journal article·2021-06Open access

Constructing high gravimetric and volumetric capacity sulfur cathode with LiCoO2 nanofibers as carbon-free sulfur host for lithium-sulfur battery

Ya-Tao Liu, Lu Wang, Sheng Liu, Guo-Ran Li, Xue-Ping Gao

Science China Materials· Volume 64· Issue 6

Abstract

Although the gravimetric energy density of lithium-sulfur battery is very encouraging, the volumetric energy density still remains a challenge for the practical application. To achieve the high volumetric energy density of battery, much attention should be paid to the sulfur cathode. Herein, we introduce heavy lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO2) nanofibers as sulfur host to enhance the volumetric capacity of cathode, maintaining the high gravimetric capacity simutaneously. With the high tap density of 2.26 g cm−3, LiCoO2 nanofibers can be used to fabricate a really compact sulfur cathode, with a density and porosity of 0.85 g cm−3 and 61.2%, respectively. More importantly, LiCoO2 nanofibers could act as an efficient electrocatalyst for enhancing the redox kinetics of sulfur species, ensuring the cathode electroactivity and alleviating the shuttle effect of polysulfides. Therefore, a balance between compact structure and high electrochemical activity is obtained for the sulfur cathode. At the sulfur loading of 5.1 mg cm−2, high volumetric and gravimetric capacities of 724 mA h cm−3cathode and 848 mA h g−1cathode could be achieved based on the cathode volume and weight, respectively. Moreover, with this efficient S/LiCoO2 cathode, the lithium corrosion by polysulfides is supressed, leading to a more stable lithium anode.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced battery technologies research · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. Bruce PG, Freunberger SA, Hardwick LJ, et al. Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage. Nat Mater, 2011, 11: 19–2910.1038/nmat3191 ↗
2. Gao XP, Yang HX. Multi-electron reaction materials for high energy density batteries. Energy Environ Sci, 2010, 3: 174–18910.1039/B916098A ↗
3. Ji X, Nazar LF. Advances in Li-S batteries. J Mater Chem, 2010, 20: 9821–982610.1039/b925751a ↗
4. Lochala J, Liu D, Wu B, et al. Research progress toward the practical applications of lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9: 24407–2442110.1021/acsami.7b06208 ↗
5. Zhao M, Li BQ, Zhang XQ, et al. A perspective toward practical lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Cent Sci, 2020, 6: 1095–110410.1021/acscentsci.0c00449 ↗
6. Li Z, Guan BY, Zhang J, et al. A compact nanoconfined sulfur cathode for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Joule, 2017, 1: 576–58710.1016/j.joule.2017.06.003 ↗
7. Zheng G, Zhang Q, Cha JJ, et al. Amphiphilic surface modification of hollow carbon nanofibers for improved cycle life of lithium sulfur batteries. Nano Lett, 2013, 13: 1265–127010.1021/nl304795g ↗
8. Li X, Banis M, Lushington A, et al. A high-energy sulfur cathode in carbonate electrolyte by eliminating polysulfides via solid-phase lithium-sulfur transformation. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 450910.1038/s41467-018-06877-9 ↗
9. Huang M, Yang J, Xi B, et al. Enhancing kinetics of Li-S batteries by graphene-like N,S-codoped biochar fabricated in NaCl non-aqueous ionic liquid. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 455–46410.1007/s40843-018-9331-x ↗
10. Ji J, Sha Y, Li Z, et al. Selective adsorption and electrocatalysis of polysulfides through hexatomic nickel clusters embedded in N-doped graphene toward high-performance Li-S batteries. Research, 2020, 2020: 1–1310.34133/2020/5714349 ↗
11. Song J, Xu T, Gordin ML, et al. Nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon promoted chemical adsorption of sulfur and fabrication of high-areal-capacity sulfur cathode with exceptional cycling stability for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 1243–125010.1002/adfm.201302631 ↗
12. Huang S, Lim YV, Zhang X, et al. Regulating the polysulfide redox conversion by iron phosphide nanocrystals for high-rate and ultrastable lithium-sulfur battery. Nano Energy, 2018, 51: 340–34810.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.052 ↗
13. Ma L, Chen R, Zhu G, et al. Cerium oxide nanocrystal embedded bimodal micromesoporous nitrogen-rich carbon nanospheres as effective sulfur host for lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Nano, 2017, 11: 7274–728310.1021/acsnano.7b03227 ↗
14. Wu J, Zhang B, Liu S, et al. Grafting polysulfides into a functional N-halo compound for high-performance lithium-sulfur battery. Sci China Mater, 2020, 63: 2002–201210.1007/s40843-020-1345-3 ↗
15. Zhang L, Liu Y, Zhao Z, et al. Enhanced polysulfide regulation via porous catalytic V2O3/V8C7 heterostructures derived from metal-organic frameworks toward high-performance Li-S batteries. ACS Nano, 2020, 14: 8495–850710.1021/acsnano.0c02762 ↗
16. Tang T, Zhang T, Zhao L, et al. Multifunctional V3S4-nanowire/graphene composites for high performance Li-S batteries. Sci China Mater, 2020, 63: 1910–191910.1007/s40843-020-1313-6 ↗
17. Kong W, Yan L, Luo Y, et al. Ultrathin MnO2/graphene oxide/carbon nanotube interlayer as efficient polysulfide-trapping shield for high-performance Li-S batteries. Adv Funct Mater, 2017, 27: 160666310.1002/adfm.201606663 ↗
18. Su YS, Manthiram A. Lithium-sulphur batteries with a microporous carbon paper as a bifunctional interlayer. Nat Commun, 2012, 3: 116610.1038/ncomms2163 ↗
19. Bai S, Liu X, Zhu K, et al. Metal-organic framework-based separator for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nat Energy, 2016, 1: 1609410.1038/nenergy.2016.94 ↗
20. Pei F, Lin L, Fu A, et al. A two-dimensional porous carbon-modified separator for high-energy-density Li-S batteries. Joule, 2018, 2: 323–33610.1016/j.joule.2017.12.003 ↗
21. Li L, Pascal TA, Connell JG, et al. Molecular understanding of polyelectrolyte binders that actively regulate ion transport in sulfur cathodes. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 227710.1038/s41467-017-02410-6 ↗
22. Li G, Ling M, Ye Y, et al. Acacia senegal-inspired bifunctional binder for longevity of lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater, 2015, 5: 150087810.1002/aenm.201500878 ↗
23. Lin D, Liu Y, Cui Y. Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries. Nat Nanotech, 2017, 12: 194–20610.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
24. Li L, Basu S, Wang Y, et al. Self-heating-induced healing of lithium dendrites. Science, 2018, 359: 1513–151610.1126/science.aap8787 ↗
25. Kong LL, Wang L, Ni ZC, et al. Lithium-magnesium alloy as a stable anode for lithium-sulfur battery. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 180875610.1002/adfm.201808756 ↗
26. He D, Liao Y, Cheng Z, et al. Facile one-step vulcanization of copper foil towards stable Li metal anode. Sci China Mater, 2020, 63: 1663–167110.1007/s40843-020-1312-7 ↗
27. Progress of lihtium-sulfur battery in Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. http://www.cas.cn/syky/201801/t20180115_4632252.shtml (accessed September 2020)
28. Sion power’s lithium-sulfur batteries power high altitude pseudosatellite flight. https://sionpower.com/2014/sion-powers-lithium-sulfur-batteries-power-high-altitude-pseudo-satellite-flight/ (accessed September 2020)
29. OXIS Energy is close to achieving 500Wh/kg and is targeting 600Wh/kg with solid state lithium sulfur technology. https://oxisenergy.com/https-oxisenergy-com-wp-content-uploads-2020-01-500-and-600-whkg-pressor-pdf/ (accessed September 2020)
30. Hagen M, Hanselmann D, Ahlbrecht K, et al. Lithium-sulfur cells: The gap between the state-of-the-art and the requirements for high energy battery cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2015, 5: 140198610.1002/aenm.201401986 ↗
31. Xue W, Miao L, Qie L, et al. Gravimetric and volumetric energy densities of lithium-sulfur batteries. Curr Opin Electrochem, 2017, 6: 92–9910.1016/j.coelec.2017.10.007 ↗
32. Liu YT, Liu S, Li GR, et al. High volumetric energy density sulfur cathode with heavy and catalytic metal oxide host for lithium-sulfur battery. Adv Sci, 2020, 7: 190369310.1002/advs.201903693 ↗
33. McCloskey BD. Attainable gravimetric and volumetric energy density of Li-S and Li ion battery cells with solid separator-protected Li metal anodes. J Phys Chem Lett, 2015, 6: 4581–458810.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01814 ↗
34. Zhang C, Yang QH. Packing sulfur into carbon framework for high volumetric performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Sci China Mater, 2015, 58: 349–35410.1007/s40843-015-0051-4 ↗
35. Cheng XB, Huang JQ, Zhang Q, et al. Aligned carbon nanotube/sulfur composite cathodes with high sulfur content for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy, 2014, 4: 65–7210.1016/j.nanoen.2013.12.013 ↗
36. Zhang C, Liu DH, Lv W, et al. A high-density graphene-sulfur assembly: A promising cathode for compact Li-S batteries. Nanoscale, 2015, 7: 5592–559710.1039/C4NR06863G ↗
37. Li H, Yang X, Wang X, et al. Dense integration of graphene and sulfur through the soft approach for compact lithium/sulfur battery cathode. Nano Energy, 2015, 12: 468–47510.1016/j.nanoen.2015.01.007 ↗
38. Li H, Tao Y, Zhang C, et al. Dense graphene monolith for high volumetric energy density Li-S batteries. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 170343810.1002/aenm.201703438 ↗
39. Pang Q, Liang X, Kwok CY, et al. A comprehensive approach toward stable lithium-sulfur batteries with high volumetric energy density. Adv Energy Mater, 2017, 7: 160163010.1002/aenm.201601630 ↗
40. Yu X, Deng J, Lv R, et al. A compact 3D interconnected sulfur cathode for high-energy, high-power and long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater, 2018, 20: 14–2310.1016/j.ensm.2018.11.029 ↗
41. Hu C, Kirk C, Cai Q, et al. A high-volumetric-capacity cathode based on interconnected close-packed N-doped porous carbon nanospheres for long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater, 2017, 7: 170108210.1002/aenm.201701082 ↗
42. Li M, Zhang Y, Hassan F, et al. Compact high volumetric and areal capacity lithium sulfur batteries through rock salt induced nanoarchitectured sulfur hosts. J Mater Chem A, 2017, 5: 21435–2144110.1039/C7TA06657K ↗
43. Zhai PY, Huang JQ, Zhu L, et al. Calendering of free-standing electrode for lithium-sulfur batteries with high volumetric energy density. Carbon, 2017, 111: 493–50110.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.035 ↗
44. Lu D, Li Q, Liu J, et al. Enabling high-energy-density cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10: 23094–2310210.1021/acsami.8b05166 ↗
45. Kang N, Lin Y, Yang L, et al. Cathode porosity is a missing key parameter to optimize lithium-sulfur battery energy density. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 459710.1038/s41467-019-12542-6 ↗
46. Lv D, Zheng J, Li Q, et al. High energy density lithium-sulfur batteries: challenges of thick sulfur cathodes. Adv Energy Mater, 2015, 5: 140229010.1002/aenm.201402290 ↗
47. Liu YT, Han DD, Wang L, et al. NiCo2O4 nanofibers as carbon-free sulfur immobilizer to fabricate sulfur-based composite with high volumetric capacity for lithium-sulfur battery. Adv Energy Mater, 2019, 9: 180347710.1002/aenm.201803477 ↗
48. Wang ZY, Wang L, Liu S, et al. Conductive CoOOH as carbon-free sulfur immobilizer to fabricate sulfur-based composite for lithium-sulfur battery. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 190105110.1002/adfm.201901051 ↗
49. Zhang Z, Wu DH, Zhou Z, et al. Sulfur/nickel ferrite composite as cathode with high-volumetric-capacity for lithium-sulfur battery. Sci China Mater, 2018, 62: 74–8610.1007/s40843-018-9292-7 ↗
50. Wang L, Song YH, Zhang BH, et al. Spherical metal oxides with high tap density as sulfur host to enhance cathode volumetric capacity for lithium-sulfur battery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 5909–591910.1021/acsami.9b20111 ↗
51. Wang ZY, Han DD, Liu S, et al. Conductive RuO2 stacking microspheres as an effective sulfur immobilizer for lithium-sulfur battery. Electrochim Acta, 2020, 337: 13577210.1016/j.electacta.2020.135772 ↗
52. Xi K, He D, Harris C, et al. Enhanced sulfur transformation by multifunctional FeS2/FeS/S composites for high-volumetric capacity cathodes in lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Sci, 2019, 6: 180081510.1002/advs.201800815 ↗
53. Pang Q, Kundu D, Nazar LF. A graphene-like metallic cathode host for long-life and high-loading lithium-sulfur batteries. Mater Horiz, 2016, 3: 130–13610.1039/C5MH00246J ↗
54. Xue W, Shi Z, Suo L, et al. Intercalation-conversion hybrid cathodes enabling Li-S full-cell architectures with jointly superior gravimetric and volumetric energy densities. Nat Energy, 2019, 4: 374–38210.1038/s41560-019-0351-0 ↗
55. Xiao Z, Yang Z, Li Z, et al. Synchronous gains of areal and volumetric capacities in lithium-sulfur batteries promised by flowerlike porous Ti3C2Tx matrix. ACS Nano, 2019, 13: 3404–341210.1021/acsnano.8b09296 ↗
56. Tukamoto H, West AR. Electronic conductivity of LiCoO2 and its enhancement by magnesium doping. J Electrochem Soc, 1997, 144: 3164–316810.1149/1.1837976 ↗
57. Zheng X, Chen Y, Zheng X, et al. Electronic structure engineering of LiCoO2 toward enhanced oxygen electrocatalysis. Adv Energy Mater, 2019, 9: 180348210.1002/aenm.201803482 ↗
58. Wang J, Li L, Tian H, et al. Ultrathin LiCoO2 nanosheets: An efficient water-oxidation catalyst. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9: 7100–710710.1021/acsami.6b14896 ↗
59. Nie H, Xu L, Song D, et al. LiCoO2: recycling from spent batteries and regeneration with solid state synthesis. Green Chem, 2015, 17: 1276–128010.1039/C4GC01951B ↗
60. Wu B, Wang J, Li J, et al. Morphology controllable synthesis and electrochemical performance of LiCoO2 for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta, 2016, 209: 315–32210.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.085 ↗
61. Heubner C, Nickol A, Seeba J, et al. Understanding thickness and porosity effects on the electrochemical performance of LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2-based cathodes for high energy Li-ion batteries. J Power Sources, 2019, 419: 119–12610.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.060 ↗
62. Biesinger MC, Payne BP, Lau LWM, et al. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic chemical state quantification of mixed nickel metal, oxide and hydroxide systems. Surf Interface Anal, 2009, 41: 324–33210.1002/sia.3026 ↗
63. Zhao M, Li BQ, Peng HJ, et al. Lithium-sulfur batteries under lean electrolyte conditions: Challenges and opportunities. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2019, 59: 12636–1265210.1002/anie.201909339 ↗
64. Peng L, Wei Z, Wan C, et al. A fundamental look at electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction Nat Catal, 2020, 3: 762–77010.1038/s41929-020-0498-x ↗
65. Chung SH, Chang CH, Manthiram A A carbon-cotton cathode with ultrahigh-loading capability for statically and dynamically stable lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Nano, 2016, 10: 10462–1047010.1021/acsnano.6b06369 ↗
66. Tao X, Wang J, Liu C, et al. Balancing surface adsorption and diffusion of lithium-polysulfides on nonconductive oxides for lithium-sulfur battery design. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 1120310.1038/ncomms11203 ↗
67. Cui HF, Ye JS, Zhang WD, et al. Electrocatalytic reduction of oxygen by a platinum nanoparticle/carbon nanotube composite electrode J Electroanal Chem, 2005, 577: 295–30210.1016/j.jelechem.2004.12.004 ↗
68. Cui HF, Ye JS, Zhang WD, et al. Selective and sensitive electrochemical detection of glucose in neutral solution using platinum-lead alloy nanoparticle/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Anal Chim Acta, 2007, 594: 175–18310.1016/j.aca.2007.05.047 ↗
69. Cheng XB, Huang JQ, Zhang Q. Review—Li metal anode in working lithium-sulfur batteries. J Electrochem Soc, 2017, 165: A6058–A607210.1149/2.0111801jes ↗
70. Xiong S, Xie K, Diao Y, et al. Characterization of the solid electrolyte interphase on lithium anode for preventing the shuttle mechanism in lithium-sulfur batteries. J Power Sources, 2014, 246: 840–84510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.041 ↗
71. Lindberg BJ, Hamrin K, Johansson G, et al. Molecular spectro-scopy by means of ESCA II. Sulfur compounds. Correlation of electron binding energy with structure. Phys Scr, 1970, 1: 286–29810.1088/0031-8949/1/5-6/020 ↗
72. Abraham KM, Chaudhri SM. The lithium surface film in the Li/SO2 cell. J Electrochem Soc, 1986, 133: 1307–131110.1149/1.2108858 ↗
73. Fan X, Chen L, Borodin O, et al. Non-flammable electrolyte enables Li-metal batteries with aggressive cathode chemistries. Nat Nanotech, 2018, 13: 715–72210.1038/s41565-018-0183-2 ↗