towards dynamic trot gait locomotion: Design, control, and experiments with Cheetah-cub, a compliant quadruped robot. Int J Robotics Res, 2013, 32: 932–95010.1177/0278364913489205 ↗
18. Kang R J, Guglielmino E, Branson D T, et al. Bio-inspired crawlinglocomotion of a multi-arm octopus-like continuum system. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Vilamoura-Algarve, 201210.1109/IROS.2012.6385954 ↗
19. Li Y, Zi B, Yang Z M, et al. Combined kinematic and static analysis of an articulated lower limb traction device for a rehabilitation robotic system. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1189–120210.1007/s11431-020-1719-5 ↗
20. Ding X L, Wang Z Y, Rovetta A, et al. Locomotion analysis of hexapod robot. Climb Walk Rob, 2010, 30: 291–310
21. Zhang Y, Li P, Quan J, et al. Progress, challenges, and prospects of soft robotics for space applications. Adv Intell Syst, 2022, 220007110.1002/aisy.202200071 ↗
22. Martínez-Moritz J, Rodríguez I, Nottensteiner K, et al. Hybrid planningsystem for in-space robotic assembly of telescopes using segment-edmirror tiles. In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference (50100). Big Sky, 2021. 1–1610.1109/AERO50100.2021.9438399 ↗
23. Doyle R, Kubota T, Picard M, et al. Recent research and development activities on space robotics and AI. Adv Robotics, 2021, 35: 1244–126410.1080/01691864.2021.1978861 ↗
24. Scherzinger S, Weinland J, Wilbrandt R, et al. A walking spacerobot for on-orbit satellite servicing: The recobot. arXiv: 2203.10217
25. Adinehvand M, Asadi E, Lai C Y, et al. Bogiebot: A climbing robot incluttered confined space of bogies with ferrous metal surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Prague, 2021. 2459–246610.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636412 ↗
26. Sheng X J, Tang L, Huang X J, et al. Operational-space wrench and acceleration capability analysis for multi-link cable-driven robots. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 2063–207210.1007/s11431-019-1525-0 ↗
27. You B D, Wen X L, Liu Y Q, et al. Gait analysis of cellular space robotfor on-orbit climbing truss. J Astronaut, 2020, 41: 521–530
28. Feng J K, Liu J G. Configuration analysis of a chain-type reconfigurable modular robot inspired by normal alkane. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1167–117610.1007/s11431-020-1816-0 ↗
29. Jiang L. Gait analysis of a novel biomimetic climbing robot. J Mech Eng, 2010, 46: 17–2210.3901/JME.2010.15.017 ↗
30. Ramón J L, Calvo R, Trujillo A, et al. Trajectory optimization and control of a free-floating two-arm humanoid robot. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2022, 45: 1661–167510.2514/1.G006828 ↗
31. Zhao J D, Han J G, Ni F L. Gait planning and study of climbingrobot with three branches for space station truss. Man Space, 2018, 24: 14–19
32. McBryan K. Comparison between stationary and crawling multi-armrobotics for in-space assembly. In: Proceedings of 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Las Vegas, 2020. 1849–185610.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341141 ↗
33. Tang T, Hou X, Xiao Y, et al. Research on motion characteristics of space truss-crawling robot. Int J Adv Robotic Syst, 2019, 16: 17298814188215710.1177/1729881418821578 ↗
34. Sun T S, Wang Y H, Yang S Q, et al. Design, hydrodynamic analysis, and testing of a bioinspired controllable wing mechanism with multi-locomotion modes for hybrid-driven underwater gliders. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 2688–270810.1007/s11431-021-1890-7 ↗
35. Zhang W. Research on autonomous navigation method for indoor robots based on multisensor fusion. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2017
36. Yue C F, Zhang X, Wang H X, et al. Three-dimensional path planning of on-orbit manipulation robot based on neighborhood continuation search. J Astronaut, 2022, 43: 206–213
37. Chen Y X, Dong W, Ding Y. An efficient method for collision-free and jerk-constrained trajectory generation with sparse desired way-points for a flying robot. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1719–173110.1007/s11431-021-1836-7 ↗
38. Leve F A. Evaluation of steering algorithm optimality for singlegimbal control moment gyroscopes. IEEE Trans on Contr Sys Tech, 2013, 22: 1130–113410.1109/TCST.2013.2259829 ↗
39. Li C Y, Li Z Q, Jiang Z N, et al. Autonomous planning and control strategy for space manipulators with dynamics uncertainty based on learning from demonstrations. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 2662–267510.1007/s11431-021-1901-x ↗
40. Kenwright B. Inverse kinematics—Cyclic Coordinate Descent (CCD). J Graphics Tools, 2012, 16: 177–21710.1080/2165347X.2013.823362 ↗
41. Muller-Cajar R, Mukundan R. Triangualation—A new algorithm for inverse kinematics. In Proceedings of Image and Vision Computing New Zealand 2007. New Zealand, 2007
42. Sun H W, Yang J X, Li D W, et al. An on-line tool path smoothing algorithm for 6R robot manipulator with geometric and dynamic constraints. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1907–191910.1007/s11431-020-1747-7 ↗
43. Ananthanarayanan H, Ordóñez R. Real-time inverse kinematics of (2n+1) DOF hyper-redundant manipulator arm via a combined numerical and analytical approach. Mech Mach Theor, 2015, 91: 209–22610.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.04.011 ↗
44. Hu Z H, Yuan H, Xu W F, et al. A geometric method based on space arc for pose-configuration simultaneous planning of segmented hyper-redundant manipulators. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 2389–240710.1007/s11431-020-1811-8 ↗
45. Maric F, Giamou M, Hall A W, et al. Riemannian optimization for distance-geometric inverse kinematics. IEEE Trans Robot, 2022, 38: 1703–172210.1109/TRO.2021.3123841 ↗
46. Shi Y, Li L, Yang J, et al. Center-based transfer feature learning with classifier adaptation for surface defect recognition. Mech Syst Signal Pr, 2023, 188: 11000110.1016/j.ymssp.2022.110001 ↗
47. Yue C F, Wei C, Cao X, et al. A virtual scene simulation system forspace on-orbit manipulation. China Patent, CN114218702A, 2021
48. Yue C F, Wei C, Cao X, et al. A ground test platform, system, andmethod for multi-arm spacecraft system. China Patent, CN114261543A, 2021