A new method to optimize the fracture geometry of a frac-packed well in unconsolidated sandstone heavy oil reservoirs
Source abstract
Abstract
The worldwide proven recoverable reserves of conventional oil are less than the amount of the heavy oil. Owing to weakly consolidated formation, sand production is an important problem encountered during oil production in heavy oil reservoirs, for which frac-pack technique is one of the most common treatments. Hence, how to obtain the optimal fracture geometry is the key to increasing well production and preventing sand. Due to the faultiness that current optimization of the fracture geometry only depends on well productivity, fracture-flow fraction was used to describe the contribution of the fracture collecting and conducting fluids from the reservoir. The higher the fracture-flow fraction, the more likely bilinear flow pattern occurs, thus leading to smaller flow resistance and better results in oil productivity and sand prevention. A reservoir numerical simulation model was established to simulate the long-term production dynamic of a fractured well in rectangular drainage areas. In order to reach the aim of increasing productivity meanwhile preventing sand, a new method based on Unified Fracture Design was developed to optimize the fracture geometry. For a specific reservoir and a certain amount of proppant injected to the target layer, there exits an optimal dimensionless fracture conductivity which corresponds to the maximum fracture-flow fraction, accordingly we can get the optimal fracture geometry. The formulas of the optimal fracture geometry were presented on square drainage area conditions, which are very convenient to apply. Equivalent Proppant Number was used to eliminate the impact of aspect ratios of rectangular drainage area, then, the same method to optimize the fracture geometry as mentioned for square drainage areas could be adopted too.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Li T, He F, Ban Y H, et al. Development overview of domestic and foreign conventional heavy oil reservoirs (in Chinese). West-China Explor Eng, 2005, 12: 81–83
2. Zhang Y L, Cheng L S, Li C L, et al. Experimental study on rheological property and threshold pressure gradient of heavy oil (in Chinese). Xinjiang Oil Gas, 2007, 3(3): 28–30
3. Niu G, Zhou T Y, Li X S, et al. Experimental study on low velocity non-Darcy flow of conventional heavy oil reservoir by water flooding process (in Chinese). DPT, 2010, 33(3): 57–60
4. Zhang J. Fracturing sand control technology (in Chinese). ODPT, 2004, 26(Suppl): 53–55
5. Liu P, Ma Y W, Zhang L, et al. Application of frac-packing technology in unconsolidated reservoir (in Chinese). ODPT, 2006, 28(4): 56–59
6. Cheng Y F, Zhao Y Z, Zhang X, et al. Research on sand production prediction in screen out fracturing well (in Chinese). PGODD, 2007, 26(5): 87–90
7. Jiao G Y, Zhao L Q, Liu P L, et al. An analytical model for predicting productivity of Frac and Packed completion (in Chinese). Offsh Oil, 2005, 25(1): 38–40
8. Xin J, Guo J C, Zhao J Z, et al. Predicting model of high permeability reservoir fracturing and stimulating (in Chinese). Fault-Block Oil Gas Field, 2007, 14(6): 55–57
9. Zhang Q H, Zhang S C, Huang X D, et al. Systemic design for tip screen out frac-pack sand control and its application in Sebei Gas field (in Chinese). J China Univ Petrol, 2007, 31(6): 55–59
10. Xie G X, Li X C, Du B T. The research and application of FracPac technique in Shengli Oil Field (in Chinese). Petrol Explor Develop, 2002, 29(3): 99–101
11. Davis E R, Palthe P, Saldungaray P. Design, implementation, results, and key learnings: case study of a novel single trip, perforated, multi-zone, isolated, frac pack completion—Keong Subsea development, South China Sea floater operations. SPE 86530, 200410.2118/86530-MS ↗
12. Vickery H, Baker B, Scott R, et al. One-trip multizone frac packs in Bohai Bay—a case study in efficient operations. SPE 90173, 200410.2118/90173-MS ↗
13. Liu L Y, Deng J M, Ma Y W, et al. Single-trip, multiple-zone frac packing offshore sand control: overview of 58 case histories. SPE 103779, 200610.2118/103779-MS ↗
14. Turnage K A, Palisch T T, Gleason A M, et al. Overcoming formation damage and increasing production using stackable frac packs and high-conductivity proppants: a case study in the Wilmington Field, Long Beach, California. SPE 98304, 200610.2118/98304-MS ↗
15. Colwart G, Burton R C, Eaton L F, et al. Lessons learned on sand-control failure and subsequent workover at Magnolia deepwater development. SPE 105542, 200710.2118/105542-MS ↗
16. Norris M R, Plahn S, Lowton D, et al. Maximising ESP uptime in forties field-introducing successful frac packs to the North Sea. SPE 109015, 200810.2523/109015-MS ↗
17. White D, Whaley K, Keatinge P. Breaking the completions paradigm: delivering world class wells in deepwater Angola. SPE 115434, 200810.2118/115434-RU ↗
18. Rivas L, Navaira G, Bourgeois B, et al. Development and use of high density fracturing fluid in deep water Gulf of Mexico frac and packs. SPE 116007, 200810.2118/116007-MS ↗
19. Reza M S, Juan L J, Pathmanathan I. A case study in the successful design and implementation of frac-pack treatments in a challenging workover environment in Malaysia. SPE 116913, 200810.2118/116913-MS ↗
20. Daal J A, Economides M J. Optimization of hydraulically fractured wells in irregularly shaped drainage areas. SPE 98047, 200610.2118/98047-MS ↗
21. Romero D J, Valko P P, Economides M J. The optimization of the productivity index and the fracture geometry of a stimulated well with fracture face and choke skins. SPE 73758, 200210.2118/73758-MS ↗
22. Demarchos A S, Chomatas A S, Economides M J. Pushing the limits in hydraulic fracture design. SPE 86483, 200410.2118/86483-MS ↗
23. Economides M J, Demarchos A S, Mach J M. Pushing the limits of hydraulic fracturing in Russia. SPE 90357, 200410.2118/90357-MS ↗
24. Rueda J I, Voronkov A, Mach J, et al. Optimum fracture design under transient and pseudosteady conditions using constant fracture volume concept. SPE 94157, 200510.2523/94157-MS ↗
25. Sabaev V V, Wolcott D S, Mach J M, et al. Vertically fractured well performance in rectangular drainage area. SPE 101048, 200610.2118/101048-MS ↗
26. Economides M J, Christine A, Slavko T, et al. Application of pressure-transient and production—Data analysis for hydraulic-fracture-treatment evaluation. SPE 106382, 200710.2523/106382-MS ↗
27. Pitakbunkate T, Yang M, Valko P P, et al. Hydraulic fracture optimization with a p-3D model. SPE 142303, 201110.2118/142303-MS ↗
28. Zhang Y, Ehlig-Economides C A, Han G, et al. Inflow performance for a hydraulic fracture in a deviated well. SPE 119345, 200910.2118/119345-MS ↗
29. Zhang Y, Marongiu-Porcu M, Ehlig-Economides C A, et al. Comprehensive model for flow behavior of High-Performance-Fracture completions. PROD OPER, 2010, 484–49710.2118/124431-PA ↗
30. Zhao G Z. Numerical simulation of 3D and three-phase flow with variable start-up pressure gradient (in Chinese). Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(Suppl): 119–123
31. Wu B Z. Efficient Development Theory and Application of the Low Permeability Reservoir (in Chinese). Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2009. 44–59
32. Zhang S C, Zhang J. Fracturing Development Theory and Application (in Chinese). Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2003. 27–37