Comparative study of crystal structure prediction approaches based on a graph network and an optimization algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Ju MG, Dai J, Ma L, et al. AgBiS2 as a low-cost and eco-friendly all-inorganic photovoltaic material: Nanoscale morphology–property relationship. Nanoscale Adv, 2020, 2: 770–77610.1039/C9NA00505F ↗
2. Kanai A, Toyonaga K, Chino K, et al. Fabrication of Cu2SnS3 thin-film solar cells with power conversion efficiency of over 4%. Jpn J Appl Phys, 2015, 54: 08KC0610.7567/JJAP.54.08KC06 ↗
3. Ennaoui A, Fiechter S, Pettenkofer C, et al. Iron disulfide for solar energy conversion. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 1993, 29: 289–37010.1016/0927-0248(93)90095-K ↗
4. Sinsermsuksakul P, Sun L, Lee SW, et al. Overcoming efficiency limitations of SnS-based solar cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2014, 4: 140049610.1002/aenm.201400496 ↗
5. Hernádez-Mota J, Espíndola-Rodríguez M, Sánchez Y, et al. Thin film photovoltaic devices prepared with Cu3BiS3 ternary compound. Mater Sci Semiconduct Process, 2018, 87: 37–4310.1016/j.mssp.2018.07.008 ↗
6. Zhang C, Li H, Zeng X, et al. Accelerated diffusion kinetics in ZnTe/CoTe2 heterojunctions for high rate potassium storage. Adv Energy Mater, 2022, 12: 220257710.1002/aenm.202202577 ↗
7. Wu W, Kang Y, Wang M, et al. An ultrahigh-areal-capacity SiOx negative electrode for lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources, 2020, 464: 22824410.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228244 ↗
8. Wang J, Zhao H, He J, et al. Nano-sized SiOx/C composite anode for lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources, 2011, 196: 4811–481510.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.053 ↗
9. Qin SH, Qiu YP, Chen MH, et al. Noble-metal-free Ni10MoCox/Mo–Ni–O as an active and durable catalyst for hydrogen generation from hydrazine monohydrate. J Mater Chem A, 2023, 11: 21411–2141910.1039/D3TA04602H ↗
10. Goodman ED, Zhou C, Cargnello M. Design of organic/inorganic hybrid catalysts for energy and environmental applications. ACS Cent Sci, 2020, 6: 1916–193710.1021/acscentsci.0c01046 ↗
11. Li X, Wang B, Ke S. Blue phosphorene/MoSi2N4 van der Waals type-II heterostructure: Highly efficient bifunctional materials for photocatalytics and photovoltaics. Chin Phys B, 2023, 32: 02710410.1088/1674-1056/ac9469 ↗
12. Wang ZQ, Wang HJ. Fabrication of cocatalyst NiO-modified BiVO4 composites for enhanced photoelectrochemical performances. Front Chem, 2022, 10: 86414310.3389/fchem.2022.864143 ↗
13. Cavalli E. Development and applications of transition metal or rare earth-based luminescent inorganic materials. Crystals, 2020, 10: 112010.3390/cryst10121120 ↗
14. Alshehri MH. Adsorption of cisplatin molecules in nanoporous inorganic materials as drug delivery vehicles. Mathematics, 2022, 10: 101810.3390/math10071018 ↗
15. De Oliveira Lima K, Caixeta FJ, Souza VDSD, et al. Super broadband at telecom wavelengths from RE3+-doped SiO2-Ta2O5 glass ceramics planar waveguides. Front Chem, 2022, 10: 91533510.3389/fchem.2022.915335 ↗
16. Zhang R, Hummelgård M, Örtegren J, et al. All-inorganic triboelectric nanogenerators based on Mo6S3I6 and indium tin oxide. Nano Energy, 2021, 89: 10636310.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106363 ↗
17. Schmidt J, Pettersson L, Verdozzi C, et al. Crystal graph attention networks for the prediction of stable materials. Sci Adv, 2021, 7: eabi794810.1126/sciadv.abi7948 ↗
18. Oliynyk AO, Antono E, Sparks TD, et al. High-throughput machine-learning-driven synthesis of full-heusler compounds. Chem Mater, 2016, 28: 7324–733110.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02724 ↗
19. Lu S, Zhou Q, Guo Y, et al. On-the-fly interpretable machine learning for rapid discovery of two-dimensional ferromagnets with high Curie temperature. Chem, 2022, 8: 769–78310.1016/j.chempr.2021.11.009 ↗
20. Xu Q, Li Z, Liu M, et al. Rationalizing perovskite data for machine learning and materials design. J Phys Chem Lett, 2018, 9: 6948–695410.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03232 ↗
21. Raccuglia P, Elbert KC, Adler PDF, et al. Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments. Nature, 2016, 533: 73–7610.1038/nature17439 ↗
22. Adamson D, Deligkas A, Gusev V, et al. On the hardness of energy minimisation for crystal structure prediction. FI, 2022, 184: 181–20310.3233/FI-2021-2096 ↗
23. Court CJ, Yildirim B, Jain A, et al. 3-D inorganic crystal structure generation and property prediction via representation learning. J Chem Inf Model, 2020, 60: 4518–453510.1021/acs.jcim.0c00464 ↗
24. Long T, Fortunato NM, Opahle I, et al. Constrained crystals deep convolutional generative adversarial network for the inverse design of crystal structures. npj Comput Mater, 2021, 7: 6610.1038/s41524-021-00526-4 ↗
25. Nouira A, Sokolovska N, Crivello JC. CrystalGAN: Learning to discover crystallographic structures with generative adversarial networks. 2019. arxiv: 1810.11203
26. Carlsson A, Rosen J, Dahlqvist M. Finding stable multi-component materials by combining cluster expansion and crystal structure predictions. npj Comput Mater, 2023, 9: 2110.1038/s41524-023-00971-3 ↗
27. Kim S, Noh J, Gu GH, et al. Generative adversarial networks for crystal structure prediction. ACS Cent Sci, 2020, 6: 1412–142010.1021/acscentsci.0c00426 ↗
28. Yan D, Smith AD, Chen CC. Structure prediction and materials design with generative neural networks. Nat Comput Sci, 2023, 3: 572–57410.1038/s43588-023-00471-w ↗
29. Hu J, Yang W, Dong R, et al. Contact map based crystal structure prediction using global optimization. CrystEngComm, 2021, 23: 1765–177610.1039/D0CE01714K ↗
30. Kusaba M, Liu C, Yoshida R. Crystal structure prediction with machine learning-based element substitution. Comput Mater Sci, 2022, 211: 11149610.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111496 ↗
31. Woodley SM, Catlow R. Crystal structure prediction from first principles. Nat Mater, 2008, 7: 937–94610.1038/nmat2321 ↗
32. Pickard CJ, Needs RJ. High-pressure phases of silane. Phys Rev Lett, 2006, 97: 04550410.1103/PhysRevLett.97.045504 ↗
33. Pickard CJ, Needs RJ. Ab initio random structure searching. J Phys-Condens Matter, 2011, 23: 05320110.1088/0953-8984/23/5/053201 ↗
34. Wang H, Wang Y, Lv J, et al. CALYPSO structure prediction method and its wide application. Comput Mater Sci, 2016, 112: 406–41510.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.037 ↗
35. Glass CW, Oganov AR, Hansen N. USPEX—Evolutionary crystal structure prediction. Comput Phys Commun, 2006, 175: 713–72010.1016/j.cpc.2006.07.020 ↗
36. Merchant A, Batzner S, Schoenholz SS, et al. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery. Nature, 2023, 624: 80–8510.1038/s41586-023-06735-9 ↗
37. Zhao Y, Siriwardane EMD, Wu Z, et al. Physics guided deep learning for generative design of crystal materials with symmetry constraints. npj Comput Mater, 2023, 9: 3810.1038/s41524-023-00987-9 ↗
38. Cheng G, Gong XG, Yin WJ. Crystal structure prediction by combining graph network and optimization algorithm. Nat Commun, 2022, 13: 149210.1038/s41467-022-29241-4 ↗
39. Jain A, Ong SP, Hautier G, et al. Commentary: The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater, 2013, 1: 01100210.1063/1.4812323 ↗
40. Esters M, Oses C, Divilov S, et al. aflow.org: A web ecosystem of databases, software and tools. Comput Mater Sci, 2023, 216: 11180810.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111808 ↗
41. Gražulis S, Daškevič A, Merkys A, et al. Crystallography open database (COD): An open-access collection of crystal structures and platform for world-wide collaboration. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012, 40: D420–D42710.1093/nar/gkr900 ↗
42. Urusov VS, Nadezhina TN. Frequency distribution and selection of space groups in inorganic crystal chemistry. J Struct Chem, 2009, 50: 22–3710.1007/s10947-009-0186-9 ↗
43. Chen C, Ong SP. A universal graph deep learning interatomic potential for the periodic table. Nat Comput Sci, 2022, 2: 718–72810.1038/s43588-022-00349-3 ↗
44. Chen C, Ye W, Zuo Y, et al. Graph networks as a universal machine learning framework for molecules and crystals. Chem Mater, 2019, 31: 3564–357210.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01294 ↗
45. Choudhary K, DeCost B. Atomistic line graph neural network for improved materials property predictions. npj Comput Mater, 2021, 7: 18510.1038/s41524-021-00650-1 ↗
46. Yan K, Liu Y, Lin Y, et al. Periodic graph transformers for crystal material property prediction. 2022, arXiv:2209.11807
47. Hajinazar S, Thorn A, Sandoval ED, et al. MAISE: Construction of neural network interatomic models and evolutionary structure optimization. Comput Phys Commun, 2021, 259: 10767910.1016/j.cpc.2020.107679 ↗
48. Zhang YY, Gao W, Chen S, et al. Inverse design of materials by multi-objective differential evolution. Comput Mater Sci, 2015, 98: 51–5510.1016/j.commatsci.2014.10.054 ↗
49. Choudhary K, Garrity KF, Reid ACE, et al. The joint automated repository for various integrated simulations (JARVIS) for data-driven materials design. npj Comput Mater, 2020, 6: 17310.1038/s41524-020-00440-1 ↗
50. Dunn A, Wang Q, Ganose A, et al. Benchmarking materials property prediction methods: The Matbench test set and Automatminer reference algorithm. npj Comput Mater, 2020, 6: 13810.1038/s41524-020-00406-3 ↗