journal article·2014-06

Spacecraft rendezvous trajectory safety quantitative performance index eliminating probability dilution

ZhenJiang Sun, YaZhong Luo, ZhiYong Niu

Publisher page

Abstract

In view of the probability dilution problem of the existing quantitative indexes of rendezvous trajectory safety performance using collision probability, this paper proposes a new quantitative index of rendezvous trajectory safety performance by well combining collision probability with warning threshold. The proposed new index increases monotonously as the position errors of the chaser spacecraft increase, therefore it can effectively overcome the problems of the reduction in the largest performance value and the advancement in the most dangerous time induced by the probability dilution. The proposed new index is applied to the safety design of close range rendezvous missions. The mission’s safety requirements for initial navigation precision and the safe region of initial and final keeping points’ positions with a certain navigation precision are analyzed, and several valuable conclusions about the relation between position navigation precision and velocity navigation precision as well as the relation between keeping points’ positions and navigation precision are obtained.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Space Satellite Systems and Control · Spacecraft Dynamics and Control · Astro and Planetary Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Fehse W. Automated Rendezvous and Docking of Spacecraft. London: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 76–11110.1017/CBO9780511543388.005 ↗
2. Tang G J, Luo Y Z, Zhang J. Mission Plan of Rendezvous and Docking (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2008. 232–249
3. Luo Y Z, Zhang J, Tang G J. Survey of orbital dynamics and control of space rendezvous. Chin J Aeronaut, 2014, 27:1–1110.1016/j.cja.2013.07.042 ↗
4. Li H N, Gao Z Z, Li J S, et al. Mathematical prototypes for collocating geostationary satellites. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 1086–109210.1007/s11431-013-5157-x ↗
5. Wu W R, Liu W W, Qiao D, et al. Investigation on the development of deep space exploration. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 1086–109110.1007/s11431-012-4759-z ↗
6. Kawano I, Mokuno M, Kasai T, et al. Result of autonomous rendezvous docking experiment of engineering test satellite-VII. J Spacecr Rockets, 2001, 38: 105–11110.2514/2.3661 ↗
7. Croomes S. Overview of the DART Mishap Investigation Results. NASA Report, 2006
8. Zhu R Z, Tang Y, Yin Y. Safety mode design of final translation trajectories of space rendezvous (in Chinese). J Astronaut, 2004, 25: 443–448
9. Xie Y C, Chen C Q. Safe retreat trajectory design for rendezvous behind a keep-out zone (in Chinese). Aerosp Control Appl, 2009, 35: 1–5
10. Ma L, Meng X, Liu Z, et al. Suboptimal power-limited rendezvous with fixed docking direction and collision avoidance. J Guid Control Dynam, 2013, 36: 229–23910.2514/1.56449 ↗
11. Luo Y Z, Tang G J, Lei Y J. Optimal multi-objective linearized rendezvous. J Guid Control Dynam, 2007, 30: 383–38910.2514/1.21433 ↗
12. Breger L, How J P. Safe trajectories for autonomous rendezvous of spacecraft. J Guid Control Dynam, 2008, 31: 1478–148910.2514/1.29590 ↗
13. Woodburn J, Tanygin S. Position covariance visualization. In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit. Monterey, California: AIAA 2002-4985, 2002
14. Liang L B, Luo Y Z, Wang H, et al. Study on the quantitative performance index of space rendezvous trajectory safety (in Chinese). J Astronaut, 2010, 31: 2239–2244
15. Luo Y Z, Liang L B, Wang H, et al. Quantitative performance for spacecraft rendezvous trajectory safety. J Guid Control Dynam, 2011, 34: 1264–126910.2514/1.52041 ↗
16. Niu Z Y. Safety Assessment Method and Design Optimization of Rendezvous Trajectory in View of Early Warning Threshold (in Chinese). Dissertation for Master’s Degree. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2012. 27–39
17. Alfano S. Relating position uncertainty to maximum conjunction probability. In: AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialists Conference. Big Sky, Montana: AAS 03-548, 2003
18. Peterson G E. NEO orbit uncertainties and their effect on risk assessment. In: 2004 Planetary Defense Conference: Protecting Earth from Asteroids. Orange County, California: AIAA 2004-1420, 2004