Molecule-like chemical units in metallic alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Each conventional alloy has its own specific compositions but the compositional origin is largely unknown due to our insufficient understanding about chemical short-range ordering in the alloy, in particular, in the solid-solution state. In the present paper, the compositions of metallic alloys are discussed and formulated, by unveiling the basic moleculelike structural units in solid solutions. Friedel oscillation theory, which describes the partial charge screening behavior in solid solutions, and henceforth the origin of short-range ordering, is applied to pin down the ideal chemical compositions of conventional metallic alloys. We propose that, at a specific composition, atoms self-assemble into an ideally ordered structure consisting of atoms residing in the nearest-neighbor shell (denoted as cluster) plus those in the next outer shell (denoted as glue atoms), which can be formulated as [cluster](glue atoms). This simplified version of short-range-order structure represents the smallest charge-neutral and mean-density zone (termed as “chemical units”) and can be regarded as the ‘molecules’ of solid solutions. Accordingly, the chemical units and the corresponding molecule-like formulas for face-centered-cubic (FCC), hexagonal close-packed (HCP), and body-centered cubic (BCC) structures are analyzed and equations are obtained to identify the chemical formulas for FCC solid solutions. For instance, well-known α-brass Cu-30Zn alloy is formulated as [Zn-Cu12]Zn4. Examples of aluminum alloys, superalloys and stainless steels are also illustrated, demonstrating the versatility of the present model to interpret chemically complex alloys.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Cowley JM. An approximate theory of order in alloys. Phys Rev, 1950, 77: 669–67510.1103/PhysRev.77.669 ↗
2. Cahn RW. Homo or hetero? Nature, 1978, 271: 407–40810.1038/271407a0 ↗
3. Hume-Rothery W, Smallman RE, Haworth CW. The Structure of Metals and Alloys. London: The Institute of Metals, 1988
4. Jones H. Notes on work at the University of Bristol, 1930–7. Proc R Soc Lond A, 1980, 371: 52–5510.1098/rspa.1980.0056 ↗
5. Friedel J. Electronic structure of primary solid solutions in metals. Adv Phys, 1954, 3: 446–50710.1080/00018735400101233 ↗
6. Ziman JM. Principles of the Theory of Solids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197210.1017/CBO9781139644075 ↗
7. Häussler P. Interrelations between atomic and electronic structures—Liquid and amorphous metals as model systems. Phys Rep, 1992, 222: 65–14310.1016/0370-1573(92)90018-U ↗
8. Chen H, Wang Q, Wang Y, et al. Composition rule for Al-transition metal binary quasicrystals. Philos Mag, 2010, 90: 3935–394610.1080/14786435.2010.502144 ↗
9. Baker H, Okamoto H. Alloy phase diagrams. Materials Park: ASM International, 1992
10. Davis JR. ASM Bandbook. 2. Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-purpose aterials. Materials Park: ASM International, 2009
11. Reinhard L, Schönfeld B, Kostorz G, et al. Short-range order in α-brass. Phys Rev B, 1990, 41: 1727–173410.1103/PhysRevB.41.1727 ↗
12. Stolz UK, Arpshofen I, Sommer P, et al. Determination of the enthalpy of mixing of liquid alloys using a high-temperature mixing calorimeter. JPE, 1993, 14: 473–47810.1007/BF02671966 ↗
13. Aalders J, van Dijk C, Radelaar S. Neutron scattering study of short-range clustering in CuNi(Fe) alloys. J Phys F-Met Phys, 1984, 14: 2801–281510.1088/0305-4608/14/12/006 ↗
14. Koo YM, Cohen JB. The structure of GP zones in Cu-10.9 at.% Be. Acta Metall, 1989, 37: 1295–130610.1016/0001-6160(89)90159-4 ↗
15. Sato A, Harada H, Yeh AC, et al. A 5th generation SC superalloy with balanced high temperature properties and processability. Minerals Metals Mater Soc, 2008: 131–13810.7449/2008/Superalloys_2008_131_138 ↗
16. Pearson WB, Villars P, Calvert LD. Pearson’s Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases. Vol. 1. Materials Park: ASM International, 1985
17. Mughrabi H. Microstructural aspects of high temperature deformation of monocrystalline nickel base superalloys: Some open problems. Mater Sci Tech, 2009, 25: 191–20410.1179/174328408X361436 ↗
18. Zhang JX, Harada H, Ro Y, et al. Thermomechanical fatigue mechanism in a modern single crystal nickel base superalloy TMS-82. Acta Mater, 2008, 56: 2975–298710.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.035 ↗
19. Jiang X, Ice GE, Sparks CJ, et al. Local atomic order and individual pair displacements of Fe46.5Ni53.5 and Fe22.5Ni77.5 from diffuse X-ray scattering studies. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54: 3211–322610.1103/PhysRevB.54.3211 ↗
20. Tavares SSM, Moura V, da Costa VC, et al. Microstructural changes and corrosion resistance of AISI 310S steel exposed to 600–800°C. Mater Charact, 2009, 60: 573–57810.1016/j.matchar.2008.12.005 ↗
21. Li ZM, Li XN, Hu YL, et al. Cuboidal γ′ phase coherent precipitation-strengthened Cu-Ni-Al alloys with high softening temperature. Acta Mater, 2021, 203: 11645810.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.076 ↗
22. Li JL, Li Z, Wang Q, et al. Phase-field simulation of coherent BCC/ B2 microstructures in high entropy alloys. Acta Mater, 2020, 197: 10–1910.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.030 ↗