journal article·2021-09

Photodynamic inheritance from methylene blue to carbon dots against reduction, aggregation, and DNA interference

Ning Xu, Quanyong Gu, Jianjun Du, Haoying Ge, Saran Long, Wen Sun, Jiangli Fan, Xiaojun Peng

Science China Materials· Volume 64· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment that uses light-sensitive drugs and a light source to destroy cancer cells. Methylene blue (MB) is an efficient photosensitizing agent that has been widely used in PDT. However, MB suffers from the hypochromic effect that is caused by self-aggregation and DNA binding in vivo. It is also easily reduced to ineffective leucomethylene blue in the hypoxic environments surrounding solid tumors. In this work, we prepared MB carbon dots (MB-CDs) using MB as the carbon source. The MB-CDs not only inherit the PDT capabilities of MB, but also demonstrate good biocompatibility and low toxicity. Importantly, MB-CDs demonstrate excellent resistance to interference from reduction, aggregation, and DNA interactions. The MB-CDs exhibited satisfactory PDT activities both in vitro and in vivo. The tumor sizes were reduced to below 20% of their original volumes when irradiated by a 590-nm light-emitting diode source.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Li X, Kim J, Yoon J, et al. Cancer-associated, stimuli-driven, turn on theranostics for multimodality imaging and therapy. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 160685710.1002/adma.201606857 ↗
2. Cui D, Huang J, Zhen X, et al. A semiconducting polymer nanoprodrug for hypoxia-activated photodynamic cancer therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2019, 58: 5920–592410.1002/anie.201814730 ↗
3. Han HH, Wang CZ, Zang Y, et al. Supramolecular core-glycoshell polythiophene nanodots for targeted imaging and photodynamic therapy. Chem Commun, 2017, 53: 9793–979610.1039/C7CC04525E ↗
4. Tian B, Wang C, Zhang S, et al. Photothermally enhanced photodynamic therapy delivered by nano-graphene oxide. ACS Nano, 2011, 5: 7000–700910.1021/nn201560b ↗
5. Sun Q, He F, Sun C, et al. Honeycomb-satellite structured pH/H2O2-responsive degradable nanoplatform for efficient photodynamic therapy and multimodal imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10: 33901–3391210.1021/acsami.8b10207 ↗
6. Wang Z, Jia T, Sun Q, et al. Construction of Bi/phthalocyanine manganese nanocomposite for trimodal imaging directed photodynamic and photothermal therapy mediated by 808 nm light. Biomaterials, 2020, 228: 11956910.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119569 ↗
7. Li X, Lee S, Yoon J. Supramolecular photosensitizers rejuvenate photodynamic therapy. Chem Soc Rev, 2018, 47: 1174–118810.1039/C7CS00594F ↗
8. Zhou Z, Song J, Nie L, et al. Reactive oxygen species generating systems meeting challenges of photodynamic cancer therapy. Chem Soc Rev, 2016, 45: 6597–662610.1039/C6CS00271D ↗
9. Li J, Rao J, Pu K. Recent progress on semiconducting polymer nanoparticles for molecular imaging and cancer phototherapy. Biomaterials, 2018, 155: 217–23510.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.025 ↗
10. Wu X, Sun X, Guo Z, et al. In vivo and in situ tracking cancer chemotherapy by highly photostable NIR fluorescent theranostic prodrug. J Am Chem Soc, 2014, 136: 3579–358810.1021/ja412380j ↗
11. Kumar R, Shin WS, Sunwoo K, et al. Small conjugate-based theranostic agents: An encouraging approach for cancer therapy. Chem Soc Rev, 2015, 44: 6670–668310.1039/C5CS00224A ↗
12. Allison RR, Downie GH, Cuenca R, et al. Photosensitizers in clinical PDT. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther, 2004, 1: 27–4210.1016/S1572-1000(04)00007-9 ↗
13. Zhu H, Li J, Qi X, et al. Oxygenic hybrid semiconducting nanoparticles for enhanced photodynamic therapy. Nano Lett, 2018, 18: 586–59410.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04759 ↗
14. Cheng L, Wang C, Feng L, et al. Functional nanomaterials for phototherapies of cancer. Chem Rev, 2014, 114: 10869–1093910.1021/cr400532z ↗
15. Sun Q, He F, Bi H, et al. An intelligent nanoplatform for simultaneously controlled chemo-, photothermal, and photodynamic therapies mediated by a single NIR light. Chem Eng J, 2019, 362: 679–69110.1016/j.cej.2019.01.095 ↗
16. Gonzalez-Bejar M, Montes-Navajas P, Garcia H, et al. Methylene blue encapsulation in cucurbit[7]uril: Laser flash photolysis and near-IR luminescence studies of the interaction with oxygen. Langmuir, 2009, 25: 10490–1049410.1021/la9011923 ↗
17. Chen Y, Zheng W, Li Y, et al. Apoptosis induced by methyleneblue-mediated photodynamic therapy in melanomas and the involvement of mitochondrial dysfunction revealed by proteomics. Cancer Sci, 2008, 99: 2019–202710.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00910.x ↗
18. Tardivo JP, Del Giglio A, de Oliveira CS, et al. Methylene blue in photodynamic therapy: From basic mechanisms to clinical applications. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther, 2005, 2: 175–19110.1016/S1572-1000(05)00097-9 ↗
19. Orth K, Beck G, Genze F, et al. Methylene blue mediated photodynamic therapy in experimental colorectal tumors in mice. J Photochem Photobiol B-Biol, 2000, 57: 186–19210.1016/S1011-1344(00)00105-6 ↗
20. Blázquez-Castro A, Stockert JC, Sanz-Rodríguez F, et al. Differential photodynamic response of cultured cells to methylene blue and toluidine blue: Role of dark redox processes. Photochem Photobiol Sci, 2009, 8: 371–37610.1039/b818585a ↗
21. Tang W, Xu H, Park EJ, et al. Encapsulation of methylene blue in polyacrylamide nanoparticle platforms protects its photodynamic effectiveness. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2008, 369: 579–58310.1016/j.bbrc.2008.02.066 ↗
22. Nuñez SC, Yoshimura TM, Ribeiro MS, et al. Urea enhances the photodynamic efficiency of methylene blue. J Photochem Photobiol B-Biol, 2015, 150: 31–3710.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.03.018 ↗
23. Nogueira JJ, González L. Molecular dynamics simulations of binding modes between methylene blue and DNA with alternating GC and AT sequences. Biochemistry, 2014, 53: 2391–241210.1021/bi500068z ↗
24. Nogueira JJ, Roßbach S, Ochsenfeld C, et al. Effect of DNA environment on electronically excited states of methylene blue evaluated by a three-layered QM/QM/MM ONIOM scheme. J Chem Theor Comput, 2018, 14: 4298–430810.1021/acs.jctc.8b00185 ↗
25. Gao P, Wang J, Zheng M, et al. Lysosome targeting carbon dots-based fluorescent probe for monitoring pH changes in vitro and in vivo. Chem Eng J, 2020, 381: 12266510.1016/j.cej.2019.122665 ↗
26. Li J, Yang S, Deng Y, et al. Emancipating target-functionalized carbon dots from autophagy vesicles for a novel visualized tumor therapy. Adv Funct Mater, 2018, 28: 180088110.1002/adfm.201800881 ↗
27. Du J, Xu N, Fan J, et al. Carbon dots for in vivo bioimaging and theranostics. Small, 2019, 15: 180508710.1002/smll.201805087 ↗
28. Ren X, Liang W, Wang P, et al. A new approach in functionalization of carbon nanoparticles for optoelectronically relevant carbon dots and beyond. Carbon, 2019, 141: 553–56010.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.085 ↗
29. Jiang K, Gao X, Feng X, et al. Carbon dots with dual-emissive, robust, and aggregation-induced room-temperature phosphorescence characteristics. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2020, 59: 1263–126910.1002/anie.201911342 ↗
30. Li C, Zhang K, Yao C, et al. Altering sub-cellular location for bioimaging by engineering the carbon based fluorescent nanoprobe. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 1496–150410.1007/s40843-019-9450-3 ↗
31. Sun S, Chen J, Jiang K, et al. Ce6-modified carbon dots for multimodal-imaging-guided and single-NIR-laser-triggered photothermal/photodynamic synergistic cancer therapy by reduced irradiation power. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 5791–580310.1021/acsami.8b19042 ↗
32. Zhang Q, Sun X, Ruan H, et al. Production of yellow-emitting carbon quantum dots from fullerene carbon soot. Sci China Mater, 2017, 60: 141–15010.1007/s40843-016-5160-9 ↗
33. Zhu S, Meng Q, Wang L, et al. Highly photoluminescent carbon dots for multicolor patterning, sensors, and bioimaging. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013, 52: 3953–395710.1002/anie.201300519 ↗
34. Ge J, Lan M, Zhou B, et al. A graphene quantum dot photodynamic therapy agent with high singlet oxygen generation. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 459610.1038/ncomms5596 ↗
35. He H, Zheng X, Liu S, et al. Diketopyrrolopyrrole-based carbon dots for photodynamic therapy. Nanoscale, 2018, 10: 10991–1099810.1039/C8NR02643B ↗
36. Jia Q, Ge J, Liu W, et al. A magnetofluorescent carbon dot assembly as an acidic H2O2-driven oxygenerator to regulate tumor hypoxia for simultaneous bimodal imaging and enhanced photodynamic therapy. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 170609010.1002/adma.201706090 ↗
37. Miao X, Yan X, Qu D, et al. Red emissive sulfur, nitrogen codoped carbon dots and their application in ion detection and theraonostics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9: 18549–1855610.1021/acsami.7b04514 ↗
38. Lan M, Zhao S, Wu S, et al. Optically tunable fluorescent carbon nanoparticles and their application in fluorometric sensing of copper ions. Nano Res, 2019, 12: 2576–258310.1007/s12274-019-2489-2 ↗
39. Li Y, Dong H, Tao Q, et al. Enhancing the magnetic relaxivity of MRI contrast agents via the localized superacid microenvironment of graphene quantum dots. Biomaterials, 2020, 250: 12005610.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120056 ↗
40. Xu N, Du J, Yao Q, et al. Precise photodynamic therapy: Penetrating the nuclear envelope with photosensitive carbon dots. Carbon, 2020, 159: 74–8210.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.002 ↗
41. Liu J, Geng Y, Li D, et al. Deep red emissive carbonized polymer dots with unprecedented narrow full width at half maximum. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 190664110.1002/adma.201906641 ↗
42. Xia C, Zhu S, Feng T, et al. Evolution and synthesis of carbon dots: From carbon dots to carbonized polymer dots. Adv Sci, 2019, 6: 190131610.1002/advs.201901316 ↗
43. Shamsipur M, Barati A, Karami S. Long-wavelength, multicolor, and white-light emitting carbon-based dots: Achievements made, challenges remaining, and applications. Carbon, 2017, 124: 429–47210.1016/j.carbon.2017.08.072 ↗
44. Zuo P, Lu X, Sun Z, et al. A review on syntheses, properties, characterization and bioanalytical applications of fluorescent carbon dots. Microchim Acta, 2016, 183: 519–54210.1007/s00604-015-1705-3 ↗
45. Chung S, Revia RA, Zhang M. Graphene quantum dots and their applications in bioimaging, biosensing, and therapy. Adv Mater, 2019, 190436210.1002/adma.201904362 ↗
46. Ristic BZ, Milenkovic MM, Dakic IR, et al. Photodynamic antibacterial effect of graphene quantum dots. Biomaterials, 2014, 35: 4428–443510.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.014 ↗
47. Zhao J, Wu W, Sun J, et al. Triplet photosensitizers: From molecular design to applications. Chem Soc Rev, 2013, 42: 5323–535110.1039/c3cs35531d ↗
48. Xu F, Li H, Yao Q, et al. Hypoxia-activated NIR photosensitizer anchoring in the mitochondria for photodynamic therapy. Chem Sci, 2019, 10: 10586–1059410.1039/C9SC03355F ↗