journal article·2022-03

Hydrophobic MAO/FSG coating based TENG for self-healable energy harvesting and self-powered cathodic protection

YuPeng Liu, WeiXiang Sun, TingHua Li, DaoAi Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

An organic/inorganic hybrid coating with self-healable hydrophobicity is prepared as triboelectrical layer by micro-arc oxidation (MAO) and fluorinated sol-gel (FSG) coating. The MAO/FSG hybrid coating-based TENG (MF-TENG) has a current output of 31 µA and voltage output of 870 V, which is eight times that of the MAO based TENG. Compared with organic coating, the organic/inorganic hybrid coating has good wear resistance. When the fluorine composition on the surface of the coating is damaged, the self-healing hydrophobicity and electrical output are achieved by transferring loaded perfluorosilane to the damaged surface. The fluorinated sol-gel coating is hydrophobic, which ensures that the coating has good corrosion resistance. Also, the electricity generated in triboelectrification could improve the anti-corrosion performance by cathodic protection. Based on the anti-corrosion, anti-wear and self-healing properties, the MF-TENG has potential applicability in the field of energy collection, energy supply, and corrosion protection.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Bai P, Zhu G, Lin Z H, et al. Integrated multilayered triboelectric nanogenerator for harvesting biomechanical energy from human motions. ACS Nano, 2013, 7: 3713–371910.1021/nn4007708 ↗
2. Cao X, Jie Y, Wang N, et al. Triboelectric nanogenerators driven self-powered electrochemical processes for energy and environmental science. Adv Energy Mater, 2016, 6: 160066510.1002/aenm.201600665 ↗
3. Cao X, Zhang M, Huang J, et al. Inductor-free wireless energy delivery via maxwell’s displacement current from an electrodeless triboelectric nanogenerator. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 170407710.1002/adma.201704077 ↗
4. Liu Y, Zheng Y, Li T, et al. Water-solid triboelectrification with self-repairable surfaces for water-flow energy harvesting. Nano Energy, 2019, 61: 454–46110.1016/j.nanoen.2019.05.007 ↗
5. Chen S, Wang N, Ma L, et al. Triboelectric nanogenerator for sustainable wastewater treatment via a self-powered electrochemical process. Adv Energy Mater, 2016, 6: 150177810.1002/aenm.201501778 ↗
6. Zhao K, Wang Z L, Yang Y. Self-powered wireless smart sensor node enabled by an ultrastable, highly efficient, and superhydrophobic-surface-based triboelectric nanogenerator. ACS Nano, 2016, 10: 9044–905210.1021/acsnano.6b05815 ↗
7. Guo H, Jia X, Liu L, et al. Freestanding triboelectric nanogenerator enables noncontact motion-tracking and positioning. ACS Nano, 2018, 12: 3461–346710.1021/acsnano.8b00140 ↗
8. Guo H, Li T, Cao X, et al. Self-sterilized flexible single-electrode triboelectric nanogenerator for energy harvesting and dynamic force sensing. ACS Nano, 2017, 11: 856–86410.1021/acsnano.6b07389 ↗
9. Kim K N, Chun J, Kim J W, et al. Highly stretchable 2D fabrics for wearable triboelectric nanogenerator under harsh environments. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 6394–640010.1021/acsnano.5b02010 ↗
10. Xing F, Jie Y, Cao X, et al. Natural triboelectric nanogenerator based on soles for harvesting low-frequency walking energy. Nano Energy, 2017, 42: 138–14210.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.029 ↗
11. Yang J, Chen J, Yang Y, et al. Broadband vibrational energy harvesting based on a triboelectric nanogenerator. Adv Energy Mater, 2014, 4: 130132210.1002/aenm.201301322 ↗
12. Yang Y, Zhang H, Wang Z L. Direct-current triboelectric generator. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 3745–375010.1002/adfm.201304295 ↗
13. Liu Y, Zheng Y, Wu Z, et al. Conductive elastic sponge-based triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) for effective random mechanical energy harvesting and ammonia sensing. Nano Energy, 2021, 79: 10542210.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105422 ↗
14. Xia K, Wu D, Fu J, et al. A pulse controllable voltage source based on triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy, 2020, 77: 10511210.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105112 ↗
15. Zeng Q, Wu Y, Tang Q, et al. A high-efficient breeze energy harvester utilizing a full-packaged triboelectric nanogenerator based on flow-induced vibration. Nano Energy, 2020, 70: 10452410.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104524 ↗
16. Cui S, Zheng Y, Liang J, et al. Triboelectrification based on double-layered polyaniline nanofibers for self-powered cathodic protection driven by wind. Nano Res, 2018, 11: 1873–188210.1007/s12274-017-1805-y ↗
17. Xu C, Liu Y, Liu Y, et al. New inorganic coating-based triboelectric nanogenerators with anti-wear and self-healing properties for efficient wave energy harvesting. Appl Mater Today, 2020, 20: 10064510.1016/j.apmt.2020.100645 ↗
18. Cui S, Zheng Y, Liang J, et al. Conducting polymer PPy nanowire-based triboelectric nanogenerator and its application for self-powered electrochemical cathodic protection. Chem Sci, 2016, 7: 6477–648310.1039/C6SC02562E ↗
19. Guo W, Li X, Chen M, et al. Electrochemical cathodic protection powered by triboelectric nanogenerator. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 6691–669910.1002/adfm.201401168 ↗
20. Zhao X J, Zhu G, Fan Y J, et al. Triboelectric charging at the nanostructured solid/liquid interface for area-scalable wave energy conversion and its use in corrosion protection. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 7671–767710.1021/acsnano.5b03093 ↗
21. Zhu H R, Tang W, Gao C Z, et al. Self-powered metal surface anticorrosion protection using energy harvested from rain drops and wind. Nano Energy, 2015, 14: 193–20010.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.041 ↗
22. Kong X, Liu Y, Liu Y, et al. New coating TENG with antiwear and healing functions for energy harvesting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 9387–939410.1021/acsami.9b22649 ↗
23. Wang B, Wu Y, Liu Y, et al. New hydrophobic organic coating based triboelectric nanogenerator for efficient and stable hydropower harvesting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 31351–3135910.1021/acsami.0c03843 ↗
24. Ganjaee Sari M, Shamshiri M, Ramezanzadeh B. Fabricating an epoxy composite coating with enhanced corrosion resistance through impregnation of functionalized graphene oxide-co-montmorillonite nanoplatelet. Corrosion Sci, 2017, 129: 38–5310.1016/j.corsci.2017.09.024 ↗
25. Moschona A, Plesu N, Mezei G, et al. Corrosion protection of carbon steel by tetraphosphonates of systematically different molecular size. Corrosion Sci, 2018, 145: 135–15010.1016/j.corsci.2018.09.021 ↗
26. Nikpour B, Ramezanzadeh B, Bahlakeh G, et al. Synthesis of graphene oxide nanosheets functionalized by green corrosion inhibitive compounds to fabricate a protective system. Corrosion Sci, 2017, 127: 240–25910.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.029 ↗
27. Pourhashem S, Vaezi M R, Rashidi A, et al. Exploring corrosion protection properties of solvent based epoxy-graphene oxide nanocomposite coatings on mild steel. Corrosion Sci, 2017, 115: 78–9210.1016/j.corsci.2016.11.008 ↗
28. Ramezanzadeh B, Haeri Z, Ramezanzadeh M. A facile route of making silica nanoparticles-covered graphene oxide nanohybrids (SiO2-GO); fabrication of SiO2-GO/epoxy composite coating with superior barrier and corrosion protection performance. Chem Eng J, 2016, 303: 511–52810.1016/j.cej.2016.06.028 ↗
29. Ramezanzadeh B, Niroumandrad S, Ahmadi A, et al. Enhancement of barrier and corrosion protection performance of an epoxy coating through wet transfer of amino functionalized graphene oxide. Corrosion Sci, 2016, 103: 283–30410.1016/j.corsci.2015.11.033 ↗
30. Liu Y P, Liu H F, Feng Y G, et al. A nanotubular coating with both high transparency and healable superhydrophobic self-cleaning properties. RSC Adv, 2016, 6: 21362–2136610.1039/C5RA26977F ↗
31. Sun W, Liu Y, Li T, et al. Anti-corrosion of amphoteric metal enhanced by MAO/corrosion inhibitor composite in acid, alkaline and salt solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2019, 554: 488–49910.1016/j.jcis.2019.07.035 ↗
32. Khosravi H S, Veerapandiyan V K, Vallant R, et al. Effect of processing conditions on the structural properties and corrosion behavior of TiO2-SiO2 multilayer coatings derived via the sol-gel method. Ceram Int, 2020, 46: 17741–1775110.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.079 ↗
33. Milošev I, Kapun B, Rodič P, et al. Hybrid sol-gel coating agents based on zirconium(IV) propoxide and epoxysilane. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol, 2015, 74: 447–45910.1007/s10971-015-3620-9 ↗
34. Paquez X, Amiard G, de Combarieu G, et al. Resistant RuO2/SiO2 absorbing sol-gel coatings for solar energy conversion at high temperature. Chem Mater, 2015, 27: 2711–271710.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00731 ↗
35. Urper O, Baydogan N. Effect of Al concentration on optical parameters of ZnO thin film derived by sol-gel dip coating technique. Mater Lett, 2020, 274: 12800010.1016/j.matlet.2020.128000 ↗