RuO2 nanoparticles supported on Ni and N co-doped carbon nanotubes as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst of lithium-oxygen battery
Source abstract
Abstract
Li2O2, as the discharge product of Li-O2 batteries on cathode, is difficult to be electrochemically decomposed, which will lead to short cycling lifespan of the batteries. In this study, the cycling lifespan of Li-O2 battery was prolonged significantly by an efficient bifunctional catalyst. The Ni and N co-doped carbon nanotubes (NiNCs) were synthesized firstly, and then RuO2 nanoparticles were deposited on NiNCs by a hydrothermal route to synthesize RuO2/NiNC catalysts. Transmission electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction characterizations demonstrated that part of metallic Ni was converted into NiO and Ni(OH)2 after loading RuO2, and the existence of NiO layer can prevent further oxidation of metallic Ni. The Li-O2 battery with RuO2/NiNC as the cathode catalyst exhibits an overpotential of 0.43 V, which is much lower than the value of 1.03 V measured with the Li-O2 battery using NiNC as the cathode catalyst. At a rate of 200 mA g−1, the Li-O2 battery with the RuO2/NiNC cathode can maintain a reversible capacity of 500 mA h g−1 for 260 cycles, and 117 cycles with a higher reversible capacity of 1000 mA h g−1. The superior property of the RuO2/NiNC bifunctional catalyst could be ascribed to the high activity of RuO2 and the rich carbon nanotube structure of NiNC for deposition and decomposition of Li2O2.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Moriarty P, Honnery D. Hydrogen’s role in an uncertain energy future. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34: 31–3910.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.10.060 ↗
2. Omer AM. Evaluation of sustainable development and environmentally friendly energy systems: case of Sudan. J Environ Res Manag, 2015, 3: 237–261
3. Omer AM. Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2008, 12: 2265–230010.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001 ↗
4. Tarascon JM, Armand M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature, 2001, 414: 359–36710.1038/35104644 ↗
5. Armand M, Tarascon JM. Building better batteries. Nature, 2008, 451: 652–65710.1038/451652a ↗
6. Goodenough JB, Park KS. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135: 1167–117610.1021/ja3091438 ↗
7. Goodenough JB, Kim Y. Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem Mater, 2010, 22: 587–60310.1021/cm901452z ↗
8. Arbabzadeh M, Johnson JX, Keoleian GA, et al. Twelve principles for green energy storage in grid applications. Environ Sci Technol, 2016, 50: 1046–105510.1021/acs.est.5b03867 ↗
9. Bilich A, Langham K, Geyer R, et al. Life cycle assessment of solar photovoltaic microgrid systems in off-grid communities. Environ Sci Technol, 2017, 51: 1043–105210.1021/acs.est.6b05455 ↗
10. Larcher D, Tarascon JM. Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nat Chem, 2015, 7: 19–2910.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
11. Ogasawara T, Débart A, Holzapfel M, et al. Rechargeable Li2O2 electrode for lithium batteries. J Am Chem Soc, 2006, 128: 1390–139310.1021/ja056811q ↗
12. Bruce PG, Freunberger SA, Hardwick LJ, et al. Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage. Nat Mater, 2012, 11: 19–2910.1038/nmat3191 ↗
13. Kraytsberg A, Ein-Eli Y. The impact of nano-scaled materials on advanced metal-air battery systems. Nano Energy, 2013, 2: 468–48010.1016/j.nanoen.2012.11.016 ↗
14. Shu C, Wang J, Long J, et al. Understanding the reaction chemistry during charging in aprotic lithium-oxygen batteries: Existing problems and solutions. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 180458710.1002/adma.201804587 ↗
15. Li F, Zhang T, Zhou H. Challenges of non-aqueous Li-O2 batteries: electrolytes, catalysts, and anodes. Energy Environ Sci, 2013, 6: 112510.1039/c3ee00053b ↗
16. Girishkumar G, McCloskey B, Luntz AC, et al. Lithium-air battery: Promise and challenges. J Phys Chem Lett, 2010, 1: 2193–220310.1021/jz1005384 ↗
17. Xu W, Xu K, Viswanathan VV, et al. Reaction mechanisms for the limited reversibility of Li-O2 chemistry in organic carbonate electrolytes. J Power Sources, 2011, 196: 9631–963910.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.099 ↗
18. Kang SY, Mo Y, Ong SP, et al. A facile mechanism for recharging Li2O2 in Li-O2 batteries. Chem Mater, 2013, 25: 3328–333610.1021/cm401720n ↗
19. Bryantsev VS, Giordani V, Walker W, et al. Predicting solvent stability in aprotic electrolyte Li-air batteries: Nucleophilic substitution by the superoxide anion radical (O•−2). J Phys Chem A, 2011, 115: 12399–1240910.1021/jp2073914 ↗
20. Zhai D, Lau KC, Wang HH, et al. The effect of potassium impurities deliberately introduced into activated carbon cathodes on the performance of lithium-oxygen batteries. ChemSusChem, 2015, 8: 4235–424110.1002/cssc.201500960 ↗
21. Mizuno F, Nakanishi S, Kotani Y, et al. Rechargeable Li-air batteries with carbonate-based liquid electrolytes. Electrochemistry, 2010, 78: 403–40510.5796/electrochemistry.78.403 ↗
22. Feng N, He P, Zhou H. Critical challenges in rechargeable aprotic Li-O2 batteries. Adv Energy Mater, 2016, 6: 150230310.1002/aenm.201502303 ↗
23. Liu QC, Xu JJ, Xu D, et al. Flexible lithium-oxygen battery based on a recoverable cathode. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 789210.1038/ncomms8892 ↗
24. Zhang P, Wang R, He M, et al. 3D hierarchical Co/CoO-graphene-carbonized melamine foam as a superior cathode toward long-life lithium oxygen batteries. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 1354–136410.1002/adfm.201503907 ↗
25. Mi R, Li S, Liu X, et al. Electrochemical performance of binder-free carbon nanotubes with different nitrogen amounts grown on the nickel foam as cathodes in Li-O2 batteries. J Mater Chem A, 2014, 2: 18746–1875310.1039/C4TA03457K ↗
26. Liu T, Leskes M, Yu W, et al. Cycling Li-O2 batteries via LiOH formation and decomposition. Science, 2015, 350: 530–53310.1126/science.aac7730 ↗
27. Huang S, Fan W, Guo X, et al. Positive role of surface defects on carbon nanotube cathodes in overpotential and capacity retention of rechargeable lithium oxygen batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 21567–2157510.1021/am506564n ↗
28. Sun B, Huang X, Chen S, et al. Porous graphene nanoarchitectures: An efficient catalyst for low charge-overpotential, long life, and high capacity lithium oxygen batteries. Nano Lett, 2014, 14: 3145–315210.1021/nl500397y ↗
29. Xiao J, Mei D, Li X, et al. Hierarchically porous graphene as a lithium air battery electrode. Nano Lett, 2011, 11: 5071–507810.1021/nl203332e ↗
30. Wu G, Mack NH, Gao W, et al. Nitrogen-doped graphene-rich catalysts derived from heteroatom polymers for oxygen reduction in nonaqueous lithium-O2 battery cathodes. ACS Nano, 2012, 6: 9764–977610.1021/nn303275d ↗
31. Yu L, Shen Y, Huang Y. FeNC catalyst modified graphene sponge as a cathode material for lithium-oxygen battery. J Alloys Compd, 2014, 595: 185–19110.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.148 ↗
32. Chen Y, Li F, Tang DM, et al. Multi-walled carbon nanotube papers as binder-free cathodes for large capacity and reversible non-aqueous Li-O2 batteries. J Mater Chem A, 2013, 1: 1307610.1039/c3ta11792h ↗
33. Lu YC, Xu Z, Gasteiger HA, et al. Platinum-gold nanoparticles: A highly active bifunctional electrocatalyst for rechargeable lithium -air batteries. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132: 12170–1217110.1021/ja1036572 ↗
34. Xie J, Yao X, Madden IP, et al. Selective deposition of Ru nanoparticles on TiSi2 nanonet and its utilization for Li2O2 formation and decomposition. J Am Chem Soc, 2014, 136: 8903–890610.1021/ja504431k ↗
35. Peng Z, Freunberger SA, Chen Y, et al. A reversible and higher-rate Li-O2 battery. Science, 2012, 337: 563–56610.1126/science.1223985 ↗
36. Mohamed SG, Tsai YQ, Chen CJ, et al. Ternary spinel MCo2O4 (M = Mn, Fe, Ni, and Zn) porous nanorods as bifunctional cathode materials for lithium-O2 batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 12038–1204610.1021/acsami.5b02180 ↗
37. Li Y, Guo K, Li J, et al. Controllable synthesis of ordered mesoporous NiFe2O4 with tunable pore structure as a bifunctional catalyst for Li-O2 batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 20949–2095710.1021/am505718k ↗
38. Wu B, Zhang H, Zhou W, et al. Carbon-free CoO mesoporous nanowire array cathode for high-performance aprotic Li-O2 batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 23182–2318910.1021/acsami.5b07003 ↗
39. Zhang P, Sun D, He M, et al. Synthesis of porous δ-MnO2 sub-micron tubes as highly efficient electrocatalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries. ChemSusChem, 2015, 8: 1972–197910.1002/cssc.201500306 ↗
40. Shui J, Du F, Xue C, et al. Vertically aligned N-doped coral-like carbon fiber arrays as efficient air electrodes for high-performance nonaqueous Li-O2 batteries. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 3015–302210.1021/nn500327p ↗
41. Gong Y, Ding W, Li Z, et al. Inverse spinel cobalt-iron oxide and N-doped graphene composite as an efficient and durable bifuctional catalyst for Li-O2 batteries. ACS Catal, 2018, 8: 4082–409010.1021/acscatal.7b04401 ↗
42. Wang J, Wu ZX, Han LL, et al. Rational design of three-dimensional nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped graphene nanoribbons/CNTs composite for the oxygen reduction. Chin Chem Lett, 2016, 27: 597–60110.1016/j.cclet.2016.03.011 ↗
43. Zhao C, Yu C, Liu S, et al. 3D porous N-doped graphene frameworks made of interconnected nanocages for ultrahigh-rate and long-life Li-O2 batteries. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 6913–692010.1002/adfm.201503077 ↗
44. Thotiyl MMO, Freunberger SA, Peng Z, et al. The carbon electrode in nonaqueous Li-O2 cells. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135: 494–50010.1021/ja310258x ↗
45. Itkis DM, Semenenko DA, Kataev EY, et al. Reactivity of carbon in lithium-oxygen battery positive electrodes. Nano Lett, 2013, 13: 4697–470110.1021/nl4021649 ↗
46. Landa-Medrano I, Pinedo R, Ortiz-Vitoriano N, et al. Carbon-free cathodes: A step forward in the development of stable lithium-oxygen batteries. ChemSusChem, 2015, 8: 3932–394010.1002/cssc.201500753 ↗
47. Li F, Tang DM, Zhang T, et al. Superior performance of a Li-O2 battery with metallic RuO2 hollow spheres as the carbon-free cathode. Adv Energy Mater, 2015, 5: 150029410.1002/aenm.201500294 ↗
48. Jian Z, Liu P, Li F, et al. Core-shell-structured CNT@RuO2 composite as a high-performance cathode catalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53: 442–44610.1002/anie.201307976 ↗
49. Marques Mota F, Kang JH, Jung Y, et al. Mechanistic study revealing the role of the Br−3/Br2 redox couple in CO2-assisted Li-O2 batteries. Adv Energy Mater, 2020, 10: 190348610.1002/aenm.201903486 ↗
50. Balaish M, Jung J, Kim I, et al. A critical review on functionalization of air-cathodes for nonaqueous Li-O2 batteries. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 30: 180830310.1002/adfm.201808303 ↗
51. Wang L, Chen S, Hei J, et al. Ultrafine, high-loading and oxygen-deficient cerium oxide embedded on mesoporous carbon nanosheets for superior lithium-oxygen batteries. Nano Energy, 2020, 71: 10457010.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104570 ↗
52. Hong M, Choi HC, Byon HR. Nanoporous NiO plates with a unique role for promoted oxidation of carbonate and carboxylate species in the Li-O2 battery. Chem Mater, 2015, 27: 2234–224110.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00488 ↗
53. Qiu D, Bu G, Zhao B, et al. In situ growth of mesoporous NiO nanoplates on a graphene matrix as cathode catalysts for rechargeable lithium-air batteries. Mater Lett, 2015, 141: 43–4610.1016/j.matlet.2014.11.033 ↗
54. Zhang PF, Lu YQ, Wu YJ, et al. High-performance rechargeable Li-CO2/O2 battery with Ru/N-doped CNT catalyst. Chem Eng J, 2019, 363: 224–23310.1016/j.cej.2019.01.048 ↗
55. Zhang PF, Zhang JY, Sheng T, et al. Synergetic effect of Ru and NiO in the electrocatalytic decomposition of Li2CO3 to enhance the performance of a Li-CO2/O2 battery. ACS Catal, 2020, 10: 1640–165110.1021/acscatal.9b04138 ↗
56. Jing Y, Zhou Z. Computational insights into oxygen reduction reaction and initial Li2O2 nucleation on pristine and N-doped graphene in Li-O2 batteries. ACS Catal, 2015, 5: 4309–431710.1021/acscatal.5b00332 ↗
57. Li Z, Yang J, Agyeman DA, et al. CNT@Ni@Ni-Co silicate core-shell nanocomposite: a synergistic triple-coaxial catalyst for enhancing catalytic activity and controlling side products for Li-O2 batteries. J Mater Chem A, 2018, 6: 10447–1045510.1039/C8TA03099E ↗
58. Wohlfahrt-Mehrens M, Heitbaum J. Oxygen evolution on Ru and RuO2 electrodes studied using isotope labelling and on-line mass spectrometry. J Electroanal Chem Interf Electrochem, 1987, 237: 251–26010.1016/0022-0728(87)85237-3 ↗
59. Li F, Chen Y, Tang DM, et al. Performance-improved Li-O2 battery with Ru nanoparticles supported on binder-free multi-walled carbon nanotube paper as cathode. Energy Environ Sci, 2014, 7: 1648–165210.1039/C3EE44043E ↗
60. Deng WQ, Xu X, Goddard WA. A two-stage mechanism of bimetallic catalyzed growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett, 2004, 4: 2331–233510.1021/nl048663s ↗
61. Su L, Zhou Z, Shen P. Ni/C hierarchical nanostructures with Ni nanoparticles highly dispersed in N-containing carbon nanosheets: Origin of Li storage capacity. J Phys Chem C, 2012, 116: 23974–2398010.1021/jp310054b ↗