journal article·2023-10Open access

Promoting through-space charge transfer-based TADF via rational alignment of quasi-planar donor and acceptor in solid state

Ping Li, Cefeng Zhou, Wenjing Li, Yewen Zhang, Jie Yuan, Runfeng Chen

Science China Materials· Volume 66· Issue 10

Abstract

基于空间电荷转移(TSCT)的热激活延迟荧光(TADF)材料因其可同时实现小的单重态-三重态分裂能(ΔEST)和快速的辐射速率(kf)而受到广泛关注, 但对这类材料的合理设计仍面临挑战. 本工作使用极化连续介质模型和量子力学与分子力学结合的方法, 对咔唑基TSCT-TADF材料在液相和固相中的光物理性质进行了理论研究, 阐明其实验性能的差异并揭示分子设计规则. 研究表明给体(D)、 受体(A)单元平面度逐渐增强的分子表现出D和A单元之间的距离减小、 分子内相互作用增强, 导致其在固相中有利的辐射过程; 并且A单元平面度的增强显著限制了分子的拉伸和旋转振动, 减少了非辐射损失, 有助于分子性能的提高. 此外, 这类分子的前线轨道分布显示出明显的分离, 有利于实现较小的ΔEST. 这些新的理论认识可以对TSCT-TADF材料的结构-性能关系提供深入的光物理见解, 为设计和探索高性能TADF材料提供有效策略.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Jeong H, Shin H, Lee J, et al. Recent progress in the use of fluorescent and phosphorescent organic compounds for organic light-emitting diode lighting. J Photon Energy, 2015, 5: 05760810.1117/1.JPE.5.057608 ↗
2. Uoyama H, Goushi K, Shizu K, et al. Highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes from delayed fluorescence. Nature, 2012, 492: 234–23810.1038/nature11687 ↗
3. Liu Y, Li C, Ren Z, et al. All-organic thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials for organic light-emitting diodes. Nat Rev Mater, 2018, 3: 1802010.1038/natrevmats.2018.20 ↗
4. Tao Y, Yuan K, Chen T, et al. Thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials towards the breakthrough of organoelectronics. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 7931–795810.1002/adma.201402532 ↗
5. Li P, Wang Z, Li W, et al. Design of thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials with high intersystem crossing efficiencies by machine learning-assisted virtual screening. J Phys Chem Lett, 2022, 13: 9910–991810.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02735 ↗
6. Hirata S, Sakai Y, Masui K, et al. Highly efficient blue electroluminescence based on thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Nat Mater, 2015, 14: 330–33610.1038/nmat4154 ↗
7. Zhang Q, Kuwabara H, Potscavage Jr. WJ, et al. Anthraquinone-based intramolecular charge-transfer compounds: Computational molecular design, thermally activated delayed fluorescence, and highly efficient red electroluminescence. J Am Chem Soc, 2014, 136: 18070–1808110.1021/ja510144h ↗
8. Ke K, Chen JX, Zhang M, et al. Improving performance of thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitter by extending its LUMO distribution. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 719–72810.1007/s40843-018-9358-9 ↗
9. Ai Q, Chai J, Lou W, et al. Efficient and stable organic light-emitting diodes employing indolo[2,3-b]indole-based thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 6127–613610.1021/acsami.9b19474 ↗
10. Zhang YP, Song SQ, Mao MX, et al. Efficient circularly polarized photoluminescence and electroluminescence of chiral spiro-skeleton based thermally activated delayed fluorescence molecules. Sci China Chem, 2022, 65: 1347–135510.1007/s11426-022-1249-7 ↗
11. Yang SY, Qu YK, Liao LS, et al. Research progress of intramolecular π-stacked small molecules for device applications. Adv Mater, 2022, 34: 210412510.1002/adma.202104125 ↗
12. Tang X, Cui LS, Li HC, et al. Highly efficient luminescence from space-confined charge-transfer emitters. Nat Mater, 2020, 19: 1332–133810.1038/s41563-020-0710-z ↗
13. Peng CC, Yang SY, Li HC, et al. Highly efficient thermally activated delayed fluorescence via an unconjugated donor-acceptor system realizing EQE of over 30%. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 200388510.1002/adma.202003885 ↗
14. Wang XQ, Yang SY, Tian QS, et al. Multi-layer π-stacked molecules as efficient thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2021, 60: 5213–521910.1002/anie.202011384 ↗
15. Wu C, Liu W, Li K, et al. Face-to-face orientation of quasiplanar donor and acceptor enables highly efficient intramolecular exciplex fluorescence. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2021, 60: 3994–399810.1002/anie.202013051 ↗
16. Huang T, Wang Q, Meng G, et al. Accelerating radiative decay in blue through-space charge transfer emitters by minimizing the face-to-face donor-acceptor distances. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61: e20220005910.1002/anie.202200059 ↗
17. Zhao Z, Zeng C, Peng X, et al. Tuning intramolecular stacking of rigid heteroaromatic compounds for high-efficiency deep-blue through-space charge-transfer emission. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61: e20221086410.1002/anie.202210864 ↗
18. Wang C, Zhang Q. Understanding solid-state solvation-enhanced thermally activated delayed fluorescence using a descriptor-tuned screened range-separated functional. J Phys Chem C, 2019, 123: 4407–441610.1021/acs.jpcc.8b08228 ↗
19. Tomasi J, Mennucci B, Cammi R. Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models. Chem Rev, 2005, 105: 2999–309410.1021/cr9904009 ↗
20. Ma H, Shi W, Ren J, et al. Electrostatic interaction-induced roomtemperature phosphorescence in pure organic molecules from QM/MM calculations. J Phys Chem Lett, 2016, 7: 2893–289810.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01156 ↗
21. Zou H, Ma Y, Liu H, et al. A QM/MM study on through space charge transfer-based thermally activated delayed fluorescence molecules in the solid state. J Mater Chem C, 2022, 10: 517–53110.1039/D1TC05159H ↗
22. Huang S, Zhang Q, Shiota Y, et al. Computational prediction for singlet- and triplet-transition energies of charge-transfer compounds. J Chem Theor Comput, 2013, 9: 3872–387710.1021/ct400415r ↗
23. Price AJA, Bryenton KR, Johnson ER. Requirements for an accurate dispersion-corrected density functional. J Chem Phys, 2021, 154: 23090210.1063/5.0050993 ↗
24. Becke AD. A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories. J Chem Phys, 1993, 98: 1372–137710.1063/1.464304 ↗
25. Adamo C, Barone V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model. J Chem Phys, 1999, 110: 6158–617010.1063/1.478522 ↗
26. Zhao Y, Truhlar DG. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor Chem Account, 2008, 120: 215–24110.1007/s00214-007-0310-x ↗
27. Boese AD, Martin JML. Development of density functionals for thermochemical kinetics. J Chem Phys, 2004, 121: 3405–341610.1063/1.1774975 ↗
28. Yanai T, Tew DP, Handy NC. A new hybrid exchange-correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem Phys Lett, 2004, 393: 51–5710.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.011 ↗
29. Li J, Zhao F, Chen Y, et al. Color tuning of di-boron derived TADF emitters: Molecular design and property prediction. J Mater Chem C, 2021, 9: 15309–1532010.1039/D1TC03345J ↗
30. Johnson ER, Keinan S, Mori-Sánchez P, et al. Revealing noncovalent interactions. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132: 6498–650610.1021/ja100936w ↗
31. Lefebvre C, Rubez G, Khartabil H, et al. Accurately extracting the signature of intermolecular interactions present in the NCI plot of the reduced density gradient versus electron density. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2017, 19: 17928–1793610.1039/C7CP02110K ↗
32. Lu T, Chen Q. Independent gradient model based on Hirshfeld partition: A new method for visual study of interactions in chemical systems. J Comput Chem, 2022, 43: 539–55510.1002/jcc.26812 ↗
33. Lu T, Chen F. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J Comput Chem, 2012, 33: 580–59210.1002/jcc.22885 ↗
34. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, et al. Gaussian 09 revision d.01. Gaussian Inc Wallingford CT, 2009
35. Lu T. Simple, reliable, and universal metrics of molecular planarity. J Mol Model, 2021, 27: 26310.1007/s00894-021-04884-0 ↗
36. Kim D. Effects of intermolecular interactions on the singlet-triplet energy difference: A theoretical study of the formation of excimers in acene molecules. J Phys Chem C, 2015, 119: 12690–1269710.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02021 ↗
37. Marian CM. Spin-orbit coupling and intersystem crossing in molecules. WIREs Comput Mol Sci, 2012, 2: 187–20310.1002/wcms.83 ↗
38. Park IS, Matsuo K, Aizawa N, et al. High-performance dibenzoheter-aborin-based thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters: Molecular architectonics for concurrently achieving narrowband emission and efficient triplet-singlet spin conversion. Adv Funct Mater, 2018, 28: 180203110.1002/adfm.201802031 ↗
39. Kim JU, Park IS, Chan CY, et al. Nanosecond-time-scale delayed fluorescence molecule for deep-blue OLEDs with small efficiency rolloff. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 176510.1038/s41467-020-15558-5 ↗
40. Chen R, Tang Y, Wan Y, et al. Promoting singlet/triplet exciton transformation in organic optoelectronic molecules: Role of excited state transition configuration. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 622510.1038/s41598-017-05339-4 ↗
41. Shuai Z. Thermal vibration correlation function formalism for molecular excited state decay rates. Chin J Chem, 2020, 38: 1223–123210.1002/cjoc.202000226 ↗
42. Reimers JR. A practical method for the use of curvilinear coordinates in calculations of normal-mode-projected displacements and Duschinsky rotation matrices for large molecules. J Chem Phys, 2001, 115: 9103–910910.1063/1.1412875 ↗
43. Wang YK, Huang CC, Ye H, et al. Through space charge transfer for efficient sky-blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) emitter with unconjugated connection. Adv Opt Mater, 2020, 8: 190115010.1002/adom.201901150 ↗
44. Yang SY, Feng ZQ, Fu Z, et al. Highly efficient sky-blue π-stacked thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitter with multi-stimulus response properties. Angew Chem, 2022, 134: e20220686110.1002/ange.202206861 ↗
45. Yang SY, Wang YK, Peng CC, et al. Circularly polarized thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters in through-space charge transfer on asymmetric spiro skeletons. J Am Chem Soc, 2020, 142: 17756–1776510.1021/jacs.0c08980 ↗