Cloud-based cyber-attack detection and secure estimation for connected and automated vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Smart Grid Security and Resilience
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Darbha S, Konduri S, Pagilla P R. Benefits of V2V communication for autonomous and connected vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2019, 20: 1954–196310.1109/TITS.2018.2859765 ↗
2. Guo J, Jingyao W, Li K, et al. Adaptive non-linear coordinated optimal dynamic platoon control of connected autonomous distributed electric vehicles on curved roads. IET Intell Trans Sys, 2020, 14: 1626–163710.1049/iet-its.2020.0112 ↗
3. Chiang K W, Tsai G J, Chu H J, et al. Performance enhancement of INS/GNSS/Refreshed-SLAM integration for acceptable lane-level navigation accuracy. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2020, 69: 2463–247610.1109/TVT.2020.2966765 ↗
4. Du T, Shi S, Zeng Y, et al. An integrated INS/LiDAR odometry/polarized camera pose estimation via factor graph optimization for sparse environment. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 2022, 71: 1–11
5. Zheng Z, Li X, Sun Z, et al. A novel visual measurement framework for land vehicle positioning based on multimodule cascaded deep neural network. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2021, 17: 2347–235610.1109/TII.2020.2998107 ↗
6. Liu Q, Liu R, Wang Z, et al. A V2X-integrated positioning methodology in ultradense networks. IEEE Int Things J, 2021, 8: 17014–17028
7. Khan S Z, Mohsin M, Iqbal W. On GPS spoofing of aerial platforms: A review of threats, challenges, methodologies, and future research directions. PeerJ Comput Sci, 2021, 7: e50710.7717/peerj-cs.507 ↗
8. Cao Y L, Xiao C W, Cyr B, et al. Adversarial sensor attack on LiDAR-based perception in autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. London, 2019. 2267–228110.1145/3319535.3339815 ↗
9. Abdollahi Biron Z, Dey S, Pisu P. Real-time detection and estimation of denial of service attack in connected vehicle systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2018, 19: 3893–390210.1109/TITS.2018.2791484 ↗
10. Petit J, Stottelaar B, Feiri M, et al. Remote attacks on automated vehicles sensors: Experiments on camera and LiDAR. In: Proceedings of the Black Hat Europe. Amsterdam, 2015
11. Ghliss M, Kechiche L, Chabir K. Security challenges in autonomous vehicles: A case study of Camera and LiDAR sensors. In: Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP). Sousse, 2024. 212–217
12. Greenberg A. Hackers remotely kill a jeep on the highway—With me in it. Wired, 2015, 7: 21
13. Yan C, Xu W, Liu J. Can you trust autonomous vehicles: Contactless attacks against sensors of self-driving vehicle. In: Proceedings of DEF CON 24. Las Vegas, 2016. 1–13
14. Li Q H, Zhang K, Cheffena M, et al. Channel-based Sybil detection in industrial wireless sensor networks: A multi-kernel approach. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference. Singapore, 2017. 1–6
15. Yang Z, Zhang K, Lei L, et al. A novel classifier exploiting mobility behaviors for Sybil detection in connected vehicle systems. IEEE Int Things J, 2019, 6: 2626–2636
16. Olivato M, Cotugno O, Brigato L, et al. A comparative analysis on the use of autoencoders for robot security anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Macao, 2019. 984–989
17. Suo D J, Sarma S. E. Real-time trust-building schemes for mitigating malicious behaviors in connected and automated vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). Auckland, 2019. 1142–114910.1109/ITSC.2019.8917078 ↗
18. Jiang F, Qi B R, Wu T H, et al. CPSS: CP-ABE based platoon secure sensing scheme against cyber-attacks. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). Auckland, 2019. 3218–322310.1109/ITSC.2019.8916784 ↗
19. Kwon C, Liu W Y, Hwang I. Security analysis for cyber-physical systems against stealthy deception attacks. In: Proceedings of the 2013 American Control Conference. Washington, 2013. 3344–334910.1109/ACC.2013.6580348 ↗
20. Sánchez H S, Rotondo D, Escobet T, et al. Bibliographical review on cyber attacks from a control oriented perspective. Annu Rev Control, 2019, 48: 103–12810.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.08.002 ↗
21. Mousavinejad E, Yang F, Han Q L, et al. Distributed cyber attacks detection and recovery mechanism for vehicle platooning. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2020, 21: 3821–383410.1109/TITS.2019.2934481 ↗
22. Javed A R, Rehman S, Khan M U, et al. CANintelliIDS: Detecting invehicle intrusion attacks on a controller area network using CNN and attention-based GRU. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng, 2021, 8: 1456–146610.1109/TNSE.2021.3059881 ↗
23. Guerrero-ibanez J A, Zeadally S, Contreras-Castillo J. Integration challenges of intelligent transportation systems with connected vehicle, cloud computing, and internet of things technologies. IEEE Wireless Commun, 2015, 22: 122–12810.1109/MWC.2015.7368833 ↗
24. Whaiduzzaman M, Sookhak M, Gani A, et al. A survey on vehicular cloud computing. J Netw Comput Appl, 2014, 40: 325–34410.1016/j.jnca.2013.08.004 ↗
25. Hussain R, Son J, Eun H, et al. Rethinking vehicular communications: Merging vanet with cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science Proceedings. Taipei, 2012. 606–60910.1109/CloudCom.2012.6427481 ↗
26. Liu Q P, Mo Y L, Mo X Y, et al. Secure pose estimation for autonomous vehicles under cyber attacks. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). Paris, 2019. 1583–158810.1109/IVS.2019.8814161 ↗
27. van Wyk F, Wang Y, Khojandi A, et al. Real-time sensor anomaly detection and identification in automated vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2020, 21: 1264–127610.1109/TITS.2019.2906038 ↗
28. Wang Y, Masoud N, Khojandi A. Real-time sensor anomaly detection and recovery in connected automated vehicle sensors. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2021, 22: 1411–142110.1109/TITS.2020.2970295 ↗
29. Alahi A, Goel K, Ramanathan V, et al. Social LSTM: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas, 2016. 961–97110.1109/CVPR.2016.110 ↗
30. Yang T, Lv C. A secure sensor fusion framework for connected and automated vehicles under sensor attacks. IEEE Int Things J, 2022, 9: 22357–22365
31. Guo J, Li L, Wang J, et al. Cyber-physical system-based path tracking control of autonomous vehicles under cyber-attacks. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2023, 19: 6624–663510.1109/TII.2022.3206354 ↗
32. Wang L, Zhang X, Li D, et al. Multi-sensors space and time dimension based intrusion detection system in automated vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2024, 73: 200–21510.1109/TVT.2023.3306345 ↗
33. Khan I A, Moustafa N, Pi D, et al. An enhanced multi-stage deep learning framework for detecting malicious activities from autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2022, 23: 25469–2547810.1109/TITS.2021.3105834 ↗