journal article·2021-06Open access

Alternately aligned 2D heterostructures enabled by d-spacing accessible, highly periodic accordion-like graphene oxide frameworks

Yingbo Ruan, Zedong Zhao, Yuanhang Ge, Bo Hu, Mengxiong Li, Lei Dong, Jiajia Zhang, Hongbin Lu

Science China Materials· Volume 64· Issue 6

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) heterostructures hold great promise in designing integrated materials, while the current synthesis strategies still confront challenges for multilayer heterostructure construction and scale-up production. Here we report a generalized host-guest strategy based on non-exfoliated layered graphene oxide (LGO) to construct graphene-based heterostructures that consist of multilayered, alternately aligned graphene and metal oxide nanosheets. The 2D-aligned GOs and open interlayer spaces make LGO an ideal platform to create periodic 2D host frameworks. Polyetheramine oligomers covalently bond the adjacent GOs. The extended chain conformation endows the resulting accordionlike GO frameworks with high structural stability, periodicity and enlarged interlayer space. Owing to the high affinity of the open and well-arranged 2D channels toward guest precursors, a variety of high-quality heterostructures can be synthesized. Furthermore, a variety of exfoliated, ultrathin metal oxide nanosheets can also be prepared by removing the graphene skeleton. The flexible interlayer chemistry presented in this study paves a way toward the synthesis of a large family of graphene-inorganic/organic 2D heterostructures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · 2D Materials and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Geim AK, Grigorieva IV. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature, 2013, 499: 419–42510.1038/nature12385 ↗
2. Novoselov KS, Mishchenko A, Carvalho A, et al. 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science, 2016, 353: aac943910.1126/science.aac9439 ↗
3. Pomerantseva E, Gogotsi Y. Two-dimensional heterostructures for energy storage. Nat Energy, 2017, 2: 1708910.1038/nenergy.2017.89 ↗
4. Deng D, Novoselov KS, Fu Q, et al. Catalysis with two-dimensional materials and their heterostructures. Nat Nanotech, 2016, 11: 218–23010.1038/nnano.2015.340 ↗
5. Li Z, Zhang X, Cheng H, et al. Confined synthesis of 2D nanostructured materials toward electrocatalysis. Adv Energy Mater, 2019, 10: 190048610.1002/aenm.201900486 ↗
6. Xiong P, Sun B, Sakai N, et al. 2D superlattices for efficient energy storage and conversion. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 190265410.1002/adma.201902654 ↗
7. Zhu Y, Peng W, Li Y, et al. Multiple roles of a heterointerface in two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures: insights into energy-related applications. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7: 23577–2360310.1039/C9TA06395A ↗
8. Zhu H, Xiao C, Cheng H, et al. Magnetocaloric effects in a freestanding and flexible graphene-based superlattice synthesized with a spatially confined reaction. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 396010.1038/ncomms4960 ↗
9. McManus D, Vranic S, Withers F, et al. Water-based and biocompatible 2D crystal inks for all-inkjet-printed heterostructures. Nat Nanotech, 2017, 12: 343–35010.1038/nnano.2016.281 ↗
10. Xiong P, Ma R, Sakai N, et al. Genuine unilamellar metal oxide nanosheets confined in a superlattice-like structure for superior energy storage. ACS Nano, 2018, 12: 1768–177710.1021/acsnano.7b08522 ↗
11. Xiong P, Zhang X, Zhang F, et al. Two-dimensional unilamellar cation-deficient metal oxide nanosheet superlattices for high-rate sodium ion energy storage. ACS Nano, 2018, 12: 12337–1234610.1021/acsnano.8b06206 ↗
12. Zeng C, Xie F, Yang X, et al. Ultrathin titanate nanosheets/graphene films derived from confined transformation for excellent Na/K ion storage. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57: 8540–854410.1002/anie.201803511 ↗
13. Wang X, Li Y, Wang S, et al. 2D amorphous V2O5/graphene heterostructures for high-safety aqueous Zn-ion batteries with unprecedented capacity and ultrahigh rate capability. Adv Energy Mater, 2020, 10: 200008110.1002/aenm.202000081 ↗
14. Cai X, Ozawa TC, Funatsu A, et al. Tuning the surface charge of 2D oxide nanosheets and the bulk-scale production of super-latticelike composites. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137: 2844–284710.1021/jacs.5b00317 ↗
15. Gao X, Qi J, Wan S, et al. Conductive molybdenum sulfide for efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Small, 2018, 14: 180336110.1002/smll.201803361 ↗
16. Zhao C, Wang X, Kong J, et al. Self-assembly-induced alternately stacked single-layer MoS2 and N-doped graphene: A novel van der Waals heterostructure for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 2372–237910.1021/acsami.5b11492 ↗
17. Wang J, Tang J, Ding B, et al. Hierarchical porous carbons with layer-by-layer motif architectures from confined soft-template self-assembly in layered materials. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 1571710.1038/ncomms15717 ↗
18. Chen C, Xie X, Anasori B, et al. MoS2-on-MXene heterostructures as highly reversible anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57: 1846–185010.1002/anie.201710616 ↗
19. Ma M, Zhang S, Yao Y, et al. Heterostructures of 2D molybdenum dichalcogenide on 2D nitrogen-doped carbon: superior potassium-ion storage and insight into potassium storage mechanism. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 200095810.1002/adma.202000958 ↗
20. Han P, Wang Z, Kuang M, et al. 2D assembly of confined space toward enhanced CO2 electroreduction. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 180123010.1002/aenm.201801230 ↗
21. Xiong P, Zhang X, Wan H, et al. Interface modulation of two-dimensional superlattices for efficient overall water splitting. Nano Lett, 2019, 19: 4518–452610.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01329 ↗
22. Lin S, Dong L, Zhang J, et al. Room-temperature intercalation and ∼ 1000-fold chemical expansion for scalable preparation of high-quality graphene. Chem Mater, 2016, 28: 2138–214610.1021/acs.chemmater.5b05043 ↗
23. Wang P, Zhang J, Dong L, et al. Interlayer polymerization in chemically expanded graphite for preparation of highly conductive, mechanically strong polymer composites. Chem Mater, 2017, 29: 3412–342210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04734 ↗
24. Herrera-Alonso M, Abdala AA, McAllister MJ, et al. Intercalation and stitching of graphite oxide with diaminoalkanes. Langmuir, 2007, 23: 10644–1064910.1021/la0633839 ↗
25. Burress JW, Gadipelli S, Ford J, et al. Graphene oxide framework materials: theoretical predictions and experimental results. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2010, 49: 8902–890410.1002/anie.201003328 ↗
26. Zhang M, Mao Y, Liu G, et al. Molecular bridges stabilize graphene oxide membranes in water. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2020, 59: 1689–169510.1002/anie.201913010 ↗
27. Zhang Y, Zhang S, Chung T. Nanometric graphene oxide framework members with enhanced heavy metal removal via nanofiltration. Environ Sci Technol, 2015, 49: 10235–1024210.1021/acs.est.5b02086 ↗
28. Cai J, Chen J, Zeng P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of CO2 adsorption in diamine-cross-linked graphene oxide. Chem Mater, 2019, 31: 3729–373510.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00688 ↗
29. Zhang X, Ciesielski A, Richard F, et al. Modular graphene-based 3D covalent networks: functional architectures for energy applications. Small, 2016, 12: 1044–105210.1002/smll.201503677 ↗
30. Yang J, Gong D, Li G, et al. Self-assembly of thiourea-crosslinked graphene oxide framework membranes toward separation of small molecules. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 170577510.1002/adma.201705775 ↗
31. Rajesh S, Bose AB. Development of graphene oxide framework membranes via the “from” and “to” cross-linking approach for ion-selective separations. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 27706–2771610.1021/acsami.9b05465 ↗
32. Yao B, Li C, Ma J, et al. Porphyrin-based graphene oxide frameworks with ultra-large d-spacings for the electrocatalyzation of oxygen reduction reaction. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2015, 17: 19538–1954510.1039/C5CP02853A ↗
33. Zhang J, Liu Q, Ruan Y, et al. Monolithic crystalline swelling of graphite oxide: a bridge to ultralarge graphene oxide with high scalability. Chem Mater, 2018, 30: 1888–189710.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04458 ↗
34. Diercks CS, Liu Y, Cordova KE, et al. The role of reticular chemistry in the design of CO2 reduction catalysts. Nat Mater, 2018, 17: 301–30710.1038/s41563-018-0033-5 ↗
35. Xiao Y, Tian G, Li W, et al. Molecule self-assembly synthesis of porous few-layer carbon nitride for highly efficient photoredox catalysis. J Am Chem Soc, 2019, 141: 2508–251510.1021/jacs.8b12428 ↗
36. Hung WS, Tsou CH, De Guzman M, et al. Cross-linking with diamine monomers to prepare composite graphene oxide-framework membranes with varying d-spacing. Chem Mater, 2014, 26: 2983–299010.1021/cm5007873 ↗
37. Wu T, Efimenko K, Vlcek P, et al. Formation and properties of anchored polymers with a gradual variation of grafting densities on flat substrates. Macromolecules, 2003, 36: 2448–245310.1021/ma0257189 ↗
38. Chen WL, Cordero R, Tran H, et al. 50th anniversary perspective: Polymer brushes: novel surfaces for future materials. Macromolecules, 2017, 50: 4089–411310.1021/acs.macromol.7b00450 ↗
39. Zhou X, Chen Z, Yan D, et al. Deposition of Fe-Ni nanoparticles on polyethyleneimine-decorated graphene oxide and application in catalytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane. J Mater Chem, 2012, 22: 13506–1351610.1039/c2jm31000g ↗
40. Saito Y, Luo X, Zhao C, et al. Filling the gaps between graphene oxide: a general strategy toward nanolayered oxides. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 5683–569010.1002/adfm.201501358 ↗
41. Chen PY, Liu M, Valentin TM, et al. Hierarchical metal oxide topographies replicated from highly textured graphene oxide by intercalation templating. ACS Nano, 2016, 10: 10869–1087910.1021/acsnano.6b05179 ↗
42. Su Y, Prestat E, Hu C, et al. Self-limiting growth of two-dimensional palladium between graphene oxide layers. Nano Lett, 2019, 19: 4678–468310.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01733 ↗