journal article·2019-05

Fundamental problem in optimizing the biaxial testing specimen

Haroon Imtiaz, YaoPeng Fang, JianBin Du, Bin Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

Most of the elements in structural design are subjected to the complex loading conditions that need to be predicted in advance for a reliable design. The failure prediction of these structural elements is based on the failure theories that employ the experimental data of the uniaxial, the biaxial and the shear tests. Among these tests, the biaxial testing is used to model the behavior of the structure loaded in more than one direction. In this study, we discover an interesting fact for the biaxial tension specimen that the thickness reduction of the measuring region cannot increase the stress to a high level. This behavior of the biaxial testing is different from the uniaxial testing where the thickness reduction of the measuring region always increases its stress to a higher level. Therefore, we further investigate the biaxial testing specimen via related fundamental problem, i.e., an axisymmetric plate with varying thickness under axisymmetric tension. We perform the shape optimization based on our analytical solution and the FEM results. For an infinite axisymmetric disk, the optimized design should include a low slope diverging section connecting the inner to outer region. On the contrary, the larger inner measuring region for finite axisymmetric disk would result in higher corresponding stress. These conclusions can be used as a guideline for the design of a biaxial testing specimen.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Juhasz J, Rolfes R, Rohwer K. A new strength model for application of a physically based failure criterion to orthogonal 3D fiber reinforced plastics. Compos Sci Technol, 2001, 61: 1821–183210.1016/S0266-3538(01)00083-5 ↗
2. Kaddour A, Hinton M. Maturity of 3D failure criteria for fibre-reinforced composites: Comparison between theories and experiments: Part B of WWFE-II. J Composite Mater, 2013, 47: 925–96610.1177/0021998313478710 ↗
3. Camanho P P, Arteiro A, Melro A R, et al. Three-dimensional invariant-based failure criteria for fibre-reinforced composites. Int J Solids Struct, 2015, 55: 92–10710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.03.038 ↗
4. Molker H, Wilhelmsson D, Gutkin R, et al. Orthotropic criteria for transverse failure of non-crimp fabric-reinforced composites. J Composite Mater, 2016, 50: 2445–245810.1177/0021998315605877 ↗
5. Jones C, Greene R. Pulled in different directions. Materials World, 2001, 9: 19–21
6. Makinde A, Thibodeau L, Neale K W. Development of an apparatus for biaxial testing using cruciform specimens. Exp Mech, 1992, 32: 138–14410.1007/BF02324725 ↗
7. Chen A S, Matthews F L. A review of multiaxial/biaxial loading tests for composite materials. Composites, 1993, 24: 395–40610.1016/0010-4361(93)90247-6 ↗
8. Wu X D, Wan M, Zhou X B. Biaxial tensile testing of cruciform specimen under complex loading. J Mater Processing Tech, 2005, 168: 181–18310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.11.003 ↗
9. Tsai S W, Wu E M. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Composite Mater, 1971, 5: 58–8010.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
10. Hashin Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech, 1980, 47: 329–33410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
11. Li S, Sitnikova E, Liang Y, et al. The Tsai-Wu failure criterion rationalised in the context of UD composites. Compos Part A-Appl Sci Manufacturing, 2017, 102: 207–21710.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.007 ↗
12. Hoge K G. Influence of strain rate on mechanical properties of 6061-T6 aluminum under uniaxial and biaxial states of stress. Exp Mech, 1966, 6: 204–21110.1007/BF02326150 ↗
13. Guess T R. Biaxial testing of composite cylinders: Experimental-theoretical comparison. Composites, 1980, 11: 139–14810.1016/0010-4361(80)90006-3 ↗
14. Choo V K S, Hull D. Influence of radial compressive stress owing to pressure on the failure modes of composite tube specimens. J Composite Mater, 1983, 17: 344–35610.1177/002199838301700405 ↗
15. Ohtake Y, Rokugawa S, Masumoto H. Geometry determination of cruciform-type specimen and biaxial tensile test of C/C composites. Key Eng Mater, 1998, 164: 151–15410.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.164-165.151 ↗
16. Tasan C C, Hoefnagels J P M, Quaak G, et al. In-plane biaxial loading of sheet metal until fracture. In: Proceedings of the 2008 SEM XI International Congress and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics. Orlando, 2008
17. Yu Y, Wan M, Wu X D, et al. Design of a cruciform biaxial tensile specimen for limit strain analysis by FEM. J Mater Proces Tech, 2002, 123: 67–7010.1016/S0924-0136(02)00062-6 ↗
18. Smits A, Van Hemelrijck D, Philippidis T P, et al. Design of a cruciform specimen for biaxial testing of fibre reinforced composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol, 2006, 66: 964–97510.1016/j.compscitech.2005.08.011 ↗
19. Baptista R, Claudio R A, Reis L, et al. Numerical study of in-plane biaxial fatigue crack growth with different phase shift angle loadings on optimal specimen geometries. Theor Appl Fract Mech, 2016, 85: 16–2510.1016/j.tafmec.2016.08.025 ↗
20. Correa E, Barroso A, Pérez M D, et al. Design for a cruciform coupon used for tensile biaxial transverse tests on composite materials. Comos Sci Technol, 2017, 145: 138–14810.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.045 ↗
21. Upadhyay M V, Patra A, Wen W, et al. Mechanical response of stainless steel subjected to biaxial load path changes: Cruciform experiments and multi-scale modeling. Int J Plast, 2018, 108: 144–16810.1016/j.ijplas.2018.05.003 ↗
22. Baptista R, Claudio R A, Reis L, et al. Optimization of cruciform specimens for biaxial fatigue loading with direct multi search. Theor Appl Fract Mech, 2015, 80: 65–7210.1016/j.tafmec.2015.06.009 ↗
23. Baptista R, Claudio R A, Reis L, et al. Optimal cruciform specimen design using the direct multi-search method and design variable influence study. Procedia Struct Integrity, 2017, 5: 659–66610.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.037 ↗