journal article·2024-11Open access

Impacts of spatially inconsistent permafrost degradation on streamflow in the Lena River Basin

ZeHuan Xue, YiChu Wang, Yi Zhao, DongDeng Li, Alistair George Liam Borthwick

Abstract

Although permafrost degradation contributes significantly to hydrological change in cold regions, gaps remain in our understanding of streamflow variation induced by degrading permafrost in different river basins. We therefore used a deep learning model to simulate the long-term (≥ 30 years) monthly streamflow at 60 hydrological stations along the Lena River, the third longest circum-Arctic river. By analyzing the effects of precipitation, temperature, and thaw depth on streamflow variation throughout the Lena River Basin, we identified two feedback patterns relating streamflow to warming permafrost, observed in areas of continuous and discontinuous permafrost. In northern plain regions with continuous permafrost, 94% of stations presented an increasing trend in annual streamflow from the 1900s to the 2010s due to permafrost degradation. The enhanced streamflow was mainly due to increased meltwater in the flood season. In southern regions covered by both continuous and discontinuous permafrost, approximately 38% of stations exhibited a declining trend in annual streamflow in response to permafrost degradation, with a high proportion (61%) located in mountain regions (elevation ≥ 500 m). The decline is attributed to the enhanced infiltration capacity of thawing frozen layers within discontinuous permafrost regions. Our study provides new insights into the mechanisms behind permafrost degradation-induced streamflow variation and highlights the importance of formulating tailored strategies for sustainable river management in cold regions experiencing climate change.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Climate change and permafrost · Cryospheric studies and observations · Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Woo M-K. Permafrost Hydrology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2012. 1–710.1007/978-3-642-23462-0 ↗
2. Smith S L, O’Neill H B, Isaksen K, et al. The changing thermal state of permafrost. Nat Rev Earth Environ, 2022, 3: 10–2310.1038/s43017-021-00240-1 ↗
3. Walvoord M A, Kurylyk B L. Hydrologic impacts of thawing permafrost—A review. Vadose Zone J, 2016, 15: 1–2010.2136/vzj2016.01.0010 ↗
4. Li L, Ni J, Chang F, et al. Global trends in water and sediment fluxes of the world’s large rivers. Sci Bull, 2020, 65: 62–6910.1016/j.scib.2019.09.012 ↗
5. Lafreniére M J, Lamoureux S F. Effects of changing permafrost conditions on hydrological processes and fluvial fluxes. Earth-Sci Rev, 2019, 191: 212–22310.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.018 ↗
6. Miner K R, Turetsky M R, Malina E, et al. Permafrost carbon emissions in a changing Arctic. Nat Rev Earth Environ, 2022, 3: 55–6710.1038/s43017-021-00230-3 ↗
7. Jin X Y, Jin H J, Iwahana G, et al. Impacts of climate-induced permafrost degradation on vegetation: A review. Adv Clim Change Res, 2021, 12: 29–4710.1016/j.accre.2020.07.002 ↗
8. Yang S, Wen X, Wu T, et al. Carbon-cycling microorganisms in permafrost and their responses to a warming climate: A review. Permafrost Periglacial, 2024, 35: 218–23110.1002/ppp.2206 ↗
9. Hjort J, Streletskiy D, Doré G, et al. Impacts of permafrost degradation on infrastructure. Nat Rev Earth Environ, 2022, 3: 24–3810.1038/s43017-021-00247-8 ↗
10. Makarieva O, Nesterova N, Post D A, et al. Warming temperatures are impacting the hydrometeorological regime of Russian rivers in the zone of continuous permafrost. Cryosphere, 2019, 13: 1635–165910.5194/tc-13-1635-2019 ↗
11. Yang D, Kane D L, Hinzman L D, et al. Siberian Lena River hydrologic regime and recent change. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107: 4694
12. Li Z J, Li Z X, Song L L, et al. Hydrological and runoff formation processes based on isotope tracing during ablation period in the source regions of Yangtze River. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2020, 24: 4169–418710.5194/hess-24-4169-2020 ↗
13. Evans S G, Yokeley B, Stephens C, et al. Potential mechanistic causes of increased baseflow across northern Eurasia catchments underlain by permafrost. Hydrol Process, 2020, 34: 2676–2690
14. Wang P, Huang Q, Pozdniakov S P, et al. Potential role of permafrost thaw on increasing Siberian river discharge. Environ Res Lett, 2021, 16: 03404610.1088/1748-9326/abe326 ↗
15. Milner A M, Khamis K, Battin T J, et al. Glacier shrinkage driving global changes in downstream systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017, 114: 9770–977810.1073/pnas.1619807114 ↗
16. Huss M, Hock R. Global-scale hydrological response to future glacier mass loss. Nat Clim Change, 2018, 8: 135–14010.1038/s41558-017-0049-x ↗
17. Lamontagne-Hallé P, McKenzie J M, Kurylyk B L, et al. Changing groundwater discharge dynamics in permafrost regions. Environ Res Lett, 2018, 13: 08401710.1088/1748-9326/aad404 ↗
18. Koch J C, Sjöberg Y, O’Donnell J A, et al. Sensitivity of headwater streamflow to thawing permafrost and vegetation change in a warming Arctic. Environ Res Lett, 2022, 17: 04407410.1088/1748-9326/ac5f2d ↗
19. Wang Z, Sun S, Wang G, et al. Determination of low-flow components in alpine permafrost rivers. J Hydrol, 2023, 617: 12888610.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128886 ↗
20. Yang J, Wang T, Yang D, et al. Insights into runoff changes in the source region of Yellow River under frozen ground degradation. J Hydrol, 2023, 617: 12889210.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128892 ↗
21. Piovano T I, Tetzlaff D, Carey S K, et al. Spatially distributed tracer-aided runoff modelling and dynamics of storage and water ages in a permafrost-influenced catchment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2019, 23: 2507–252310.5194/hess-23-2507-2019 ↗
22. Xiao X, Zhang F, Che T, et al. Changes in plot-scale runoff generation processes from the spring-summer transition period to the summer months in a permafrost-dominated catchment. J Hydrol, 2020, 587: 12496610.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124966 ↗
23. O’Connor M T, Cardenas M B, Neilson B T, et al. Active layer groundwater flow: The interrelated effects of stratigraphy, thaw, and topography. Water Resour Res, 2019, 55: 6555–657610.1029/2018WR024636 ↗
24. Burke E J, Zhang Y, Krinner G. Evaluating permafrost physics in the coupled model intercomparison project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change. Cryosphere, 2020, 14: 3155–317410.5194/tc-14-3155-2020 ↗
25. Westermann S, Langer M, Boike J, et al. Simulating the thermal regime and thaw processes of ice-rich permafrost ground with the land-surface model CryoGrid 3. Geosci Model Dev, 2016, 9: 523–54610.5194/gmd-9-523-2016 ↗
26. Müller Schmied H, Cáceres D, Eisner S, et al. The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2d: Model description and evaluation. Geosci Model Dev, 2021, 14: 1037–107910.5194/gmd-14-1037-2021 ↗
27. Van Houdt G, Mosquera C, Nápoles G. A review on the long short-term memory model. Artif Intell Rev, 2020, 53: 5929–595510.1007/s10462-020-09838-1 ↗
28. Cheng M, Fang F, Kinouchi T, et al. Long lead-time daily and monthly streamflow forecasting using machine learning methods. J Hydrol, 2020, 590: 12537610.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125376 ↗
29. Hunt K M R, Matthews G R, Pappenberger F, et al. Using a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to boost river streamflow forecasts over the western United States. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2022, 26: 5449–547210.5194/hess-26-5449-2022 ↗
30. Xu W, Chen J, Zhang X J. Scale effects of the monthly streamflow prediction using a state-of-the-art deep learning model. Water Resour Manage, 2022, 36: 3609–362510.1007/s11269-022-03216-y ↗
31. Gao M, Chen X, Li G, et al. Impacts of elevational variability of climate and frozen ground on streamflow in a glacierized catchment in Tibetan Plateau. J Hydrol, 2023, 619: 12931210.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129312 ↗
32. Alizadeh B, Ghaderi Bafti A, Kamangir H, et al. A novel attention-based LSTM cell post-processor coupled with bayesian optimization for streamflow prediction. J Hydrol, 2021, 601: 12652610.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126526 ↗
33. Torre Jorgenson M, Harden J, Kanevskiy M, et al. Reorganization of vegetation, hydrology and soil carbon after permafrost degradation across heterogeneous boreal landscapes. Environ Res Lett, 2013, 8: 03501710.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035017 ↗
34. Madaeni F, Chokmani K, Lhissou R, et al. Convolutional neural network and long short-term memory models for ice-jam predictions. Cryosphere, 2022, 16: 1447–146810.5194/tc-16-1447-2022 ↗
35. Thapa S, Zhao Z, Li B, et al. Snowmelt-driven streamflow prediction using machine learning techniques (LSTM, NARX, GPR, and SVR). Water, 2020, 12: 173410.3390/w12061734 ↗
36. Li H, Wang W, Fu J, et al. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity and attributions of streamflow and baseflow changes across the headstreams of the Tarim River Basin, Northwest China. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 856: 15923010.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159230 ↗
37. Jiang W, Fu B, Lü Y. Assessing impacts of land use/land cover conversion on changes in ecosystem services value on the Loess Plateau, China. Sustainability, 2020, 12: 712810.3390/su12177128 ↗
38. Liang W, Bai D, Wang F, et al. Quantifying the impacts of climate change and ecological restoration on streamflow changes based on a Budyko hydrological model in China’s Loess Plateau. Water Resour Res, 2015, 51: 6500–651910.1002/2014WR016589 ↗
39. Fang J, Yi P, Stockinger M, et al. Investigation of factors controlling the runoff generation mechanism using isotope tracing in large-scale nested basins. J Hydrol, 2022, 615: 12872810.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128728 ↗
40. van der Kolk H J, Heijmans M M P D, van Huissteden J, et al. Potential Arctic tundra vegetation shifts in response to changing temperature, precipitation and permafrost thaw. Biogeosciences, 2016, 13: 6229–624510.5194/bg-13-6229-2016 ↗
41. Piao S, Wang X, Park T, et al. Characteristics, drivers and feedbacks of global greening. Nat Rev Earth Environ, 2020, 1: 14–2710.1038/s43017-019-0001-x ↗
42. Adam J C, Haddeland I, Su F, et al. Simulation of reservoir influences on annual and seasonal streamflow changes for the Lena, Yenisei, and Ob’ rivers. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112: D24114
43. Ye B, Yang D, Kane D L. Changes in Lena River streamflow hydrology: Human impacts versus natural variations. Water Resour Res, 2003, 39: 120010.1029/2003WR001991 ↗
44. Berezovskaya S, Yang D, Hinzman L. Long-term annual water balance analysis of the Lena River. Glob Planet Change, 2005, 48: 84–9510.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.12.006 ↗
45. Huang Q, Long D, Han Z, et al. High-resolution satellite images combined with hydrological modeling derive river discharge for headwaters: A step toward discharge estimation in ungauged basins. Remote Sens Environ, 2022, 277: 11303010.1016/j.rse.2022.113030 ↗
46. Li X, Long D, Huang Q, et al. High-temporal-resolution water level and storage change data sets for lakes on the Tibetan Plateau during 2000–2017 using multiple altimetric missions and Landsat-derived lake shoreline positions. Earth Syst Sci Data, 2019, 11: 1603–162710.5194/essd-11-1603-2019 ↗
47. Li D, Lu X, Overeem I, et al. Exceptional increases in fluvial sediment fluxes in a warmer and wetter High Mountain Asia. Science, 2021, 374: 599–60310.1126/science.abi9649 ↗
48. Olefeldt D, Goswami S, Grosse G, et al. Circumpolar distribution and carbon storage of thermokarst landscapes. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: ncomms13043–110.1038/ncomms13043 ↗
49. Guo D, Wang H. Permafrost degradation and associated ground settlement estimation under 2 °C global warming. Clim Dyn, 2016, 49: 2569–258310.1007/s00382-016-3469-9 ↗