(NiZnMg)MoN with optimized d-band center enables industrial-level hydrogen production
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Developing efficient hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) electrocatalysts based on earth-abundant elements is critical for advancing sustainable energy technologies. However, existing catalysts suffer from suboptimal Gibbs free energy for hydrogen adsorption (ΔG H*), resulting in significantly lower catalytic performance compared to platinum-based catalysts. In this study, a novel electronegativity modulation strategy was applied to enhance catalytic activity. Inspired by the d-band center (E d) theory, Zn and Mg were introduced into the catalyst system to regulate the electronic structure. The electronegativity difference induced strong local electronic interactions, which effectively tuned the d-band center of Ni active sites and optimized ΔG H*. As a result, the (NiZnMg)MoN catalyst exhibited outstanding HER performance with an overpotential of only 138 mV at 300 mA cm−2, surpassing commercial Pt/C catalysts. This study provides valuable insights into designing efficient doped electrocatalysts based on d-band tuning and electronegativity engineering. The findings offer a promising strategy to overcome performance limitations in HER electrocatalysis and accelerate the practical application of alkaline hydrogen production in sustainable energy systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Glenk G, Reichelstein S. Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen. Nat Energy, 2019, 4: 216–22210.1038/s41560-019-0326-1 ↗
2. Staffell I, Scamman D, Velazquez Abad A, et al. The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system. Energy Environ Sci, 2019, 12: 463–49110.1039/C8EE01157E ↗
3. Yan H, Xie Y, Jiao Y, et al. Holey reduced graphene oxide coupled with an Mo2N–Mo2C heterojunction for efficient hydrogen evolution. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 170415610.1002/adma.201704156 ↗
4. Oener SZ, Foster MJ, Boettcher SW. Accelerating water dissociation in bipolar membranes and for electrocatalysis. Science, 2020, 369: 1099–110310.1126/science.aaz1487 ↗
5. Sun T, Tang Z, Zang W, et al. Ferromagnetic single-atom spin catalyst for boosting water splitting. Nat Nanotechnol, 2023, 18: 763–77110.1038/s41565-023-01407-1 ↗
6. Yu Z, Duan Y, Feng X, et al. Clean and affordable hydrogen fuel from alkaline water splitting: past, recent progress, and future prospects. Adv Mater, 2021, 33: 200710010.1002/adma.202007100 ↗
7. Hao J, Zhuang Z, Cao K, et al. Unraveling the electronegativity-dominated intermediate adsorption on high-entropy alloy electro-catalysts. Nat Commun, 2022, 13: 266210.1038/s41467-022-30379-4 ↗
8. Wang N, Song S, Wu W, et al. Bridging laboratory electrocatalysts with industrially relevant alkaline water electrolyzers. Adv Energy Mater, 2024, 14: 230345110.1002/aenm.202303451 ↗
9. Du H, Sun T, Wang M, et al. Impact of harmful ions in seawater on electrolysis catalysts: challenges and mitigation strategies. Chem Commun, 2025, 61: 5719–573010.1039/D5CC00844A ↗
10. Zhang J, Zhang L, Liu J, et al. OH spectator at IrMo intermetallic narrowing activity gap between alkaline and acidic hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat Commun, 2022, 13: 549710.1038/s41467-022-33216-w ↗
11. Chen X, Wang XT, Le JB, et al. Revealing the role of interfacial water and key intermediates at ruthenium surfaces in the alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat Commun, 2023, 14: 528910.1038/s41467-023-41030-1 ↗
12. Li Z, Feng Y, Liang YL, et al. Stable rhodium (IV) oxide for alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 190852110.1002/adma.201908521 ↗
13. Wan C, Zhang Z, Dong J, et al. Amorphous nickel hydroxide shell tailors local chemical environment on platinum surface for alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat Mater, 2023, 22: 1022–102910.1038/s41563-023-01584-3 ↗
14. Sun W, Bartel CJ, Arca E, et al. A map of the inorganic ternary metal nitrides. Nat Mater, 2019, 18: 732–73910.1038/s41563-019-0396-2 ↗
15. Yu L, Zhu Q, Song S, et al. Non-noble metal-nitride based electro-catalysts for high-performance alkaline seawater electrolysis. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 510610.1038/s41467-019-13092-7 ↗
16. Shang Y, Su J, Jiang N, et al. In situ growth of MoN on nickel foam for highly efficient hydrogen evolution in alkaline solution. Langmuir, 2024, 40: 22717–2272510.1021/acs.langmuir.4c02615 ↗
17. Nichols NN, Han X, Kang S, et al. Platinum and gold supported on transition metal nitrides for hydrogen evolution in an alkaline electrolyte. Energy Fuels, 2025, 39: 5587–559310.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c00198 ↗
18. Luo Q, Lu C, Liu L, et al. A review on the synthesis of transition metal nitride nanostructures and their energy related applications. Green Energy Environ, 2023, 8: 406–43710.1016/j.gee.2022.07.002 ↗
19. Norskov JK, Abild-Pedersen F, Studt F, et al. Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011, 108: 937–94310.1073/pnas.1006652108 ↗
20. Jia X, Zhao Y, Chen G, et al. Ni3FeN nanoparticles derived from ultrathin NiFe-layered double hydroxide nanosheets: an efficient overall water splitting electrocatalyst. Adv Energy Mater, 2016, 6: 150258510.1002/aenm.201502585 ↗
21. Ma R, Zhao X, Pei Y, et al. Modulating hydroxyl adsorption on transition metal nitrides by magnetic moments toward fast alkaline hydrogen evolution. EnLab, 2024, 1: 230007
22. Zhang J, Zhao Y, Guo X, et al. Single platinum atoms immobilized on an MXene as an efficient catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat Catal, 2018, 1: 985–99210.1038/s41929-018-0195-1 ↗
23. Cai C, Liu K, Zhu Y, et al. Optimizing hydrogen binding on Ru sites with RuCo alloy nanosheets for efficient alkaline hydrogen evolution. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61: e20211366410.1002/anie.202113664 ↗
24. Lu X, Pan J, Lovell E, et al. A sea-change: manganese doped nickel/nickel oxide electrocatalysts for hydrogen generation from seawater. Energy Environ Sci, 2018, 11: 1898–191010.1039/C8EE00976G ↗
25. Chen X, Feng S, Xie S, et al. Boosting hydrogen evolution via work-function-accelerated electronic reconfiguration of Mo-based heterojunction. Sci China Mater, 2025, 68: 189–19810.1007/s40843-024-3190-7 ↗
26. Zhang J, Tu Y, Zhang L, et al. Surface-reconstructed CdNNi3 antiperovskite electrocatalyst: unlocking ampere-level current density for hydrogen evolution. ACS Nano, 2024, 18: 32077–3208710.1021/acsnano.4c10486 ↗
27. Zhu C, Wang A, Xiao W, et al. In situ grown epitaxial heterojunction exhibits high-performance electrocatalytic water splitting. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 170551610.1002/adma.201705516 ↗
28. Zhang B, Wang J, Liu G, et al. A strongly coupled Ru–CrOx cluster-cluster heterostructure for efficient alkaline hydrogen electrocatalysis. Nat Catal, 2024, 7: 441–45110.1038/s41929-024-01126-3 ↗
29. Sun S, Zhou X, Cong B, et al. Tailoring the d-band centers endows (NixFe1−x)2P nanosheets with efficient oxygen evolution catalysis. ACS Catal, 2020, 10: 9086–909710.1021/acscatal.0c01273 ↗
30. Norskov JK, Bligaard T, Rossmeisl J, et al. Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. Nat Chem, 2009, 1: 37–4610.1038/nchem.121 ↗
31. Huang C, Yu L, Zhang W, et al. N-doped Ni-Mo based sulfides for high-efficiency and stable hydrogen evolution reaction. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2020, 276: 11913710.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119137 ↗
32. Pérez-Ramírez J, López N. Strategies to break linear scaling relationships. Nat Catal, 2019, 2: 971–97610.1038/s41929-019-0376-6 ↗
33. Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for open-shell transition metals. Phys Rev B, 1993, 48: 13115–1311810.1103/PhysRevB.48.13115 ↗
34. Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54: 11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
35. Kohn W, Sham LJ. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev, 1965, 140: A1133–A113810.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
36. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 77: 3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
37. Wang V, Xu N, Liu JC, et al. VASPKIT: a user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code. Comput Phys Commun, 2021, 267: 10803310.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033 ↗
38. Momma K, Izumi F. VESTA: a three-dimensional visualization system for electronic and structural analysis. J Appl Crystlogr, 2008, 41: 653–65810.1107/S0021889808012016 ↗
39. Hu H, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, et al. An ultra-low Pt metal nitride electrocatalyst for sustainable seawater hydrogen production. Energy Environ Sci, 2023, 16: 4584–459210.1039/D3EE01541F ↗
40. Xu N, Wilson JA, Wang YD, et al. Flexible self-supported bi-metal electrode as a highly stable carbon- and binder-free cathode for large-scale solid-state zinc-air batteries. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2020, 272: 11895310.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118953 ↗
41. Wang X, Ma R, Li S, et al. In situ electrochemical oxyanion steering of water oxidation electrocatalysts for optimized activity and stability. Adv Energy Mater, 2023, 13: 230076510.1002/aenm.202300765 ↗
42. Zhu H, Wang JJ, Xu Z, et al. Pd nanoparticle size-dependent H coverage for Cu-catalyzed nitrate electro-reduction to ammonia in neutral electrolyte. Small, 2024, 20: 240491910.1002/smll.202404919 ↗
43. Wang X, Hu H, Song J, et al. Surface anticorrosion engineering by polyphosphate oxyanions for durable seawater oxidation. Adv Energy Mater, 2025, 15: 240288310.1002/aenm.202402883 ↗
44. Wang X, Song J, Ma J, et al. Surface-bound formate oxyanions destabilize hydration layers to pave OH− transport pathways for oxygen evolution. ACS Catal, 2024, 14: 10871–1088110.1021/acscatal.4c02369 ↗
45. Feng Y, Wang X, Ma J, et al. A solid-solution with asymmetric Ni-O-Cr sites for boosting protonation toward anodic oxidation. Adv Energy Mater, 2024, 14: 240150110.1002/aenm.202401501 ↗
46. Zhang Y, Ouyang B, Xu J, et al. 3D porous hierarchical nickel-molybdenum nitrides synthesized by RF plasma as highly active and stable hydrogen-evolution-reaction electrocatalysts. Adv Energy Mater, 2016, 6: 160022110.1002/aenm.201600221 ↗
47. Jin H, Yu H, Li H, et al. MXene analogue: a 2D nitridene solid solution for high-rate hydrogen production. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61: e20220385010.1002/anie.202203850 ↗
48. Tang J, Zhang S, Zeng Y, et al. Porous rod-like structured ternary nitride heterocatalyst Co3Mo3N/Ni3Mo3N for efficient and stable hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem Eng J, 2024, 487: 15043910.1016/j.cej.2024.150439 ↗
49. Zhu C, Yin Z, Lai W, et al. Fe-Ni-Mo nitride porous nanotubes for full water splitting and Zn-air batteries. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 180232710.1002/aenm.201802327 ↗
50. Ferree M, Gunduz S, Kim J, et al. Enhanced N2 activation on a composite Co3Mo3N nitride and La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 perovskite cathode for high-temperature electrochemical ammonia synthesis. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2023, 11: 5007–501310.1021/acssuschemeng.2c06520 ↗
51. Wang J, He W, Zong Y, et al. Electronic redistribution induced by interaction between ruthenium nanoparticles and Ni–N(O)–C sites boosts alkaline water electrolysis. Chem Commun, 2024, 60: 9444–944710.1039/D4CC02851A ↗
52. Zhang J, Zhao Y, Zhao W, et al. Improving electrocatalytic oxygen evolution through local field distortion in Mg/Fe dual-site catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2023, 62: e20231430310.1002/anie.202314303 ↗
53. Liu X, Qian J, Chen J, et al. A sustainable and scalable approach for in situ induction of gradient nucleation sites in biomass-derived interface layers for ultra-stable aqueous zinc metal batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2025, 64: e20250461310.1002/anie.202504613 ↗
54. Zhang Y, Wang R, Ao H, et al. Zn2+-rich chelate layer facilitates ultrahigh-rate zinc anodes via cation compensation and anion repulsion. Adv Energy Mater, 2025, 15: 240420310.1002/aenm.202404203 ↗
55. Zhang HM, Wang JJ, Meng Y, et al. Review on intrinsic electrocatalytic activity of transition metal nitrides on HER. Energy Mater Adv, 2022, 2022: 000610.34133/energymatadv.0006 ↗
56. Chen Z, Song Y, Cai J, et al. Tailoring the d-band centers enables Co4N nanosheets to be highly active for hydrogen evolution catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57: 5076–508010.1002/anie.201801834 ↗
57. Zhang H, Zhou W, Chen T, et al. A modular strategy for decorating isolated cobalt atoms into multichannel carbon matrix for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Energy Environ Sci, 2018, 11: 1980–198410.1039/C8EE00901E ↗
58. Xin H, Linic S. Communications: exceptions to the d-band model of chemisorption on metal surfaces: the dominant role of repulsion between adsorbate states and metal d-states. J Chem Phys, 2010, 132: 22110110.1063/1.3437609 ↗
59. Stamenkovic VR, Mun BS, Arenz M, et al. Trends in electrocatalysis on extended and nanoscale Pt-bimetallic alloy surfaces. Nat Mater, 2007, 6: 241–24710.1038/nmat1840 ↗
60. Yan J, Kong L, Ji Y, et al. Single atom tungsten doped ultrathin α-Ni(OH)2 for enhanced electrocatalytic water oxidation. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 214910.1038/s41467-019-09845-z ↗
61. Subbaraman R, Tripkovic D, Chang KC, et al. Trends in activity for the water electrolyser reactions on 3d M(Ni,Co,Fe,Mn) hydr(oxy)oxide catalysts. Nat Mater, 2012, 11: 550–55710.1038/nmat3313 ↗