journal article·2024-09

An organometallic salt as the electrolyte additive to regulate lithium polysulfide redox and stabilize lithium anodes for robust lithium-sulfur batteries

Yixuan Meng, Meifang Zhang, Youliang Wang, Chen Liu, Ze Zhang, Ji Yu, Jianxin Cai, Zhenyu Yang

Science China Materials· Volume 67· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Cao Y, Li M, Lu J, et al. Bridging the academic and industrial metrics for next-generation practical batteries. Nat Nanotechnol, 2019, 14: 200–20710.1038/s41565-019-0371-8 ↗
2. Verma J, Kumar D. Metal-ion batteries for electric vehicles: Current state of the technology, issues and future perspectives. Nanoscale Adv, 2021, 3: 3384–339410.1039/D1NA00214G ↗
3. Seh ZW, Sun Y, Zhang Q, et al. Designing high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Soc Rev, 2016, 45: 5605–563410.1039/C5CS00410A ↗
4. Rana M, Ahad SA, Li M, et al. Review on areal capacities and long-term cycling performances of lithium sulfur battery at high sulfur loading. Energy Storage Mater, 2019, 18: 289–31010.1016/j.ensm.2018.12.024 ↗
5. Fang R, Zhao S, Sun Z, et al. More reliable lithium-sulfur batteries: Status, solutions and prospects. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 160682310.1002/adma.201606823 ↗
6. Lv ZC, Wang PF, Wang JC, et al. Key challenges, recent advances and future perspectives of rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. J Industrial Eng Chem, 2023, 124: 68–8810.1016/j.jiec.2023.04.025 ↗
7. Chen J, Zhang Y, Yang J, et al. Post lithium-sulfur battery era: Challenges and opportunities towards practical application. Sci China Chem, 2024, 67: 106–12110.1007/s11426-022-1421-7 ↗
8. Deng C, Wang Z, Wang S, et al. Inhibition of polysulfide diffusion in lithium-sulfur batteries: mechanism and improvement strategies. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7: 12381–1241310.1039/C9TA00535H ↗
9. Di Donato G, Ates T, Adenusi H, et al. Electrolyte measures to prevent polysulfide shuttle in lithium-sulfur batteries. Batteries & Supercaps, 2022, 5: e20220009710.1002/batt.202200097 ↗
10. Ren W, Ma W, Zhang S, et al. Recent advances in shuttle effect inhibition for lithium sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater, 2019, 23: 707–73210.1016/j.ensm.2019.02.022 ↗
11. Xin S, Zhang X, Wang L, et al. Roadmap for rechargeable batteries: present and beyond. Sci China Chem, 2024, 67: 13–4210.1007/s11426-023-1908-9 ↗
12. Li S, Luo Z, Li L, et al. Recent progress on electrolyte additives for stable lithium metal anode. Energy Storage Mater, 2020, 32: 306–31910.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.008 ↗
13. Chen T, Kong W, Zhao P, et al. Dendrite-free and stable lithium metal anodes enabled by an antimony-based lithiophilic interphase. Chem Mater, 2019, 31: 7565–757310.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02356 ↗
14. Bora M, Bhattacharjya D, Saikia BK. Coal-derived activated carbon for electrochemical energy storage: Status on supercapacitor, Li-ion battery, and Li-S battery applications. Energy Fuels, 2021, 35: 18285–1830710.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02518 ↗
15. Peng XX, Lu YQ, Zhou LL, et al. Graphitized porous carbon materials with high sulfur loading for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy, 2017, 32: 503–51010.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.060 ↗
16. Wang Z, Zhang X, Liu X, et al. High specific surface area bimodal porous carbon derived from biomass reed flowers for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2020, 569: 22–3310.1016/j.jcis.2020.02.062 ↗
17. Manoj M, Muhamed Ashraf C, Jasna M, et al. Biomass-derived, activated carbon-sulfur composite cathode with a bifunctional interlayer of functionalized carbon nanotubes for lithium-sulfur cells. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2019, 535: 287–29910.1016/j.jcis.2018.09.096 ↗
18. He W, He X, Du M, et al. Three-dimensional functionalized carbon nanotubes/graphitic carbon nitride hybrid composite as the sulfur host for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J Phys Chem C, 2019, 123: 15924–1593410.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02356 ↗
19. Zhao P, Zhang Z, He H, et al. Cobalt-tungsten bimetallic carbide nanoparticles as efficient catalytic material for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. ChemSusChem, 2019, 12: 4866–487310.1002/cssc.201901736 ↗
20. He B, Wang Z, Li G, et al. Perovskite transition metal oxide of nanofibers as catalytic hosts for lithium-sulfur battery. J Alloys Compd, 2022, 918: 16566010.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165660 ↗
21. Zhang Z, Basu S, Zhu P, et al. Highly sulfiphilic Ni-Fe bimetallic oxide nanoparticles anchored on carbon nanotubes enable effective immobilization and conversion of polysulfides for stable lithium-sulfur batteries. Carbon, 2019, 142: 32–3910.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.035 ↗
22. Zheng Y, Zheng S, Xue H, et al. Metal-organic frameworks for lithium-sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7: 3469–349110.1039/C8TA11075A ↗
23. Chong Y-, Zhao D-, Wang B, et al. Metal-organic frameworks functionalized separators for lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Record, 2022, 22: e20220014210.1002/tcr.202200142 ↗
24. Zhou C, Li Z, Xu X, et al. Metal-organic frameworks enable broad strategies for lithium-sulfur batteries. Natl Sci Rev, 2021, 8: nwab05510.1093/nsr/nwab055 ↗
25. Dong Y, Li T, Cai D, et al. Progress and prospect of organic electrocatalysts in lithium-sulfur batteries. Front Chem, 2021, 9: 70335410.3389/fchem.2021.703354 ↗
26. He J, Manthiram A. A review on the status and challenges of electrocatalysts in lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater, 2019, 20: 55–7010.1016/j.ensm.2019.04.038 ↗
27. Huang J, Li F, Wu M, et al. Electrolyte chemistry for lithium metal batteries. Sci China Chem, 2022, 65: 840–85710.1007/s11426-021-1235-2 ↗
28. Huang MZ, Hu T, Zhang YT, et al. In situ constructing a stable solid electrolyte interface by multifunctional electrolyte additive to stabilize lithium metal anodes for Li-S batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2022, 14: 17959–1796710.1021/acsami.1c25151 ↗
29. Hu T, Guo Y, Meng Y, et al. Uniform lithium deposition induced by copper phthalocyanine additive for durable lithium anode in lithium-sulfur batteries. Chin Chem Lett, 2024, 35: 10860310.1016/j.cclet.2023.108603 ↗
30. Zhao M, Peng H-, Wei J-, et al. Dictating high-capacity lithium-sulfur batteries through redox-mediated lithium sulfide growth. Small Methods, 2020, 4: 190034410.1002/smtd.201900344 ↗
31. Shi Z, Wang L, Xu H, et al. A soluble single atom catalyst promotes lithium polysulfide conversion in lithium sulfur batteries. Chem Commun, 2019, 55: 12056–1205910.1039/C9CC06168A ↗
32. Ding F, Xu W, Graff GL, et al. Dendrite-free lithium deposition via self-healing electrostatic shield mechanism. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135: 4450–445610.1021/ja312241y ↗
33. Ye H, Yin YX, Zhang SF, et al. Synergism of Al-containing solid electrolyte interphase layer and Al-based colloidal particles for stable lithium anode. Nano Energy, 2017, 36: 411–41710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.056 ↗
34. Luo C, Liang X, Sun Y, et al. An organic nickel salt-based electrolyte additive boosts homogeneous catalysis for lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater, 2020, 33: 290–29710.1016/j.ensm.2020.08.033 ↗
35. Wang J, Wu ZY, Zhong XN, et al. Ni-NiS heterojunction composite-coated separator for high-performance lithium sulfur battery. Coatings, 2022, 12: 155710.3390/coatings12101557 ↗
36. Zhang Z, Wu DH, Zhou Z, et al. Sulfur/nickel ferrite composite as cathode with high-volumetric-capacity for lithium-sulfur battery. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 74–8610.1007/s40843-018-9292-7 ↗
37. Zhang X, Zhu Y, Miao Z, et al. Dual confining polysulfides by growing NiCo2S4 nanosheets on porous carbon nanoboxes to accelerate redox kinetics for efficient lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta, 2023, 441: 14186410.1016/j.electacta.2023.141864 ↗
38. Wang D, Yan H, Yang Y, et al. Promoting polysulfide bidirectional conversion by one-dimensional p-n junctions for Li-S batteries. Sci China Mater, 2024, 67: 93–10610.1007/s40843-023-2666-1 ↗
39. Jiang X, Zhang S, Zou B, et al. Electrospun CoSe@NC nanofiber membrane as an effective polysulfides adsorption-catalysis interlayer for Li-S batteries. Chem Eng J, 2022, 430: 13191110.1016/j.cej.2021.131911 ↗
40. Yao W, Zheng W, Xu J, et al. ZnS-SnS@NC heterostructure as robust lithiophilicity and sulfiphilicity mediator toward high-rate and long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Nano, 2021, 15: 7114–713010.1021/acsnano.1c00270 ↗
41. Ye Z, Jiang Y, Yang T, et al. Engineering catalytic CoSe-ZnSe heterojunctions anchored on graphene aerogels for bidirectional sulfur conversion reactions. Adv Sci, 2022, 9: 210345610.1002/advs.202103456 ↗
42. Wang Y, Zhu L, Wang J, et al. Enhanced chemisorption and catalytic conversion of polysulfides via CoFe@NC nanocubes modified separator for superior Li-S batteries. Chem Eng J, 2022, 433: 13379210.1016/j.cej.2021.133792 ↗
43. Zhao T, Chen J, Dai K, et al. InOOH as an efficient bidirectional catalyst for accelerated polysulfides conversion to enable high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2022, 610: 418–42610.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.063 ↗
44. Tian L, Zhang Z, Liu S, et al. High-entropy perovskite oxide nanofibers as efficient bidirectional electrocatalyst of liquid-solid conversion processes in lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy, 2023, 106: 10803710.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108037 ↗
45. Lin Q, Huang L, Liu W, et al. High-performance lithium-sulfur batteries enabled by regulating Li2S deposition. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2021, 23: 21385–2139810.1039/D1CP03030B ↗
46. Feng L, Wang S. Bidirectional catalysis of Co0.4Ni1.6P for Li2S1–2 deposition/decomposition reactions in Li-S batteries. Sci China Chem, 2023, 66: 2267–227310.1007/s11426-023-1688-5 ↗
47. Fu L, Wang X, Chen Z, et al. Insights on “nitrate salt” in lithium anode for stabilized solid electrolyte interphase. Carbon Energy, 2022, 4: 12–2010.1002/cey2.169 ↗
48. Wu L, Hu J, Chen S, et al. Lithium nitrate mediated dynamic formation of solid electrolyte interphase revealed by in situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Electrochim Acta, 2023, 466: 14297310.1016/j.electacta.2023.142973 ↗
49. Li S, Dai H, Li Y, et al. Designing Li-protective layer via SOCl2 additive for stabilizing lithium-sulfur battery Energy Storage. Mater, 2019, 18: 222–228
50. Biswal P, Kludze A, Rodrigues J, et al. The early-stage growth and reversibility of Li electrodeposition in Br-rich electrolytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2021, 118: e201207111810.1073/pnas.2012071118 ↗
51. Qi S, He J, Liu J, et al. Phosphonium bromides regulating solid electrolyte interphase components and optimizing solvation sheath structure for suppressing lithium dendrite growth. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31: 200901310.1002/adfm.202009013 ↗
52. Liang JL, Sun SY, Yao N, et al. Regulating the electrolyte solvation structure by weakening the solvating power of solvents for stable lithium metal batteries. Sci China Chem, 2023, 66: 3620–362710.1007/s11426-023-1730-x ↗
53. Sun F, Zhou D, Wang X, et al. Cautious interpretation of coulombic efficiency (CE) in lithium metal batteries. J Energy Chem, 2021, 56: 34–3610.1016/j.jechem.2020.07.039 ↗
54. Adams BD, Zheng J, Ren X, et al. Accurate determination of coulombic efficiency for lithium metal anodes and lithium metal batteries. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 170209710.1002/aenm.201702097 ↗
55. Liu T, Feng J, Shi Z, et al. Diminishing ether-oxygen content of electrolytes enables temperature-immune lithium metal batteries. Sci China Chem, 2023, 66: 2700–271010.1007/s11426-023-1705-9 ↗
56. Zhang C, Biendicho JJ, Zhang T, et al. Combined high catalytic activity and efficient polar tubular nanostructure in urchin-like metallic NiCo2Se4 for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 190384210.1002/adfm.201903842 ↗
57. Liu K, Wang X, Gu S, et al. N, S-coordinated Co single atomic catalyst boosting adsorption and conversion of lithium polysulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries. Small, 2022, 18: 220470710.1002/smll.202204707 ↗
58. Liu FJ, Luo WL, Zhang Z, et al. Cation-doped V2O5 microsphere as a bidirectional catalyst to activate sulfur redox reactions for lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Eng J, 2023, 456: 14094810.1016/j.cej.2022.140948 ↗
59. Wu Q, Li L, Zheng Y, et al. Achieving physical blocking and chemical electrocatalysis of polysulfides by using a separator coating layer in lithium-sulfur batteries. Sci China Mater, 2024, 67: 107–11510.1007/s40843-023-2702-4 ↗
60. Huang X, Wang Z, Knibbe R, et al. Cyclic voltammetry in lithium-sulfur batteries—Challenges and opportunities. Energy Tech, 2019, 7: 180100110.1002/ente.201801001 ↗
61. Pan S, Yin Z, Cheng Q, et al. Bifunctional TiS2/CNT as efficient polysulfide barrier to improve the performance of lithium-sulfur battery. J Alloys Compd, 2020, 832: 15494710.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154947 ↗
62. Tian L, Zhang Z, Liu S, et al. High-entropy spinel oxide nanofibers as catalytic sulfur hosts promise the high gravimetric and volumetric capacities for lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy & Environ Mater, 2022, 5: 645–65410.1002/eem2.12215 ↗
63. Zhang Z, Shao AH, Xiong DG, et al. Efficient polysulfide redox enabled by lattice-distorted Ni3Fe intermetallic electrocatalyst-modified separator for lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 19572–1958010.1021/acsami.0c02942 ↗
64. Ye H, Sun J, Lim XF, et al. Mediator-assisted catalysis of polysulfide conversion for high-loading lithium-sulfur batteries operating under the lean electrolyte condition. Energy Storage Mater, 2021, 38: 338–34310.1016/j.ensm.2021.03.023 ↗
65. Hari Mohan E, Nanaji K, Anandan S, et al. Porous graphitic carbon sheets with high sulfur loading and dual confinement of polysulfide species for enhanced performance of Li-S batteries. J Mater Sci, 2020, 55: 16659–1667310.1007/s10853-020-05193-2 ↗
66. Luo Q, Zhang M, Liu JM, et al. Visualized redox reaction guides polysulfide synthesis with electrochemical approach for long-cycle lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta, 2022, 413: 14017810.1016/j.electacta.2022.140178 ↗
67. Bharti VK, Pathak AD, Sharma CS, et al. Ultra-high-rate lithium-sulfur batteries with high sulfur loading enabled by Mn2O3-carbonized bacterial cellulose composite as a cathode host. Electrochim Acta, 2022, 422: 14053110.1016/j.electacta.2022.140531 ↗
68. Wang T, He J, Cheng XB, et al. Strategies toward high-loading lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Energy Lett, 2023, 8: 116–15010.1021/acsenergylett.2c02179 ↗
69. Zhang Z, Wang JN, Shao AH, et al. Recyclable cobalt-molybdenum bimetallic carbide modified separator boosts the polysulfide adsorption-catalysis of lithium sulfur battery. Sci China Mater, 2020, 63: 2443–245510.1007/s40843-020-1425-2 ↗