Enhancing interpretability in the exploration of high-energy conversion efficiency in CsSnBr3−xIx configurations using crystal graph convolutional neural networks and adversarial example methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Noel NK, Abate A, Stranks SD, et al. Enhanced photoluminescence and solar cell performance via Lewis base passivation of organic-inorganic lead halide perovskites. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 9815–982110.1021/nn5036476 ↗
2. Hao J, Li W, Zhai J, et al. Progress in high-strain perovskite piezoelectric ceramics. Mater Sci Eng-R-Rep, 2019, 135: 1–5710.1016/j.mser.2018.08.001 ↗
3. Fechner M, Maznichenko IV, Ostanin S, et al. Magnetic phase transition in two-phase multiferroics predicted from first principles. Phys Rev B, 2008, 78: 21240610.1103/PhysRevB.78.212406 ↗
4. Gao LK, Zhao XH, Diao XF, et al. First-principles study of photoelectric properties of CsSnBr3 under hydrostatic pressure. Acta Phys Sin, 2021, 70: 15880110.7498/aps.70.20210397 ↗
5. Mahmood Q, Yaseen M, Hassan M, et al. The first-principle study of mechanical, optoelectronic and thermoelectric properties of CsGeBr3 and CsSnBr3 perovskites. Mater Res Express, 2019, 6: 04590110.1088/2053-1591/aaf997 ↗
6. Liang Y, Cui X, Li F, et al. Electrode-induced impurities in tin halide perovskite solar cell material CsSnBr3 from first principles. npj Comput Mater, 2021, 7: 6310.1038/s41524-021-00533-5 ↗
7. Luo T, Zhang Y, Chang X, et al. Dual interfacial engineering for efficient Cs2AgBiBr6 based solar cells. J Energy Chem, 2021, 53: 372–37810.1016/j.jechem.2020.05.016 ↗
8. Li T, Wang J, Gao Z, et al. Local stress enhanced photocurrent of visible light photo-detection in Cs2AgBiBr6 single crystal. Appl Phys Lett, 2019, 115: 13110310.1063/1.5116088 ↗
9. Sabba D, Mulmudi HK, Prabhakar RR, et al. Impact of anionic Br− substitution on open circuit voltage in lead free perovskite (CsSnI3−xBrx) solar cells. J Phys Chem C, 2015, 119: 1763–176710.1021/jp5126624 ↗
10. Iqbal A, Sun Z, Wang G, et al. Optimizing band gap of inorganic halide perovskites by donor-acceptor pair codoping. Inorg Chem, 2020, 59: 6053–605910.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00033 ↗
11. Shi R, Fang Q, Vasenko AS, et al. Structural disorder in higher-temperature phases increases charge carrier lifetimes in metal halide perovskites. J Am Chem Soc, 2022, 144: 19137–1914910.1021/jacs.2c08627 ↗
12. Liu Y, Long R, Fang WH. Great influence of organic cation motion on charge carrier dynamics in metal halide perovskite unraveled by un-supervised machine learning. J Phys Chem Lett, 2022, 13: 8537–854510.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02515 ↗
13. Lu S, Zhou Q, Ouyang Y, et al. Accelerated discovery of stable lead-free hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites via machine learning. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 340510.1038/s41467-018-05761-w ↗
14. Gladkikh V, Kim DY, Hajibabaei A, et al. Machine learning for predicting the band gaps of ABX3 perovskites from elemental properties. J Phys Chem C, 2020, 124: 8905–891810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11768 ↗
15. Yuan R, Liu Z, Balachandran PV, et al. Accelerated discovery of large electrostrains in BaTiO3-based piezoelectrics using active learning. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 170288410.1002/adma.201702884 ↗
16. Jin H, Zhang H, Li J, et al. Data-driven systematic search of promising photocatalysts for water splitting under visible light. J Phys Chem Lett, 2019, 10: 5211–521810.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01977 ↗
17. Davies DW, Butler KT, Walsh A. Data-driven discovery of photoactive quaternary oxides using first-principles machine learning. Chem Mater, 2019, 31: 7221–723010.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01519 ↗
18. Wang T, Tan X, Wei Y, et al. Unveiling the layer-dependent electronic properties in transition-metal dichalcogenide heterostructures assisted by machine learning. Nanoscale, 2022, 14: 2511–252010.1039/D1NR07747C ↗
19. Zhuo Y, Mansouri Tehrani A, Brgoch J. Predicting the band gaps of inorganic solids by machine learning. J Phys Chem Lett, 2018, 9: 1668–167310.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00124 ↗
20. Ouyang R, Curtarolo S, Ahmetcik E, et al. SISSO: A compressed-sensing method for identifying the best low-dimensional descriptor in an immensity of offered candidates. Phys Rev Mater, 2018, 2: 08380210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.083802 ↗
21. Wang T, Tan X, Wei Y, et al. Accurate bandgap predictions of solids assisted by machine learning. Mater Today Commun, 2021, 29: 10293210.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102932 ↗
22. Oftelie LB, Rajak P, Kalia RK, et al. Active learning for accelerated design of layered materials. npj Comput Mater, 2018, 4: 7410.1038/s41524-018-0129-0 ↗
23. Hibat-Allah M, Ganahl M, Hayward LE, et al. Recurrent neural network wave functions. Phys Rev Res, 2020, 2: 02335810.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023358 ↗
24. Jin H, Zhang H, Li J, et al. Discovery of novel two-dimensional photovoltaic materials accelerated by machine learning. J Phys Chem Lett, 2020, 11: 3075–308110.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00721 ↗
25. L. Agiorgousis M, Sun Y, Choe D, et al. Machine learning augmented discovery of chalcogenide double perovskites for photovoltaics. Advcd Theor Sims, 2019, 2: 180017310.1002/adts.201800173 ↗
26. Pfau D, Spencer JS, Matthews AGDG, et al. Ab initio solution of the many-electron Schrödinger equation with deep neural networks. Phys Rev Res, 2020, 2: 03342910.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033429 ↗
27. Carleo G, Choo K, Hofmann D, et al. NetKet: A machine learning toolkit for many-body quantum systems. SoftwareX, 2019, 10: 10031110.1016/j.softx.2019.100311 ↗
28. Wu Z, Pan S, Chen F, et al. A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2021, 32: 4–2410.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386 ↗
29. Xie T, Grossman JC. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys Rev Lett, 2018, 120: 14530110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 ↗
30. Chen C, Ye W, Zuo Y, et al. Graph networks as a universal machine learning framework for molecules and crystals. Chem Mater, 2019, 31: 3564–357210.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01294 ↗
31. Wang Z, Han Y, Cai J, et al. DeepTMC: A deep learning platform to targeted design doped transition metal compounds. Energy Storage Mater, 2022, 45: 1201–121110.1016/j.ensm.2021.11.020 ↗
32. Choudhary K, DeCost B. Atomistic line graph neural network for improved materials property predictions. npj Comput Mater, 2021, 7: 18510.1038/s41524-021-00650-1 ↗
33. Park CW, Wolverton C. Developing an improved crystal graph convolutional neural network framework for accelerated materials discovery. Phys Rev Mater, 2020, 4: 06380110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.063801 ↗
34. Kailkhura B, Gallagher B, Kim S, et al. Reliable and explainable machine-learning methods for accelerated material discovery. npj Comput Mater, 2019, 5: 10810.1038/s41524-019-0248-2 ↗
35. Deng J, Jia G. An interpretable hybrid machine learning prediction of dielectric constant of alkali halide crystals. Chem Phys, 2022, 555: 11145710.1016/j.chemphys.2022.111457 ↗
36. Anker AS, Kjær ETS, Juelsholt M, et al. Extracting structural motifs from pair distribution function data of nanostructures using explainable machine learning. npj Comput Mater, 2022, 8: 21310.1038/s41524-022-00896-3 ↗
37. Takehara Y, Sekimoto A, Okano Y, et al. Explainable machine learning for the analysis of transport phenomena in top-seeded solution growth of SiC single crystal. J Ther Sci Technol, 2021, 16: JTST000910.1299/jtst.2021jtst0009 ↗
38. Bartök AP, Kondor R, Csányi G. On representing chemical environments. Phys Rev B, 2013, 87: 18411510.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 ↗
39. Gastegger M, Schwiedrzik L, Bittermann M, et al. wACSF—Weighted atom-centered symmetry functions as descriptors in machine learning potentials. J Chem Phys, 2018, 148: 24170910.1063/1.5019667 ↗
40. Ghiringhelli LM, Vybiral J, Levchenko SV, et al. Big data of materials science: Critical role of the descriptor. Phys Rev Lett, 2015, 114: 10550310.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105503 ↗
41. Ward L, Agrawal A, Choudhary A, et al. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. npj Comput Mater, 2016, 2: 1602810.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
42. Ward L, Liu R, Krishna A, et al. Including crystal structure attributes in machine learning models of formation energies via Voronoi tessellations. Phys Rev B, 2017, 96: 02410410.1103/PhysRevB.96.024104 ↗
43. De S, Bartök AP, Csányi G, et al. Comparing molecules and solids across structural and alchemical space. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2016, 18: 13754–1376910.1039/C6CP00415F ↗
44. Seko A, Maekawa T, Tsuda K, et al. Machine learning with systematic density-functional theory calculations: Application to melting temperatures of single- and binary-component solids. Phys Rev B, 2014, 89: 05430310.1103/PhysRevB.89.054303 ↗
45. Liang J, Zhu X. Phillips-inspired machine learning for band gap and exciton binding energy prediction. J Phys Chem Lett, 2019, 10: 5640–564610.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02232 ↗
46. M. Dieb T, Hou Z, Tsuda K. Structure prediction of boron-doped graphene by machine learning. J Chem Phys, 2018, 148: 24171610.1063/1.5018065 ↗
47. Lu S, Zhou Q, Ma L, et al. Rapid discovery of ferroelectric photovoltaic perovskites and material descriptors via machine learning. Small Methods, 2019, 3: 190036010.1002/smtd.201900360 ↗
48. Choudhary K, Garrity KF, Reid ACE, et al. The joint automated repository for various integrated simulations (JARVIS) for data-driven materials design. npj Comput Mater, 2020, 6: 17310.1038/s41524-020-00440-1 ↗
49. Hicks D, Toher C, Ford DC, et al. AFLOW-XtalFinder: A reliable choice to identify crystalline prototypes. npj Comput Mater, 2021, 7: 3010.1038/s41524-020-00483-4 ↗
50. Ward L, Dunn A, Faghaninia A, et al. Matminer: An open source toolkit for materials data mining. Comput Mater Sci, 2018, 152: 60–6910.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.018 ↗
51. Schutt KT, Glawe H, Brockherde F, et al. How to represent crystal structures for machine learning: Towards fast prediction of electronic properties. Phys Rev B, 2014, 89: 20511810.1103/PhysRevB.89.205118 ↗
52. Mathew K, Singh AK, Gabriel JJ, et al. MPInterfaces: A materials project based Python tool for high-throughput computational screening of interfacial systems. Comput Mater Sci, 2016, 122: 183–19010.1016/j.commatsci.2016.05.020 ↗
53. Morales-García Á, Valero R, Illas F. An empirical, yet practical way to predict the band gap in solids by using density functional band structure calculations. J Phys Chem C, 2017, 121: 18862–1886610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07421 ↗
54. Szegedy C, Zaremba W, Sutskever I, et al. Intriguing properties of neural networks. 2013, http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199
55. Liu X, Zhang J, Lin Y, et al. ATMPA: attacking machine learning-based malware visualization detection methods via adversarial examples. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Quality of Service. New York: ACM, 2019. 1–10
56. Kwon H, Yoon H, Park KW. Robust CAPTCHA image generation enhanced with adversarial example methods. IEICE Trans Inf Syst, 2020, E103.D: 879–88210.1587/transinf.2019EDL8194 ↗
57. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial nets. 2014, http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661
58. Okhotnikov K, Charpentier T, Cadars S. Supercell program: A combinatorial structure-generation approach for the local-level modeling of atomic substitutions and partial occupancies in crystals. J Cheminform, 2016, 8: 1710.1186/s13321-016-0129-3 ↗