journal article·2021-02Open access

Smart adsorbents for CO2 capture: Making strong adsorption sites respond to visible light

Qiu-Rong Wu, Peng Tan, Chen Gu, Rui Zhou, Shi-Chao Qi, Xiao-Qin Liu, Yao Jiang, Lin-Bing Sun

Science China Materials· Volume 64· Issue 2

Abstract

Due to the good controllability and high energy efficiency in adsorption processes, photoresponsive adsorbents are intriguing for CO2 capture. Nevertheless, most reported photoresponsive adsorbents are designed based on weak adsorption sites, regulating CO2 adsorption through structural change or steric hindrance. In addition, ultraviolet (UV) light is commonly involved in the regulation of adsorption capacity. Here we report for the first time the smart adsorbents for CO2 capture, which makes strong adsorption sites respond to visible (Vis) light. The adsorbents were fabricated by introducing primary amine and Dispersed Red 1 (DR1, a kind of push-pull azobenzene that responds to Vis light rapidly) units to mesoporous silica, which act as strong adsorption sites and triggers, respectively. The primary amine sites make the adsorbents highly selective in the adsorption of CO2 over CH4. Without light irradiation, azobenzene is in the form of trans configuration, which leads to decreased electrostatic potential of primary amines and subsequently, exposure of active sites and liberal adsorption of CO2. Upon Vis-light irradiation, cis isomers are formed, which results in increased electrostatic potential of primary amines and subsequently shelter of active sites. Even on such strong adsorption sites, the alteration of CO2 adsorption capacity can reach 40% for the adsorbent with and without Vis-light irradiation. Moreover, the trans/cis isomerization of DR1 units can be triggered reversibly by Vis light. The present smart system endows adsorbents with selective adsorption capacity and avoids the employment of UV light, which is unlikely to be achieved by conventional photoresponsive adsorbents.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Connolly BM, Aragones-Anglada M, Gandara-Loe J, et al. Tuning porosity in macroscopic monolithic metal-organic frameworks for exceptional natural gas storage. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 234510.1038/s41467-019-10185-1 ↗
2. Jewell J, McCollum D, Emmerling J, et al. Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions. Nature, 2018, 554: 229–23310.1038/nature25467 ↗
3. Alvarez RA, Zavala-Araiza D, Lyon DR, et al. Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain. Science, 2018, 361: 186–18810.1126/science.aar7204 ↗
4. Kotchen MJ, Mansur ET. Correspondence: Reassessing the contribution of natural gas to US CO2 emission reductions since 2007. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 1064810.1038/ncomms10648 ↗
5. Chen S, Tian M, Tao Z, et al. Effect of swing on removing CO2 from offshore natural gas by adsorption. Chem Eng J, 2020, 382: 12293210.1016/j.cej.2019.122932 ↗
6. Huang Z, Sednek C, Urynowicz MA, et al. Low carbon renewable natural gas production from coalbeds and implications for carbon capture and storage. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 56810.1038/s41467-017-00611-7 ↗
7. Souther S. Drawbacks to natural gas. Science, 2013, 340: 14110.1126/science.340.6129.141-a ↗
8. Yoon JW, Chang H, Lee SJ, et al. Selective nitrogen capture by porous hybrid materials containing accessible transition metal ion sites. Nat Mater, 2017, 16: 526–53110.1038/nmat4825 ↗
9. Dutcher B, Fan M, Russell AG. Amine-based CO2 capture technology development from the beginning of 2013—A review. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 2137–214810.1021/am507465f ↗
10. Filburn T, Helble JJ, Weiss RA. Development of supported ethanolamines and modified ethanolamines for CO2 capture. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2005, 44: 1542–154610.1021/ie0495527 ↗
11. Rochelle GT. Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science, 2009, 325: 1652–165410.1126/science.1176731 ↗
12. Wriedt M, Sculley JP, Yakovenko AA, et al. Low-energy selective capture of carbon dioxide by a pre-designed elastic single-molecule trap. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2012, 51: 9804–980810.1002/anie.201202992 ↗
13. Jee SE, Sholl DS. Carbon dioxide and methane transport in DDR zeolite: Insights from molecular simulations into carbon dioxide separations in small pore zeolites. J Am Chem Soc, 2009, 131: 7896–790410.1021/ja901483e ↗
14. Hao GP, Li WC, Qian D, et al. Rapid synthesis of nitrogen-doped porous carbon monolith for CO2 capture. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 853–85710.1002/adma.200903765 ↗
15. Ding M, Flaig RW, Jiang HL, et al. Carbon capture and conversion using metal-organic frameworks and MOF-based materials. Chem Soc Rev, 2019, 48: 2783–282810.1039/C8CS00829A ↗
16. Cui WG, Hu TL, Bu XH. Metal-organic framework materials for the separation and purification of light hydrocarbons. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 180644510.1002/adma.201806445 ↗
17. Zhao X, Yuan Y, Li P, et al. A polyether amine modified metal organic framework enhanced the CO2 adsorption capacity of room temperature porous liquids. Chem Commun, 2019, 55: 13179–1318210.1039/C9CC07243H ↗
18. Li X, Ma W, Li H, et al. Sulfur-functionalized metal-organic frameworks: Synthesis and applications as advanced adsorbents. Coord Chem Rev, 2020, 408: 21319110.1016/j.ccr.2020.213191 ↗
19. Aznar E, Oroval M, Pascual L, et al. Gated materials for oncommand release of guest molecules. Chem Rev, 2016, 116: 561–71810.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00456 ↗
20. Cobo I, Li M, Sumerlin BS, et al. Smart hybrid materials by conjugation of responsive polymers to biomacromolecules. Nat Mater, 2015, 14: 143–15910.1038/nmat4106 ↗
21. Dong L, Feng Y, Wang L, et al. Azobenzene-based solar thermal fuels: Design, properties, and applications. Chem Soc Rev, 2018, 47: 7339–736810.1039/C8CS00470F ↗
22. Grzelczak M, Liz-Marzán LM, Klajn R. Stimuli-responsive self-assembly of nanoparticles. Chem Soc Rev, 2019, 48: 1342–136110.1039/C8CS00787J ↗
23. Huang N, Ding X, Kim J, et al. A photoresponsive smart covalent organic framework. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2015, 54: 8704–870710.1002/anie.201503902 ↗
24. Vanduyfhuys L, Rogge SMJ, Wieme J, et al. Thermodynamic insight into stimuli-responsive behaviour of soft porous crystals. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 20410.1038/s41467-017-02666-y ↗
25. Xia LW, Xie R, Ju XJ, et al. Nano-structured smart hydrogels with rapid response and high elasticity. Nat Commun, 2013, 4: 222610.1038/ncomms3226 ↗
26. Fan CB, Gong LL, Huang L, et al. Significant Enhancement of C2H2/C2H4 separation by a photochromic diarylethene unit: A temperature- and light-responsive separation switch. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2017, 56: 7900–790610.1002/anie.201702484 ↗
27. Huang H, Sato H, Aida T. Crystalline nanochannels with pendant azobenzene groups: Steric or polar effects on gas adsorption and diffusion? J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139: 8784–878710.1021/jacs.7b02979 ↗
28. Tan P, Jiang Y, Qi SC, et al. Ce-doped smart adsorbents with photoresponsive molecular switches for selective adsorption and efficient desorption. Engineering, 2020, 6: 569–57610.1016/j.eng.2020.03.005 ↗
29. Knebel A, Sundermann L, Mohmeyer A, et al. Azobenzene guest molecules as light-switchable CO2 valves in an ultrathin UiO-67 membrane. Chem Mater, 2017, 29: 3111–311710.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00147 ↗
30. Kundu PK, Samanta D, Leizrowice R, et al. Light-controlled self-assembly of non-photoresponsive nanoparticles. Nat Chem, 2015, 7: 646–65210.1038/nchem.2303 ↗
31. Liu Z, Wang HI, Narita A, et al. Photoswitchable micro-supercapacitor based on a diarylethene-graphene composite film. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139: 9443–944610.1021/jacs.7b04491 ↗
32. Qin L, Gu W, Wei J, et al. Piecewise phototuning of self-organized helical superstructures. Adv Mater, 2017, 30: 170494110.1002/adma.201704941 ↗
33. Jiang Y, Tan P, Qi SC, et al. Metal-organic frameworks with target-specific active sites switched by photoresponsive motifs: Efficient adsorbents for tailorable CO2 capture. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2019, 58: 6600–660410.1002/anie.201900141 ↗
34. Park J, Yuan D, Pham KT, et al. Reversible alteration of CO2 adsorption upon photochemical or thermal treatment in a metal-organic framework. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134: 99–10210.1021/ja209197f ↗
35. Lyndon R, Konstas K, Ladewig BP, et al. Dynamic photo-switching in metal-organic frameworks as a route to low-energy carbon dioxide capture and release. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013, 52: 3695–369810.1002/anie.201206359 ↗
36. Tan SY, Ang CY, Li P, et al. Drug encapsulation and release by mesoporous silica nanoparticles: The effect of surface functional groups. Chem Eur J, 2015, 20: 11276–1128210.1002/chem.201403551 ↗
37. Qin JX, Wang ZM, Liu XQ, et al. Low-temperature fabrication of Cu(I) sites in zeolites by using a vapor-induced reduction strategy. J Mater Chem A, 2015, 3: 12247–1225110.1039/C5TA02569A ↗
38. Rowsell JLC, Yaghi OM. Effects of functionalization, catenation, and variation of the metal oxide and organic linking units on the low-pressure hydrogen adsorption properties of metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc, 2006, 128: 1304–131510.1021/ja056639q ↗
39. Yin Y, Tan P, Liu XQ, et al. Constructing a confined space in silica nanopores: An ideal platform for the formation and dispersion of cuprous sites. J Mater Chem A, 2014, 2: 3399–340610.1039/c3ta14760f ↗
40. Bloch ED, Hudson MR, Mason JA, et al. Reversible CO binding enables tunable CO/H2 and CO/N2 separations in metal-organic frameworks with exposed divalent metal cations. J Am Chem Soc, 2014, 136: 10752–1076110.1021/ja505318p ↗
41. Cheng L, Jiang Y, Qi SC, et al. Controllable adsorption of CO2 on smart adsorbents: An interplay between amines and photoresponsive molecules. Chem Mater, 2018, 30: 3429–343710.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01005 ↗
42. Myers AL, Prausnitz JM. Thermodynamics of mixed-gas adsorption. AIChE J, 2010, 11: 121–12710.1002/aic.690110125 ↗
43. Chen T, Chen R, Jin Z, et al. Engineering hollow mesoporous silica nanocontainers with molecular switches for continuous self-healing anticorrosion coating. J Mater Chem A, 2015, 3: 9510–951610.1039/C5TA01188D ↗
44. Cheng R, Kang M, Zhuang S, et al. Adsorption of Sr(II) from water by mercerized bacterial cellulose membrane modified with edta. J Hazard Mater, 2019, 364: 645–65310.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.083 ↗
45. Bushuyev OS, Singleton TA, Barrett CJ. Fast, reversible, and general photomechanical motion in single crystals of various azo compounds using visible light. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 1796–180010.1002/adma.201204831 ↗
46. Amrutha AS, Kumar KRS, Kikukawa T, et al. Targeted activation of molecular transportation by visible light. ACS Nano, 2017, 11: 12292–1230110.1021/acsnano.7b06059 ↗
47. Jiang Y, Park J, Tan P, et al. Maximizing photoresponsive efficiency by isolating metal-organic polyhedra into confined nanoscaled spaces. J Am Chem Soc, 2019, 141: 8221–822710.1021/jacs.9b01380 ↗