High-performance SiOx/MgOx electron-selective contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Blakers A. Development of the PERC solar cell. IEEE J Photovoltaics, 2019, 9: 629–63510.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2899460 ↗
2. Fertig F, Lantzsch R, Mohr A, et al. Mass production of p-type Cz silicon solar cells approaching average stable conversion efficiencies of 22%. Energy Procedia, 2017, 124: 338–34510.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.308 ↗
3. Allen TG, Bullock J, Yang X, et al. Passivating contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells. Nat Energy, 2019, 4: 914–92810.1038/s41560-019-0463-6 ↗
4. Melskens J, van de Loo BWH, Macco B, et al. Passivating contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells: From concepts and materials to prospects. IEEE J Photovoltaics, 2018, 8: 373–38810.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2797106 ↗
5. Jolywood. Jolywood claims 26.7% efficiency for n-type TOPCon solarcell. 2023, https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/04/12/jolywood-claims-26-7-efficiency-for-n-type-topcon-solar-cell/
6. LONGi. Longi sets a new world record of 27.09% for the efficiency of silicon heterojunction back-contact (HBC) solar cells. 2023, https://www.longi.com/en/news/heterojunction-back-contact-battery/
7. Gao K, Bi Q, Wang X, et al. Progress and future prospects of wide-bandgap metal-compound-based passivating contacts for silicon solar cells. Adv Mater, 2022, 34: e220034410.1002/adma.202200344 ↗
8. Liu W, Shi J, Zhang L, et al. Light-induced activation of boron doping in hydrogenated amorphous silicon for over 25% efficiency silicon solar cells. Nat Energy, 2022, 7: 427–43710.1038/s41560-022-01018-5 ↗
9. Yang X, Zheng P, Bi Q, et al. Silicon heterojunction solar cells with electron selective TiOx contact. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2016, 150: 32–3810.1016/j.solmat.2016.01.020 ↗
10. Yang X, Bi Q, Ali H, et al. High-performance TiO2-based electron-selective contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 5891–589710.1002/adma.201600926 ↗
11. Wan Y, Karuturi SK, Samundsett C, et al. Tantalum oxide electron-selective heterocontacts for silicon photovoltaics and photoelectrochemical water reduction. ACS Energy Lett, 2017, 3: 125–13110.1021/acsenergylett.7b01153 ↗
12. Wan Y, Samundsett C, Bullock J, et al. Conductive and stable magnesium oxide electron-selective contacts for efficient silicon solar cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2016, 7: 160186310.1002/aenm.201601863 ↗
13. Macco B, Black LE, Melskens J, et al. Atomic-layer deposited Nb2O5 as transparent passivating electron contact for c-Si solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2018, 184: 98–10410.1016/j.solmat.2018.04.037 ↗
14. Dréon J, Jeangros Q, Cattin J, et al. 23.5%-efficient silicon heterojunction silicon solar cell using molybdenum oxide as hole-selective contact. Nano Energy, 2020, 70: 10449510.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104495 ↗
15. Yang X, Xu H, Liu W, et al. Atomic layer deposition of vanadium oxide as hole-selective contact for crystalline silicon solar cells. Adv Elect Mater, 2020, 6: 200046710.1002/aelm.202000467 ↗
16. Yang X, Aydin E, Xu H, et al. Tantalum nitride electron-selective contact for crystalline silicon solar cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 180060810.1002/aenm.201800608 ↗
17. Yang X, Liu W, De Bastiani M, et al. Dual-function electron-conductive, hole-blocking titanium nitride contacts for efficient silicon solar cells. Joule, 2019, 3: 1314–132710.1016/j.joule.2019.03.008 ↗
18. Yang X, Lin Y, Liu J, et al. A highly conductive titanium oxynitride electron-selective contact for efficient photovoltaic devices. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: e200260810.1002/adma.202002608 ↗
19. Fang L, Baik SJ, Lim S, et al. Amorphous Si rear Schottky junction solar cell with a LiF/Al back electrode. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2011, 58: 3048–305210.1109/TED.2011.2160267 ↗
20. Xing C, Jiang C, Gu W, et al. SrFx-based electron-selective contact with high tolerance to thickness for crystalline silicon solar cells enabling efficiency over 21%. Prog Photovoltaics, 2024, 32: 35–4410.1002/pip.3733 ↗
21. Wan Y, Samundsett C, Bullock J, et al. Magnesium fluoride electron-selective contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 14671–1467710.1021/acsami.6b03599 ↗
22. Allen TG, Bullock J, Zheng P, et al. Calcium contacts to n-type crystalline silicon solar cells. Prog Photovoltaics, 2017, 25: 636–64410.1002/pip.2838 ↗
23. Young DL, Nemeth W, Grover S, et al. Carrier selective, passivated contacts for high efficiency silicon solar cells based on transparent conducting oxides. Energy Procedia, 2014, 55: 733–74010.1016/j.egypro.2014.08.053 ↗
24. Benick J, Hoex B, van de Sanden MCM, et al. High efficiency n-type Si solar cells on Al2O3-passivated boron emitters. Appl Phys Lett, 2008, 92: 25350410.1063/1.2945287 ↗
25. Titova V, Veith-Wolf B, Startsev D, et al. Effective passivation of crystalline silicon surfaces by ultrathin atomic-layer-deposited TiOx layers. Energy Procedia, 2017, 124: 441–44710.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.272 ↗
26. Mochizuki T, Gotoh K, Kurokawa Y, et al. Local structure of high performance TiOx electron-selective contact revealed by electron energy loss spectroscopy. Adv Mater Inter, 2019, 6: 180164510.1002/admi.201801645 ↗
27. Du G, Li L, Yang X, et al. Improved V2OX passivating contact for p-type crystalline silicon solar cells by oxygen vacancy modulation with a SiOx tunnel layer. Adv Mater Inter, 2021, 8: 210098910.1002/admi.202100989 ↗
28. Cao L, Procel P, Alcañiz A, et al. Achieving 23.83% conversion efficiency in silicon heterojunction solar cell with ultra-thin MoOx hole collector layer via tailoring (i)a-Si:H/MoOx interface. Prog Photovoltaics, 2022, 31: 1245–125410.1002/pip.3638 ↗
29. Taurian OE, Springborg M, Christensen NE. Self-consistent electronic structures of MgO and SrO. Solid State Commun, 1985, 55: 351–35510.1016/0038-1098(85)90622-2 ↗
30. Yang X, Wang Y, Chen Y, et al. The structural and electronic properties of BaO under epitaxial strains: First-principles calculations. Acta Phys Pol A, 2016, 129: 64–6810.12693/APhysPolA.129.64 ↗
31. Droubay TC, Kong L, Chambers SA, et al. Work function reduction by BaO: Growth of crystalline barium oxide on Ag(001) and Ag(111) surfaces. Surf Sci, 2015, 632: 201–20610.1016/j.susc.2014.07.010 ↗
32. Chen J, Zhang Z, Guo Y, et al. Electronic properties of CaF2 bulk and interfaces. J Appl Phys, 2022, 131: 21530210.1063/5.0087914 ↗
33. Andrade AB, Ferreira NS, Valerio MEG. Particle size effects on structural and optical properties of BaF2 nanoparticles. RSC Adv, 2017, 7: 26839–2684810.1039/C7RA01582H ↗
34. Bory BF, Rocha PRF, Janssen RAJ, et al. Lithium fluoride injection layers can form quasi-Ohmic contacts for both holes and electrons. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 105: 12330210.1063/1.4896636 ↗
35. Bory BF, Gomes HL, Janssen RAJ, et al. Electrical conduction of LiF interlayers in organic diodes. J Appl Phys, 2015, 117: 15550210.1063/1.4917461 ↗
36. Bullock J, Zheng P, Jeangros Q, et al. Lithium fluoride based electron contacts for high efficiency n-type crystalline silicon solar cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2016, 6: 160024110.1002/aenm.201600241 ↗
37. Gerling LG, Voz C, Alcubilla R, et al. Origin of passivation in hole-selective transition metal oxides for crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cells. J Mater Res, 2017, 32: 260–26810.1557/jmr.2016.453 ↗
38. Le NM, Lee BT. ZnMgBeO/Ag/ZnMgBeO transparent multilayer films with UV energy bandgap and very low resistance. Ceramics Int, 2016, 42: 5258–526210.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.053 ↗
39. Gao X, Jing X, Li Y, et al. Anticorrosion properties of waterborn SiO2@PANI/VTMS coating on surface of Mg-Li alloy. Chin J Mater Res, 2018, 32: 42–50
40. Hao Y, Liu B, Tian L, et al. Synthesis of {111} facet-exposed MgO with surface oxygen vacancies for reactive oxygen species generation in the dark. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9: 12687–1269310.1021/acsami.6b16856 ↗
41. Liu X, Choi MS, Hwang E, et al. Fermi level pinning dependent 2D semiconductor devices: Challenges and prospects. Adv Mater, 2022, 34: e210842510.1002/adma.202108425 ↗
42. Reeves GK, Harrison HB. Obtaining the specific contact resistance from transmission line model measurements. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 1982, 3: 111–11310.1109/EDL.1982.25502 ↗
43. Zhang L, Meng L, Cai L, et al. High-performance europium fluoride electron-selective contacts for efficient crystalline silicon solar cells. Sol RRL, 2021, 5: 210005710.1002/solr.202100057 ↗
44. Li S, Yao Z, Zhou J, et al. Fabrication and characterization of WO3 thin films on silicon surface by thermal evaporation. Mater Lett, 2017, 195: 213–21610.1016/j.matlet.2017.02.078 ↗
45. Du G, Bai Y, Huang J, et al. Surface passivation of ITO on heterojunction solar cells with enhanced cell performance and module reliability. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol, 2021, 10: 03500810.1149/2162-8777/abeece ↗
46. Shklyaev AA, Kozhukhov AS, Armbrister VA, et al. Surface morphology of Si layers grown on SiO2. Appl Surf Sci, 2013, 267: 40–4410.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.069 ↗
47. Agrawal A, Lin J, Barth M, et al. Fermi level depinning and contact resistivity reduction using a reduced titania interlayer in n-silicon metal-insulator-semiconductor ohmic contacts. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 104: 11210110.1063/1.4868302 ↗
48. Bullock J, Hettick M, Geissbühler J, et al. Efficient silicon solar cells with dopant-free asymmetric heterocontacts. Nat Energy, 2016, 1: 1503110.1038/nenergy.2015.31 ↗