In situ reconstruction of Bi nanoparticles confined within 3D nanoporous Cu to boost CO2 electroreduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. De Luna P, Hahn C, Higgins D, et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science, 2019, 364: eaav350610.1126/science.aav3506 ↗
2. Huang W, He Q, Hu Y, et al. Back cover: Molecular heterostructures of covalent triazine frameworks for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2019, 58: 894410.1002/anie.201906351 ↗
3. Zhang K, Wang J, Zhang W, et al. Regulated surface electronic states of CuNi nanoparticles through metal-support interaction for enhanced electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to ethanol. Small, 2023, 19: 230028110.1002/smll.202300281 ↗
4. Nguyen TN, Guo J, Sachindran A, et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction to ethanol: From mechanistic understanding to catalyst design. J Mater Chem A, 2021, 9: 12474–1249410.1039/D1TA01115D ↗
5. Li YC, Wang Z, Yuan T, et al. Binding site diversity promotes CO2 electroreduction to ethanol. J Am Chem Soc, 2019, 141: 8584–859110.1021/jacs.9b02945 ↗
6. Kim C, Cho KM, Park K, et al. Cu/Cu2O interconnected porous aerogel catalyst for highly productive electrosynthesis of ethanol from CO2. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31: 210214210.1002/adfm.202102142 ↗
7. Zhao Y, Liu X, Chen D, et al. Atomic-level-designed copper atoms on hierarchically porous gold architectures for high-efficiency electrochemical CO2 reduction. Sci China Mater, 2021, 64: 1900–190910.1007/s40843-020-1583-4 ↗
8. Hu Y, Lu D, Zhou W, et al. In situ construction of 3D low-coordinated bismuth nanosheets@Cu nanowire core-shell nanoarchitectures for superior CO2 electroreduction activity. J Mater Chem A, 2023, 11: 1937–194310.1039/D2TA07469A ↗
9. Whipple DT, Kenis PJA. Prospects of CO2 utilization via direct heterogeneous electrochemical reduction. J Phys Chem Lett, 2010, 1: 3451–345810.1021/jz1012627 ↗
10. Pardo Pérez LC, Teschner D, Willinger E, et al. In situ formed “Sn1−xIn x@In1−ySnyOz” core@shell nanoparticles as electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction to formate. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31: 210360110.1002/adfm.202103601 ↗
11. Wang J, Ning S, Luo M, et al. In−Sn alloy core-shell nanoparticles: In-doped SnOx shell enables high stability and activity towards selective formate production from electrochemical reduction of CO2. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2021, 288: 11997910.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119979 ↗
12. He S, Ni F, Ji Y, et al. The p-orbital delocalization of main-group metals to boost CO2 electroreduction. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57: 16114–1611910.1002/anie.201810538 ↗
13. Ren B, Wen G, Gao R, et al. Nano-crumples induced Sn−Bi bimetallic interface pattern with moderate electron bank for highly efficient CO2 electroreduction. Nat Commun, 2022, 13: 248610.1038/s41467-022-29861-w ↗
14. Yang H, Han N, Deng J, et al. Selective CO2 reduction on 2D mesoporous Bi nanosheets. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 180153610.1002/aenm.201801536 ↗
15. Zhao Y, Liu X, Liu Z, et al. Spontaneously Sn-doped Bi/BiOx core–shell nanowires toward high-performance CO2 electroreduction to liquid fuel. Nano Lett, 2021, 21: 6907–691310.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02053 ↗
16. Cao C, Ma D, Gu J, et al. Metal-organic layers leading to atomically thin bismuthene for efficient carbon dioxide electroreduction to liquid fuel. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2020, 59: 15014–1502010.1002/anie.202005577 ↗
17. Yuan Y, Wang Q, Qiao Y, et al. In situ structural reconstruction to generate the active sites for CO2 electroreduction on bismuth ultrathin nanosheets. Adv Energy Mater, 2022, 12: 220097010.1002/aenm.202200970 ↗
18. Chang S, Xuan Y, Duan J, et al. High-performance electroreduction CO2 to formate at Bi/Nafion interface. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2022, 306: 12113510.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121135 ↗
19. Chen J, Wang L. Effects of the catalyst dynamic changes and influence of the reaction environment on the performance of electrochemical CO2 reduction. Adv Mater, 2022, 34: 210390010.1002/adma.202103900 ↗
20. Zhang J, Pan B, Li Y. Modulating electrochemical CO2 reduction at interfaces. Sci Bull, 2022, 67: 1844–184810.1016/j.scib.2022.08.011 ↗
21. Deng B, Huang M, Zhao X, et al. Interfacial electrolyte effects on electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. ACS Catal, 2022, 12: 331–36210.1021/acscatal.1c03501 ↗
22. Kuang M, Zheng G. Interfacial microenvironments for carbon dioxide electro-upgrading to multicarbon products. Chem Catal, 2023, 3: 10056510.1016/j.checat.2023.100565 ↗
23. Yang S, An H, Arnouts S, et al. Halide-guided active site exposure in bismuth electrocatalysts for selective CO2 conversion into formic acid. Nat Catal, 2023, 6: 796–80610.1038/s41929-023-01008-0 ↗
24. Li C, Liu Z, Zhou X, et al. Bio-inspired engineering of Bi2S3−PPy composite for the efficient electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide. Energy Environ Sci, 2023, 16: 3885–389810.1039/D3EE02029K ↗
25. Cheng W, Zhang H, Luan D, et al. Exposing unsaturated Cu1−O2 sites in nanoscale Cu−MOF for efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Sci Adv, 2021, 7: 258010.1126/sciadv.abg2580 ↗
26. Zhong H, Qiu Y, Zhang T, et al. Bismuth nanodendrites as a high performance electrocatalyst for selective conversion of CO2 to formate. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4: 13746–1375310.1039/C6TA06202D ↗
27. Wei X, Zhang W, Liu D, et al. Bi particles with exposed (012) facet on 3D substrate as highly active and durable electrode for CO2 reduction to formate. J CO2 Util, 2022, 55: 10179710.1016/j.jcou.2021.101797 ↗
28. Yang Z, Wang H, Fei X, et al. MOF derived bimetallic CuBi catalysts with ultra-wide potential window for high-efficient electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formate. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2021, 298: 12057110.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120571 ↗
29. Jeong JM, Choi BG, Lee SC, et al. Hierarchical hollow spheres of Fe2O3@polyaniline for lithium ion battery anodes. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 6250–625510.1002/adma.201302710 ↗
30. Luc W, Jiao F. Nanoporous metals as electrocatalysts: State-of-the-art, opportunities, and challenges. ACS Catal, 2017, 7: 5856–586110.1021/acscatal.7b01803 ↗
31. Yang Q, Zhao Y, Meng L, et al. Nanoporous intermetallic SnTe enables efficient electrochemical CO2 reduction into formate via promoting the fracture of metal-oxygen bonding. Small, 2022, 18: 210796810.1002/smll.202107968 ↗
32. Wan WB, Dai TY, Shi H, et al. Intermetallic Cu11In9 in situ formed on hierarchical nanoporous Cu for highly selective CO2 electroreduction. J Mater Chem A, 2022, 10: 4333–434310.1039/D1TA10163C ↗
33. Lv JJ, Jouny M, Luc W, et al. A highly porous copper electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 180311110.1002/adma.201803111 ↗
34. Yang Q, Liu X, Peng W, et al. Vanadium oxide integrated on hierarchically nanoporous copper for efficient electroreduction of CO2 to ethanol. J Mater Chem A, 2021, 9: 3044–305110.1039/D0TA09522B ↗
35. Chen L, Yu J, Fujita T, et al. Nanoporous copper with tunable nanoporosity for SERS applications. Adv Funct Mater, 2009, 19: 1221–122610.1002/adfm.200801239 ↗
36. Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54: 11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
37. Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B, 1993, 47: 558–56110.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
38. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 77: 3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
39. Blöchl PE. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B, 1994, 50: 17953–1797910.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
40. Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, et al. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys, 2010, 132: 15410410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
41. Wang V, Xu N, Liu JC, et al. VASPKIT: A user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code. Comput Phys Commun, 2021, 267: 10803310.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033 ↗
42. Peterson AA, Abild-Pedersen F, Studt F, et al. How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels. Energy Environ Sci, 2010, 3: 131110.1039/c0ee00071j ↗
43. Wu D, Wang X, Fu XZ, et al. Ultrasmall Bi nanoparticles confined in carbon nanosheets as highly active and durable catalysts for CO2 electroreduction. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2021, 284: 11972310.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119723 ↗
44. Yuan C, Lv H, Zhang Y, et al. Three-dimensional nanoporous heterojunction of CdS/np-rGO for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light. Carbon, 2023, 206: 237–24510.1016/j.carbon.2023.02.022 ↗
45. Huang R, Liu T, Zhao Y, et al. Angular dependent XPS study of surface band bending on Ga-polar n-GaN. Appl Surf Sci, 2018, 440: 637–64210.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.196 ↗
46. Yang S, Jiang M, Zhang W, et al. In situ structure refactoring of bismuth nanoflowers for highly selective electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formate. Adv Funct Mater, 2023, 33: 230198410.1002/adfm.202301984 ↗
47. Zhang D, Tao Z, Feng F, et al. High efficiency and selectivity from synergy: Bi nanoparticles embedded in nitrogen doped porous carbon for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formate. Electrochim Acta, 2020, 334: 13556310.1016/j.electacta.2019.135563 ↗
48. Ma J, Yan J, Xu J, et al. Dynamic ion exchange engineering BiOI-derived Bi2O2CO3 to promote CO2 electroreduction for efficient formate production. Chem Eng J, 2023, 455: 14092610.1016/j.cej.2022.140926 ↗
49. Wu D, Liu J, Liang Y, et al. Electrochemical transformation of facet-controlled BiOI into mesoporous bismuth nanosheets for selective electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formic acid. ChemSusChem, 2019, 12: 4700–470710.1002/cssc.201901724 ↗
50. Wordsworth J, Benedetti TM, Somerville SV, et al. The influence of nanoconfinement on electrocatalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61: e20220075510.1002/anie.202200755 ↗
51. Zhang H, Pan X, Han X, et al. Enhancing chemical reactions in a confined hydrophobic environment: An NMR study of benzene hydroxylation in carbon nanotubes. Chem Sci, 2013, 4: 1075–107810.1039/c2sc21761a ↗
52. Dai J, Zhang H. Recent advances in catalytic confinement effect within micro/meso-porous crystalline materials. Small, 2021, 17: 200533410.1002/smll.202005334 ↗
53. Chen X, Yin H, Yang X, et al. Co-doped Fe3S4 nanoflowers for boosting electrocatalytic nitrogen fixation to ammonia under mild conditions. Inorg Chem, 2022, 61: 20123–2013210.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03578 ↗
54. Fan J, Zhao X, Mao X, et al. Large-area vertically aligned bismuthene nanosheet arrays from galvanic replacement reaction for efficient electrochemical CO2 conversion. Adv Mater, 2021, 33: 210091010.1002/adma.202100910 ↗
55. Zhang Y, Lan J, Xie F, et al. Aligned InS nanorods for efficient electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2022, 14: 25257–2526610.1021/acsami.2c01152 ↗