journal article·2025-12

A deep-sea pressure sensor capable of sensing small gripping forces without coupling

Jiawei Wu, Xiangling Xia, Zhiyi Gao, Zhaopeng Liu, Xiaona Feng, Hao Liu, Huihui Tian, Zidong He, Jinyun Liu, Xiaohui Yi, Baoru Bian, Jie Shang, Huayang Li, Run-Wei Li

Science China Materials· Volume 68· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Marine animal studies overview · Dielectric materials and actuators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Petersen S, Krätschell A, Augustin N, et al. News from the seabed—geological characteristics and resource potential of deep-sea mineral resources. Mar Policy, 2016, 70: 175–18710.1016/j.marpol.2016.03.012 ↗
2. Beaulieu SE, Graedel TE, Hannington MD. Should we mine the deep seafloor? Earths Future, 2017, 5: 655–65810.1002/2017EF000605 ↗
3. Folkersen MV, Fleming CM, Hasan S. Depths of uncertainty for deep-sea policy and legislation. Glob Environ Change, 2019, 54: 1–510.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.002 ↗
4. Koschinsky A, Heinrich L, Boehnke K, et al. Deep-sea mining: Interdisciplinary research on potential environmental, legal, economic, and societal implications. Integr Environ Assess Manage, 2018, 14: 672–69110.1002/ieam.4071 ↗
5. Agarwala N. Managing marine environmental pollution using artificial intelligence. Marit Technol Res, 2020, 3: Manuscript10.33175/mtr.2021.248053 ↗
6. Yang L, Zhao S, Wang X, et al. Deep-sea underwater cooperative operation of manned/unmanned submersible and surface vehicles for different application scenarios. J Mar Sci Eng, 2022, 10: 90910.3390/jmse10070909 ↗
7. Agarwala N. Using robotics to achieve ocean sustainability during the exploration phase of deep seabed mining. Mar Technol Soc J, 2023, 57: 130–15010.4031/MTSJ.57.1.15 ↗
8. Yuh J, Marani G, Blidberg DR. Applications of marine robotic vehicles. Intel Serv Robotics, 2011, 4: 221–23110.1007/s11370-011-0096-5 ↗
9. Sousselier T, Dreo J, Sevaux M. Line formation algorithm in a swarm of reactive robots constrained by underwater environment. Expert Syst Appl, 2015, 42: 5117–512710.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.040 ↗
10. Jiao M, Wang M, Fan Y, et al. Temperature compensated wide-range micro pressure sensor with polyimide anticorrosive coating for harsh environment applications. Appl Sci, 2021, 11: 901210.3390/app11199012 ↗
11. Aggarwal A, Kampmann P, Lemburg J, et al. Haptic object recognition in underwater and deep-sea environments. J Field Robotics, 2015, 32: 167–18510.1002/rob.21538 ↗
12. Jian M, Wang C, Wang Q, et al. Advanced carbon materials for flexible and wearable sensors. Sci China Mater, 2017, 60: 1026–106210.1007/s40843-017-9077-x ↗
13. Bai J, Wang R, Ju M, et al. Facile preparation and high performance of wearable strain sensors based on ionically cross-linked composite hydrogels. Sci China Mater, 2021, 64: 942–95210.1007/s40843-020-1507-0 ↗
14. Guo D, He H. Flexible strain sensors based on CNTs/PDMS nanocomposite. In: Proceedings of 2018 19th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology (ICEPT). Shanghai: IEEE, 2018. 1013–101810.1109/ICEPT.2018.8480720 ↗
15. Hu X, Ma Z, Gong Z, et al. A highly sensitive deep-sea hydrodynamic pressure sensor inspired by fish lateral line. Biomimetics, 2024, 9: 19010.3390/biomimetics9030190 ↗
16. Hosseini ES, Chakraborty M, Roe J, et al. Porous elastomer based wide range flexible pressure sensor for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Sens J, 2022, 22: 9914–992110.1109/JSEN.2022.3165560 ↗
17. Li Y, Villada A, Lu SH, et al. Soft, flexible pressure sensors for pressure monitoring under large hydrostatic pressure and harsh ocean environments. Soft Matter, 2023, 19: 5772–578010.1039/D3SM00563A ↗
18. Wang Q, Song Y, Liu P, et al. Self-powered underwater pressing and position sensing and autonomous object grasping with a porous thermoplastic polyurethane film sensor. Adv Funct Mater, 2024, 34: 231564810.1002/adfm.202315648 ↗
19. Souri H, Banerjee H, Jusufi A, et al. Wearable and stretchable strain sensors: materials, sensing mechanisms, and applications. Adv Intelligent Syst, 2020, 2: 200003910.1002/aisy.202000039 ↗
20. Liu L, Jiao Z, Zhang J, et al. Bioinspired, superhydrophobic, and paper-based strain sensors for wearable and underwater applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13: 1967–197810.1021/acsami.0c18818 ↗
21. Hu S, Zhang W, Li S, et al. A highly sensitive 3D-printed flexible sensor for sensing small pressures in deep-sea high-pressure Environment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2024, 16: 48025–4803310.1021/acsami.4c10569 ↗
22. Bonk HW, Sardanopoli AA, Ulrich H, et al. Pellethane®: a new generation of polyurethane thermoplastic elastomers. J Elasto Plasts, 1971, 3: 157–18610.1177/009524437100300302 ↗
23. Szycher M. Biostability of polyurethane elastomers: a critical review. J Biomater Appl, 1988, 3: 297–40210.1177/088532828800300207 ↗
24. Stokes K, McVenes R, Anderson JM. Polyurethane elastomer biost-ability. J Biomater Appl, 1995, 9: 321–35410.1177/088532829500900402 ↗
25. Christenson EM, Anderson JM, Hiltner A. Biodegradation mechanisms of polyurethane elastomers. Corrosion Eng Sci Tech, 2007, 42: 312–32310.1179/174327807X238909 ↗
26. Fan CJ, Huang ZC, Li B, et al. A robust self-healing polyurethane elastomer: from H-bonds and stacking interactions to well-defined microphase morphology. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 1188–119810.1007/s40843-019-9422-7 ↗
27. Uscátegui YL, Arévalo-Alquichire SJ, Gómez-Tejedor JA, et al. Polyurethane-based bioadhesive synthesized from polyols derived from castor oil (Ricinus communis) and low concentration of chitosan. J Mater Res, 2017, 32: 3699–371110.1557/jmr.2017.371 ↗
28. Wicks DA, WicksJr ZW. Multistep chemistry in thin films; the challenges of blocked isocyanates. Prog Org Coatings, 2001, 43: 131–14010.1016/S0300-9440(01)00188-6 ↗
29. Ha M, Lim S, Park J, et al. Bioinspired interlocked and hierarchical design of ZnO nanowire arrays for static and dynamic pressure-sensitive electronic skins. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 2841–284910.1002/adfm.201500453 ↗
30. Park JI, Choe A, Kim MP, et al. Water-adaptive and repeatable self-healing polymers bearing bulky urea bonds. Polym Chem, 2018, 9: 11–1910.1039/C7PY01655G ↗
31. Deng XY, Xie H, Du L, et al. Polyurethane networks based on disulfide bonds: from tunable multi-shape memory effects to simultaneous self-healing. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 437–44710.1007/s40843-018-9318-7 ↗
32. Brousseau EB, Dimov SS, Pham DT. Some recent advances in multi-material micro- and nano-manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2010, 47: 161–18010.1007/s00170-009-2214-5 ↗
33. Zvonkina IJ, Hilt M. Tuning the mechanical performance and adhesion of polyurethane UV cured coatings by composition of acrylic reactive diluents. Prog Org Coatings, 2015, 89: 288–29610.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.08.006 ↗
34. Fan F, Zheng R, Zeng C, et al. Synergistically dissipating the local strain and restraining lattice oxygen escape by fine-tuning of microstructure enabling Ni-rich cathodes with superior cyclabilities. J Energy Chem, 2025, 105: 24–3410.1016/j.jechem.2025.01.039 ↗
35. Shin CK, Lee H. Effect of alkyl side-chain length and solvent on the luminescent characteristics of poly(3-n-alkylthiophene). Synth Met, 2004, 140: 177–18110.1016/S0379-6779(03)00361-8 ↗
36. Jacobs PF. Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing: Fundamentals of Stereolithography. New York: Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1992
37. Jacobs PF. Stereolithography and Other RP&M Technologies: From Rapid Prototyping to Rapid Tooling. New York: Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1995
38. Velankar S, Pazos J, Cooper S. High-performance UV-curable urethane acrylates via deblocking chemistry. J Appl Polym Sci, 1996, 62: 1361–137610.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19961128)62:9<1361::AID-APP6>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
39. Wicks DA, WicksJr. ZW. Blocked isocyanates III: part A. Mechanisms and chemistry. Prog Org Coatings, 1999, 36: 148–17210.1016/S0300-9440(99)00042-9 ↗
40. David EC, Brantut N, Schubnel A, et al. Sliding crack model for non-linearity and hysteresis in the uniaxial stress-strain curve of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2012, 52: 9–1710.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.02.001 ↗
41. Schwaab M, Pinto JC. Optimum reference temperature for reparameterization of the Arrhenius equation. Part 1: problems involving one kinetic constant. Chem Eng Sci, 2007, 62: 2750–276410.1016/j.ces.2007.02.020 ↗
42. Xu W, Zhang R, Liu W, et al. A multiscale investigation on the mechanism of shape recovery for IPDI to PPDI hard segment substitution in polyurethane. Macromolecules, 2016, 49: 5931–594410.1021/acs.macromol.6b01172 ↗
43. Guo Y, Zhang R, Xiao Q, et al. Asynchronous fracture of hierarchical microstructures in hard domain of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer: effect of chain extender. Polymer, 2018, 138: 242–25410.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.035 ↗
44. Amjadi M, Kyung K, Park I, et al. Stretchable, skin-mountable, and wearable strain sensors and their potential applications: a review. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 1678–169810.1002/adfm.201504755 ↗
45. Zhang J, Liu W, Gao L, et al. Design, analysis and experiment of a tactile force sensor for underwater dexterous hand intelligent grasping. Sensors, 2018, 18: 242710.3390/s18082427 ↗
46. Shi R, Lou Z, Chen S, et al. Flexible and transparent capacitive pressure sensor with patterned microstructured composite rubber dielectric for wearable touch keyboard application. Sci China Mater, 2018, 61: 1587–159510.1007/s40843-018-9267-3 ↗
47. Wang Y, Mao H, Wang Y, et al. 3D geometrically structured PANI/CNT-decorated polydimethylsiloxane active pressure and temperature dual-parameter sensors for man-machine interaction applications. J Mater Chem A, 2020, 8: 15167–1517610.1039/D0TA05651K ↗
48. Kaidarova A, Alsharif N, Oliveira BNM, et al. Laser-printed, flexible graphene pressure sensors. Glob Challenges, 2020, 4: 200000110.1002/gch2.202000001 ↗
49. Liu S, Zhang D, Fu X, et al. Tactile sensing for soft robotic manipulators in 50 MPa hydrostatic pressure environments. Adv Intell Syst, 2023, 5: 230029610.1002/aisy.202300296 ↗
50. Dervin S, Hosseini ES, Dahiya R. Porous elastomer based soft pressure sensor for autonomous underwater vehicles. In: Proceedings of 2021 IEEE International Conference on Flexible and Printable Sensors and Systems (FLEPS). Manchester: IEEE, 2021. 1–4
51. Li T, Shang H, Wang B, et al. High-pressure sensor with high sensitivity and high accuracy for full ocean depth measurements. IEEE Sens J, 2022, 22: 3994–400310.1109/JSEN.2022.3144467 ↗